Best of the Best Submissions & Eligibility Rubric Thread

[Looksmax]

Dear forum members,

As a newly appointed moderator of this website, my primary objective is to identify outstanding threads and give justice to the rotting gems on the looksmaxing section, and promote them to the "Best of the Best" section. Having assumed my role just a few hours ago, I am eager to fulfill my promise right away.

To get your thread appointed to the Best of the Best section, first, make sure you have all of these fundamental requirements met.

• Reactions:
  • The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance:
  • The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
  • It should either be educational and/or instructional.
  • The thread demonstrates what it promises.
  • The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best.
  • The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (common sense) to normies.
• Effort:
  • The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
• Evidence and Quality:
  • The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
  • The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
  • The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
• Presentation:
  • The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
  • The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
  • The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
  • If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious.
  • The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
• Originality:
  • The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.

Here is a deeper explanation of the rubric. Please read if you're interested in getting your thread approved for BOTB.

Spoiler: Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify

Spoiler: Reactions

Reactions:

• The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.

This is very straightforward. Your thread needs to get 20+ positive reacts.

Spoiler: Relevance

Relevance:

• The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.

Pretty self-explanatory. Topics that don't help people looksmax, understand the blackpill, or self-improve don't count.

• It should either be educational and/or instructional.

The thread should teach people something and/or show them how to do something.

• The thread demonstrates what it promises.

If your title is "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", please talk about that. If the thread is 95% about how fantastic plants are, or the thread doesn't really fulfill the promise of showing a "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", it would violate this rule.

• The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best. If there's already another fashion thread, for example in the BOTB section that is superior to your fashion thread, your thread isn't eligible.

If there is a thread already in the BOTB section on the topic you'll discuss, then the thread you will write must be better.

• The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (aka common sense) to most of the target audience. This would basically mean that if the thread contains information that most non-blackpilled normies would know, it wouldn't qualify. Example: A thread solely dedicated to "Why acne destroys your looks" would violate this one.

A thread that mostly or entirely states very obvious things that normies know will not be added, like "Why Acne is a Looksmin", even if it's obvious to users, it still qualifies, as long as it isn't obvious to normies, because remember, we have much more lurkers than users. But if it's obvious to normies, it doesn't qualify.

Spoiler: Effort

Effort:

• The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort, and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.

Very easy. Threads that appear high-effort only. No moderate-effort or low effort threads.

Spoiler: Evidence and Quality

Evidence and Quality:

• The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.

The thread shouldn't demonstrate threads that are empty, narrow, limited, and shallow when it comes to information. If you're going to make a skin guide, explain everything you know and can find online about skin. If you're talking about a more narrow subject, like How to turn straight hair curly, explain everything you know about how to turn straight hair curly! People want information-rich threads, especially when it comes to understanding the topic and solutions (if applicable) to the topic. Threads that are shallow or information-poor, or missing crucial information won't be added.

• The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.

This is the most important one. Especially when it comes to things that are science-based.
Get the facts right. Know what you're talking about. Demonstrate your understanding. Threads explaining things that the author doesn't know about can't be added to BOTB due to possible misinformation or the lack of crucial information. Please, always do as much research as possible and learn as much about the topic as possible. You'd be amazed at how much you don't know. Trust me. I removed almost all of my own BOTB threads in November 2023 for a reason, this reason specifically.

Example: Someone makes a guide on how to grow taller, and they know nothing about how HGH converts to IGF-1 in the liver and the whole thread assumes more HGH = more growth, not knowing that things like protein, minerals aromatase inhibitors, and vitamins also are important. This person's thread can't go to BOTB.

• The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.

When it comes to using scientific evidence. If you took information from a scientific source of information, like a research paper, scientific article, etc. to write your thread, it's vital that you cite your sources. At the absolute minimum, show the link of the source you got your information from. Pasting the link on the thread or on the bottom of the thread in its own section is good. Citations are preferred.

Outside of that, if the thread is on things that are objective, like ways to grow taller, the information on the thread should be as truthful as possible. Threads that have misinformation on objective topics or that don't have good reasoning on topics that might be subjective (like opinions) won't qualify.

