Best of the Best Submissions & Eligibility Rubric Thread

[enchanted_elixir]

IMO this one has to be on BOTB:

Temporal peaks are crucial for aesthetics and often completely ignored

https://brunoferreira.com/blog/behindagreathairline "Temporal peaks usually can make a hairline look much lower or higher than it actually is, just by their positioning - more frontal (shortening the distance between each contralateral peak) or more posterior (increasing their distance). We can...

looksmax.org

This didn't start as strong, but progressed in a very interesting direction and contains plenty of relevant info not found anywhere else about palate expansion:

12 tooth smile is an unmoggable trait. Swallow the smilepill.

Literally the first thing normies notice. Even in Photofeeler, there's always someone that comments, irrespectibly of how good looking you are: "would prefer if you were smiling". This is what a winner smile looks like: Notice how successful, approachable, friendly and confident he looks at...

looksmax.org

Second one is too short, you can assess the other one according to the rubric

 

[NegativeNorwood]

You're a mod as well, you can add them.

No I'm not currently, landed a full time job and had to quit.

 

[Whatashame]

did u excluded any thread that was previously in the botb section?? @enchanted_elixir

Dear forum members,

As a newly appointed moderator of this website, my primary objective is to identify outstanding threads and give justice to the rotting gems on the looksmaxing section, and promote them to the "Best of the Best" section. Having assumed my role just a few hours ago, I am eager to fulfill my promise right away.

To get your thread appointed to the Best of the Best section, first, make sure you have all of these fundamental requirements met.

• Reactions: The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance: The thread must be an informational thread on looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. It should either be educational information (ex. a thread explaining why pickup is flawed, a great explanation of what a phenotype is, the hierarchy of aesthetics), or a guide. The thread demonstrates what it promises.
• Effort: The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort, research, and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
• Evidence: The thread must be substantiated by credible evidence, facts, sound logic, and/or genuine examples.
• Presentation: The thread must be titled, written, structured, and formatted to a satisfactory standard. The title must be clear and not entirely informal, there should be structure to the thread (includes a table of contents, clear outline, or section titles for the thread), and the thread should be readable, coherent, and written in such a way that it's easy to follow and understand.

To get your thread rejected from going to the Best of the Best section, here's what you need to do.

• Reactions: The thread has less than 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance: The thread isn't about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. The thread doesn't demonstrate what it promises.
• Effort: The thread is short, below 500 words.
• Evidence: The thread doesn't present valid information, doesn't have good logic, is hard to understand, and/or has no evidence.
• Presentation: The thread is hard to read and follow, has no table of contents or headers, isn't coherent, has poor formatting, bad title (ex. HOW TO GET WOMEN ONLINE GTFIH EVERYONE + PICS + I SLAYED A STACY LOL)

Examples of qualifiable threads

Symmetry Looksmaxxing Guide: The key to attractive success

Symmetry Looksmaxxing Guide: The key to attractive success by @ascension! Table Of Contents: Introduction Facial Symmetry The Importance of a Good Nutrition Correct Symmetry How To Enhance Symmetry Introduction The first thing you should know is that you can improve your facial symmetry...

looksmax.org

by @ascension!

The Hierarchy Of Aesthetics (A Must-Read!)

The Hierarchy Of Aesthetics by @enchanted_elixir November 28th, 2022 Table Of Contents Introduction 🔴Hard Features 🟡Soft Features 🟢Coloring 🔵Decoration 🟣Anti-Aging Tags Introduction In the pursuit to better understand human aesthetics, I've formulated what I believe to be a universal...

looksmax.org

by @enchanted_elixir

How I Achieved A Chad Physique Naturally (My Detailed Exercise Routine)

I. Overview of the routine II. Monday: Upper body 1 Seated cable rows They are as good at building up the thickness of the back as weighted pull ups at widening it. Sets: 4 Reps: 8-12 https://www.strengthlog.com/cable-wide-grip-seated-row/ Shoulders Shoulder press A constantly rotate...

looksmax.org

by @Prettyboy

Once your thread meets these qualifications...

1. Submit: Once your thread meets these qualifications, submit the link below or notify one of the moderators (and link the thread(s), please).
2. Evaluation: One of the moderators will carefully review your submission.
3. Notification: If your thread is selected, we will notify you and promote it to the "Best of the Best" section.

Note: This thread will be edited from time to time by the moderators as the website's environment changes.
Tagging all moderators: @TRUE_CEL @enchanted_elixir @Preston @Lmao @Kingkellz @Gargantuan @NegativeNorwood @StoicSperg @tyronelite @AscendingHero @Niklaus Mikaelson @5ft1 @Lorsss @Alexanderr @Master

Spoiler: Tagging Users

@Lygodactylus @8PSLcel @Br0sk1 @PrinceLuenLeoncur Chadeep@Chadeep @LMSMaxxer @Xangsane @mulattomaxxer @RottenSperg @StrangerDanger @Predeterminism @KING REIDYZ @AscendingHero @Prettyboy @SupremeSubhuman @Mogpogs @Piratecel @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Preoximerianas @tyronelite @FailedNormieManlet @Lars @Korea @bogii @StreegeReturn @Biggdink @eren1 @Reckless Turtle @Broly Banderas @House Lannister @WannabeJock @Racky @Erik-Jón @heightface @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Clark69 @ilovelamp08 @St.TikTokcel
@Anstrum95 @TeenAscender @loox @justadude @vaseqmoherad @astatine @Amnesia @Sigmamale @anya @dimorphism @Assyrian_Warrior @FreakkForLife @ThousandCuts @5footsix56 @Alexanderr @HQNPmaxxing @currylightskin @BasedPsychiatrist @´´´´´´´´ @ALP @HOLYFUARK @Chadpreetmaybe @BeenLMSsinceMSN @Kroker @oldcelloser @Tinydragon98 @Hiraeth @ascension! @HimmyButler @latincell95 @Niko @latino_ @capybara @LiteralCaucasian @crimclown63 @Zures @Unsh @reptiles @pneumocystosis @Moggie

@Nation @RIPPED IRL @Saturn @Patient A @dieavirgin @SteveRogers @fogdart @Clark69 @vaninskybird @Racky @Beastimmung @Prince charming @NegativeNorwood @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @fjor2096 @callisto @Corleone @BasedPsychiatrist @heightface @currylightskin @HOLYFUARK @Anstrum95 @Moggedbyevery1 @StepbroMo @gamma2 @Unsh @Daniel Plainview @teemowhite @luljankybo @bogii @5ft1 @Chadpreetmaybe @latino_ @tesseract @FrameMogger @edward999 @Hiraeth @bleksandre @op463 @NFA PB @HerpDerpson @THEMOGGER @Bezel @norwegiancel @Moggie @ascension! @Frozqen @saulgoodman @crimclown63 @BigBundaSlapper @killaeast @Aypo129 @tbh af @jfbjfb @brea @dimorphism @CT03 @throwaway12902 @Tuxiio @Van @Sprinkles @futuregigamogger @julianchicago @HimmyButler @LiteralCaucasian @gribsufer1 @notrealdanish @Never Give Up! @Euclidious @Sarx @Jim @garoupilled_ @5footsix56

 

[enchanted_elixir]

did u excluded any thread that was previously in the botb section?? @enchanted_elixir

No, not yet

 

[Deleted member 4106]

@enchanted_elixir

How to Find a Faithful Girlfriend, Based on Personality Traits

Extraversion This trait is related to positive affect, for example happiness, and self-steem, and is associated with sociability, dominance, and active or energetic traits. Sounds great, right? However, those high in extraversion have also been found to have lower rates of relationship...

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 16673]

I PUT ON 12KG OF MUSCLE IN 6 WEEKS - AN INTRO TO RAD-140

I PUT ON 12KG OF MUSCLE IN A MONTH AND A HALF These were not newbie gains; I had started training 3 months prior and I only put on 2kg of muscle. Pathetic. :feelswhy: I was eating just above maintenance most weeks and cutting back to 1600kcals/day sometimes to debloat because "muh jb appeal"...

looksmax.org

What should be changed/removed/added to this thread? Or is it pointless cus it’s too far gone and autistic?

@enchanted_elixir

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Mfs out here grading threads

 

[sp3ll]

SP3LLING

introducing "sp3lling", my own personal looksmaxxing technique.

