ChristianChad
Kraken
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2021
- Posts
- 11,701
- Reputation
- 12,646
Either that or a doctorOP is dangerously retarded
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Either that or a doctorOP is dangerously retarded
Ironic.Lmao simvastatin. You should actually look up the drugs you cite. Simvastatin is used in treating people with smith-lemli opitz disease and the effect of the drug that is usually designed to lower cholesterol actually RAISES it. Another bullshit vegan misrepresentation of the facts as usual. Why are vegans so intellectually dishonest? Could it be because veganism is like a RELIGION to them or something?
Simvastatin is used together with diet, weight-loss, and exercise to reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke and to decrease the chance that heart surgery will be needed in people who have heart disease or who are at risk of developing heart disease. Simvastatin is also used to decrease the amount of fatty substances such as low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (''bad cholesterol'') and triglycerides in the blood and to increase the amount of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (''good cholesterol'') in the blood. Simvastatin may also be used to decrease the amount of cholesterol and other fatty substances in the blood in children and teenagers 10 to 17 years of age who have familial heterozygous hypercholesterolemia (an inherited condition in which cholesterol cannot be removed from the body normally). Simvastatin is in a class of medications called HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins). It works by slowing the production of cholesterol in the body to decrease the amount of cholesterol that may build up on the walls of the arteries and block blood flow to the heart, brain, and other parts of the body.
I only wrote that to trigger users into actually commenting. Otherwise, hardly anybody would comment on this post.Nah I read this sentence of yours. Maybe u should read ur own title.
Cock definitely isn't vegan and is for meat-eaters only.Cock is vegan too maybe you would like to suck cock OP?
//Thomas DOM
Cock definitely isn't vegan and is for meat-eaters only.
//Reckless Turtle
That summary said that vegetable oils are worse then saturated fat, you realize this right? They have lots of double bonds, and that directly causes more oxidative radicals that your body needs to put in work to get rid of every time cause more cell stress, reversible cell damage and speeding up aging.I'm going to use the head main source summary to save time:
A ~60% increase from 4.2% to 7.3%.
They were already deemed unhealthy prior to adding even more unhealthy food to their diet (vegetable oil margarine). Certainly the control diet of "animal fats, common margarines, and shortenings" wasn't working well for them in the first place. Had they been consuming a whole-foods, plant-based diet (which doesn't contain vegetable oil margarine, by the way) instead of their initial diet, they may not have been suffering from cardiovascular problems.
Yet I was never arguing in favor of processed vegetable oils, because (as far as I'm concerned), they aren't included in a whole-foods, plant-based diet (except in small quantities).
Ironically, the OP study included vegetable oils in their healthy plant diet:
Yet, they still had greater fertility than animal product eaters, maybe because their lack of dietary cholesterol prevented harmful amounts of oxidized LDL.
Your argument is all over the place, seeing as I've directly refuted multiple claims of yours (including by using your own linked study), yet you have no follow-up to any of that. Who's the coper, exactly?
Yes, and that could be due to vegetable oils being highly processed, condensed fat from plants in liquid form. I'm not even sure that lard is as fat-dense as some vegetable oils.That summary said that vegetable oils are worse then saturated fat, you realize this right?
Source? If it's in that metanalysis, I don't want to spend 30 minutes looking for it when you can specifically and clearly reference it.They have lots of double bonds, and that directly causes more oxidative radicals that your body needs to put in work to get rid of every time cause more cell stress, reversible cell damage and speeding up aging.
Although when it comes to cholesterol, i can't actually argue on that cause im not sure, tbh im leaning on diatery cholesterol being bad for you simply because it also gets oxidised like PUFA in the human body. Carnivores saying how cholesterol is needed for muh hormone production don't realize that your body makes just enough cholesterol to cover every need, and dietary cholesterol is completely useless. But except eggs, red meat has very little of it. Its literally like 100mg per 100g of red meat which is nothing.
Two recent guidelines, one for primary prevention and one for secondary prevention, have addressed the issue of dietary cholesterol. The “2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease” cited studies of the benefit of plant-based rather than animal-based protein and concluded, “A diet containing reduced amounts of cholesterol and sodium can be beneficial to decrease atherosclerotic CVD risk” without further distinction.9 The 2015 “National Lipid Association Recommendations for Patient-Centered Management of Dyslipidemia,” focused on individuals with established hypercholesterolemia, recommend limiting dietary cholesterol to <200 mg/d to lower LDL cholesterol and non–high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations.10 The National Lipid Association Expert Panel concluded that “dietary cholesterol modestly increases total cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol on average, although hypo- and hyper-responders do exist in the population.”10
Myth: Eating foods with a lot of cholesterol will not make my cholesterol levels go up.
