Matt Lemond is the highest PSL man alive.

[Shieda_Kayn]

Makes no sense at all, they are just editorials of him. You compare editorials to editorials, you don’t go on a witch hunt on editorials. What does this photoshoot of him have do with you? We already know what he looks like based on interviews and this is capturing the best of him, nothing wrong with that. The problem arises when you are frauding and decieving your looks with autistic selfies and think thats what you look like and being unable to provide any realistic footage

Show me one unedited unfrauded pic of this lemond faggot?

 

[StrangerDanger]

Show me one unedited unfrauded pic of this lemond faggot?

Go watch a interview of him?

 

[Shieda_Kayn]

Go watch a interview of him?

Literally in the first 5 seconds of him showing up from 2015.

He was senior in highschool in 2009, so he's probably 24 25 here.

@inferiorpispot234 @8PSLcel @BrahminBoss

 

[khvirgin]

@8PSLcel @inferiorpispot234

you forgot the "12 PSL WOWZERS"

 

[StrangerDanger]

Literally in the first 5 seconds of him showing up from 2015.
View attachment 2089033View attachment 2089034View attachment 2089036

He was senior in highschool in 2009, so he's probably 24 25 here.

@inferiorpispot234 @8PSLcel @BrahminBoss

I don’t see your point? That’s what he looks like. Lmao what the fuck are you on about, nothing relevant to frauding was ever said , you are so insecure that you see it and bring it up everywhere you go despite it not being mentioned

 

[beypazarisoda0]

not enough forward growth.

 

[Shieda_Kayn]

I don’t see your point? That’s what he looks like. Lmao what the fuck are you on about, nothing relevant to frauding was ever said , you are so insecure that you see it and bring it up everywhere you go despite it not being mentioned

Clearly you’re avoided the obvious implications of what I’m saying here. That you only call out frauds according to your preconceived biases. Jfl at how different you act when it comes to atesh or others u have a bias against. @David Rothschild was right about you

 

[StrangerDanger]

Clearly you’re avoided the obvious implications of what I’m saying here. That you only call out frauds according to your preconceived biases. Jfl at how different you act when it comes to atesh or others u have a bias against. @David Rothschild was right about you

I joked that he looked like @Erik-Jón
what the fuck you on LOL i made no remarks on his appereance

 

[SoberAndRetarded]

Recessed zombie.

Gym internet wouldn’t post. This guy mogs your ogre

 

[5'7 zoomer]

He can break obsidian with his jaw

 

[Deleted member 16357]

View attachment 2088983

Male gaze appeal to gay men
vs

Cope

Lorenzo gives off that 21st century sad boy aesthetic look that drives women insane and makes them horny. Ask any young women who is better looking and 99% will say Lorenzo

View attachment 2088973
View attachment 2088979
“muh I’m so alpha and chiseled “

View attachment 2088982

Mogged to death by Lorenzo

View attachment 2088980

Female gaze appeal to actual women

 

[Deleted member 16275]

Makes no sense at all, they are just editorials of him. You compare editorials to editorials, you don’t go on a witch hunt on editorials. What does this photoshoot of him have do with you? We already know what he looks like based on interviews and this is capturing the best of him, nothing wrong with that. The problem arises when you are frauding and decieving your looks with autistic selfies and think thats what you look like and being unable to provide any realistic footage

The pics in OP are frauded. Yes or no?

 

[makeme183]

View attachment 2088935

would this be called long midface ?

how tall is he btw ?

 

[StrangerDanger]

The pics in OP are frauded. Yes or no?

Absolutely retarded
They are editorials, it’s a format supposed catch them at their best and it may be enhanced so yes by those means its frauded but considering that is the literal point of these types of images it would be retarded to call them frauded in the same context we are used to. It’s basically their natural look on steroids to make them look as photogenic as possible contrary to some basement dweller here tensing every single muscle in the face with the most scuffed angles until they look like a completly different person

 

[Deleted member 16275]

Absolutely retarded
They are editorials, it’s a format supposed catch them at their best and it may be enhanced so yes by those means its frauded but considering that is the literal point of these types of images it would be retarded to call them frauded in the same context we are used to. It’s basically their natural look on steroids to make them look as photogenic as possible contrary to some basement dweller here tensing every single muscle in the face with the most scuffed angles until they look like a completly different person

@Shieda literally proved with pics that lemond is tensing every muscle in his face too

He's the one looking like a completely diff person jfl look at the Pics ITT

 

[StrangerDanger]

@Shieda literally proved with pics that lemond is tensing every muscle in his face too

He's the one looking like a completely diff person jfl look at the Pics ITT

Tell me Matt Lemond doesnt look the same on the editorials as he does in person.
This is the difference you’d expect between a candid vs editorial hence it’s not a fraud as it applies to everyone. The problem arises is when you fraud and look nowhere close to what you would if you didn’t.
Editorials are catching the maximum best peak of your looks, frauding is when you try to make yourself look as good as possible until you don’t resemble yourself any more.

If someone showed an editorial to a friend they would say hey you look great there and compliment them as they still look like themselves but captured in a good way.