You don't have to cite evidence or anything if the topic is susceptible to subjectivity. Fashion is a good example, since fashion is susceptible to subjectivity. Anything that is susceptible to subjectivity will be assessed based on the thread's reasoning and consensus among users and moderators. If you're making a thread recommending people to wear dresses, the reasoning is bad (why would a straight male wear a dress as a looksmax?), and it won't gain consensus, therefore, it won't qualify.

When it comes to conjectural threads (A conjecture is a statement that is believed to be true, but has not yet been proven. Conjectures are based on intuition, observation, or experience, but lack formal proof and are based on incomplete information). The reasoning for the conjecture has to be solid.

For example, if you hypothesize or theorize something is likely to be true, like maybe you think a certain supplement can do something nobody (not even in the scientific community) has thought about in terms of looksmaxing, display good reasoning for it.

Opinions and theories. are touchy, since they can actually be good ones. If it's opinion-based or a theory, please add as many sources, pieces of evidence, or as much solid reasoning to back it up, to avoid the thread look like pure opinion or an uncredible theory or a hypothesis. With opinions and theories, consensus and great reasoning is the key to qualifying, so be extremely persuasive.

Spoiler: Presentation

Presentation:

• The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.

Example Topic: Health, and how it relates to Looksmaxing
Good Title: "Ultimate Health Guide: How To Maximize Your Health & Why Health is ESSENTIAL For Looksmaxing"
Bad Title: "health guide (high effort everyone GTFIH NOW)"

• The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.

If the thread shows that the user can't spell, doesn't understand proper grammar, doesn't know how to punctuate, etc. It can't qualify.

• The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.

Threads that are hard to read, are incoherent, look like run-on sentences, or are poorly formatted or any other major structuring or formatting flaws will not qualify. People don't want to read threads that are hard to read or ugly.

• If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious, like getting rid of acne, explaining to people why it's important is necessary.

Easy to explain. If necessary, the thread must explain to the reader what the topic, and content of the thread is and why it's important. If you're talking about why people should take a supplement, explain why. You must explain the why's and answer questions users may have when reading your thread, unless it's super obvious, like why not eating for a year will kill you.

• The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.

Incomprehensible threads that sound like Shakespeare wrote a PhD paper on the relationship between looksmaxing, quantum superchemistry and teleology will not be added to BOTB, since nobody will understand it and few will put in the effort to understand it, making the thread useless even if the information in it is great.

Spoiler: Originality

Originality:

• The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.

This is because we value originality, effort and expertise. Generating threads with language models doesn't really demonstrate that the user actually is knowledgeable in a subject. Language models may either not be experts on these subjects, or the user may be a poor prompt engineer, causing these language models to give shallow level information on the topic, and can possibly give misinformation, hard to understand explanations, too simple and incomprehensive explanations, or demonstrate a bad understanding of the topic or audience. People who use these tools to write their threads may not realize this since they don't know better, therefore hindering the quality of the thread. As with threads that are mostly copypasta/information from external sources, this can't qualify since that user didn't actually write a majority of the thread, therefore, it isn't original. Again, we want the author to know what they're talking about and an author that is using mostly external, non-original information is less likely to know what they are talking about.

You can always copy and paste the rubric in GPT to ask it if the thread fits the criteria or ask a moderator or someone you trust to evaluate your draft for you in the PMs.

Want to know how to write BOTB-Worthy threads? Click the thread below.

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...

looksmax.org

Notes:

1. Moderators, especially me can fix minor flaws for you, like bad titles and typos, or flaws that are easy to fix. Things like reformatting an entire thread usually won't happen unless the thread is extremely good.
2. Compilations of good and valuable threads can qualify for BOTB. Just tag me and I'll analyze it. The qualification for compilations don't follow the above rules.
3. Reasons for rejections are not limited to these criteria. In very rare cases, I do reject threads due to things not in the rubric, and update this thread accordingly. For example, as of October 9th, 2023, I recently added the Originality criteria since I saw a thread I couldn't promote to BOTB due to it being mostly generated by A.I.

To get your thread rejected from going to the Best of the Best section, here's what you need to do.

