UltimateMan
Gold
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2020
- Posts
- 994
- Reputation
- 1,812
Kinda water but:
On average (mean), criminals of low attractiveness were sentenced to 4.10 years in prison and criminals of high attractiveness were sentenced to 1.87 years in prison. This equals a 119.25% increase.
The scenario where the criminal is clearly guilty, the women gave higher sentences to the unattractive criminal (24.71 years), than the attractive criminal (15.11 years). This amounts to a 63.53% increase. [See image below]
Of course this bias is less pronounced for men because for a women all your worth as a male is how attractive you are. If this isnt motivation to looksmax I don't know what is.
On average (mean), criminals of low attractiveness were sentenced to 4.10 years in prison and criminals of high attractiveness were sentenced to 1.87 years in prison. This equals a 119.25% increase.
The scenario where the criminal is clearly guilty, the women gave higher sentences to the unattractive criminal (24.71 years), than the attractive criminal (15.11 years). This amounts to a 63.53% increase. [See image below]
Of course this bias is less pronounced for men because for a women all your worth as a male is how attractive you are. If this isnt motivation to looksmax I don't know what is.
Physical Attractiveness Bias in the Legal System — The Law Project
[Download for PDF/printable version of this article] When I started looking into this subject, I predicted a person’s physical attractiveness would only have minor advantages. I was wrong. In fact, I was so wrong, that in one study, the effects of physical attractiveness on judges were so influ
www.thelawproject.com.au