PSL needs to give way to a bell curve

[crisprmaxx]

If looksmaxxers want to be pragmatic in pushing social and public acceptance of our plight, we need to be more scientific. PSL is a good start but its very primitive. Ratings like that are a lot more subjective than we like to think.

Fix people to a bell curve; mirror this pattern on both sides of a middle point: 34%, 14%, 2%, 0.1%. Following this let's us determine what an actual average and above average measurement is

PSL is gay

 

[recessed]

yes.

 

[pm_me_ur_beach_house]

I like this. Rate guys on broad appeal on a percentile scale like Truerateme, which is now overflowing with Stacies (why Reddit of all places?) and Low tier normies (understandable)

 

[Deleted member 5349]

Don’t expect the idiot 15 year olds here to understand how the normal distribution and standard deviations work. That’s way beyond the realm of what they’ll ever understand

 

[Deleted member 643]

Both can be used at the same time. Since women find 80% of men unattractive, PSL 5 would be 80th percentile.

 

[crisprmaxx]

Both can be used at the same time. Since women find 80% of men unattractive, PSL 5 would be 80th percentile.

There are a lot of errors with that but I don't really care to go into it because im depressed as fuck right now after looking in the mirror so just

shut up

 

[SubhumanCurrycel]

A normal distribution is great in theory but would never work due to the way women rate men

4PSL would be average yea taking 0-8 PSL into account 4 is the median which would theoretically be average however the “average” male rates by a woman is a 3.3

 

[crisprmaxx]

psl is gay because it just says "women only pick men in x percentile" but it doesn't actually accurately define the percentile

 

[SubhumanCurrycel]

psl is gay because it just says "women only pick men in x percentile" but it doesn't actually accurately define the percentile

https://looksmax.org/threads/an-explanation-of-the-psl-scale.103244/

 

[crisprmaxx]

https://looksmax.org/threads/an-explanation-of-the-psl-scale.103244/

again, literally gay. this dude doesn't understand how distribution is variable dependent.

 

[SubhumanCurrycel]

again, literally gay. this dude doesn't understand how distribution is variable dependent.

Yea the standard deviation was pulled out of thin air tbh.

 

[crisprmaxx]

If you say "Nuclear Science only accepts people above 120 IQ"(I don't know what a standard IQ for this is here) You don't measure people on a PSL-equivalent system. You just say "Hey if you want to fuck hotties do nuclear science you need to be in x standard deviation from the middle of the distribution"

 

[SubhumanCurrycel]

If you say "Nuclear Science only accepts people above 120 IQ"(I don't know what a standard IQ for this is here) You don't measure people on a PSL-equivalent system. You just say "Hey if you want to fuck hotties do nuclear science you need to be in x standard deviation from the middle of the distribution"

Being able to fuck hotties differs so much tbh , especially when you take shit like race into account 5PSL white guy would out do a 6PSL ethnic and it depends on the hypergamy of that into account

 

[Deleted member 2012]

Trying to make ratings completely objective is autistic and will never work

 

[crisprmaxx]

A bell curve distribution also allows us to explore more than just sex.

what is minimum attractiveness for male - male companionship
what is minimum for good economic success
what is the difference between one standard deviation below the middle and two above in parental bias

 

[crisprmaxx]

Need to create an IQ system for attractiveness.

Attractiveness Quotient. AQ.

 

[Dylan2]

I feel like if the form went really hardcore one day there could be a serious sliding scale formula that takes everything possible into account including things pheno and mandible length that can give you percentage of appeal throughout age/race/location brackets and even results that calculate which real life "pheno" you have, ex jock, pretty boy, British nobleman, autistic/school pheno, nerd, BBC slayer, gay alien, etc. There are intiricies that PSL doesn't account for, for example someone who has strong mandible length looks like a jock, where as someone with a better maxillia and a shitty mandible looks more beta/nerd even though they might technicallt have a better psl score. This is a pipe dream at the currrent state though because there doesn't even seem to be a uniform step by step way to calculate ps.l in its current form. What i envision would be a system where you could essentially input variables and data would be available as a full report with the things I describes with surgery rrccomendations, what type of maxxing/stereotype you should do etc. I feel like it could be an app that could actually earn money through ads or something if someone was to take the extensive research and construction required to develop such a system.

 

[crisprmaxx]

I feel like if the form went really hardcore one day there could be a serious sliding scale formula that takes everything possible into account including things pheno and mandible length that can give you percentage of appeal throughout age/race/location brackets and even results that calculate which real life "pheno" you have, ex jock, pretty boy, British nobleman, autistic/school pheno, nerd, BBC slayer, gay alien, etc. There are intiricies that PSL doesn't account for, for example someone who has strong mandible length looks like a jock, where as someone with a better maxillia and a shitty mandible looks more beta/nerd even though they might technicallt have a better psl score. This is a pipe dream at the currrent state though because there doesn't even seem to be a uniform step by step way to calculate ps.l in its current form. What i envision would be a system where you could essentially input variables and data would be available as a full report with the things I describes with surgery rrccomendations, what type of maxxing/stereotype you should do etc. I feel like it could be an app that could actually earn money through ads or something if someone was to take the extensive research and construction required to develop such a system.