• Reactions: The thread has less than 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance: The thread isn't about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. The thread doesn't demonstrate what it promises.
• Effort: The thread is short, or not high-effort, below 500 words.
• Evidence: The thread doesn't present valid information, not information-dense, doesn't have good reasoning, and/or has no evidence.
• Presentation: The thread is hard to read and follow, is hard to understand, isn't organized, isn't coherent, has poor formatting, bad title (ex. "guide on eyes", "HOW TO GET WOMEN ONLINE GTFIH EVERYONE + PICS + I SLAYED A STACY LOL")
• Originality: Thread is written entirely or mostly by A.I. or copypasta from another source.

Examples of qualifiable threads

The Nose: Importance of the nasal base and how to find the correct nasal surgery for your nose

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE NOSE IN FACIAL AESTHETICS The nose can be a deciding factor on whether an individual is deemed attractive or not, a large proportion of this forum will claim that a good nose is only a necessity to facial aesthetics and is not a critical aspect when analysing the face...

looksmax.org

by @coispet

Male Archetypes Spectrum

Introduction There is a lot of talk around here about prettyboys, mascmaxxers, ogres and the like. It becomes exceedingly complex to cleanly understand what these archetypes refer to, as posters often use different words to refer to the same concepts, or have twisted views of what an archetype...

looksmax.org

by @BucketCrab

The Sleepmaxxing Playbook: understand why and how to have the best deep night rest possible with this value-packed sleep megaguide

What if I told you... that scientists have discovered a brand new revolutionary pill, that when taken daily... increases your lifespan by 10 years, makes your face more attractive, increases IQ, lowers depression and anxiety, enhances memory by 20%, increases testosterone production by 15%...

looksmax.org

by @garoupilled_

BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide - Understanding Hair & How To Get Beautiful Hair As Quick As Possible.

“...hair is architecture with a human element.” – Vidal Sassoon BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide the fastest way to understand hair, and how to make it beautiful Introduction This guide is written with the explicit aim to educate people about hair care in order to achieve beautiful hair as...

looksmax.org

by @BucketCrab

How I Achieved A Chad Physique Naturally (My Detailed Exercise Routine)

I. Overview of the routine II. Monday: Upper body 1 Seated cable rows They are as good at building up the thickness of the back as weighted pull ups at widening it. Sets: 4 Reps: 8-12 https://www.strengthlog.com/cable-wide-grip-seated-row/ Shoulders Shoulder press A constantly rotate...

looksmax.org

by @Prettyboy

BOTB LIVER HEALTHMAXXING GUIDE

inb4 dnrd n reading without reacting, just skip to end conclusion n leave ur react :feelswhat: may also be of interest to heightmaxxers @Osie another rlly good thread https://looksmax.org/threads/underrated-factor-of-high-igf-1-levels-liver-function.842345/unread thread theme song Liver...

looksmax.org

by @the MOUSE

Again, if you want to qualify for BOTB, please read this.

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...

looksmax.org

If you have any questions, please message me or a moderator by heading to my profile and pressing "Start Conversation".

Once your thread meets these qualifications...

1. Submit: Once your thread meets these qualifications, submit the link below or notify one of the moderators (and link the thread(s), please).
2. Evaluation: One of the moderators will carefully review your submission.
3. Notification: If your thread is selected, we will notify you and promote it to the "Best of the Best" section.

Note: This thread will be edited from time to time by the moderators as the website's environment changes.
Tagging all moderators: @TRUE_CEL @enchanted_elixir @Preston @Lmao @Kingkellz @Gargantuan @NegativeNorwood @StoicSperg @tyronelite @AscendingHero @Niklaus Mikaelson @5ft1 @Lorsss @Alexanderr @Master