I'm gonna get called retard by the majority replying to this post but. my personal posturemaxxing i guess What sp3lling essentially is, is essentially instead of doing stupid chin tuck exercises, always chin tucking(except when laying in bed etc.) as much as you can without it looking weird...

looksmax.org

 

[sp3ll]

AOWing / wellbeing-buddhistmaxx

https://looksmax.org/threads/sp3lls-2nd-looksmax-aowing-wellbeingmaxxing.711349/

 

[Deleted member 27148]

AOWing / wellbeing-buddhistmaxx

https://looksmax.org/threads/sp3lls-2nd-looksmax-aowing-wellbeingmaxxing.711349/

VOuch

 

[sp3ll]

Newing (Back of palate mewing)

SP3LL's third looksmax: Newing

This guide is intended for people already mewing, you can easily find information online how to mew if you don't know how to, make sure to cross-reference so you don't accidentally find someone teaching you the wrong way to mew and sticking with that thinking it's right. A huge mistake. If you...

looksmax.org

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Newing (Back of palate mewing)

SP3LL's third looksmax: Newing

This guide is intended for people already mewing, you can easily find information online how to mew if you don't know how to, make sure to cross-reference so you don't accidentally find someone teaching you the wrong way to mew and sticking with that thinking it's right. A huge mistake. If you...

looksmax.org

You need 20 reacts for eligibility

 

[AngryShortMale]

Why Height Is Everything

I will prefix this post by saying that it's over and it never begin. WIth that out of the way, let's start. WHY HEIGHT IS EVERYTHING, BY YOUNGMAXXING. Table of Contents 1st, Height Impact in Dating 2nd, Height Impact in Life 3rd, What Women Think of Short Men Let's begin. Height, as...

looksmax.org

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Why Height Is Everything

I will prefix this post by saying that it's over and it never begin. WIth that out of the way, let's start. WHY HEIGHT IS EVERYTHING, BY YOUNGMAXXING. Table of Contents 1st, Height Impact in Dating 2nd, Height Impact in Life 3rd, What Women Think of Short Men Let's begin. Height, as...

looksmax.org

Is that true though..

 

[AngryShortMale]

Is that true though..

It's a high effort post about the effects of being a manlet in dating and society with statistics to back it up.

 

[coispet]

NOSEMAXXING THREAD 👃

SALAM FELLOW NOSECELS LIKE MYSELF Today I will be blessing you with all known and possibly forgotten nose techniques (both softmaxxes and hardmaxxes) you can do at home (or in a hospital under anaesthesia) that will help your pig snout/beak of a nose look and harmonise with the rest of your...

looksmax.org

i know it doesn't have 20 reacts but its not my fault the trolls dont appreciate thoughtfully and well insinuated info

it meets all the other criteria tho

@enchanted_elixir

 

[enchanted_elixir]

NOSEMAXXING THREAD 👃

SALAM FELLOW NOSECELS LIKE MYSELF Today I will be blessing you with all known and possibly forgotten nose techniques (both softmaxxes and hardmaxxes) you can do at home (or in a hospital under anaesthesia) that will help your pig snout/beak of a nose look and harmonise with the rest of your...

looksmax.org

i know it doesn't have 20 reacts but its not my fault the trolls dont appreciate thoughtfully and well insinuated info

it meets all the other criteria tho

@enchanted_elixir

Contact me at 20+ reacts bhai

 

[Samiscool234]

Dear forum members,

As a newly appointed moderator of this website, my primary objective is to identify outstanding threads and give justice to the rotting gems on the looksmaxing section, and promote them to the "Best of the Best" section. Having assumed my role just a few hours ago, I am eager to fulfill my promise right away.

To get your thread appointed to the Best of the Best section, first, make sure you have all of these fundamental requirements met.

• Reactions: The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance: The thread must be an informational thread on looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. It should either be educational information (ex. a thread explaining why pickup is flawed, a great explanation of what a phenotype is, the hierarchy of aesthetics), or a guide. The thread demonstrates what it promises.
• Effort: The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort, research, and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
• Evidence: The thread must be substantiated by credible evidence, facts, sound logic, and/or genuine examples.
• Presentation: The thread must be titled, written, structured, and formatted to a satisfactory standard. The title must be clear and not entirely informal, there should be structure to the thread (includes a table of contents, clear outline/progression, or section titles for the thread), and the thread should be readable, coherent, and written in such a way that it's easy to follow and understand.

To get your thread rejected from going to the Best of the Best section, here's what you need to do.

• Reactions: The thread has less than 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance: The thread isn't about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. The thread doesn't demonstrate what it promises.
• Effort: The thread is short, below 500 words.
• Evidence: The thread doesn't present valid information, doesn't have good logic, is hard to understand, and/or has no evidence.
• Presentation: The thread is hard to read and follow, has no table of contents or headers, isn't coherent, has poor formatting, bad title (ex. HOW TO GET WOMEN ONLINE GTFIH EVERYONE + PICS + I SLAYED A STACY LOL)

Examples of qualifiable threads

Symmetry Looksmaxxing Guide: The key to attractive success

Symmetry Looksmaxxing Guide: The key to attractive success by @ascension! Table Of Contents: Introduction Facial Symmetry The Importance of a Good Nutrition Correct Symmetry How To Enhance Symmetry Introduction The first thing you should know is that you can improve your facial symmetry...

looksmax.org

by @ascension!

The Hierarchy Of Aesthetics (A Must-Read!)

The Hierarchy Of Aesthetics by @enchanted_elixir November 28th, 2022 Table Of Contents Introduction 🔴Hard Features 🟡Soft Features 🟢Coloring 🔵Decoration 🟣Anti-Aging Tags Introduction In the pursuit to better understand human aesthetics, I've formulated what I believe to be a universal...

looksmax.org

by @enchanted_elixir

How I Achieved A Chad Physique Naturally (My Detailed Exercise Routine)

I. Overview of the routine II. Monday: Upper body 1 Seated cable rows They are as good at building up the thickness of the back as weighted pull ups at widening it. Sets: 4 Reps: 8-12 https://www.strengthlog.com/cable-wide-grip-seated-row/ Shoulders Shoulder press A constantly rotate...

looksmax.org

by @Prettyboy

Once your thread meets these qualifications...

1. Submit: Once your thread meets these qualifications, submit the link below or notify one of the moderators (and link the thread(s), please).
2. Evaluation: One of the moderators will carefully review your submission.
3. Notification: If your thread is selected, we will notify you and promote it to the "Best of the Best" section.

Note: This thread will be edited from time to time by the moderators as the website's environment changes.
Tagging all moderators: @TRUE_CEL @enchanted_elixir @Preston @Lmao @Kingkellz @Gargantuan @NegativeNorwood @StoicSperg @tyronelite @AscendingHero @Niklaus Mikaelson @5ft1 @Lorsss @Alexanderr @Master

Spoiler: Tagging Users

@Lygodactylus @8PSLcel @Br0sk1 @PrinceLuenLeoncur Chadeep@Chadeep @LMSMaxxer @Xangsane @mulattomaxxer @RottenSperg @StrangerDanger @Predeterminism @KING REIDYZ @AscendingHero @Prettyboy @SupremeSubhuman @Mogpogs @Piratecel @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Preoximerianas @tyronelite @FailedNormieManlet @Lars @Korea @bogii @StreegeReturn @Biggdink @eren1 @Reckless Turtle @Broly Banderas @House Lannister @WannabeJock @Racky @Erik-Jón @heightface @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Clark69 @ilovelamp08 @St.TikTokcel
@Anstrum95 @TeenAscender @loox @justadude @vaseqmoherad @astatine @Amnesia @Sigmamale @anya @dimorphism @Assyrian_Warrior @FreakkForLife @ThousandCuts @5footsix56 @Alexanderr @HQNPmaxxing @currylightskin @BasedPsychiatrist @´´´´´´´´ @ALP @HOLYFUARK @Chadpreetmaybe @BeenLMSsinceMSN @Kroker @oldcelloser @Tinydragon98 @Hiraeth @ascension! @HimmyButler @latincell95 @Niko @latino_ @capybara @LiteralCaucasian @crimclown63 @Zures @Unsh @reptiles @pneumocystosis @Moggie

@Nation @RIPPED IRL @Saturn @Patient A @dieavirgin @SteveRogers @fogdart @Clark69 @vaninskybird @Racky @Beastimmung @Prince charming @NegativeNorwood @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @fjor2096 @callisto @Corleone @BasedPsychiatrist @heightface @currylightskin @HOLYFUARK @Anstrum95 @Moggedbyevery1 @StepbroMo @gamma2 @Unsh @Daniel Plainview @teemowhite @luljankybo @bogii @5ft1 @Chadpreetmaybe @latino_ @tesseract @FrameMogger @edward999 @Hiraeth @bleksandre @op463 @NFA PB @HerpDerpson @THEMOGGER @Bezel @norwegiancel @Moggie @ascension! @Frozqen @saulgoodman @crimclown63 @BigBundaSlapper @killaeast @Aypo129 @tbh af @jfbjfb @brea @dimorphism @CT03 @throwaway12902 @Tuxiio @Van @Sprinkles @futuregigamogger @julianchicago @HimmyButler @LiteralCaucasian @gribsufer1 @notrealdanish @Never Give Up! @Euclidious @Sarx @Jim @garoupilled_ @5footsix56

bros the lookmaxxing equivalent of a discord mod

 

[garoupilled_]

The Sleepmaxxing Playbook: understand why and how to have the best deep night rest possible with this value-packed sleep megaguide

What if I told you... that scientists have discovered a brand new revolutionary pill, that when taken daily... increases your lifespan by 10 years, makes your face more attractive, increases IQ, lowers depression and anxiety, enhances memory by 20%, increases testosterone production by 15%...

looksmax.org

I think this is eligible

 

[coispet]

@enchanted_elixir my nosemaxxing thread has reached 20+ reacts

 

[enchanted_elixir]

@enchanted_elixir my nosemaxxing thread has reached 20+ reacts

Send it to me for review, just reply with the link

 

[Maalik]

well I for one am very grateful for the knowledge I received from you.
But why are you sinking so much time in the forum? Why not just use your knowledge to improve yourself, leave maybe a few threads and move on in life. Are you legit subhuman?

