Mind Blown, I asked the question about the dating market shifting (which it now has) half a decade ago

6ft4

6ft4

Juggernaut Genes Possessor
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Posts
9,305
Reputation
22,691
A lot of you will have seen this thread I made recently about the changes to the dating market in recent years with the main idea being that we have reached the limit in how much dating success you can have by "mogging/looksmaxxing" meaning that foids have become unimpressed with a looks standard that got guys dating success 5 years ago meaning that the effectiveness of relying solely on looks for dating success is plummeting, meaning that you either need status to stand out (every normie trying to tiktokmax) or you need to be below average looking so that foids out of your league pick you for an LTR knowing you'll be a handbag cuck for her.


Here is the thread I made in July 2019 when I could see the writing on the wall that looksmaxxing/mogging has taken men's dating success as far as it could possibly go.
Funnily enough the hype around looksmaxxing has increased dramatically since then while it's actual effectiveness has decreased dramatically and the early adopters (guys who ascended in the 2010s) got the vast majority of the sexual rewards available while guys who are late to the party either by ignorance or due to age aren't getting a sliver of what moggers used to get.

 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Just a Mogger, Whatever, Chadeep and 3 others
The pursuit of looksmaxxing often makes dating more competitive by continually setting new standards of what’s “attractive.” As more men focus on optimizing their appearance, it can lead to a “race to the top” where the bar for male attractiveness keeps getting pushed higher. The result is that once common attributes (such as being fit or well-groomed) become the baseline rather than the exception, making it harder for men to stand out.

Looksmaxxing efforts have diminishing returns due to the nature of attraction. Improving physical appearance up to a point can enhance self-confidence and social success, but further changes often yield less impact. There are limitations to how much one’s looks alone can influence dating success; after a certain threshold, qualities like personality, emotional intelligence, and financial stability become equally or more critical factors.

Studies have shown that while appearance is initially important, long-term compatibility is largely influenced by non-physical traits. Psychologists note that qualities like shared interests, values, and communication skills often determine the sustainability of relationships more than physical attraction alone. For example, a study from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology highlights that relationships based solely on physical attraction tend to be less stable compared to those built on mutual compatibility .

Looksmaxxing also has a psychological downside. The pressure to constantly improve one’s appearance can lead to self-esteem issues and body dysmorphia, especially if one becomes overly focused on looks as the key to relationship success. This often leads to burnout or dissatisfaction, as the pursuit of physical perfection becomes harder to sustain and less rewarding over time.

@Xangsane
 
  • +1
Reactions: WishIHadBBC, Chadeep, psychomandible and 1 other person
) or you need to be below average looking so that foids out of your league pick you for an LTR knowing you'll be a handbag cuck for her.


Ray Liotta Laughing GIF
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, nofap and 6ft4
The pursuit of looksmaxxing often makes dating more competitive by continually setting new standards of what’s “attractive.” As more men focus on optimizing their appearance, it can lead to a “race to the top” where the bar for male attractiveness keeps getting pushed higher. The result is that once common attributes (such as being fit or well-groomed) become the baseline rather than the exception, making it harder for men to stand out.

Looksmaxxing efforts have diminishing returns due to the nature of attraction. Improving physical appearance up to a point can enhance self-confidence and social success, but further changes often yield less impact. There are limitations to how much one’s looks alone can influence dating success; after a certain threshold, qualities like personality, emotional intelligence, and financial stability become equally or more critical factors.

Studies have shown that while appearance is initially important, long-term compatibility is largely influenced by non-physical traits. Psychologists note that qualities like shared interests, values, and communication skills often determine the sustainability of relationships more than physical attraction alone. For example, a study from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology highlights that relationships based solely on physical attraction tend to be less stable compared to those built on mutual compatibility .

Looksmaxxing also has a psychological downside. The pressure to constantly improve one’s appearance can lead to self-esteem issues and body dysmorphia, especially if one becomes overly focused on looks as the key to relationship success. This often leads to burnout or dissatisfaction, as the pursuit of physical perfection becomes harder to sustain and less rewarding over time.