Spoiler: Tagging Users

@Lygodactylus @8PSLcel @Br0sk1 @PrinceLuenLeoncur Chadeep@Chadeep @LMSMaxxer @Xangsane @mulattomaxxer @RottenSperg @StrangerDanger @Predeterminism @KING REIDYZ @AscendingHero @Prettyboy @SupremeSubhuman @Mogpogs @Piratecel @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Preoximerianas @tyronelite @FailedNormieManlet @Lars @Korea @bogii @StreegeReturn @Biggdink @eren1 @Reckless Turtle @Broly Banderas @House Lannister @WannabeJock @Racky @Erik-Jón @heightface @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Clark69 @ilovelamp08 @St.TikTokcel
@Anstrum95 @TeenAscender @loox @justadude @vaseqmoherad @astatine @Amnesia @Sigmamale @anya @dimorphism @Assyrian_Warrior @FreakkForLife @ThousandCuts @5footsix56 @Alexanderr @HQNPmaxxing @currylightskin @BasedPsychiatrist @´´´´´´´´ @ALP @HOLYFUARK @Chadpreetmaybe @BeenLMSsinceMSN @Kroker @oldcelloser @Tinydragon98 @Hiraeth @ascension! @HimmyButler @latincell95 @niko @latino_ @capybara @LiteralCaucasian @crimclown63 @Zures @Unsh @reptiles @pneumocystosis @Moggie

@Nation @RIPPED IRL @Saturn @Patient A @dieavirgin @SteveRogers @fogdart @Clark69 @vaninskybird @Racky @Beastimmung @Prince charming @NegativeNorwood @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @fjor2096 @callisto @Corleone @BasedPsychiatrist @heightface @currylightskin @HOLYFUARK @Anstrum95 @Moggedbyevery1 @StepbroMo @gamma2 @Unsh @Daniel Plainview @teemowhite @luljankybo @bogii @5ft1 @Chadpreetmaybe @latino_ @tesseract @FrameMogger @edward999 @Hiraeth @bleksandre @op463 @NFA PB @HerpDerpson @THEMOGGER @Bezel @norwegiancel @Moggie @ascension! @Frozqen @saulgoodman @crimclown63 @BigBundaSlapper @killaeast @Aypo129 @tbh af @jfbjfb @brea @dimorphism @CT03 @throwaway12902 @Tuxiio @Van @Sprinkles @futuregigamogger @julianchicago @HimmyButler @LiteralCaucasian @gribsufer1 @notrealdanish @Never Give Up! @Euclidious @Sarx @jim @garoupilled_ @5footsix56

 

[Enfant terrible]

no life investing so much in this forum

 

[Deleted member 15854]

Dear forum members,

As a newly appointed moderator of this website, my primary objective is to identify outstanding threads and give justice to the rotting gems on the looksmaxing section, and promote them to the "Best of the Best" section. Having assumed my role just a few hours ago, I am eager to fulfill my promise right away.

To get your thread appointed to the Best of the Best section, first, make sure you have all of these fundamental requirements met.

• Reactions: The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance: The thread must focus on looksmaxing, blackpill, self-improvement, or other related topics.
• Effort: The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort, research, and thoughtfulness.
• Evidence: The thread must be substantiated by credible evidence, facts, sound logic, and/or genuine examples.
• Presentation: The thread must be titled, written, and formatted to a satisfactory standard.

Bonuses:

• Innovation: Introduces a fresh perspective, novel approach, or unique topic
• Organization: Includes a table of contents or clear outline for easy navigation
• Formatting: Features exceptional formatting for readability and aesthetic appeal
• Structure: Exhibits a clear structure, including an introduction, body, and conclusion
• Title: Is accurately and appropriately titled, reflecting the content and tone of the thread
• Necessity: A topic that the forum needed, but hasn't been covered on the forum yet

Examples of qualifiable threads

Symmetry Looksmaxxing Guide: The key to attractive success

Symmetry Looksmaxxing Guide: The key to attractive success by @ascension! Table Of Contents: Introduction Facial Symmetry The Importance of a Good Nutrition Correct Symmetry How To Enhance Symmetry Introduction The first thing you should know is that you can improve your facial symmetry...

looksmax.org

by @ascension!

Heightmaxing Guide: The Best Guide On How To Get Taller On The Internet (Revamped)

Heightmaxing Guide: The Best Guide On How To Get Taller On The Internet (Remastered) by @enchanted_elixir Table Of Contents Introduction Human Growth Hormone Protein Aromatase Inhibitors IGF-1 Alternate Methods Glucosamine & Chondroitin Stack (with links and dosages) Conclusion Introduction...

looksmax.org

by @enchanted_elixir

Pro Social Drugs: A guide to using substances to climb the social ladder

Disclaimer In no way am I claiming to have a complete knowledge of the subject, nor have I tried all of the substances listed. I am however, a loser who reads studies and likes to write research papers. I didn't proof read this, so it may be a little choppy at times. Please use cation when...

looksmax.org

by @TeenagePharmacy

Once your thread meets these qualifications...