was based until that cringe last sentence

 

[Dylan2]

was based until that cringe last sentence

Haha well I put that in because I dont know what other incentive someone would have to actually put the effort into something like that other than financial because it would be really in depth and time consuming. just saying that it's possible to at least get something out of it

 

[poloralf]

There are a lot of errors with that but I don't really care to go into it because im depressed as fuck right now after looking in the mirror so just

shut up

Go into it you fucking low iq, gaussian curves are kindergarden math why the fuck do you think you're so special

 

[Lev Peshkov]

No because it'd not statistics

Either you're hot to a woman or ugly

Binary 1 or 0

 

[Britishlooksmaxxer]

I like this. Rate guys on broad appeal on a percentile scale like Truerateme, which is now overflowing with Stacies (why Reddit of all places?) and Low tier normies (understandable)

Ofc the gaycels unite

Fucking hive minded just like women

 

[SteveRogers]

Both can be used at the same time. Since women find 80% of men unattractive, PSL 5 would be 80th percentile.

They find about 5% attractive

 

[crisprmaxx]

No because it'd not statistics

Either you're hot to a woman or ugly

Binary 1 or 0

Unscientific bs

 

[Lev Peshkov]

Unscientific bs

Sorry its truev

Literally 80/20 rule bro

Anything below 5 is over

 

[crisprmaxx]

Sorry its truev

Literally 80/20 rule bro

Anything below 5 is over

Statistically impossible for the retards in this forum to balance the 80/20 rule with the claim "women can't be incels"

 

[Lev Peshkov]

Statistically impossible for the retards in this forum to balance the 80/20 rule with the claim "women can't be incels"

They can't be incels

They have unlimited smv

 

[poloralf]

Statistically impossible for the retards in this forum to balance the 80/20 rule with the claim "women can't be incels"

Fucking cuck, they fuck the same guys many times, its extremely simple to understand the 80/20 fucking distribution, while you jerk off muh iq statistics, women are fucking the same guys, some are his fuckbuddy, some their gf, some are booty calls if they are lucky.

 

[crisprmaxx]

JFL if you think a woman would rather die childless than with an ugly guy

 

[crisprmaxx]

Fucking cuck, they fuck the same guys many times, its extremely simple to understand the 80/20 fucking distribution, while you jerk off muh iq statistics, women are fucking the same guys, some are his fuckbuddy, some their gf, some are booty calls if they are lucky.

Source other than the one tinder study

 

[poloralf]

Source other than the one tinder study

Cite my dick, you think im your slave go search yourself, but before searching why are you coping ? Why is the idea of women fucking the same top tier guys and sharing them so impossible to your pea sized brain to compute ? You do realise that less than 40% hunter gatherer men never passed on their genes opposed to 80 %+ women passing them on ? Is it science fiction to you to accept that women are biologically selective and all want the same top tier men, its basic high IQ biology.

 

[Deleted member 7076]

yes a mathematical model would be great for this website

 

[eduardkoopman]

Just talking Percentile %.
Should fix all discussions on rating.

Like a dude having a face that is 70%.
Objective above average significantly.
In eyes of woman a low tier normie.

 

[Time Travel]

It's way funnier to see all these Indians cope with how they mog eachother with marginal differences of 0.2 psl

 

[crisprmaxx]

Cite my dick, you think im your slave go search yourself, but before searching why are you coping ? Why is the idea of women fucking the same top tier guys and sharing them so impossible to your pea sized brain to compute ? You do realise that less than 40% hunter gatherer men never passed on their genes opposed to 80 %+ women passing them on ? Is it science fiction to you to accept that women are biologically selective and all want the same top tier men, its basic high IQ biology.

Because you're a retard jfl if you think only 20% of men are passing their genes on to 80% of women

 

[LooksPSL]

A normal distribution is great in theory but would never work due to the way women rate men
View attachment 583156
4PSL would be average yea taking 0-8 PSL into account 4 is the median which would theoretically be average however the “average” male rates by a woman is a 3.3

On OKcupid, the world is not okcupid

 

[SubhumanCurrycel]

On OKcupid, the world is not okcupid

Human behaviour is human behaviour though and this is women’s rating after being exposed to a large group of men, if that is so why didn’t men’s ratings change from the expected?
Online dating accounts for a large proportion of relationships in the last decade (around 30%) if I remember correctly.
Not that I would ever go online again it’s trash.

 

[crisprmaxx]

Okcupid will have a serious selection bias. Would need to spread the number of people in that data across multiple dating sites to get an accurate picture of online dating.

 

[LooksPSL]

Human behaviour is human behaviour though and this is women’s rating after being exposed to a large group of men, if that is so why didn’t men’s ratings change from the expected?
Online dating accounts for a large proportion of relationships in the last decade (around 30%) if I remember correctly.
Not that I would ever go online again it’s trash.

they were shown men from okcupid. It’s a specific sample size. Most men from Okcupid are probably uglier than the average man.

 

[LooksPSL]

Okcupid will have a serious selection bias. Would need to spread the number of people in that data across multiple dating sites to get an accurate picture of online dating.

dat statistics iq