Now is the First Time in Human History Looksmaxxing is Possible

Moneymaxxed

Moneymaxxed

Gold
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Posts
943
Reputation
1,949
Homo sapiens has been around for hundreds of thousands of years. Only in the past hundred can you have cosmetic surgery, or even softmaxxes. Couldn’t even get a haircut and a shower 500 years ago.

In addition, society being bluepilled is an advantage we all have over the competition. Nobody (on male side) takes advantage of the fact that looksmaxxing is the best and most efficient way to a better life.
I’ve fixed so many genetic failos and going to fix more...

Be thankful you’re not a Stone Age trucel
 
  • +1
Reactions: PurplePaintBox, PubertyMaxxer, Zdeweilx and 16 others
  • +1
Reactions: PURE ARYAN GENETICS, Deleted member 1707, Deleted member 2607 and 6 others
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1707, je3oe and Deleted member 3202
Cope, Lmao at you if you think most looksmaxxers will spend or even have 20000+ on looksmaxxing.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Cleftcel, Gren, Deleted member 2607 and 7 others
Nobody had to looksmax back then, even this guy had 3 wives
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4645
Nobody had to looksmax back then, even this guy had 3 wives
By definition this means 2 other guys didn’t have wives
 
  • +1
Reactions: PubertyMaxxer, Gren and je3oe
People back in the stone age didn't have soft foods that fucked their facial development or computer to ruin their posture and encourage a sedentary lifestyle. Looks back then probably didn't matter as much, since it was all about securing resources to ensure the safety of your partner and offspring. Even in the 1900's this was the case, women were more interested in (financial) resources than looks.

And even when women became more financialy independent and started priotizing looks, it wasn't that bad. Women dating standards in early 2000s compared to our Tinder era are very different.

This is the first time in human history that looksmaxxing is not only possible, but necessary.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
  • So Sad
Reactions: Zdeweilx, middayshowers, HighIQcel and 9 others
People back in the stone age didn't have soft foods that fucked their facial development or computer to ruin their posture and encourage a sedentary lifestyle. Looks back then probably didn't matter as much, since it was all about securing resources to ensure the safety of your partner and offspring. Even in the 1900's this was the case, women were more interested in (financial) resources than looks.

And even when women became more financialy independent and started priotizing looks, it wasn't that bad. Women dating standards in early 2000s compared to our Tinder era are very different.

This is the first time in human history that looksmaxxing is not only possible, but necessary.
Don't most women just use Tinder for fun? I've heard that they don't use it (usually) to go on dates or even ONS.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: RAITEIII, je3oe and Deleted member 4645
Don't most women just use Tinder for fun? I've heard that they don't use it (usually) to go on dates or even ONS.

No idea, all I know about it is that as a man you'll very likely get a match with a gl girl.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 3202
people will laugh at our "looksmaxing" in 100 years
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQcel, Deleted member 3202, RAITEIII and 1 other person
people will laugh at our "looksmaxing" in 100 years
They will edit their genes with a click and will look at us as if we were monkeys...trying to fix their zygos smashing them with a rock
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: EzioGrezzo, HighIQcel, Moneymaxxed and 7 others
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: idkagoodusername and Deleted member 3202
People back in the stone age didn't have soft foods that fucked their facial development or computer to ruin their posture and encourage a sedentary lifestyle. Looks back then probably didn't matter as much, since it was all about securing resources to ensure the safety of your partner and offspring. Even in the 1900's this was the case, women were more interested in (financial) resources than looks.

And even when women became more financialy independent and started priotizing looks, it wasn't that bad. Women dating standards in early 2000s compared to our Tinder era are very different.

This is the first time in human history that looksmaxxing is not only possible, but necessary.
writes this on sitting on a computer
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: HighIQcel, Deleted member 4645 and Deleted member 3202
  • JFL
Reactions: Moneymaxxed
People back in the stone age didn't have soft foods that fucked their facial development or computer to ruin their posture and encourage a sedentary lifestyle. Looks back then probably didn't matter as much, since it was all about securing resources to ensure the safety of your partner and offspring. Even in the 1900's this was the case, women were more interested in (financial) resources than looks.

And even when women became more financialy independent and started priotizing looks, it wasn't that bad. Women dating standards in early 2000s compared to our Tinder era are very different.

This is the first time in human history that looksmaxxing is not only possible, but necessary.




Dude it's genes mainly
 
  • +1
Reactions: HighIQcel, goodman78 and Deleted member 3202
It's also the first time in history where you can't wife and kids
 
Chadgrug mogs me



1583444178530
 
  • +1
Reactions: Moneymaxxed

Similar threads

Edgarpill
Replies
35
Views
2K
Kater Maxxing
Kater Maxxing
heightmaxxing
Replies
56
Views
5K
lurking truecel
lurking truecel
.Myth
Replies
418
Views
41K
jonrenoldnine
jonrenoldnine
Baban
Replies
41
Views
8K
IOS
IOS
dreamcake1mo
Replies
54
Views
13K
IOS
IOS

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top