Fact: It can be complicated. We know that foods with a lot of cholesterol usually also have a lot of saturated fat. Saturated fats can make your cholesterol numbers higher, so it’s best to choose foods that are lower in saturated fats. Foods made from animals, including red meat, butter, and cheese, have a lot of saturated fats.
Instead, aim to eat foods with plenty of fiber, such as oatmeal and beans, and healthy unsaturated fats, such as avocados, olive oil, and nuts. Learn more about healthy diets and nutrition at CDC’s nutrition, physical activity, and obesity website.
The obvious reason to not be eating red meat is its significant heme iron content, in addition to some cholesterol.red meat has very little of it. Its literally like 100mg per 100g of red meat which is nothing.
This meme is BotB-worthy.
Heme iron is literally what your body needs, thats like saying water causes cancer, you sound incredibly soy. Even those studies show like 15% increase which is miniscule. Non of those studies are true, i can literally just send you studies which state otherwise, but in the end of the day countries with highest meat intake have longest life expectancy.Yes, and that could be due to vegetable oils being highly processed, condensed fat from plants in liquid form. I'm not even sure that lard is as fat-dense as some vegetable oils.
Source? If it's in that metanalysis, I don't want to spend 30 minutes looking for it when you can specifically and clearly reference it.
Dietary Cholesterol and Cardiovascular Risk: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association
The elimination of specific dietary cholesterol target recommendations in recent guidelines has raised questions about its role with respect to cardiovascular disease. This advisory was developed aftwww.ahajournals.org
The CDC is also not budging on this, by the way (but I'm not saying I'm putting all my confidence in them):
Cholesterol Myths and Facts | cdc.gov
Learn answers to common questions about high blood cholesterol.www.cdc.gov
The obvious reason to not be eating red meat is its significant heme iron content, in addition to some cholesterol.
Heme - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
The body needs iron. Non-heme iron is just less well absorbed.Heme iron is literally what your body needs
No, that's like saying that radiated water causes cancer.thats like saying water causes cancer
There is an association between high intake of heme iron sourced from meat and increased risk of colon cancer.[46] The heme content of red meat is 10 times higher than that of white meat such as chicken.[47] A 2019 review found that heme iron intake is associated with increased breast cancer risk.[48]
Okay...Non of those studies are true, i can literally just send you studies which state otherwise
Source?but in the end of the day countries with highest meat intake have longest life expectancy.
Heme iron is literally what your body needs, thats like saying water causes cancer, you sound incredibly soy. Even those studies show like 15% increase which is miniscule. Non of those studies are true, i can literally just send you studies which state otherwise, but in the end of the day countries with highest meat intake have longest life expectancy.
Im in the bus right now, can't write a huge essay, but just know that plants have tons of anti nutrients, low amino acid bioavability, low amino acid quality.The body needs iron. Non-heme iron is just less well absorbed.
No, that's like saying that radiated water causes cancer.
Okay...
Source?
I know about these studies bro, i just don't have time to argue with retarded vegans like OP when studying cortisol inducing uni subjects all day
you in uni ?I know about these studies bro, i just don't have time to argue with retarded vegans like OP when studying cortisol inducing uni subjects all day
Yes broyou in uni ?
It controls for obvious important factors:
Partial correlation of Pearson’s moment-product approach was performed to identify the worldwide correlations between meat intake and life expectancy/mortality independent of the potential confounding variables, energy intake, urbanization, GDP PPP and obesity.
The relationship between total energy intake, rather than that of particular nutrients in the diet, and life span has been debated in animal and human models36–38 so it needed to be controlled for.
Of course, nutritional variations among countries include many more variables than those included into this study. Diet composition, food preparation methods, cultural dietary constraints, availability of some nutrients and a number of other variables should have been considered to obtain a complete picture of meat’s importance in human diet. However, even with these possible analytical inadequacies, our statistical analyses indicate a significant role that meat plays in influencing variation of survival and mortality.
I'm not even remotely Jewish. Certified schizo moment.this jew is desperate to make us believe in his meme diet JFL
Maybe when you're off the bus you can argue here:but just know that plants have tons of anti nutrients, low amino acid bioavability, low amino acid quality.
Also plants don't contain taurine, creatine, b12, K2, D3, DHA, EPA, collagen, and tons more nutrients.
The study linked controlled for GDP, so I'm arguing about a lack of nutritional control now.And source look up Hong Kong meat consumption per capita. We already discussed this, you were coping how this is because the country is wealthy, high gdp etc. But i made the contra argument how a country with the same gdp and higher then Hong Kong and higher rated Healthcare but way less meat consumption, has lower life expectancy. So how do you cope then that its because of gdp or hdi?
