Why didn't Jeff Seid & Laid's face get agging from roids?

A

AndrogennicMaster

Bronze
Joined
Oct 24, 2024
Posts
259
Reputation
190
What do you think is the golden mean for them? High anabolic cycles, but low androgenic? Genetics? Or some half-joking, half-serious additives like accutane / ghk-cu

They both started early and their faces in peak looked young, with very clean skin - as if they weren't on steroids.
 
  • +1
Reactions: aleex
David laid looks fucking 50
1739963705809
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: ascension124
Laid is already losing hair, meanwhile jeff seid just has insane genetics on looking healthy i guess, his hairline is still immaculate and he still claims to this day he never used steroids
 
  • +1
Reactions: lucifer6969
What do you think is the golden mean for them? High anabolic cycles, but low androgenic? Genetics? Or some half-joking, half-serious additives like accutane / ghk-cu

They both started early and their faces in peak looked young, with very clean skin - as if they weren't on steroids.
Depends on dose and compound used
 
What do you think is the golden mean for them? High anabolic cycles, but low androgenic? Genetics? Or some half-joking, half-serious additives like accutane / ghk-cu

They both started early and their faces in peak looked young, with very clean skin - as if they weren't on steroids.
Outrageous genetics and luck in so many senses, that includes their faces and response to steroids imo
 
  • +1
Reactions: aleex
they were on low doses
 
Laid is already losing hair, meanwhile jeff seid just has insane genetics on looking healthy i guess, his hairline is still immaculate and he still claims to this day he never used steroids
Jeff mogs Laid so hard
 
  • +1
Reactions: aleex

Similar threads

D
Replies
20
Views
9K
carlos72
carlos72
20/04/2008
Replies
71
Views
4K
roidsuser2
R
the MOUSE
Replies
31
Views
5K
Axhar1
Axhar1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top