1. Submit: Once your thread meets these qualifications, submit the link below or notify one of the moderators (and link the thread(s), please).
2. Evaluation: One of the moderators will carefully review your submission.
3. Notification: If your thread is selected, we will notify you and promote it to the "Best of the Best" section.

Note: This thread will be edited from time to time by the moderators as the website's environment changes.
Tagging all moderators: @TRUE_CEL @enchanted_elixir @Preston @Lmao @Kingkellz @Gargantuan @NegativeNorwood @StoicSperg @tyronelite @AscendingHero @Niklaus Mikaelson @5ft1 @Lorsss @Alexanderr @Master

Spoiler: Tagging Users

@Lygodactylus @8PSLcel @Br0sk1 @PrinceLuenLeoncur Chadeep@Chadeep @LMSMaxxer @Xangsane @mulattomaxxer @RottenSperg @StrangerDanger @Predeterminism @KING REIDYZ @AscendingHero @Prettyboy @SupremeSubhuman @Mogpogs @Piratecel @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Preoximerianas @tyronelite @FailedNormieManlet @Lars @Korea @bogii @StreegeReturn @Biggdink @eren1 @Reckless Turtle @Broly Banderas @House Lannister @WannabeJock @Racky @Erik-Jón @heightface @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Clark69 @ilovelamp08 @St.TikTokcel
@Anstrum95 @TeenAscender @loox @justadude @vaseqmoherad @astatine @Amnesia @Sigmamale @anya @dimorphism @Assyrian_Warrior @FreakkForLife @ThousandCuts @5footsix56 @Alexanderr @HQNPmaxxing @currylightskin @BasedPsychiatrist @´´´´´´´´ @ALP @HOLYFUARK @Chadpreetmaybe @BeenLMSsinceMSN @Kroker @oldcelloser @Tinydragon98 @Hiraeth @ascension! @HimmyButler @latincell95 @Niko @latino_ @capybara @LiteralCaucasian @crimclown63 @Zures @Unsh @reptiles @pneumocystosis @Moggie

@Nation @RIPPED IRL @Saturn @Patient A @dieavirgin @SteveRogers @fogdart @Clark69 @vaninskybird @Racky @Beastimmung @Prince charming @NegativeNorwood @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @fjor2096 @callisto @Corleone @BasedPsychiatrist @heightface @currylightskin @HOLYFUARK @Anstrum95 @Moggedbyevery1 @StepbroMo @gamma2 @Unsh @Daniel Plainview @teemowhite @luljankybo @bogii @5ft1 @Chadpreetmaybe @latino_ @tesseract @FrameMogger @edward999 @Hiraeth @bleksandre @op463 @NFA PB @HerpDerpson @THEMOGGER @Bezel @norwegiancel @Moggie @ascension! @Frozqen @saulgoodman @crimclown63 @BigBundaSlapper @killaeast @Aypo129 @tbh af @jfbjfb @brea @dimorphism @CT03 @throwaway12902 @Tuxiio @Van @Sprinkles @futuregigamogger @julianchicago @HimmyButler @LiteralCaucasian @gribsufer1 @notrealdanish @Never Give Up! @Euclidious @Sarx @Jim @garoupilled_ @5footsix56

dnrd add this to botb

ultimate heightmax guide BOTB

Chondroinduction in vascular tissue can occur without injury: Overexpression of transforming growth factor beta1 in arterial endothelium causes hyperplasia, apoptosis, and cartilaginous metaplasia. "Uninjured rat arteries transduced with an adenoviral vector expressing an active form of...

looksmax.org

my guide i wrote as notes earlier on the ray peat diet

buckle up buddy goyos, youre in for a ride of this amazing guide i have wrote! listen to this whilst reading for full immersion and experience or, you could listen to this Introduction: There seems to be so much confusion around and a lack of organization in the body of Dr. Ray Peat’s work...

