Titanium jaw angle implants

Acromegaly_Chad

Acromegaly_Chad

Offical Surgery Consultant
Joined
Apr 16, 2020
Posts
2,050
Reputation
5,194
If your gonions are giga inwards tilted just as mine not even a chin wing can safe you. The only option are custom titanium jaw angle implants.
Titanium has been used for decades with very little known complications.

Let's have a look at a study aimed at analyzing compatibility of titanium on your cranium/head to show how well it works:

Object​

Decompressive craniectomy is an established procedure to lower intracranial pressure. Therefore, cranioplasty remains a necessity in neurosurgery as well. If the patient's own bone flap is not available, the surgeon can choose between various alloplast grafts. A review of the literature proves that 4–13.8% of polymethylmethacrylate plates and 2.6–10% of hydroxyapatite-based implants require replacement. In this retrospective study of large skull defects, the authors compared computer-assisted design/computer-assisted modeled (CAD/CAM) titanium implants for cranioplasty with other frequently used materials described in literature.

Methods​

Twenty-six patients underwent cranioplasty with CAD/CAM titanium implants (mean diameter 112 mm). With the aid of visual analog scales, the patients' pain and cosmesis were evaluated 6–12 years (mean 8.1 years) after insertion of the implants.

Results​

None of the implants had to be removed. Of all patients, 68% declared their outcomes as excellent, 24% as good, 0.8% as fair, and 0% as poor. There was no resulting pain in 84% of the patients, and 88% were satisfied with the cosmetic result, noting > 75 mm on the visual analog scale of cosmesis. All patients would have chosen cranioplasty again, stating an improvement in their quality of life by the calvarial reconstruction. Nevertheless, follow-up images obtained in 4 patients undergoing removal of meningiomas was only suboptimal.

Conclusions​

With the aid of CAD technology, all currently used alloplastic materials are suited even for large skull defect cranioplasty. Analysis of the authors' data and the literature shows that cranioplasty with CAD/CAM titanium implants provides the lowest rate of complications, reasonable costs, and acceptable postoperative imaging. Polymethylmethacrylate is suited for primary cranioplasty or for long-term follow-up imaging of tumors. Titanium implants seem to be the material of choice for secondary cranioplasty of large skull defects resulting from decompressive craniectomy after trauma or infarction. Expensive HA-based ceramics show no obvious advantage over titanium or PMMA.



Even further and more detailed information about the usage of jaw angle implants:

Asymmetry and unfavorable esthetics of the jawline have become possible to correct in three dimensions using computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing.

Aims:​

The aim of this study was to provide esthetic, technical, and operative guidelines for mandibular angle and border augmentation using patient-specific titanium implants made by selective laser melting.

Settings and Design:​

University hospital - prospective registry.

Subjects and Methods:​

Twelve patients and 17 implantation sites were documented and prospectively registered. Malformational, deformational, and purely esthetic indications were encountered.

Statistical Analysis Used:​

Descriptive.

Results:​

Patient satisfaction was high, probably because the patients had input into the planned dimensions and shape. A serious infection with implant removal occurred in one patient who had six previous surgeries at the same sites. Technical and surgical guidelines were developed including splitting implants into two segments when the mental nerve was at risk, using a three-dimensional (3D) puzzle connection, providing at least two screw holes per segment, using scaffolds at the bony contact side, using a “satin” finish at the periosteal side, referring to anatomical structures where possible, making provisions for transbuccal and transoral fixation, using a high vestibular incision, and using a double-layer closure. Esthetic guidelines are discussed but could not be upgraded.

Conclusions:​

Mirroring techniques and 3D print accuracy up to 0.1 mm allow precise planning of jaw angle implants. Patients are pleased when given preoperative renderings for their consideration. Infections can be managed using technical and operative recommendations and careful patient selection.
 
  • +1
Reactions: aBetterMii, Deleted member 3270, LastHopeForNorman and 4 others
custom titanium jaw angle implants :soy::soy::soy::soy:


this bullshit again and again... there is not enough study about continuous bone resorption by silicone or peek, there is also no study about tiTaNiUm implants that proves titanium doesn't cause any resorption or erosion.

every time someone against silicone but praise another material keep failing to show any proof that material superior to silicone.

Also, imagine getting an impact -like punch- to your titanium implants JFL.
Your whole jaw would be shattered into million pieces my friend.



people like OP is just procrastinating.
they will never get any kind of procedures but keep fantasising about procedures that not exist yet.
well, keep coping my fellow friend
Leaving Spongebob Squarepants GIF
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Wallenberg, Danish_Retard and oldcelloser
just get chin wing or side wing surgery
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2729
If your gonions are giga inwards tilted just as mine not even a chin wing can safe you. The only option are custom titanium jaw angle implants.
Titanium has been used for decades with very little known complications.

Let's have a look at a study aimed at analyzing compatibility of titanium on your cranium/head to show how well it works:

Object​

Decompressive craniectomy is an established procedure to lower intracranial pressure. Therefore, cranioplasty remains a necessity in neurosurgery as well. If the patient's own bone flap is not available, the surgeon can choose between various alloplast grafts. A review of the literature proves that 4–13.8% of polymethylmethacrylate plates and 2.6–10% of hydroxyapatite-based implants require replacement. In this retrospective study of large skull defects, the authors compared computer-assisted design/computer-assisted modeled (CAD/CAM) titanium implants for cranioplasty with other frequently used materials described in literature.