 

[enchanted_elixir]

well I for one am very grateful for the knowledge I received from you.
But why are you sinking so much time in the forum? Why not just use your knowledge to improve yourself, leave maybe a few threads and move on in life. Are you legit subhuman?

One word. Money. I don't have money.

Also, I care about helping people on this website so even if I did ascend, I'd still spew out everything I know, or learn along the way.
I am motivated to make guides by desire to be of service and guilt that I'm hoarding knowledge for myself.
If I learn a bunch of things about for example, anti-aging and don't write a guide, or don't recreate the guide on it, I don't really feel at ease.

I'm a normie.

 

[John Cracovizk]

well I for one am very grateful for the knowledge I received from you.
But why are you sinking so much time in the forum? Why not just use your knowledge to improve yourself, leave maybe a few threads and move on in life. Are you legit subhuman?

As biopsychosocial beings our reproductive needs go beyond mere physical reproduction (sex ), people who write guides are reproducing a knowledge they believe is useful, a intelectual reproduction... They are doing this in a healthy way, helping others.

Many do this in a unhealthy way with extremism in politics/religion.

 

[John Cracovizk]

One word. Money. I don't have money.

Also, I care about helping people on this website so even if I did ascend, I'd still spew out everything I know, or learn along the way.
I am motivated to make guides by desire to be of service and guilt that I'm hoarding knowledge for myself.
If I learn a bunch of things about for example, anti-aging and don't write a guide, or don't recreate the guide on it, I don't really feel at ease.

I'm a normie.

It's non ironically a way of love, a fraternal love, maybe we can even call it "true love", because what we do is independent of sex and material issues and it transcends space, time and even social interactions...

Writing long guides for people we don't even know, people who will most likely forget about us and probably most won't even say a thank you. That's why I have a high respect for everybody who write high efforts guides in here, being helped by them gave the urge to write something as well to contribute...

It's like a good deeds chain ? Being helped made me feel the urge to help someone else as well, maybe some else will feel the same and he'll feel like contributing as well.

 

[Deleted member 43403]

It's non ironically a way of love, a fraternal love, maybe we can even call it "true love", because what we do is independent of sex and material issues and it transcends space, time and even social interactions...

Writing long guides for people we don't even know, people who will most likely forget about us and probably most won't even say a thank you. That's why I have a high respect for everybody who write high efforts guides in here, being helped by them gave the urge to write something as well to contribute...

It's like a good deeds chain ? Being helped made me feel the urge to help someone else as well, maybe some else will feel the same and he'll feel like contributing as well.

 

[Deleted member 43403]

One word. Money. I don't have money.

Also, I care about helping people on this website so even if I did ascend, I'd still spew out everything I know, or learn along the way.
I am motivated to make guides by desire to be of service and guilt that I'm hoarding knowledge for myself.
If I learn a bunch of things about for example, anti-aging and don't write a guide, or don't recreate the guide on it, I don't really feel at ease.

I'm a normie.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

It's non ironically a way of love, a fraternal love, maybe we can even call it "true love", because what we do is independent of sex and material issues and it transcends space, time and even social interactions...

Writing long guides for people we don't even know, people who will most likely forget about us and probably most won't even say a thank you. That's why I have a high respect for everybody who write high efforts guides in here, being helped by them gave the urge to write something as well to contribute...

It's like a good deeds chain ? Being helped made me feel the urge to help someone else as well, maybe some else will feel the same and he'll feel like contributing as well.

 

[0hMan]

How to judge whether or not you should take advice from forum members

This seems to be a real issue with the influx of members, and the old simple way of name coloring indicating newfaggotry doesn't seem to do the trick anymore, as some newfags have been on here enough to be blue, etc. Anyways, like a plague of locusts, newfags have infiltrated the forum posting...

looksmax.org

Do you think this is BOTB tier? Meets requirements and replies were saying it was.

 

[enchanted_elixir]

How to judge whether or not you should take advice from forum members

This seems to be a real issue with the influx of members, and the old simple way of name coloring indicating newfaggotry doesn't seem to do the trick anymore, as some newfags have been on here enough to be blue, etc. Anyways, like a plague of locusts, newfags have infiltrated the forum posting...

looksmax.org

Do you think this is BOTB tier? Meets requirements and replies were saying it was.

I gave you feedback.

 

[johnrocksaints]

congrats bro

 

[enchanted_elixir]

congrats bro

Thanks!
By the way, I wrote this in March 2023, if you didn't realize it.

 

[DildoFaggins]

THE ULTIMATE VAMPIREMAXXING GUIDE

THE ULTIMATE VAMPIREMAXXING GUIDE The Twilight saga of the mid-2000s put the spotlight on an ancient creature of the night like never before. Vampires, the ultra-sexsymbols known for drinking blood, being immortal and seductive, have always been an object of fascination for many cultures...

looksmax.org

Can I get BOTB? I think it's eligible

 

[Deleted member 19766]

THE ULTIMATE VAMPIREMAXXING GUIDE

THE ULTIMATE VAMPIREMAXXING GUIDE The Twilight saga of the mid-2000s put the spotlight on an ancient creature of the night like never before. Vampires, the ultra-sexsymbols known for drinking blood, being immortal and seductive, have always been an object of fascination for many cultures...

looksmax.org

Can I get BOTB? I think it's eligible

 

[DildoFaggins]

For example, as of October 9th, 2023, I recently added the Originality criteria since I saw a thread I couldn't promote to BOTB due to it being mostly generated by A.I.

Brutal, this was def because of my hydroquinone guide

 

[klimo]

Dear forum members,

As a newly appointed moderator of this website, my primary objective is to identify outstanding threads and give justice to the rotting gems on the looksmaxing section, and promote them to the "Best of the Best" section. Having assumed my role just a few hours ago, I am eager to fulfill my promise right away.

To get your thread appointed to the Best of the Best section, first, make sure you have all of these fundamental requirements met.

• Reactions:
  • The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance:
  • The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
  • It should either be educational and/or instructional.
  • The thread demonstrates what it promises.
  • The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best.
  • The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (common sense) to normies.
• Effort:
  • The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
• Evidence and Quality:
  • The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
  • The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
  • The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
• Presentation:
  • The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
  • The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
  • The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
  • If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious.
  • The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
• Originality:
  • The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.

Here is a deeper explanation of the rubric. Please read if you're interested in getting your thread approved for BOTB.

Spoiler: Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify

Spoiler: Reactions

Reactions:

• The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.

This is very straightforward. Your thread needs to get 20+ positive reacts.

Spoiler: Relevance

Relevance:

• The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.

Pretty self-explanatory. Topics that don't help people looksmax, understand the blackpill, or self-improve don't count.

• It should either be educational and/or instructional.

The thread should teach people something and/or show them how to do something.

• The thread demonstrates what it promises.

If your title is "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", please talk about that. If the thread is 95% about how fantastic plants are, or the thread doesn't really fulfill the promise of showing a "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", it would violate this rule.

• The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best. If there's already another fashion thread, for example in the BOTB section that is superior to your fashion thread, your thread isn't eligible.

If there is a thread already in the BOTB section on the topic you'll discuss, then the thread you will write must be better.

• The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (aka common sense) to most of the target audience. This would basically mean that if the thread contains information that most non-blackpilled normies would know, it wouldn't qualify. Example: A thread solely dedicated to "Why acne destroys your looks" would violate this one.

A thread that mostly or entirely states very obvious things that normies know will not be added, like "Why Acne is a Looksmin", even if it's obvious to users, it still qualifies, as long as it isn't obvious to normies, because remember, we have much more lurkers than users. But if it's obvious to normies, it doesn't qualify.

Spoiler: Effort

Effort:

• The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort, and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.

Very easy. Threads that appear high-effort only. No moderate-effort or low effort threads.

Spoiler: Evidence and Quality

Evidence and Quality:

• The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.

The thread shouldn't demonstrate threads that are empty, narrow, limited, and shallow when it comes to information. If you're going to make a skin guide, explain everything you know and can find online about skin. If you're talking about a more narrow subject, like How to turn straight hair curly, explain everything you know about how to turn straight hair curly! People want information-rich threads, especially when it comes to understanding the topic and solutions (if applicable) to the topic. Threads that are shallow or information-poor, or missing crucial information won't be added.

• The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.

This is the most important one. Especially when it comes to things that are science-based.
Get the facts right. Know what you're talking about. Demonstrate your understanding. Threads explaining things that the author doesn't know about can't be added to BOTB due to possible misinformation or the lack of crucial information. Please, always do as much research as possible and learn as much about the topic as possible. You'd be amazed at how much you don't know. Trust me. I removed almost all of my own BOTB threads in November 2023 for a reason, this reason specifically.

