More intelligent men are more likely to value monogamy and sexual exclusivity than less intelligent men

Deleted member 1973

Deleted member 1973

pastebin.com/Tb8AYcyk
Joined
Jun 8, 2019
Posts
5,826
Reputation
6,885
. since they are very intelligent, they learn doing things that benefit society benefits them and their offspring. They probably don't see the world as "I work for myself and for my inmediate benefit and pleasure".

So they sacrifice sexual pleasure in their younger years to do things that enrich them, not only with money, but spiritually and experience wise. Once they have reached a certain place in the world for example, become CEOs, become an important public figure, become someone who is in charge of many people, etc they then settle down. These type of men see women and relationships just as a side effect of being succesful, while other men see women and relationships as goals.

They weight their options, and discover that long term pleasure outweights short term gratification.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: disillusioned, Deleted member 2597, AussieCurry and 5 others
dn rd anything that isnt peepee in vagina = insel cope
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: BigBiceps
More intelligent men are likely to be copers. From everything I've read on IQ, it's best to be in the 115-120 range. Anything higher and your intelligence comes with ailments such as neuroticism, Alzheimer's and all sorts of nasty shit.
t. middling IQcel.
 
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: disillusioned, Deleted member 1680, AussieCurry and 4 others
More intelligent men are likely to be copers. From everything I've read on IQ, it's best to be in the 115-120 range. Anything higher and your intelligence comes with ailments such as neuroticism, Alzheimer's and all sorts of nasty shit.
t. middling IQcel.
now this is heavy cope
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBiceps
no, more intelligent men understand monogamy is cope and they just try their best to have a fun time in this world, w/e that might be for them
 
  • +1
Reactions: AutisticBeaner
How is it cope if I'm not even in that perfect range? Learn what buzzwords mean before using them.
you're coping with the fact that you're not higher in intelligence than you are
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: BigBiceps and Deleted member 6382
you're coping with the fact that you're not higher in intelligence than you are
1589927983840
 
  • JFL
Reactions: AutisticBeaner
you're coping with the fact that you're not higher in intelligence than you are
And you're a Chad worshipping closet faggot judging by your pictures.

I'm sorry, I cannot take this whole argument seriously. It turned into a contest of seeing who said the most offensive statement based on flimsy evidence at best.
 
I'm sorry, I cannot take this whole argument seriously. It turned into a contest of seeing who said the most offensive statement based on flimsy evidence at best.
what? i simply justified my point
 
  • +1
Reactions: BigBiceps
what? i simply justified my point
Me: it's best to have a 115-120 IQ, my IQ is lower than that btw
You: you're coping
Me: stop using words you don't understand
You: you're coping with the fact you're stupid

Can anyone else that's not him tell me if I'm in the wrong? Because in this exchange I'm the one who sounds like a sane person.
 
Me: it's best to have a 115-120 IQ, my IQ is lower than that btw
You: you're coping
Me: stop using words you don't understand
You: you're coping with the fact you're stupid

Can anyone else that's not him tell me if I'm in the wrong? Because in this exchange I'm the one who sounds like a sane person.
you disagree that you're coping with the fact that you're not more intelligent than you are?
 
you disagree that you're coping with the fact that you're not more intelligent than you are?
Yes. I dissed myself. IQ is just another metric in which I am suboptimal.
 
Yes. I dissed myself. IQ is just another metric in which I am suboptimal.
are you also still of the opinion that i used the word "coping" wrong?
 
are you also still of the opinion that i used the word "coping" wrong?
Yup, a typical cope would mean in this case that I downplay IQ's importance because I'm not high IQ, but I don't, I just put the standard for ideal IQ slightly lower than the average person, but still unattainable to me anyway.

If that makes any sense. English usually has shorter sentences, apologise for bad English.

It's late here, I'm going to bed. We can DM or something, we derailed the original thread pretty hard.
 
Last edited:
Yup, a typical cope would mean in this case that I downplay IQ's importance because I'm not high IQ, but I don't, I just put the standard for ideal IQ slightly lower than the average person, but still unattainable to me anyway.