If a frauder showed his picture to a friend the friend would look at you weirdly since they dont even recognize thats its you and probably think you have some insecurities since you are going overkill to look like someone you aren’t

vs

 

[StrangerDanger]

Tell me Matt Lemond doesnt look the same on the editorials as he does in person.
This is the difference you’d expect between a candid vs editorial hence it’s not a fraud as it applies to everyone. The problem arises is when you fraud and look nowhere close to what you would if you didn’t.
Editorials are catching the maximum best peak of your looks, frauding is when you try to make yourself look as good as possible until you don’t resemble yourself any more.

If someone showed an editorial to a friend they would say hey you look great there and compliment them as they still look like themselves but captured in a good way.

If a frauder showed his picture to a friend the friend would look at you weirdly since they dont even recognize thats its you and probably think you have some insecurities since you are going overkill to look like someone you aren’t
View attachment 2090149View attachment 2090151
vs
View attachment 2090171View attachment 2090176

As you can see Matt Lemond resembles himself, if you saw him in that editorial and then meet him IRL his natural appearence would still align.

If you saw Crisick in the bottom photo in a magazine and then met him IRL looking like the top photo it would be a different story and you would instantly know how much a fraud/catfish he is

 

[Deleted member 25667]

His best pic.
View attachment 2088944

Notice how it's a 3/4 because his front looks like a retarded cube

 

[Shieda_Kayn]

Tell me Matt Lemond doesnt look the same on the editorials as he does in person.
This is the difference you’d expect between a candid vs editorial hence it’s not a fraud as it applies to everyone. The problem arises is when you fraud and look nowhere close to what you would if you didn’t.
Editorials are catching the maximum best peak of your looks, frauding is when you try to make yourself look as good as possible until you don’t resemble yourself any more.

If someone showed an editorial to a friend they would say hey you look great there and compliment them as they still look like themselves but captured in a good way.

If a frauder showed his picture to a friend the friend would look at you weirdly since they dont even recognize thats its you and probably think you have some insecurities since you are going overkill to look like someone you aren’t
View attachment 2090149View attachment 2090151
vs
View attachment 2090171View attachment 2090176

As you can see Matt Lemond resembles himself, if you saw him in that editorial and then meet him IRL his natural appearence would still align.

If you saw Crisick in the bottom photo in a magazine and then met him IRL looking like the top photo it would be a different story and you would instantly know how much a fraud/catfish he is

Completely retarded and copemaxxed. @inferiorpispot234
Both Lemond and Crisick went from sub 5 psl HTN to 7 psl Gigachad. You can't with a straight face sit here and tell me this is a face anywhere close to what his HARD frauded pics are. His skin elasticity, nose, eye area, eyebrow tilt (ffs), jawline/hyoid sharpness, and ALL facial creasing is literally photoshopped. This is isn't a simple filter or muh sun shining on the window.

He is literally using hard fraud methods to go from 5ish psl in the video stills to 7.5 in the giga edited pics.

 

[Shieda_Kayn]

Tell me Matt Lemond doesnt look the same on the editorials as he does in person.
This is the difference you’d expect between a candid vs editorial hence it’s not a fraud as it applies to everyone. The problem arises is when you fraud and look nowhere close to what you would if you didn’t.
Editorials are catching the maximum best peak of your looks, frauding is when you try to make yourself look as good as possible until you don’t resemble yourself any more.

If someone showed an editorial to a friend they would say hey you look great there and compliment them as they still look like themselves but captured in a good way.

If a frauder showed his picture to a friend the friend would look at you weirdly since they dont even recognize thats its you and probably think you have some insecurities since you are going overkill to look like someone you aren’t
View attachment 2090149View attachment 2090151
vs
View attachment 2090171View attachment 2090176

At rest

After tensing every muscle in his face to become someone he's not even

@inferiorpispot234

 

[StrangerDanger]

At rest

After tensing every muscle in his face to become someone he's not even

@inferiorpispot234

Looks the same
Take the second guy and get him in a modelling photoshoot and that would be expected change. How are you gonna compare him mid workout with the sunlight in his face vs a photoshoot in a direct comprision lol, may just be the most retarded thing I’ve ever heard. you are incredibly naive. You guys think one person will constantly look the same regardless of the circumstances, and a part of yo ur brain is missing cause it seems to be blind in processing the factors cause you just look at the big image instead of considering what is going on.

 

[StrangerDanger]

At rest

After tensing every muscle in his face to become someone he's not even

@inferiorpispot234

 

[Deleted member 21044]

View attachment 2090253

Absolute chad.

 

[Deleted member 17791]

Literally in the first 5 seconds of him showing up from 2015.
View attachment 2089033View attachment 2089034View attachment 2089036

He was senior in highschool in 2009, so he's probably 24 25 here.

@inferiorpispot234 @8PSLcel @BrahminBoss

looks bad tbh. blockhead

 

[FutureChadronelite]

Mogged

hope for me, i have similar eye area when not bloated

 

[chadmanlet04]

I wonder too. Likely young mother, lived on farm or something, played sports, optimal posture, spent time outside, great diet.

even if you get a stacy wife, she will most likely drink, smoke and live a studio apartment. you will never have this