Example: Someone makes a guide on how to grow taller, and they know nothing about how HGH converts to IGF-1 in the liver and the whole thread assumes more HGH = more growth, not knowing that things like protein, minerals aromatase inhibitors, and vitamins also are important. This person's thread can't go to BOTB.

• The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.

When it comes to using scientific evidence. If you took information from a scientific source of information, like a research paper, scientific article, etc. to write your thread, it's vital that you cite your sources. At the absolute minimum, show the link of the source you got your information from. Pasting the link on the thread or on the bottom of the thread in its own section is good. Citations are preferred.

Outside of that, if the thread is on things that are objective, like ways to grow taller, the information on the thread should be as truthful as possible. Threads that have misinformation on objective topics or that don't have good reasoning on topics that might be subjective (like opinions) won't qualify.

You don't have to cite evidence or anything if the topic is susceptible to subjectivity. Fashion is a good example, since fashion is susceptible to subjectivity. Anything that is susceptible to subjectivity will be assessed based on the thread's reasoning and consensus among users and moderators. If you're making a thread recommending people to wear dresses, the reasoning is bad (why would a straight male wear a dress as a looksmax?), and it won't gain consensus, therefore, it won't qualify.

When it comes to conjectural threads (A conjecture is a statement that is believed to be true, but has not yet been proven. Conjectures are based on intuition, observation, or experience, but lack formal proof and are based on incomplete information). The reasoning for the conjecture has to be solid.

For example, if you hypothesize or theorize something is likely to be true, like maybe you think a certain supplement can do something nobody (not even in the scientific community) has thought about in terms of looksmaxing, display good reasoning for it.

Opinions and theories. are touchy, since they can actually be good ones. If it's opinion-based or a theory, please add as many sources, pieces of evidence, or as much solid reasoning to back it up, to avoid the thread look like pure opinion or an uncredible theory or a hypothesis. With opinions and theories, consensus and great reasoning is the key to qualifying, so be extremely persuasive.

Spoiler: Presentation

Presentation:

• The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.

Example Topic: Health, and how it relates to Looksmaxing
Good Title: "Ultimate Health Guide: How To Maximize Your Health & Why Health is ESSENTIAL For Looksmaxing"
Bad Title: "health guide (high effort everyone GTFIH NOW)"

• The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.

If the thread shows that the user can't spell, doesn't understand proper grammar, doesn't know how to punctuate, etc. It can't qualify.

• The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.

Threads that are hard to read, are incoherent, look like run-on sentences, or are poorly formatted or any other major structuring or formatting flaws will not qualify. People don't want to read threads that are hard to read or ugly.

• If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious, like getting rid of acne, explaining to people why it's important is necessary.

Easy to explain. If necessary, the thread must explain to the reader what the topic, and content of the thread is and why it's important. If you're talking about why people should take a supplement, explain why. You must explain the why's and answer questions users may have when reading your thread, unless it's super obvious, like why not eating for a year will kill you.

• The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.

Incomprehensible threads that sound like Shakespeare wrote a PhD paper on the relationship between looksmaxing, quantum superchemistry and teleology will not be added to BOTB, since nobody will understand it and few will put in the effort to understand it, making the thread useless even if the information in it is great.

Spoiler: Originality

Originality:

• The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.

This is because we value originality, effort and expertise. Generating threads with language models doesn't really demonstrate that the user actually is knowledgeable in a subject. Language models may either not be experts on these subjects, or the user may be a poor prompt engineer, causing these language models to give shallow level information on the topic, and can possibly give misinformation, hard to understand explanations, too simple and incomprehensive explanations, or demonstrate a bad understanding of the topic or audience. People who use these tools to write their threads may not realize this since they don't know better, therefore hindering the quality of the thread. As with threads that are mostly copypasta/information from external sources, this can't qualify since that user didn't actually write a majority of the thread, therefore, it isn't original. Again, we want the author to know what they're talking about and an author that is using mostly external, non-original information is less likely to know what they are talking about.

You can always copy and paste the rubric in GPT to ask it if the thread fits the criteria or ask a moderator or someone you trust to evaluate your draft for you in the PMs.

Want to know how to write BOTB-Worthy threads? Click the thread below.

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...

looksmax.org

Notes:

1. Moderators, especially me can fix minor flaws for you, like bad titles and typos, or flaws that are easy to fix. Things like reformatting an entire thread usually won't happen unless the thread is extremely good.
2. Compilations of good and valuable threads can qualify for BOTB. Just tag me and I'll analyze it. The qualification for compilations don't follow the above rules.
3. Reasons for rejections are not limited to these criteria. In very rare cases, I do reject threads due to things not in the rubric, and update this thread accordingly. For example, as of October 9th, 2023, I recently added the Originality criteria since I saw a thread I couldn't promote to BOTB due to it being mostly generated by A.I.

To get your thread rejected from going to the Best of the Best section, here's what you need to do.

• Reactions: The thread has less than 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance: The thread isn't about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. The thread doesn't demonstrate what it promises.
• Effort: The thread is short, or not high-effort, below 500 words.
• Evidence: The thread doesn't present valid information, not information-dense, doesn't have good reasoning, and/or has no evidence.
• Presentation: The thread is hard to read and follow, is hard to understand, isn't organized, isn't coherent, has poor formatting, bad title (ex. "guide on eyes", "HOW TO GET WOMEN ONLINE GTFIH EVERYONE + PICS + I SLAYED A STACY LOL")
• Originality: Thread is written entirely or mostly by A.I. or copypasta from another source.

Examples of qualifiable threads

The Nose: Importance of the nasal base and how to find the correct nasal surgery for your nose

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE NOSE IN FACIAL AESTHETICS The nose can be a deciding factor on whether an individual is deemed attractive or not, a large proportion of this forum will claim that a good nose is only a necessity to facial aesthetics and is not a critical aspect when analysing the face...

looksmax.org

by @coispet

Male Archetypes Spectrum

Introduction There is a lot of talk around here about prettyboys, mascmaxxers, ogres and the like. It becomes exceedingly complex to cleanly understand what these archetypes refer to, as posters often use different words to refer to the same concepts, or have twisted views of what an archetype...

looksmax.org

by @BucketCrab

The Sleepmaxxing Playbook: understand why and how to have the best deep night rest possible with this value-packed sleep megaguide

What if I told you... that scientists have discovered a brand new revolutionary pill, that when taken daily... increases your lifespan by 10 years, makes your face more attractive, increases IQ, lowers depression and anxiety, enhances memory by 20%, increases testosterone production by 15%...

looksmax.org

by @garoupilled_

BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide - Understanding Hair & How To Get Beautiful Hair As Quick As Possible.

“...hair is architecture with a human element.” – Vidal Sassoon BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide the fastest way to understand hair, and how to make it beautiful Introduction This guide is written with the explicit aim to educate people about hair care in order to achieve beautiful hair as...

looksmax.org

by @BucketCrab

How I Achieved A Chad Physique Naturally (My Detailed Exercise Routine)

I. Overview of the routine II. Monday: Upper body 1 Seated cable rows They are as good at building up the thickness of the back as weighted pull ups at widening it. Sets: 4 Reps: 8-12 https://www.strengthlog.com/cable-wide-grip-seated-row/ Shoulders Shoulder press A constantly rotate...

looksmax.org

by @Prettyboy

BOTB LIVER HEALTHMAXXING GUIDE

inb4 dnrd n reading without reacting, just skip to end conclusion n leave ur react :feelswhat: may also be of interest to heightmaxxers @Osie another rlly good thread https://looksmax.org/threads/underrated-factor-of-high-igf-1-levels-liver-function.842345/unread thread theme song Liver...

looksmax.org

by @the MOUSE

Again, if you want to qualify for BOTB, please read this.

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...

looksmax.org

If you have any questions, please message me or a moderator by heading to my profile and pressing "Start Conversation".

Once your thread meets these qualifications...

1. Submit: Once your thread meets these qualifications, submit the link below or notify one of the moderators (and link the thread(s), please).
2. Evaluation: One of the moderators will carefully review your submission.
3. Notification: If your thread is selected, we will notify you and promote it to the "Best of the Best" section.