It controls for obvious important factors:
However, the authors note the lack of control for nutrition, which is arguably the most important factor:
Ironic. You've had time to argue since 19 hours ago. Also:i just don't have time to argue with retarded vegans like OP when studying cortisol inducing uni subjects all day
Your argument is all over the place, seeing as I've directly refuted multiple claims of yours (including by using your own linked study), yet you have no follow-up to any of that. Who's the coper, exactly?
"However, even with these possible analytical inadequacies, our statistical analyses indicate a significant role that meat plays in influencing variation of survival and mortality."Maybe when you're off the bus you can argue here:
Plants megathread
I'm copy-pasting this from previous arguments I've had with multiple users here regarding plants. Vitamin A is synthesized from β-Carotene, which is abundantly found in plant sources...looksmax.org
The study linked controlled for GDP, so I'm arguing about a lack of nutritional control now.
...which contradicts nothing I mentioned."However, even with these possible analytical inadequacies, our statistical analyses indicate a significant role that meat plays in influencing variation of survival and mortality."
Ironic.its okay to admit you are wrong
So you admit that meat is significantly raises life quality/extension?...which contradicts nothing I mentioned.
Ironic.
No, I admit that meat intake correlates with increased life expectancy and lower childhood mortality when controlling for caloric intake, socioeconomic status (GDP PPP), obesity, urbanization (lifestyle), and education.So you admit that meat is significantly raises life quality/extension?
Well meat doesn't have positive linear correlation to life expectancy because eating too much protein is directly linked with cellular stress.No, I admit that meat intake correlates with increased life expectancy and lower childhood mortality when controlling for caloric intake, socioeconomic status (GDP PPP), obesity, urbanization (lifestyle), and education.
However, I don't admit that meat intake correlates with increased life expectancy and lower childhood mortality when controlling for nutrition because nobody's linked a study indicating so.
I've been averaging only a few novel sentences per post. Most of the text is copied directly from studies, unlike some users'.View attachment 1921262
>mfw the 2 autists are still writing essays arguing with eachother over sperm potentiation
That thread is dumh for the simple reason that those compounds that our body can make on their own that you listed, are just enough for normal baseline functionality.Maybe when you're off the bus you can argue here:
Plants megathread
I'm copy-pasting this from previous arguments I've had with multiple users here regarding plants. Vitamin A is synthesized from β-Carotene, which is abundantly found in plant sources...looksmax.org
The study linked controlled for GDP, so I'm arguing about a lack of nutritional control now.
It's only quadratic in SEA. It's nearly linear (very slightly logarithmic in some) everywhere else.meat doesn't have positive linear correlation to life expectancy because eating too much protein is directly linked with cellular stress.
Such as eating meat?cause more educated people make smarter choices.
...and have evolved accordingly (smaller jaws, notably), resulting in population explosion as well.We only started eating way more plant food 10k years ago.
Source?But again in the end of the day, people from Hong Kong eat an insane amount of meat (670g daily) and have the highest life expectancy
Yes and women prefer men with a bigger jaw which came from us chewing meat while receased jaw is a subhuman trait. Why don't women prefer recessed jaws which are caused from us eating slave grain diets?It's only quadratic in SEA. It's nearly linear everywhere else.
Such as eating meat?
...and have evolved accordingly (smaller jaws, notably), resulting in population explosion as well.
Source?
And there are plant-based supplements for those...Mine and your body also produces testosterone but the guy that injects testosterone has significantly more benefits in muscle building. This is also the case for the stuff you mentioned like creatine, taurine, carnitine.
You ought to click the link.Also how do you expect do be taken seriously when mentioning vit D from mushrooms which is laughably miniscule and fucking moss?
Neither is considered essential. You're making an appeal to nature fallacy as well.And there is no plant source for DHA and EPA unless you unironically say the algae that fish get their DHA and EPA from that in no way and shape has been the way humans have taken this absolutely essential nutrient.
You already answered this yourself:Whole point is that it's clear we have evolved to eat animal products especially marine ones for Omega 3 from the reason that humans have always mostly lived close to water sources.
the algae that fish get their DHA and EPA from
Source?ALA has only 3-5% conversion rate to DHA and EPA jfl.
Because occlusal issues worsen breathing and can result in infection (overcrowding leading to plaque buildup). Most modern humans have some amount of facial recession and crowding, suggesting that their ancestors were probably surviving primarily on soft plant foods.Yes and women prefer men with a bigger jaw which came from us chewing meat while receased jaw is a subhuman trait. Why don't women prefer recessed jaws which are caused from us eating slave grain diets?