looksmax.org

ultimate framemaxxing guide botb pls

Introduction: Frame, referring to the skeletal structure and muscle mass, is crucial for aesthetics and plays a central role in both bodybuilding and real world attractiveness (accounting for 70% of bodily attractiveness.) The centerpoints of a ‘good’ frame are clavicle width/shoulder mass...

looksmax.org

 

[enchanted_elixir]

dnrd add this to botb

ultimate heightmax guide BOTB

Chondroinduction in vascular tissue can occur without injury: Overexpression of transforming growth factor beta1 in arterial endothelium causes hyperplasia, apoptosis, and cartilaginous metaplasia. "Uninjured rat arteries transduced with an adenoviral vector expressing an active form of...

looksmax.org

my guide i wrote as notes earlier on the ray peat diet

buckle up buddy goyos, youre in for a ride of this amazing guide i have wrote! listen to this whilst reading for full immersion and experience or, you could listen to this Introduction: There seems to be so much confusion around and a lack of organization in the body of Dr. Ray Peat’s work...

looksmax.org

ultimate framemaxxing guide botb pls

Introduction: Frame, referring to the skeletal structure and muscle mass, is crucial for aesthetics and plays a central role in both bodybuilding and real world attractiveness (accounting for 70% of bodily attractiveness.) The centerpoints of a ‘good’ frame are clavicle width/shoulder mass...

looksmax.org

You better read it, because there are criteria you must meet.

 

[Sprinkles]

congratulations!

most underrated user here ngl

 

[Deleted member 15854]

You better read it, because there are criteria you must meet.

i think min 20 reactions is gay. ive never a made a thread above that despite some good ones. niggas barely react nowadays and also forum status pill. greycels will post good shit that goes unnoticed, also disincentive to provide botb content if threshhold is this hard to attain

 

[Michael Myers]

Didn’t read.

 

[Deleted member 17531]

who gave cuh moddddd

 

[Michael Myers]

Jokes aside, I will read it in a bit.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

i think min 20 reactions is gay. ive never a made a thread above that despite some good ones. niggas barely react nowadays and also forum status pill. greycels will post good shit that goes unnoticed, also disincentive to provide botb content if threshhold is this hard to attain

What does everyone else think?

 

[enchanted_elixir]

who gave cuh moddddd

The admin

 

[Michael Myers]

What does everyone else think?

I read it minutes ago. Nice thread. Chuckled at the humble brag when you used your own thread as a good example.

 

[Deleted member 15854]

who gave cuh moddddd

hes good candidate imo tbh ngl, pre good user whos contributed well

 

[enchanted_elixir]

I read it minutes ago. Nice thread. Chuckled at the humble brag when you used your own thread as a good example.

lol

 

[enchanted_elixir]

who gave cuh moddddd

Is that a bad idea?

 

[Deleted member 17531]

Is that a bad idea?

nah it's fine
my comment was a tiktok joke

 

[enchanted_elixir]

nah it's fine
my comment was a tiktok joke

"tiktok joke" lol.
Can't believe that was from tiktok

 

[tyronelite]

Congrats

I’m amazed we still have users putting this much effort in this forum lol

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Congrats

I’m amazed we still have users putting this much effort in this forum lol

I don't know many users who do high effort stuff tbh

 

[Acne Victim]

Even though I love to mock you and destroy your posts, you are probably the best and most dedicated user here. Hope you can improve this place

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Even though I love to mock you and destroy your posts, you are probably the best and most dedicated user here. Hope you can improve this place

Thanks!

 

[Deleted member 25938]

Would you be open to considering my Moggernese hype thread as BOTB-worthy?

The thread in question:

This forum needs its own language. We're gonna create it [EVERYONE GTFIH]

inb4 "dnrd," "not a word," "not a pixel," etc. How it all started One day, I was rotting on offtopic when I came across this thread: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-new-language-work-in-progress.663106/ And a brilliant thought came to my mind: WHAT IF WE MADE OUR OWN LANGUAGE SO THAT WE CAN...

looksmax.org

The only two criteria that would challenge such a consideration/nomination would be Relevance and Evidence. However, I think potential bonus points for Innovation can be warranted.