Note: This thread will be edited from time to time by the moderators as the website's environment changes.
Tagging all moderators: @TRUE_CEL @enchanted_elixir @Preston @Lmao @Kingkellz @Gargantuan @NegativeNorwood @StoicSperg @tyronelite @AscendingHero @Niklaus Mikaelson @5ft1 @Lorsss @Alexanderr @Master

Spoiler: Tagging Users

@Lygodactylus @8PSLcel @Br0sk1 @PrinceLuenLeoncur Chadeep@Chadeep @LMSMaxxer @Xangsane @mulattomaxxer @RottenSperg @StrangerDanger @Predeterminism @KING REIDYZ @AscendingHero @Prettyboy @SupremeSubhuman @Mogpogs @Piratecel @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Preoximerianas @tyronelite @FailedNormieManlet @Lars @Korea @bogii @StreegeReturn @Biggdink @eren1 @Reckless Turtle @Broly Banderas @House Lannister @WannabeJock @Racky @Erik-Jón @heightface @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Clark69 @ilovelamp08 @St.TikTokcel
@Anstrum95 @TeenAscender @loox @justadude @vaseqmoherad @astatine @Amnesia @Sigmamale @anya @dimorphism @Assyrian_Warrior @FreakkForLife @ThousandCuts @5footsix56 @Alexanderr @HQNPmaxxing @currylightskin @BasedPsychiatrist @´´´´´´´´ @ALP @HOLYFUARK @Chadpreetmaybe @BeenLMSsinceMSN @Kroker @oldcelloser @Tinydragon98 @Hiraeth @ascension! @HimmyButler @latincell95 @niko @latino_ @capybara @LiteralCaucasian @crimclown63 @Zures @Unsh @reptiles @pneumocystosis @Moggie

@Nation @RIPPED IRL @Saturn @Patient A @dieavirgin @SteveRogers @fogdart @Clark69 @vaninskybird @Racky @Beastimmung @Prince charming @NegativeNorwood @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @fjor2096 @callisto @Corleone @BasedPsychiatrist @heightface @currylightskin @HOLYFUARK @Anstrum95 @Moggedbyevery1 @StepbroMo @gamma2 @Unsh @Daniel Plainview @teemowhite @luljankybo @bogii @5ft1 @Chadpreetmaybe @latino_ @tesseract @FrameMogger @edward999 @Hiraeth @bleksandre @op463 @NFA PB @HerpDerpson @THEMOGGER @Bezel @norwegiancel @Moggie @ascension! @Frozqen @saulgoodman @crimclown63 @BigBundaSlapper @killaeast @Aypo129 @tbh af @jfbjfb @brea @dimorphism @CT03 @throwaway12902 @Tuxiio @Van @Sprinkles @futuregigamogger @julianchicago @HimmyButler @LiteralCaucasian @gribsufer1 @notrealdanish @Never Give Up! @Euclidious @Sarx @jim @garoupilled_ @5footsix56

How going outside could unironically improve your face (BUG-EYEDCELS, RECESSEDCELS, & EVERYONE ELSE GTFIH) (BOTB Worthy Thread?)

Table of Contents 1. Why Chico Gets Away with His Recession. 2. What Is Myopia? What Causes it? 3. How Myopia Effects Your Appearance and Why Your Bone Structure May Not be the Problem. 4. Is It Treatable/Curable? 5. Other Potential Factors That Can Lead to Bigger Eyes. 4. Eye...

looksmax.org

Check out my thread i think it may be worthy

 

[polishcel]

BUILDING NEW BONE: Vitamin K2 MEGADOSING Thread [WITH SOURCES]

Not so long ago, I've found this interesting article (medical studies at the bottom): High Dose Vitamin K2 Builds New Bone "Vitamin K2 has been shown, in preclinical studies, to promote: An increase in bone-building osteoblast activity, and A reduction in bone-destroying osteoclast activity."...

looksmax.org

 

[Deleted member 30843]

dannydipss’ HGH effects on FACIAL GROWTH guide (how to avoid/induce facial growth)

hello, as many of us are aware hgh has the potential to grow our face, thus making us more masculine and dimorphic. take example below: as you can see, this man has acromegaly and has the biggest skull i have ever seen. however, with some cases of acromegaly come undesirable results, such as...

looksmax.org

i feel like this should be added, every other week i see someone complaining about facial problems off of hgh.

 

[looks>books]

Dear forum members,

As a newly appointed moderator of this website, my primary objective is to identify outstanding threads and give justice to the rotting gems on the looksmaxing section, and promote them to the "Best of the Best" section. Having assumed my role just a few hours ago, I am eager to fulfill my promise right away.

To get your thread appointed to the Best of the Best section, first, make sure you have all of these fundamental requirements met.

• Reactions:
  • The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance:
  • The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
  • It should either be educational and/or instructional.
  • The thread demonstrates what it promises.
  • The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best.
  • The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (common sense) to normies.
• Effort:
  • The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
• Evidence and Quality:
  • The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
  • The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
  • The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
• Presentation:
  • The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
  • The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
  • The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
  • If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious.
  • The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
• Originality:
  • The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.

Here is a deeper explanation of the rubric. Please read if you're interested in getting your thread approved for BOTB.

Spoiler: Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify

Spoiler: Reactions

Reactions:

• The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.

This is very straightforward. Your thread needs to get 20+ positive reacts.

Spoiler: Relevance

Relevance:

• The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.

Pretty self-explanatory. Topics that don't help people looksmax, understand the blackpill, or self-improve don't count.

• It should either be educational and/or instructional.

The thread should teach people something and/or show them how to do something.

• The thread demonstrates what it promises.

If your title is "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", please talk about that. If the thread is 95% about how fantastic plants are, or the thread doesn't really fulfill the promise of showing a "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", it would violate this rule.

• The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best. If there's already another fashion thread, for example in the BOTB section that is superior to your fashion thread, your thread isn't eligible.

If there is a thread already in the BOTB section on the topic you'll discuss, then the thread you will write must be better.

• The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (aka common sense) to most of the target audience. This would basically mean that if the thread contains information that most non-blackpilled normies would know, it wouldn't qualify. Example: A thread solely dedicated to "Why acne destroys your looks" would violate this one.

A thread that mostly or entirely states very obvious things that normies know will not be added, like "Why Acne is a Looksmin", even if it's obvious to users, it still qualifies, as long as it isn't obvious to normies, because remember, we have much more lurkers than users. But if it's obvious to normies, it doesn't qualify.

Spoiler: Effort

Effort:

• The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort, and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.

Very easy. Threads that appear high-effort only. No moderate-effort or low effort threads.

Spoiler: Evidence and Quality

Evidence and Quality:

• The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.

The thread shouldn't demonstrate threads that are empty, narrow, limited, and shallow when it comes to information. If you're going to make a skin guide, explain everything you know and can find online about skin. If you're talking about a more narrow subject, like How to turn straight hair curly, explain everything you know about how to turn straight hair curly! People want information-rich threads, especially when it comes to understanding the topic and solutions (if applicable) to the topic. Threads that are shallow or information-poor, or missing crucial information won't be added.

• The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.

This is the most important one. Especially when it comes to things that are science-based.
Get the facts right. Know what you're talking about. Demonstrate your understanding. Threads explaining things that the author doesn't know about can't be added to BOTB due to possible misinformation or the lack of crucial information. Please, always do as much research as possible and learn as much about the topic as possible. You'd be amazed at how much you don't know. Trust me. I removed almost all of my own BOTB threads in November 2023 for a reason, this reason specifically.

Example: Someone makes a guide on how to grow taller, and they know nothing about how HGH converts to IGF-1 in the liver and the whole thread assumes more HGH = more growth, not knowing that things like protein, minerals aromatase inhibitors, and vitamins also are important. This person's thread can't go to BOTB.

• The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.

When it comes to using scientific evidence. If you took information from a scientific source of information, like a research paper, scientific article, etc. to write your thread, it's vital that you cite your sources. At the absolute minimum, show the link of the source you got your information from. Pasting the link on the thread or on the bottom of the thread in its own section is good. Citations are preferred.

Outside of that, if the thread is on things that are objective, like ways to grow taller, the information on the thread should be as truthful as possible. Threads that have misinformation on objective topics or that don't have good reasoning on topics that might be subjective (like opinions) won't qualify.

You don't have to cite evidence or anything if the topic is susceptible to subjectivity. Fashion is a good example, since fashion is susceptible to subjectivity. Anything that is susceptible to subjectivity will be assessed based on the thread's reasoning and consensus among users and moderators. If you're making a thread recommending people to wear dresses, the reasoning is bad (why would a straight male wear a dress as a looksmax?), and it won't gain consensus, therefore, it won't qualify.

When it comes to conjectural threads (A conjecture is a statement that is believed to be true, but has not yet been proven. Conjectures are based on intuition, observation, or experience, but lack formal proof and are based on incomplete information). The reasoning for the conjecture has to be solid.

For example, if you hypothesize or theorize something is likely to be true, like maybe you think a certain supplement can do something nobody (not even in the scientific community) has thought about in terms of looksmaxing, display good reasoning for it.

Opinions and theories. are touchy, since they can actually be good ones. If it's opinion-based or a theory, please add as many sources, pieces of evidence, or as much solid reasoning to back it up, to avoid the thread look like pure opinion or an uncredible theory or a hypothesis. With opinions and theories, consensus and great reasoning is the key to qualifying, so be extremely persuasive.

Spoiler: Presentation

Presentation:

• The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.

Example Topic: Health, and how it relates to Looksmaxing
Good Title: "Ultimate Health Guide: How To Maximize Your Health & Why Health is ESSENTIAL For Looksmaxing"
Bad Title: "health guide (high effort everyone GTFIH NOW)"

• The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.

If the thread shows that the user can't spell, doesn't understand proper grammar, doesn't know how to punctuate, etc. It can't qualify.

• The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.

Threads that are hard to read, are incoherent, look like run-on sentences, or are poorly formatted or any other major structuring or formatting flaws will not qualify. People don't want to read threads that are hard to read or ugly.

• If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious, like getting rid of acne, explaining to people why it's important is necessary.