Methods​

Twenty-six patients underwent cranioplasty with CAD/CAM titanium implants (mean diameter 112 mm). With the aid of visual analog scales, the patients' pain and cosmesis were evaluated 6–12 years (mean 8.1 years) after insertion of the implants.

Results​

None of the implants had to be removed. Of all patients, 68% declared their outcomes as excellent, 24% as good, 0.8% as fair, and 0% as poor. There was no resulting pain in 84% of the patients, and 88% were satisfied with the cosmetic result, noting > 75 mm on the visual analog scale of cosmesis. All patients would have chosen cranioplasty again, stating an improvement in their quality of life by the calvarial reconstruction. Nevertheless, follow-up images obtained in 4 patients undergoing removal of meningiomas was only suboptimal.

Conclusions​

With the aid of CAD technology, all currently used alloplastic materials are suited even for large skull defect cranioplasty. Analysis of the authors' data and the literature shows that cranioplasty with CAD/CAM titanium implants provides the lowest rate of complications, reasonable costs, and acceptable postoperative imaging. Polymethylmethacrylate is suited for primary cranioplasty or for long-term follow-up imaging of tumors. Titanium implants seem to be the material of choice for secondary cranioplasty of large skull defects resulting from decompressive craniectomy after trauma or infarction. Expensive HA-based ceramics show no obvious advantage over titanium or PMMA.



Even further and more detailed information about the usage of jaw angle implants:

Asymmetry and unfavorable esthetics of the jawline have become possible to correct in three dimensions using computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing.

Aims:​

The aim of this study was to provide esthetic, technical, and operative guidelines for mandibular angle and border augmentation using patient-specific titanium implants made by selective laser melting.

Settings and Design:​

University hospital - prospective registry.

Subjects and Methods:​

Twelve patients and 17 implantation sites were documented and prospectively registered. Malformational, deformational, and purely esthetic indications were encountered.

Statistical Analysis Used:​

Descriptive.

Results:​

Patient satisfaction was high, probably because the patients had input into the planned dimensions and shape. A serious infection with implant removal occurred in one patient who had six previous surgeries at the same sites. Technical and surgical guidelines were developed including splitting implants into two segments when the mental nerve was at risk, using a three-dimensional (3D) puzzle connection, providing at least two screw holes per segment, using scaffolds at the bony contact side, using a “satin” finish at the periosteal side, referring to anatomical structures where possible, making provisions for transbuccal and transoral fixation, using a high vestibular incision, and using a double-layer closure. Esthetic guidelines are discussed but could not be upgraded.

Conclusions:​

Mirroring techniques and 3D print accuracy up to 0.1 mm allow precise planning of jaw angle implants. Patients are pleased when given preoperative renderings for their consideration. Infections can be managed using technical and operative recommendations and careful patient selection.

The issue is finding a reputable surgeon who does them.
 
We are alike. I also want titanium jaw implant but I must try with silicone first since can be removed easily in case I don’t like the outcome
 
We are alike. I also want titanium jaw implant but I must try with silicone first since can be removed easily in case I don’t like the outcome
I see, you are back. Fillers still looking good?
 
What do you think of this jaw implant result? @need-a-wide-jaw @Acromegaly_Chad

IMO it doesn't look good at all. Results like this make me skeptical of jaw implants.

shit result tbh; can they be taken out? and what will you look after if you do? what are the consequences?
 
Jaw angles are the temporal points of the face. Absolutely pivotal and necessary for true facial harmony and aesthetics.

Jaw surgery only copers won't like this.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.png
    Untitled-1.png
    503.9 KB · Views: 62
Last edited:
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Oberyn and Fear
shit result tbh; can they be taken out? and what will you look after if you do? what are the consequences?
They can be taken out. Not many consequences if you hadn't had them in for a long time.

Can someone explain to me why this result looks so bad? Did the doctor just choose implants that were not a "good fit" for this guy?
 
custom titanium jaw angle implants :soy::soy::soy::soy:

this bullshit again and again... there is not enough study about continuous bone resorption by silicone or peek, there is also no study about tiTaNiUm implants that proves titanium doesn't cause any resorption or erosion.

every time someone against silicone but praise another material keep failing to show any proof that material superior to silicone.

Also, imagine getting an impact -like punch- to your titanium implants JFL.
Your whole jaw would be shattered into million pieces my friend.


people like OP is just procrastinating.
they will never get any kind of procedures but keep fantasising about procedures that not exist yet.
well, keep coping my fellow friend
this tbh. average org user gets lefort 3 + double LL and + 2 eye area implant in a month.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Acromegaly_Chad

Similar threads

RSzeiS
Replies
5
Views
694
DeformedCell
DeformedCell
enchanted_elixir
Replies
93
Views
14K
One Rep Max
One Rep Max
Jade
Replies
17
Views
2K
Jade
Jade
Jade
Replies
7
Views
878
Deleted member 21192
Deleted member 21192

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top