💀 The 3 Most Important Craniofacial Plane Angles for Aesthetics [3D Morphs]

Mandibular Plane Angle

Animation Range: 0º to 45º Below Horizon

Ideal Pitch: 12.5º Degrees Below Horizon

Spoiler: Examples of Good Mandibular Plane Angles

Spoiler: Subhuman Examples

---

Orbitomaxillary Plane Angle

Animation Range: 2.5º Inward to 30º Outward

Ideal Yaw: 25º Outward

Spoiler: Examples of Good Orbitomaxillary Plane Angles

Spoiler: Subhuman Examples

---

Temporal Plane Angle

Animation Range: 0º to 30º

Ideal Yaw: 10º

Spoiler: Examples of Good Temporal Plane Angles

Spoiler: Subhuman Examples

 

[VampyrMaxx]

Is there any way to reduce temporal plane angle?

I don't think we can shave the skull from the sides but I may be wrong.

Temporal angle also seems to depend on the forehead ridge, so the way to reduce the temporal angle is by getting a wider forehead. I don't know if this can be done with implants or if it has to be by bone.

Eye Sockets Narrower Than Forehead Ridges = Shit Orbital Bones

Mogger orbits have eye socket holes wider than the forehead’s side ridges: Shitty orbits have eye socket holes within the forehead’s side ridges:

looksmax.org

 

[Snoofy]

I don't think we can shave the skull from the sides but I may be wrong.

Temporal angle also seems to depend on the forehead ridge, so the way to reduce the temporal angle is by getting a wider forehead. I don't know if this can be done with implants or if it has to be by bone.

Eye Sockets Narrower Than Forehead Ridges = Shit Orbital Bones

Mogger orbits have eye socket holes wider than the forehead’s side ridges: Shitty orbits have eye socket holes within the forehead’s side ridges:

looksmax.org

Hair and a stronger lower third, look at the Charlie Kirk morphs, they only touched his jaw and he looks pretty solid

 

[ykim]

Mandibular Plane Angle

View attachment 4054612 View attachment 4054616

Animation Range: 0º to 45º Below Horizon

Ideal Pitch: 12.5º Degrees Below Horizon

Spoiler: Examples of Good Mandibular Plane Angles

View attachment 4054663View attachment 4054628View attachment 4054627

Spoiler: Subhuman Examples

View attachment 4054632View attachment 4054633View attachment 4054636View attachment 4054637

---

Orbitomaxillary Plane Angle

View attachment 4054618 View attachment 4054620

Animation Range: 2.5º Inward to 30º Outward

Ideal Yaw: 25º Outward

Spoiler: Examples of Good Orbitomaxillary Plane Angles

View attachment 4054653View attachment 4054654View attachment 4054655

Spoiler: Subhuman Examples

View attachment 4054658View attachment 4054659

---

Temporal Plane Angle

View attachment 4054621 View attachment 4054622

Animation Range: 0º to 30º

Ideal Yaw: 10º

Spoiler: Examples of Good Temporal Plane Angles

View attachment 4054651View attachment 4054649View attachment 4054652

Spoiler: Subhuman Examples

View attachment 4054642View attachment 4054643View attachment 4054645View attachment 4054646

How did you know I'm somalian?

 

[VampyrMaxx]

Hair and a stronger lower third, look at the Charlie Kirk morphs, they only touched his jaw and he looks pretty solid

Can u send me the morph

 

[Snoofy]

Can u send me the morph

They all ovah TikTok

 

[VampyrMaxx]

Contrary to what this forum thinks, striking features are not good to have.

@thecel why JFL emoji?

 

[mirrormogger]

you realize you can have a high mandibular angle and still posses a long mandible and strong chin? or have a low gonion angle and a recessed mandible/chin?

 

[Lookologist003]

you realize you can have a high mandibular angle and still posses a long mandible and strong chin?

If you have a high mandibular plane angle and your jaw is long, your occlusal plane angle must be very low or else you'll have a long horse face that's as horsy as your jaw is long. This would mean that you have "downgrown" mandible, which would be nightmare if you were a birdcel and needed a Le Fort II to have sex and a girlfriend. You'd be inoperable with a downgrown mandible but a need for more facial depth.

or have a low gonion angle and a recessed mandible/chin?

That's not as bad because you can get the surgeons to slide your recessed shit out and overcome your shitty jaws that way.

 

[Lookologist003]

so the way to reduce the temporal angle is by getting a wider forehead

The problem with this is that the solution is not as isolated as just increasing the width of the brow, that would make your eyes look creepy. The theoretical solution is to pair that increase with expansion of the lateral canthus which I think would mean intense expansion of the whole orbit if the state of it caused the brow to be narrow. How the hell expansion could be possible is unknown. This dependence is why we got away with ascribing the look of low temporal plane angles with ESR for so long. But in detail true ESR is distinct from the package of itself and the temporal plane angle.

 

[Lookologist003]

and ratios and whatnot are very generalized so I just don’t believe in them

This is like climate change denier logic.

"This model is too complicated for me to understand, therefore it is not real."
Maxwell's equations are complicated. Yet you wouldn't have a computer or computer monitor or an internet connection to spread your ignorance if physicists all had your attitude.