Easy to explain. If necessary, the thread must explain to the reader what the topic, and content of the thread is and why it's important. If you're talking about why people should take a supplement, explain why. You must explain the why's and answer questions users may have when reading your thread, unless it's super obvious, like why not eating for a year will kill you.

• The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.

Incomprehensible threads that sound like Shakespeare wrote a PhD paper on the relationship between looksmaxing, quantum superchemistry and teleology will not be added to BOTB, since nobody will understand it and few will put in the effort to understand it, making the thread useless even if the information in it is great.

Spoiler: Originality

Originality:

• The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.

This is because we value originality, effort and expertise. Generating threads with language models doesn't really demonstrate that the user actually is knowledgeable in a subject. Language models may either not be experts on these subjects, or the user may be a poor prompt engineer, causing these language models to give shallow level information on the topic, and can possibly give misinformation, hard to understand explanations, too simple and incomprehensive explanations, or demonstrate a bad understanding of the topic or audience. People who use these tools to write their threads may not realize this since they don't know better, therefore hindering the quality of the thread. As with threads that are mostly copypasta/information from external sources, this can't qualify since that user didn't actually write a majority of the thread, therefore, it isn't original. Again, we want the author to know what they're talking about and an author that is using mostly external, non-original information is less likely to know what they are talking about.

You can always copy and paste the rubric in GPT to ask it if the thread fits the criteria or ask a moderator or someone you trust to evaluate your draft for you in the PMs.

Want to know how to write BOTB-Worthy threads? Click the thread below.

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...

looksmax.org

Notes:

1. Moderators, especially me can fix minor flaws for you, like bad titles and typos, or flaws that are easy to fix. Things like reformatting an entire thread usually won't happen unless the thread is extremely good.
2. Compilations of good and valuable threads can qualify for BOTB. Just tag me and I'll analyze it. The qualification for compilations don't follow the above rules.
3. Reasons for rejections are not limited to these criteria. In very rare cases, I do reject threads due to things not in the rubric, and update this thread accordingly. For example, as of October 9th, 2023, I recently added the Originality criteria since I saw a thread I couldn't promote to BOTB due to it being mostly generated by A.I.

To get your thread rejected from going to the Best of the Best section, here's what you need to do.

• Reactions: The thread has less than 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance: The thread isn't about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. The thread doesn't demonstrate what it promises.
• Effort: The thread is short, or not high-effort, below 500 words.
• Evidence: The thread doesn't present valid information, not information-dense, doesn't have good reasoning, and/or has no evidence.
• Presentation: The thread is hard to read and follow, is hard to understand, isn't organized, isn't coherent, has poor formatting, bad title (ex. "guide on eyes", "HOW TO GET WOMEN ONLINE GTFIH EVERYONE + PICS + I SLAYED A STACY LOL")
• Originality: Thread is written entirely or mostly by A.I. or copypasta from another source.

Examples of qualifiable threads

The Nose: Importance of the nasal base and how to find the correct nasal surgery for your nose

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE NOSE IN FACIAL AESTHETICS The nose can be a deciding factor on whether an individual is deemed attractive or not, a large proportion of this forum will claim that a good nose is only a necessity to facial aesthetics and is not a critical aspect when analysing the face...

looksmax.org

by @coispet

Male Archetypes Spectrum

Introduction There is a lot of talk around here about prettyboys, mascmaxxers, ogres and the like. It becomes exceedingly complex to cleanly understand what these archetypes refer to, as posters often use different words to refer to the same concepts, or have twisted views of what an archetype...

looksmax.org

by @BucketCrab

The Sleepmaxxing Playbook: understand why and how to have the best deep night rest possible with this value-packed sleep megaguide

What if I told you... that scientists have discovered a brand new revolutionary pill, that when taken daily... increases your lifespan by 10 years, makes your face more attractive, increases IQ, lowers depression and anxiety, enhances memory by 20%, increases testosterone production by 15%...

looksmax.org

by @garoupilled_

BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide - Understanding Hair & How To Get Beautiful Hair As Quick As Possible.

“...hair is architecture with a human element.” – Vidal Sassoon BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide the fastest way to understand hair, and how to make it beautiful Introduction This guide is written with the explicit aim to educate people about hair care in order to achieve beautiful hair as...

looksmax.org

by @BucketCrab

How I Achieved A Chad Physique Naturally (My Detailed Exercise Routine)

I. Overview of the routine II. Monday: Upper body 1 Seated cable rows They are as good at building up the thickness of the back as weighted pull ups at widening it. Sets: 4 Reps: 8-12 https://www.strengthlog.com/cable-wide-grip-seated-row/ Shoulders Shoulder press A constantly rotate...

looksmax.org

by @Prettyboy

BOTB LIVER HEALTHMAXXING GUIDE

inb4 dnrd n reading without reacting, just skip to end conclusion n leave ur react :feelswhat: may also be of interest to heightmaxxers @Osie another rlly good thread https://looksmax.org/threads/underrated-factor-of-high-igf-1-levels-liver-function.842345/unread thread theme song Liver...

looksmax.org

by @the MOUSE

Again, if you want to qualify for BOTB, please read this.

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...

looksmax.org

If you have any questions, please message me or a moderator by heading to my profile and pressing "Start Conversation".

Once your thread meets these qualifications...

1. Submit: Once your thread meets these qualifications, submit the link below or notify one of the moderators (and link the thread(s), please).
2. Evaluation: One of the moderators will carefully review your submission.
3. Notification: If your thread is selected, we will notify you and promote it to the "Best of the Best" section.

Note: This thread will be edited from time to time by the moderators as the website's environment changes.
Tagging all moderators: @TRUE_CEL @enchanted_elixir @Preston @Lmao @Kingkellz @Gargantuan @NegativeNorwood @StoicSperg @tyronelite @AscendingHero @Niklaus Mikaelson @5ft1 @Lorsss @Alexanderr @Master

Spoiler: Tagging Users

@Lygodactylus @8PSLcel @Br0sk1 @PrinceLuenLeoncur Chadeep@Chadeep @LMSMaxxer @Xangsane @mulattomaxxer @RottenSperg @StrangerDanger @Predeterminism @KING REIDYZ @AscendingHero @Prettyboy @SupremeSubhuman @Mogpogs @Piratecel @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Preoximerianas @tyronelite @FailedNormieManlet @Lars @Korea @bogii @StreegeReturn @Biggdink @eren1 @Reckless Turtle @Broly Banderas @House Lannister @WannabeJock @Racky @Erik-Jón @heightface @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Clark69 @ilovelamp08 @St.TikTokcel
@Anstrum95 @TeenAscender @loox @justadude @vaseqmoherad @astatine @Amnesia @Sigmamale @anya @dimorphism @Assyrian_Warrior @FreakkForLife @ThousandCuts @5footsix56 @Alexanderr @HQNPmaxxing @currylightskin @BasedPsychiatrist @´´´´´´´´ @ALP @HOLYFUARK @Chadpreetmaybe @BeenLMSsinceMSN @Kroker @oldcelloser @Tinydragon98 @Hiraeth @ascension! @HimmyButler @latincell95 @niko @latino_ @capybara @LiteralCaucasian @crimclown63 @Zures @Unsh @reptiles @pneumocystosis @Moggie

@Nation @RIPPED IRL @Saturn @Patient A @dieavirgin @SteveRogers @fogdart @Clark69 @vaninskybird @Racky @Beastimmung @Prince charming @NegativeNorwood @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @fjor2096 @callisto @Corleone @BasedPsychiatrist @heightface @currylightskin @HOLYFUARK @Anstrum95 @Moggedbyevery1 @StepbroMo @gamma2 @Unsh @Daniel Plainview @teemowhite @luljankybo @bogii @5ft1 @Chadpreetmaybe @latino_ @tesseract @FrameMogger @edward999 @Hiraeth @bleksandre @op463 @NFA PB @HerpDerpson @THEMOGGER @Bezel @norwegiancel @Moggie @ascension! @Frozqen @saulgoodman @crimclown63 @BigBundaSlapper @killaeast @Aypo129 @tbh af @jfbjfb @brea @dimorphism @CT03 @throwaway12902 @Tuxiio @Van @Sprinkles @futuregigamogger @julianchicago @HimmyButler @LiteralCaucasian @gribsufer1 @notrealdanish @Never Give Up! @Euclidious @Sarx @jim @garoupilled_ @5footsix56

Dear forum members,

As a newly appointed moderator of this website, my primary objective is to identify outstanding threads and give justice to the rotting gems on the looksmaxing section, and promote them to the "Best of the Best" section. Having assumed my role just a few hours ago, I am eager to fulfill my promise right away.

To get your thread appointed to the Best of the Best section, first, make sure you have all of these fundamental requirements met.

• Reactions:
  • The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance:
  • The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
  • It should either be educational and/or instructional.
  • The thread demonstrates what it promises.
  • The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best.
  • The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (common sense) to normies.
• Effort:
  • The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
• Evidence and Quality:
  • The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
  • The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
  • The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
• Presentation:
  • The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
  • The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
  • The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
  • If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious.
  • The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
• Originality:
  • The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.