Looking at Relevance, I can argue Moggernese can be deemed a significant effort to enhance/ameliorate the .org subculture as well as providing a safeguard/plan B for when this site and PSL lingo become mainstream and infiltrated by normies, and as a byproduct, weeding out the dumb normies who would otherwise pollute .org further. If we also want to look at another interpretation of relevance, I've made consequent threads elaborate and improving on the language, which would help cement its presence from obscurity.

Justifying Evidence would be difficult just considering the nature of the topic itself, but with regards to the language itself, I definitely include a cohesive list of linguistic rules and conventions, which would ensure the functional integrity of Moggernese. Furthermore, I also made the post interactive, encouraging users to vote on the poll related as well as making suggestions for the input of lexicon and changing of any rules.

I appreciate your consideration.

I'm anticipating some jfl's from this post.

 

[Deleted member 16515]

can I submit old threads made by other users if I find it helpful and feel like they deserve BOTB?

 

[pneumocystosis]

i fucking love you man, happy to see you’ve been given the authority and recognition you absolutely deserve!

 

[ripcordgod1]

someone should make all my threads botb as an april fools joke

 

[PURE ARYAN GENETICS]

now that you're a mod how should we avoid your tags seeing that the ignore function no longer works?

 

[Master]

Who gave you mod?

 

[Patient A]

Who gave you mod?

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Would you be open to considering my Moggernese hype thread as BOTB-worthy?

The thread in question:

This forum needs its own language. We're gonna create it [EVERYONE GTFIH]

inb4 "dnrd," "not a word," "not a pixel," etc. How it all started One day, I was rotting on offtopic when I came across this thread: https://looksmax.org/threads/my-new-language-work-in-progress.663106/ And a brilliant thought came to my mind: WHAT IF WE MADE OUR OWN LANGUAGE SO THAT WE CAN...

looksmax.org

The only two criteria that would challenge such a consideration/nomination would be Relevance and Evidence. However, I think potential bonus points for Innovation can be warranted.

Looking at Relevance, I can argue Moggernese can be deemed a significant effort to enhance/ameliorate the .org subculture as well as providing a safeguard/plan B for when this site and PSL lingo become mainstream and infiltrated by normies, and as a byproduct, weeding out the dumb normies who would otherwise pollute .org further. If we also want to look at another interpretation of relevance, I've made consequent threads elaborate and improving on the language, which would help cement its presence from obscurity.

Justifying Evidence would be difficult just considering the nature of the topic itself, but with regards to the language itself, I definitely include a cohesive list of linguistic rules and conventions, which would ensure the functional integrity of Moggernese. Furthermore, I also made the post interactive, encouraging users to vote on the poll related as well as making suggestions for the input of lexicon and changing of any rules.

I appreciate your consideration.

I'm anticipating some jfl's from this post.

It's not related to looksmaxing, blackpill or self-improvement so it's not eligible for nomination.
Just letting you know buddy, the first 5 criteria are musts. You must meet all of them. The bonuses are optional and welcomed.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

can I submit old threads made by other users if I find it helpful and feel like they deserve BOTB?

Yes.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

i fucking love you man, happy to see you’ve been given the authority and recognition you absolutely deserve!

Thanks s much @pneumocystosis
Do you have any threads you'd like to nominate?

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Who gave you mod?

One of the admins.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

now that you're a mod how should we avoid your tags seeing that the ignore function no longer works?

Just tell me that you'd like to be removed from my tag list and I will do so.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

@Prettyboy @Hiraeth any threads you have that you'd like to nominate?

 

[Deleted member 25938]

It's not related to looksmaxing, blackpill or self-improvement so it's not eligible for nomination.
Just letting you know buddy, the first 5 criteria are musts. You must meet all of them. The bonuses are optional and welcomed.

Brutal, I'm being cocklobked from launching a cultural revolution

 

[futuregigamogger]

Is that a bad idea?

no.
good user

 

[Sondern]

@Prettyboy @Hiraeth any threads you have that you'd like to nominate?

Yo that’s crazy, yeah I think I have a bunch of them, might have to gatekeep them if I can even find the list I’ll send it over.

 

[Sondern]

Yo that’s crazy, yeah I think I have a bunch of them, might have to gatekeep them if I can even find the list I’ll send it over.

