why do normies in face vs height debates allow "tall, average looking" to be used as an example but saying " average height and handsome" isnt

Dondraper75

Dondraper75

Apricot
Joined
Oct 27, 2024
Posts
4,173
Reputation
5,046
ive noticed this a ton where normies who overrate height use extreme examples to give an unfair advantage to height by saying "oh 6'2 mid dude will pull more than 5'3 and handsome" which is true but for some reason anytime you use "oh 5'9 and handsome" they refuse to allow it because "oh they're average height brooo thats not an issue ofc they wont have an issue" its frustrating asf for people to allow height to beat face in these arguments they make it unbalanced and unfair
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 141098, Pandora and proxyy
The face won't be able to be clearly rated, unlike the height, hence the uncertainty.
 
ive noticed this a ton where normies who overrate height use extreme examples to give an unfair advantage to height by saying "oh 6'2 mid dude will pull more than 5'3 and handsome" which is true but for some reason anytime you use "oh 5'9 and handsome" they refuse to allow it because "oh they're average height brooo thats not an issue ofc they wont have an issue" its frustrating asf for people to allow height to beat face in these arguments they make it unbalanced and unfair
normies are retards thats why
 
face > hight > muscle
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 141098

Similar threads

nuttheb
Replies
149
Views
28K
Th3Man
Th3Man
D
Replies
106
Views
14K
¿Nero
¿Nero
D
Replies
121
Views
43K
helpmeoutOFbp
helpmeoutOFbp

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top