Here is a deeper explanation of the rubric. Please read if you're interested in getting your thread approved for BOTB.

Spoiler: Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify

Spoiler: Reactions

Reactions:

• The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.

This is very straightforward. Your thread needs to get 20+ positive reacts.

Spoiler: Relevance

Relevance:

• The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.

Pretty self-explanatory. Topics that don't help people looksmax, understand the blackpill, or self-improve don't count.

• It should either be educational and/or instructional.

The thread should teach people something and/or show them how to do something.

• The thread demonstrates what it promises.

If your title is "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", please talk about that. If the thread is 95% about how fantastic plants are, or the thread doesn't really fulfill the promise of showing a "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", it would violate this rule.

• The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best. If there's already another fashion thread, for example in the BOTB section that is superior to your fashion thread, your thread isn't eligible.

If there is a thread already in the BOTB section on the topic you'll discuss, then the thread you will write must be better.

• The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (aka common sense) to most of the target audience. This would basically mean that if the thread contains information that most non-blackpilled normies would know, it wouldn't qualify. Example: A thread solely dedicated to "Why acne destroys your looks" would violate this one.

A thread that mostly or entirely states very obvious things that normies know will not be added, like "Why Acne is a Looksmin", even if it's obvious to users, it still qualifies, as long as it isn't obvious to normies, because remember, we have much more lurkers than users. But if it's obvious to normies, it doesn't qualify.

Spoiler: Effort

Effort:

• The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort, and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.

Very easy. Threads that appear high-effort only. No moderate-effort or low effort threads.

Spoiler: Evidence and Quality

Evidence and Quality:

• The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.

The thread shouldn't demonstrate threads that are empty, narrow, limited, and shallow when it comes to information. If you're going to make a skin guide, explain everything you know and can find online about skin. If you're talking about a more narrow subject, like How to turn straight hair curly, explain everything you know about how to turn straight hair curly! People want information-rich threads, especially when it comes to understanding the topic and solutions (if applicable) to the topic. Threads that are shallow or information-poor, or missing crucial information won't be added.

• The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.

This is the most important one. Especially when it comes to things that are science-based.
Get the facts right. Know what you're talking about. Demonstrate your understanding. Threads explaining things that the author doesn't know about can't be added to BOTB due to possible misinformation or the lack of crucial information. Please, always do as much research as possible and learn as much about the topic as possible. You'd be amazed at how much you don't know. Trust me. I removed almost all of my own BOTB threads in November 2023 for a reason, this reason specifically.

Example: Someone makes a guide on how to grow taller, and they know nothing about how HGH converts to IGF-1 in the liver and the whole thread assumes more HGH = more growth, not knowing that things like protein, minerals aromatase inhibitors, and vitamins also are important. This person's thread can't go to BOTB.

• The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.

When it comes to using scientific evidence. If you took information from a scientific source of information, like a research paper, scientific article, etc. to write your thread, it's vital that you cite your sources. At the absolute minimum, show the link of the source you got your information from. Pasting the link on the thread or on the bottom of the thread in its own section is good. Citations are preferred.

Outside of that, if the thread is on things that are objective, like ways to grow taller, the information on the thread should be as truthful as possible. Threads that have misinformation on objective topics or that don't have good reasoning on topics that might be subjective (like opinions) won't qualify.

You don't have to cite evidence or anything if the topic is susceptible to subjectivity. Fashion is a good example, since fashion is susceptible to subjectivity. Anything that is susceptible to subjectivity will be assessed based on the thread's reasoning and consensus among users and moderators. If you're making a thread recommending people to wear dresses, the reasoning is bad (why would a straight male wear a dress as a looksmax?), and it won't gain consensus, therefore, it won't qualify.

When it comes to conjectural threads (A conjecture is a statement that is believed to be true, but has not yet been proven. Conjectures are based on intuition, observation, or experience, but lack formal proof and are based on incomplete information). The reasoning for the conjecture has to be solid.

For example, if you hypothesize or theorize something is likely to be true, like maybe you think a certain supplement can do something nobody (not even in the scientific community) has thought about in terms of looksmaxing, display good reasoning for it.

Opinions and theories. are touchy, since they can actually be good ones. If it's opinion-based or a theory, please add as many sources, pieces of evidence, or as much solid reasoning to back it up, to avoid the thread look like pure opinion or an uncredible theory or a hypothesis. With opinions and theories, consensus and great reasoning is the key to qualifying, so be extremely persuasive.

Spoiler: Presentation

Presentation:

• The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.

Example Topic: Health, and how it relates to Looksmaxing
Good Title: "Ultimate Health Guide: How To Maximize Your Health & Why Health is ESSENTIAL For Looksmaxing"
Bad Title: "health guide (high effort everyone GTFIH NOW)"

• The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.

If the thread shows that the user can't spell, doesn't understand proper grammar, doesn't know how to punctuate, etc. It can't qualify.

• The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.

Threads that are hard to read, are incoherent, look like run-on sentences, or are poorly formatted or any other major structuring or formatting flaws will not qualify. People don't want to read threads that are hard to read or ugly.

• If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious, like getting rid of acne, explaining to people why it's important is necessary.

Easy to explain. If necessary, the thread must explain to the reader what the topic, and content of the thread is and why it's important. If you're talking about why people should take a supplement, explain why. You must explain the why's and answer questions users may have when reading your thread, unless it's super obvious, like why not eating for a year will kill you.

• The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.

Incomprehensible threads that sound like Shakespeare wrote a PhD paper on the relationship between looksmaxing, quantum superchemistry and teleology will not be added to BOTB, since nobody will understand it and few will put in the effort to understand it, making the thread useless even if the information in it is great.

Spoiler: Originality

Originality:

• The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.

This is because we value originality, effort and expertise. Generating threads with language models doesn't really demonstrate that the user actually is knowledgeable in a subject. Language models may either not be experts on these subjects, or the user may be a poor prompt engineer, causing these language models to give shallow level information on the topic, and can possibly give misinformation, hard to understand explanations, too simple and incomprehensive explanations, or demonstrate a bad understanding of the topic or audience. People who use these tools to write their threads may not realize this since they don't know better, therefore hindering the quality of the thread. As with threads that are mostly copypasta/information from external sources, this can't qualify since that user didn't actually write a majority of the thread, therefore, it isn't original. Again, we want the author to know what they're talking about and an author that is using mostly external, non-original information is less likely to know what they are talking about.

You can always copy and paste the rubric in GPT to ask it if the thread fits the criteria or ask a moderator or someone you trust to evaluate your draft for you in the PMs.

Want to know how to write BOTB-Worthy threads? Click the thread below.

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...

looksmax.org

Notes:

1. Moderators, especially me can fix minor flaws for you, like bad titles and typos, or flaws that are easy to fix. Things like reformatting an entire thread usually won't happen unless the thread is extremely good.
2. Compilations of good and valuable threads can qualify for BOTB. Just tag me and I'll analyze it. The qualification for compilations don't follow the above rules.
3. Reasons for rejections are not limited to these criteria. In very rare cases, I do reject threads due to things not in the rubric, and update this thread accordingly. For example, as of October 9th, 2023, I recently added the Originality criteria since I saw a thread I couldn't promote to BOTB due to it being mostly generated by A.I.

To get your thread rejected from going to the Best of the Best section, here's what you need to do.

• Reactions: The thread has less than 20 positive reactions from the community.
• Relevance: The thread isn't about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. The thread doesn't demonstrate what it promises.
• Effort: The thread is short, or not high-effort, below 500 words.
• Evidence: The thread doesn't present valid information, not information-dense, doesn't have good reasoning, and/or has no evidence.
• Presentation: The thread is hard to read and follow, is hard to understand, isn't organized, isn't coherent, has poor formatting, bad title (ex. "guide on eyes", "HOW TO GET WOMEN ONLINE GTFIH EVERYONE + PICS + I SLAYED A STACY LOL")
• Originality: Thread is written entirely or mostly by A.I. or copypasta from another source.

Examples of qualifiable threads

The Nose: Importance of the nasal base and how to find the correct nasal surgery for your nose

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE NOSE IN FACIAL AESTHETICS The nose can be a deciding factor on whether an individual is deemed attractive or not, a large proportion of this forum will claim that a good nose is only a necessity to facial aesthetics and is not a critical aspect when analysing the face...

looksmax.org

by @coispet

Male Archetypes Spectrum

Introduction There is a lot of talk around here about prettyboys, mascmaxxers, ogres and the like. It becomes exceedingly complex to cleanly understand what these archetypes refer to, as posters often use different words to refer to the same concepts, or have twisted views of what an archetype...

looksmax.org

by @BucketCrab

The Sleepmaxxing Playbook: understand why and how to have the best deep night rest possible with this value-packed sleep megaguide

What if I told you... that scientists have discovered a brand new revolutionary pill, that when taken daily... increases your lifespan by 10 years, makes your face more attractive, increases IQ, lowers depression and anxiety, enhances memory by 20%, increases testosterone production by 15%...

looksmax.org

by @garoupilled_

BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide - Understanding Hair & How To Get Beautiful Hair As Quick As Possible.