Could have gotten this thread in the section but I’m a low repcel https://looksmax.org/threads/how-to...the-best-guide-on-the-entire-internet.601524/

 

[Psychophilly]

my lucid dream guide

 

[Psychophilly]

my lucid dream guide

 

[Psychophilly]

https://looksmax.org/threads/ultimate-guide-for-lucid-dreaming-part-1.610603/

 

[Alexanderr]

Just-find-an-old-high-effort-thread-and-have-ChatGPT-rewrite-it-to-publish-it-as-if-it-was-yours-to-farm-reacts-theory?

 

[Deleted member 25938]

It's not related to looksmaxing, blackpill or self-improvement so it's not eligible for nomination.
Just letting you know buddy, the first 5 criteria are musts. You must meet all of them. The bonuses are optional and welcomed.

Rip. But don't worry, I'm gonna drop a possibly BOTB-worthy thread in the moneymaking/success section

 

[Deleted member 21044]

Add this. Theres 0 whitepill in botb.

EPIGENETICS - The Nature Of Ugliness (HIGH IQ THREAD)

"There are many ways a human can be ugly but only one way he can be beautiful." The phenomenon of beauty is the core of the looksmaxxing doctrine, however most struggle to define and understand it. What is beauty? Beauty is an indicator of potential for evolutionary success. Simply put, beauty...

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 25938]

Consider this, I haven't seen many good threads on blackpill in higher education (and a lot of us here are young too)

Some Blackpills of the U.S. College System + Tips To Get Into A Top U.S. College [STUDYCELS & HIGHSCHOOLCELS GTFIH]

Introduction The U.S. college admissions system is drastically different from that of most (if not all) other countries in the world. Whereas the admissions systems of countries such as the UK, Germany, and South Korea function meritocratically, only considering grades and/or exams, the...

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 26678]

add this, here i highlighted the main factors that comprise beauty @enchanted_elixir

Here Are The Factors Are That Make Up Beauty

Proportions when it comes to aesthetics there are established canons and ratios of the face and body that have been proven through science to be ideal these ideal proportions appear to be hereditary because infants have been shown to express preference for attractive faces as opposed to...

looksmax.org

i also provide an explanation for facial harmony and facial averageness, there isn’t really anything on botb about those topics

 

[Marsiere214]

no life investing so much in this forum

don't forget, hes gonna do all of that for free.

 

[BrendioEEE]

This dude did not exist before I looked at this thread. I manifested him into reality.

 

[NegativeNorwood]

IMO this one has to be on BOTB:

Temporal peaks are crucial for aesthetics and often completely ignored

https://brunoferreira.com/blog/behindagreathairline "Temporal peaks usually can make a hairline look much lower or higher than it actually is, just by their positioning - more frontal (shortening the distance between each contralateral peak) or more posterior (increasing their distance). We can...

looksmax.org

This didn't start as strong, but progressed in a very interesting direction and contains plenty of relevant info not found anywhere else about palate expansion:

12 tooth smile is an unmoggable trait. Swallow the smilepill.

Literally the first thing normies notice. Even in Photofeeler, there's always someone that comments, irrespectibly of how good looking you are: "would prefer if you were smiling". This is what a winner smile looks like: Notice how successful, approachable, friendly and confident he looks at...

looksmax.org

 

[enchanted_elixir]

IMO this one has to be on BOTB:

Temporal peaks are crucial for aesthetics and often completely ignored

https://brunoferreira.com/blog/behindagreathairline "Temporal peaks usually can make a hairline look much lower or higher than it actually is, just by their positioning - more frontal (shortening the distance between each contralateral peak) or more posterior (increasing their distance). We can...

looksmax.org

This didn't start as strong, but progressed in a very interesting direction and contains plenty of relevant info not found anywhere else about palate expansion:

12 tooth smile is an unmoggable trait. Swallow the smilepill.

Literally the first thing normies notice. Even in Photofeeler, there's always someone that comments, irrespectibly of how good looking you are: "would prefer if you were smiling". This is what a winner smile looks like: Notice how successful, approachable, friendly and confident he looks at...

looksmax.org

You're a mod as well, you can add them.