 

[futureashtray]

This is like climate change denier logic.

"This model is too complicated for me to understand, therefore it is not real."
Maxwell's equations are complicated. Yet you wouldn't have a computer or computer monitor or an internet connection to spread your ignorance if physicists all had your attitude.

What the fuck? this has nothing to do with anything being complicated.

ratios/angles/etc that are “ideal” are very generalized. because people are all different shapes and sizes and that’s including their skull

 

[ostri99]

@thecel

 

[ostri99]

@thecel

 

[AscendingHero]

Contrary to what this forum thinks, striking features are not good to have.

Aesthetic ones always are and literally the difference (to different degrees) of relevant looks levels, attractive traits are inherently striking

Fact

Super high PFL doesn't really matter as much as other things like 0 scleral show, prominent infraorbital, canthal tilt and low set brows imo. But it can definitely increase appeal, I see what you mean.

Disagree + none of those guys really have high pfl like that, I mean maybe for a caucasoid

Names for those dudes at the bottom? 2nd guy to the left has a crazy medial canthus and periorbital contours, crazy, know of any similar striking eye moggers? PFL wise? Brows? Aggressive angles, etc?

0mm philtrum? You will need african lips to compensate. If you have a 10mm philtrum with thinner caucasian lips you will look retarded.

Short philtrum big lips

Longer philtrum full lips

Lol

Bigger lips are ideal to begin with (Beckford's ratio isn't but another topic)

Chico would benefit from bigger lips, a more distinct cuspids bow and lip-vermillion border/cornices as well as a shorter philtrum, any easy morph makes that clear

It's just that when you change one ratio everything changes you just gotta be aware of the chin to philtrum and everything in between

Short philtrum without the whole mouth area compensating doesn't mog

Wdym by whole mouth area compensating?

His mouth area is aesthetic and pound for pound short philtrum is more aesthetic and mogs a longer one. Not to be confused with with anytime type of syndrome like boils, some cleft syndrome or over filling

It's a feminine trait ish and it FOGS/MOGS

Again you can still be aesthetic with a long ish philtrum, especially a male provided the chin/rest of the lower third comes along, more acceptable on caucasoids but it's still not ideal nor is it striking ( especially not a good way at least, super long ones are ogreishly striking too lol)

Higher bizygomatic width is not aesthetic honestly. Maybe slightly higher but not super high. For example this bizygomatic width is 15.3cm. It not as aesthetic as bzw closer to 14.3 cm.

15.3cm bzw; wide skull

How are you calculating this shit lol?

And how does a high bizygomatic width not mog lol, peep this

sleeker cranium

Cranium slightly on meso and it's not that sleekness is defined by the facial features itself and the cranial index + facial depth + temporal angle /bizygo to eurion ratio

+Low facial adiposity and general futuristic intelligent traits

I got the JFA from this photo. This angle is kind of stupid because getting a perfect front profile photo is almost impossible. As long as the ramus is long and the chin is good, then I wouldn't worry about the angle itself.

JFA

Dimorphic mogger oldcel, he looks like a slightly more virile version of Zod from Man of Steel, too many unideal features, although some nice dimorphic markers


Lookscels, incels are too obsessed going by the book with something that was just supposed to serve as a marker, many have to evolve the way they see faces overall and what looks good and doesnt'

 

[VampyrMaxx]

Aesthetic ones always are and literally the difference (to different degrees) of relevant looks levels, attractive

thoughts on this morph?

 

[Neolithic Zagrosian]

good examples especially charlie kirk's temporal plane angle

 

[Cinnamon fan64]

I think haaland has a bad Temporal plane angle

 

[eyelidcel]

View attachment 4224368
I think haaland has a bad Temporal plane angle

top third too big.. nose too big ,cheeks too low set, eyes too close eyebrows nonexistent and he is lacking in cinnamon.

 

[Chadlite.dream]

Mandibular Plane Angle

View attachment 4054612 View attachment 4054616

Animation Range: 0º to 45º Below Horizon

Ideal Pitch: 12.5º Degrees Below Horizon

Spoiler: Examples of Good Mandibular Plane Angles

View attachment 4054663View attachment 4054628View attachment 4054627

Spoiler: Subhuman Examples

View attachment 4054632View attachment 4054633View attachment 4054636View attachment 4054637

---

Orbitomaxillary Plane Angle

View attachment 4054618 View attachment 4054620

Animation Range: 2.5º Inward to 30º Outward

Ideal Yaw: 25º Outward

Spoiler: Examples of Good Orbitomaxillary Plane Angles

View attachment 4054653View attachment 4054654View attachment 4054655

Spoiler: Subhuman Examples

View attachment 4054658View attachment 4054659

---

Temporal Plane Angle

View attachment 4054621 View attachment 4054622

Animation Range: 0º to 30º

Ideal Yaw: 10º

Spoiler: Examples of Good Temporal Plane Angles

View attachment 4054651View attachment 4054649View attachment 4054652

Spoiler: Subhuman Examples

View attachment 4054642View attachment 4054643View attachment 4054645View attachment 4054646

One day one day one day one day one day

 

[Chadlite.dream]

View attachment 4224368
I think haaland has a bad Temporal plane angle

In agartha