“...hair is architecture with a human element.” – Vidal Sassoon BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide the fastest way to understand hair, and how to make it beautiful Introduction This guide is written with the explicit aim to educate people about hair care in order to achieve beautiful hair as...

looksmax.org

by @BucketCrab

How I Achieved A Chad Physique Naturally (My Detailed Exercise Routine)

I. Overview of the routine II. Monday: Upper body 1 Seated cable rows They are as good at building up the thickness of the back as weighted pull ups at widening it. Sets: 4 Reps: 8-12 https://www.strengthlog.com/cable-wide-grip-seated-row/ Shoulders Shoulder press A constantly rotate...

looksmax.org

by @Prettyboy

BOTB LIVER HEALTHMAXXING GUIDE

inb4 dnrd n reading without reacting, just skip to end conclusion n leave ur react :feelswhat: may also be of interest to heightmaxxers @Osie another rlly good thread https://looksmax.org/threads/underrated-factor-of-high-igf-1-levels-liver-function.842345/unread thread theme song Liver...

looksmax.org

by @the MOUSE

Again, if you want to qualify for BOTB, please read this.

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads

How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...

looksmax.org

If you have any questions, please message me or a moderator by heading to my profile and pressing "Start Conversation".

Once your thread meets these qualifications...

1. Submit: Once your thread meets these qualifications, submit the link below or notify one of the moderators (and link the thread(s), please).
2. Evaluation: One of the moderators will carefully review your submission.
3. Notification: If your thread is selected, we will notify you and promote it to the "Best of the Best" section.

Note: This thread will be edited from time to time by the moderators as the website's environment changes.
Tagging all moderators: @TRUE_CEL @enchanted_elixir @Preston @Lmao @Kingkellz @Gargantuan @NegativeNorwood @StoicSperg @tyronelite @AscendingHero @Niklaus Mikaelson @5ft1 @Lorsss @Alexanderr @Master

Spoiler: Tagging Users

@Lygodactylus @8PSLcel @Br0sk1 @PrinceLuenLeoncur Chadeep@Chadeep @LMSMaxxer @Xangsane @mulattomaxxer @RottenSperg @StrangerDanger @Predeterminism @KING REIDYZ @AscendingHero @Prettyboy @SupremeSubhuman @Mogpogs @Piratecel @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Preoximerianas @tyronelite @FailedNormieManlet @Lars @Korea @bogii @StreegeReturn @Biggdink @eren1 @Reckless Turtle @Broly Banderas @House Lannister @WannabeJock @Racky @Erik-Jón @heightface @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Clark69 @ilovelamp08 @St.TikTokcel
@Anstrum95 @TeenAscender @loox @justadude @vaseqmoherad @astatine @Amnesia @Sigmamale @anya @dimorphism @Assyrian_Warrior @FreakkForLife @ThousandCuts @5footsix56 @Alexanderr @HQNPmaxxing @currylightskin @BasedPsychiatrist @´´´´´´´´ @ALP @HOLYFUARK @Chadpreetmaybe @BeenLMSsinceMSN @Kroker @oldcelloser @Tinydragon98 @Hiraeth @ascension! @HimmyButler @latincell95 @niko @latino_ @capybara @LiteralCaucasian @crimclown63 @Zures @Unsh @reptiles @pneumocystosis @Moggie

@Nation @RIPPED IRL @Saturn @Patient A @dieavirgin @SteveRogers @fogdart @Clark69 @vaninskybird @Racky @Beastimmung @Prince charming @NegativeNorwood @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @fjor2096 @callisto @Corleone @BasedPsychiatrist @heightface @currylightskin @HOLYFUARK @Anstrum95 @Moggedbyevery1 @StepbroMo @gamma2 @Unsh @Daniel Plainview @teemowhite @luljankybo @bogii @5ft1 @Chadpreetmaybe @latino_ @tesseract @FrameMogger @edward999 @Hiraeth @bleksandre @op463 @NFA PB @HerpDerpson @THEMOGGER @Bezel @norwegiancel @Moggie @ascension! @Frozqen @saulgoodman @crimclown63 @BigBundaSlapper @killaeast @Aypo129 @tbh af @jfbjfb @brea @dimorphism @CT03 @throwaway12902 @Tuxiio @Van @Sprinkles @futuregigamogger @julianchicago @HimmyButler @LiteralCaucasian @gribsufer1 @notrealdanish @Never Give Up! @Euclidious @Sarx @jim @garoupilled_ @5footsix56

Is this botb worthy

The ONLY looksmaxxing tip you need (at minimum)

I’ve been gatekeeping this idea for a while but even tho y’all are evil self centered narc assholes y’all do contribute still so thought I’d share: ofc this on its own won’t do the whole trick but if I could only had like 10 seconds to go back in time to tell my younger self one piece of...

looksmax.org

 

[AdIndependent6291]

Mastering Cortisol: The Body's Stress Hormone

Mastering Cortisol: The Body's Stress Hormone Table of Contents: Introduction Chapter 1: Effects on Body Chapter 2: Causes of Elevated Cortisol Chapter 3: Cortisol and Testosterone Chapter 4: Managing Cortisol Conclusion Introduction Cortisol is a steroid hormone produced in adrenal...

looksmax.org

 

[AdIndependent6291]

Mastering Cortisol: The Body's Stress Hormone

Mastering Cortisol: The Body's Stress Hormone Table of Contents: Introduction Chapter 1: Effects on Body Chapter 2: Causes of Elevated Cortisol Chapter 3: Cortisol and Testosterone Chapter 4: Managing Cortisol Conclusion Introduction Cortisol is a steroid hormone produced in adrenal...

looksmax.org

@enchanted_elixir

 

[Deleted member 16673]

A Guide To Taking Furosemide : The Hollow Cheek Pill

This is a more or less comprehensive guide on how to use furosemide (Lasix). I am genuinely so happy it's gotten popular in recent months, but I also feel like it's my job to make sure you are taking it safely and EFFECTIVELY. I see a lot of misinformation being spread on here, so I hope...

looksmax.org

can you consider and also give me edit access to this thread? Thanks

 

[chadintraining]

Haven’t seen anything like this on BOTB

HOW TO HIDE YOUR SURGERIES

So you have finally got the surgeries you have been talking about for years on this forum. However, you have one problem: how are you going to explain the changes done to your face to family, friends, etc.. We all know that telling other people that you got surgery is SOCIAL SUICIDE, so you...

looksmax.org

 

[Martian]

Modified Chewing Patterns

MODIFIED CHEWING The jaw elevator muscles develop the main forces used in mastication. The force generated during routine mastication of food such as carrots or meat is about 70 to 150 newtons (16 to 34 lbf). The maximum masticatory force in some people may reach up to 500 to 700 newtons (110 to...

looksmax.org

 

[geenger]

Can you consider my thread to be in the BOTB? Its by far the highest quality thing about investing this forum has ever seen, I also put multiple academic studies to back up all the things I said.

https://looksmax.org/threads/megagu...g-manager-backed-up-by-research-data.1113302/

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Can you consider my thread to be in the BOTB? Its by far the highest quality thing about investing this forum has ever seen, I also put multiple academic studies to back up all the things I said.

https://looksmax.org/threads/megagu...g-manager-backed-up-by-research-data.1113302/

@NumbThePain @Alexanderr @Clavicular @Arcturus @Orc

 

[xnj]

Nose Size Reduction via Softmaxing, or Why you may NOT need a Rhino

Welcome to yet another banger thread, my lovely buddy boyos! You probably need a smaller nose. Nose-related ratios play a huge part in your facial harmony, and unless you’re a lucky bastard with a tiny nose already - you will see what I mean; for example after you reduce your nose size, even...

looksmax.org

My Maxillary Expansion via Softmaxxing Guide (depthcels GTFIH)

A lot of you fuckers have been asking me about how I expanded my maxilla by miles in around 2 months, here's the full in-depth explanation on all methods I have used. Benefits of well-developed maxillae: Maxilla affects more parts of your skull than you think; your undereye support is greatly...

looksmax.org

@Gengar @Clavicular @NumbThePain @TechnoBoss @Orc @Alexanderr @Arcturus

 

[enchanted_elixir]

Nose Size Reduction via Softmaxing, or Why you may NOT need a Rhino

Welcome to yet another banger thread, my lovely buddy boyos! You probably need a smaller nose. Nose-related ratios play a huge part in your facial harmony, and unless you’re a lucky bastard with a tiny nose already - you will see what I mean; for example after you reduce your nose size, even...

looksmax.org

My Maxillary Expansion via Softmaxxing Guide (depthcels GTFIH)

A lot of you fuckers have been asking me about how I expanded my maxilla by miles in around 2 months, here's the full in-depth explanation on all methods I have used. Benefits of well-developed maxillae: Maxilla affects more parts of your skull than you think; your undereye support is greatly...

looksmax.org

you're supposed to tag the moderators and/or admins.

 

[geenger]

@NumbThePain @Alexanderr @Clavicular @Arcturus @Orc

thanks man

 

[xnj]

you're supposed to tag the moderators and/or admins.

my bad