@Xangsane
Only a few molecules
 
Only a few molecules

Basically if everyone looksmaxxes
The bar just gets higher and we have a new baseline

Plus looks aren't that important for a long term relationship
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible
The pursuit of looksmaxxing often makes dating more competitive by continually setting new standards of what’s “attractive.” As more men focus on optimizing their appearance, it can lead to a “race to the top” where the bar for male attractiveness keeps getting pushed higher. The result is that once common attributes (such as being fit or well-groomed) become the baseline rather than the exception, making it harder for men to stand out.

Looksmaxxing efforts have diminishing returns due to the nature of attraction. Improving physical appearance up to a point can enhance self-confidence and social success, but further changes often yield less impact. There are limitations to how much one’s looks alone can influence dating success; after a certain threshold, qualities like personality, emotional intelligence, and financial stability become equally or more critical factors.

Studies have shown that while appearance is initially important, long-term compatibility is largely influenced by non-physical traits. Psychologists note that qualities like shared interests, values, and communication skills often determine the sustainability of relationships more than physical attraction alone. For example, a study from the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology highlights that relationships based solely on physical attraction tend to be less stable compared to those built on mutual compatibility .

Looksmaxxing also has a psychological downside. The pressure to constantly improve one’s appearance can lead to self-esteem issues and body dysmorphia, especially if one becomes overly focused on looks as the key to relationship success. This often leads to burnout or dissatisfaction, as the pursuit of physical perfection becomes harder to sustain and less rewarding over time.

@Xangsane
now even ROBUST PRETTYBOYS have pajeet/faggot/tranny/furry/autist orbiters. not foids
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Whatever, Chadeep and Shahnameh
Evolution at play. Just more about specialisation and be her type theory. This market I hope goes bullish again and women come to their standards again and the majority of middle worth fall back in line. Either way at this point I want oofies and the retarded-type of girls to pay for it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, Shahnameh and 6ft4
Evolution at play. This market I hope goes bullish again and women come to their standards again and the majority of middle worth fall back in line. Either way at this point I want oofies and the retarded-type of girls to pay for it.
now even ROBUST PRETTYBOYS have pajeet/faggot/tranny/furry/autist orbiters. not foids
 
I could’ve known in 2021 that things were changing. I had a neighbor who’s like 6’2”, Chadlite face, lean and athletic body, and the big thing was that he’s tan, tattooed, low inhib looking, sex appeal maxxed. One of the highest PSL and appeal guys that I’ve known. Yet in the whole year that I lived there he never had one attractive girl over, he finally had this one foid over after months but she was nothing special to say the least.

Meanwhile I see the girls that I would’ve expected him with with oofy doofys so often that put it this way. I never leave the house M-F except to go to work because I don’t have time. But the other day I did a rare weekday errand to the post office and even that was enough for me to see a skinny curvy ginger HTB with a LTN her height, and this guy looked legit gross, pubic hair beard and like he needed a shower.

No more hypotheticals, no more “who they could be with”.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6ft4
I could’ve known in 2021 that things were changing. I had a neighbor who’s like 6’2”, Chadlite face, lean and athletic body, and the big thing was that he’s tan, tattooed, low inhib looking, sex appeal maxxed. One of the highest PSL and appeal guys that I’ve known. Yet in the whole year that I lived there he never had one attractive girl over, he finally had this one foid over after months but she was nothing special to say the least.

Meanwhile I see the girls that I would’ve expected him with with oofy doofys so often that put it this way. I never leave the house M-F except to go to work because I don’t have time. But the other day I did a rare weekday errand to the post office and even that was enough for me to see a skinny curvy ginger HTB with a LTN her height, and this guy looked legit gross, pubic hair beard and like he needed a shower.

No more hypotheticals, no more “who they could be with”.
Something significant changed after 2020
I simply cannot rule out the possibility of the vax having some mechanism that causes foids to develop attraction for subhumans and lose attraction for above average males
@nofap
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: widdi, nofap and Whatever
Something significant changed after 2020
I simply cannot rule out the possibility of the vax having some mechanism that causes foids to develop attraction for subhumans and lose attraction for above average males
@nofap

For sure the vax fucked with people’s hormones so yes, very possible. I can also make sense of it through proximity and people’s changing life structures, I was gonna make a thread about this soon.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 6ft4
Thats why height and dick is everything
 
  • +1
Reactions: Huge غرور

Similar threads

pneumocystosis
Replies
176
Views
26K
Deleted member 13264
D
dreamcake1mo
Replies
106
Views
28K
illusivespirits
illusivespirits

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top