If that makes any sense. English usually has shorter sentences, apologise for bad English.
why can't a cope be "having a higher iq is not a good thing for certain reasons, having an iq in the range of 115-120 is ideal"? you would like to be more intelligent than you are, so in order to cope you tell yourself that being more intelligent is not beneficial anyway. does this not make sense? saying that the ideal range would be even lower does not mean that you can't use this as a cope for yourself.

obviously this is based on an assumption. but if the assumption is not correct then that would not mean that my use of the word is incorrect as well, it would simply mean that it doesn't apply. just clarifying in case it needs to be clarified.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 1973
maybe intelligent non gl man tbh. they understand they wont go anywhere without money. also its very possible for both man and women given they are actually intelligent to be more ,,autistic'' and actually try to fuck the best and keep the best/dont fuck if they dont get to go somewhere etc. but first one is closer to reality later is exeption
 
high iq = low iq
 
why can't a cope be "having a higher iq is not a good thing for certain reasons, having an iq in the range of 115-120 is ideal"? you would like to be more intelligent than you are, so in order to cope you tell yourself that being more intelligent is not beneficial anyway. does this not make sense? saying that the ideal range would be even lower does not mean that you can't use this as a cope for yourself.

obviously this is based on an assumption. but if the assumption is not correct then that would not mean that my use of the word is incorrect as well, it would simply mean that it doesn't apply. just clarifying in case it needs to be clarified.
just when i thought i finally won an argument against someone who is able to own up to it. how unfortunate.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep
just when i thought i finally won an argument against someone who is able to own up to it. how unfortunate.
dude I told you it was bedtime for me lmao. Anyway, I read your post and understood it. I concede. I was indeed coping.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, AutisticBeaner and Deleted member 1973
i'm dumb and only want an ltr with oneitis

i am the worst kind of outlier.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep
@tulasdanslos is corrent. there is a siginificant underrepresentation of people that score over 135 in iq tests in "intellectually elite professions" (source (that has sources in it): https://michaelwferguson.blogspot.com/p/the-inappropriately-excluded-by-michael.html?m=1).

also, i find the claim that highly intelligent people prefer a more quality (by securing the livelyhood of the offspring wtih having collected the adequate amount of funds) based breeding tactic resonable but why wouldnt they also prefer the quantity based strategy for example empregnating hundreds of females located in a third world country? by doing that statistically speaking one of your offsprings is bound to live and reproduce countinueing the passing of your genes. especially nowdays that travel and healthcare is more available than ever.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep
High IQ = incel trait. Women are repulsed by intellectual, analytical, rational men, they need a primitive low inhibition mentally numb brute that is going to pump and dump them.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep
More intelligent men are likely to be copers. From everything I've read on IQ, it's best to be in the 115-120 range. Anything higher and your intelligence comes with ailments such as neuroticism, Alzheimer's and all sorts of nasty shit.
t. middling IQcel.
Fuck I'm 128 IQ and definitely have neuroticism 😡🤬
 
@tulasdanslos is corrent. there is a siginificant underrepresentation of people that score over 135 in iq tests in "intellectually elite professions" (source (that has sources in it): https://michaelwferguson.blogspot.com/p/the-inappropriately-excluded-by-michael.html?m=1).

also, i find the claim that highly intelligent people prefer a more quality (by securing the livelyhood of the offspring wtih having collected the adequate amount of funds) based breeding tactic resonable but why wouldnt they also prefer the quantity based strategy for example empregnating hundreds of females located in a third world country? by doing that statistically speaking one of your offsprings is bound to live and reproduce countinueing the passing of your genes. especially nowdays that travel and healthcare is more available than ever.
Based greycel.
I'm not coping anymore! Truth gang here!
 
why wouldnt they also prefer the quantity based strategy for example empregnating hundreds of females located in a third world country? by doing that statistically speaking one of your offsprings is bound to live and reproduce countinueing the passing of your genes
isn't just what they do... since they are very intelligent, they learn doing things that benefit society benefits them and their offspring. They probably don't see the world as "I work for myself and for my immediate benefit and pleasure".

studies that show that openness (which correlates highly with IQ) is detrimental to attractiveness. Which means that for these men, it is better to live in a "sexual socialism" than in a very competitive sexual environment where chad gets all chicks while the nerd gets nothing/women with high N count.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2597
More intelligent men are likely to be copers. From everything I've read on IQ, it's best to be in the 115-120 range. Anything higher and your intelligence comes with ailments such as neuroticism, Alzheimer's and all sorts of nasty shit.
t. middling IQcel.
I'm 120 IQ and neourotic
as fuck. Jfl
 
More intelligent men are likely to be copers. From everything I've read on IQ, it's best to be in the 115-120 range. Anything higher and your intelligence comes with ailments such as neuroticism, Alzheimer's and all sorts of nasty shit.
t. middling IQcel.
feels good, im confirmed 119
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top