You're making assumptions about my statement that was simply observing that agricultural plants led to exponential reproduction that the vast majority of modern humans are derived from.And the population exploding thing is just low iq, bigger population =/= better life quality. The rich aristocratic classes would keep on eating meat while slaves would be the ones eating more grains and reproducing like rabbits.
And for Hong Kong's life expectancy ranking...?
Obtained results showed that total sperm count (224.7 [117–369] vs. 119.7 [64.8–442.8]; P = 0.011) and the percentage of rapid progressively motile sperm were significantly higher in the vegan group compared with the non-vegan group (1 [0–7] vs. 17.5 [15–30]; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the oxidation-reduction potential (0.4 [0.3–0.9] vs. 1.5 [0.6–2.8]; P < 0.0001) and the proportion of spermatozoon with DNA damage (14.7 [7–33.5] vs. 8.2 [3–19.5]; P = 0.05) were significantly higher in the non-vegan group in comparison to the vegan group.
There was an inverse relation between processed red meat intake and total sperm count. The adjusted relative differences in total sperm counts for men in increasing quartiles of processed meat intake were 0 (ref), −3 (95% confidence interval = −67 to 37), −14 (−82 to 28), and −78 (−202 to −5) million (test for trend, P = 0.01). This association was strongest among men with abstinence time less than 2 days and was driven by a strong inverse relation between processed red meat intake and ejaculate volume (test for trend, P = 0.003).
We found that intake of full-fat dairy was inversely related to sperm motility and morphology. These associations were driven primarily by intake of cheese and were independent of overall dietary patterns.
The study they referenced says:Patients who have died from sudden cardiac death have more linoleic acid and less omega-3 polyunsaturated fats in their coronary arteries versus control patients who died mostly from traffic accidents.61
In conclusion, this study showed increased percentages of saturated and reduced percentages of polyunsaturated fatty acids, except linoleic acid, in total phospholipids of human coronary arteries in cases of sudden cardiac death.
what a load of bullshit. The reason this correlation exists is that most ppl who eat plant based are health nuts and most omnivores eat trash.It's over for spermcel animal product eaters.
The Relationship between Plant-Based Diet Index and Semen Parameters of Men with Infertility: A Cross-Sectional Study - PubMed
In this study, for the first time, the relationship between PDI, hPDI, uPDI and male infertility was evaluated. Altogether, this study demonstrated that nutrition has an impact on semen quality and fertility of men.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
what a load of bullshit. The reason this correlation exists is that most ppl who eat plant based are health nuts and most omnivores eat trash.
In the crude model, there was a significant association between total motility and uPDI, and participants in the highest uPDI tertile had a lower risk of sperm motility (OR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.72, P=0.005). After adjustment for potential confounders including age, energy intake, BMI, physical activity, marriage time, educational status, smoking, and alcohol history, the association was significant and participants in the highest uPDI tertile had a lower risk (OR=0.34, 95% CI: 0.16, 0.72, P=0.005 and OR=0.39, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.85, P=0.01).
Wasn’t vegetables and fish the Jesus dietTbh I notice my mind is clearer and I feel better when I limit grains and red meat and only eat vegetables + fish.
Pescatarian diet seems ideal for daily life and longevity, that's why the Japanese live so long
Healthy user bias isnt realNot only is this study completely irrelevant for the simple reason that people who eat more unprocessed plant food have way healthier habits (lower bmi, less smoking, less alcohol, better sleep hygiene, higher income, education etc etc.) But the uPDI includes stuff like hamburgers, fries, artifical fruit juices, deep fried foods (you get the point). Animal products are included into the uPDI but that means nothing cause the study doesn't control for isolated animal stuff.
Example:
*guy 1: 300kcal of hazelnuts, 500kcal of boiled vegetables, 700kcal of soaked legumes, 350kcal oatmeal, 350kcal fruit
*guy 2: 700kcal hamburger, 700kcal pizza, 500kcal white bread, 140kcal eggs, 250kcal beef
Notice the problem? The guy 2 has shittier sperm quality right? But in what shape and form does it have to do with the actually pure animal products he ate and not the garbage PUFA filled food + white yeast made bread completely devoid of nutrients?
Tldr: legumes, fruits, vegetables are healthier then pufa processed bread Frankenstein meat foods where health deterioration links are strongly established, which are part of the uPDI.
It depends on your genes.@8PSLcel is vego
maybe in your mouth and anusPlant-based diet correlates with greater sperm mobility, density, and overall fertility
Grains and vegetables are shit.just ditch highly processed foods and refined grains, eat enough vegetables but still keep meat and dairy imo.
balanced diet