ghost!
PM for help
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2025
- Posts
- 2,999
- Reputation
- 8,095
great ascension but those types of threads dont rlly belong in botb
also u joined on my bday
also u joined on my bday
Askinov
𝖋𝖚𝖙𝖚𝖗𝖊 𝟔'𝟏 𝖍𝖙𝖓 𝖘𝖑𝖆𝖞𝖊𝖗
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2025
- Posts
- 4,763
- Reputation
- 11,250
see niggas edited version https://looksmax.org/threads/an-ove...see-is-it-possible-old-thread-edited.2155488/ i have tons more if you want
Last edited:
SteveRogers
I have to return some videotapes.
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2019
- Posts
- 4,099
- Reputation
- 5,442
It’s obviously — AI buddy boyo
L1G7
Bronze
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2025
- Posts
- 282
- Reputation
- 294
That makes sense tbh I thought it could just be valuable for some new guys figuring stuff out.great ascension but those types of threads dont rlly belong in botb
also u joined on my bday
Yeah this is a new account but hell yeah (I’m not a new gen I just needed to say that haha)
Sadist
I EAT EXPLOSIVES (AGAIN)
Contributor
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2024
- Posts
- 4,669
- Reputation
- 11,980
billions must know the correct way to inject
@NumbThePain @Master @Chad @Hernan @Gengar’s Ghost
Askinov
𝖋𝖚𝖙𝖚𝖗𝖊 𝟔'𝟏 𝖍𝖙𝖓 𝖘𝖑𝖆𝖞𝖊𝖗
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2025
- Posts
- 4,763
- Reputation
- 11,250
tag me from next time ill tag you too
billions must know the correct way to inject
@NumbThePain @Master @Chad @Hernan @Gengar’s Ghost
neurodivergent
Extremely neurotic; Discord Staff
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2025
- Posts
- 1,492
- Reputation
- 3,022
dnr
jotunnr
The Infamous
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2026
- Posts
- 2,082
- Reputation
- 3,376
Dear forum members,
As a newly appointed moderator of this website, my primary objective is to identify outstanding threads and give justice to the rotting gems on the looksmaxing section, and promote them to the "Best of the Best" section. Having assumed my role just a few hours ago, I am eager to fulfill my promise right away.
To get your thread appointed to the Best of the Best section, first, make sure you have all of these fundamental requirements met.
- Reactions:
- The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
- Relevance:
- The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
- It should either be educational and/or instructional.
- The thread demonstrates what it promises.
- The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best.
- The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (common sense) to normies.
- Effort:
- The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
- Evidence and Quality:
- The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
- The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
- The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
- Presentation:
- The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
- The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
- The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
- If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious.
- The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
- Originality:
- The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.
Here is a deeper explanation of the rubric. Please read if you're interested in getting your thread approved for BOTB.
Reactions:
This is very straightforward. Your thread needs to get 20+ positive reacts.
- The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
Relevance:
Pretty self-explanatory. Topics that don't help people looksmax, understand the blackpill, or self-improve don't count.
- The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
The thread should teach people something and/or show them how to do something.
- It should either be educational and/or instructional.
If your title is "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", please talk about that. If the thread is 95% about how fantastic plants are, or the thread doesn't really fulfill the promise of showing a "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", it would violate this rule.
- The thread demonstrates what it promises.
If there is a thread already in the BOTB section on the topic you'll discuss, then the thread you will write must be better.
- The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best. If there's already another fashion thread, for example in the BOTB section that is superior to your fashion thread, your thread isn't eligible.
A thread that mostly or entirely states very obvious things that normies know will not be added, like "Why Acne is a Looksmin", even if it's obvious to users, it still qualifies, as long as it isn't obvious to normies, because remember, we have much more lurkers than users. But if it's obvious to normies, it doesn't qualify.
- The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (aka common sense) to most of the target audience. This would basically mean that if the thread contains information that most non-blackpilled normies would know, it wouldn't qualify. Example: A thread solely dedicated to "Why acne destroys your looks" would violate this one.
Effort:
Very easy. Threads that appear high-effort only. No moderate-effort or low effort threads.
- The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort, and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
Evidence and Quality:
The thread shouldn't demonstrate threads that are empty, narrow, limited, and shallow when it comes to information. If you're going to make a skin guide, explain everything you know and can find online about skin. If you're talking about a more narrow subject, like How to turn straight hair curly, explain everything you know about how to turn straight hair curly! People want information-rich threads, especially when it comes to understanding the topic and solutions (if applicable) to the topic. Threads that are shallow or information-poor, or missing crucial information won't be added.
- The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
This is the most important one. Especially when it comes to things that are science-based.
- The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
Get the facts right. Know what you're talking about. Demonstrate your understanding. Threads explaining things that the author doesn't know about can't be added to BOTB due to possible misinformation or the lack of crucial information. Please, always do as much research as possible and learn as much about the topic as possible. You'd be amazed at how much you don't know. Trust me. I removed almost all of my own BOTB threads in November 2023 for a reason, this reason specifically.
Example: Someone makes a guide on how to grow taller, and they know nothing about how HGH converts to IGF-1 in the liver and the whole thread assumes more HGH = more growth, not knowing that things like protein, minerals aromatase inhibitors, and vitamins also are important. This person's thread can't go to BOTB.
When it comes to using scientific evidence. If you took information from a scientific source of information, like a research paper, scientific article, etc. to write your thread, it's vital that you cite your sources. At the absolute minimum, show the link of the source you got your information from. Pasting the link on the thread or on the bottom of the thread in its own section is good. Citations are preferred.
- The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
Outside of that, if the thread is on things that are objective, like ways to grow taller, the information on the thread should be as truthful as possible. Threads that have misinformation on objective topics or that don't have good reasoning on topics that might be subjective (like opinions) won't qualify.
You don't have to cite evidence or anything if the topic is susceptible to subjectivity. Fashion is a good example, since fashion is susceptible to subjectivity. Anything that is susceptible to subjectivity will be assessed based on the thread's reasoning and consensus among users and moderators. If you're making a thread recommending people to wear dresses, the reasoning is bad (why would a straight male wear a dress as a looksmax?), and it won't gain consensus, therefore, it won't qualify.
When it comes to conjectural threads (A conjecture is a statement that is believed to be true, but has not yet been proven. Conjectures are based on intuition, observation, or experience, but lack formal proof and are based on incomplete information). The reasoning for the conjecture has to be solid.
For example, if you hypothesize or theorize something is likely to be true, like maybe you think a certain supplement can do something nobody (not even in the scientific community) has thought about in terms of looksmaxing, display good reasoning for it.
Opinions and theories. are touchy, since they can actually be good ones. If it's opinion-based or a theory, please add as many sources, pieces of evidence, or as much solid reasoning to back it up, to avoid the thread look like pure opinion or an uncredible theory or a hypothesis. With opinions and theories, consensus and great reasoning is the key to qualifying, so be extremely persuasive.
Presentation:
Example Topic: Health, and how it relates to Looksmaxing
- The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
Good Title: "Ultimate Health Guide: How To Maximize Your Health & Why Health is ESSENTIAL For Looksmaxing"
Bad Title: "health guide (high effort everyone GTFIH NOW)"
If the thread shows that the user can't spell, doesn't understand proper grammar, doesn't know how to punctuate, etc. It can't qualify.
- The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
Threads that are hard to read, are incoherent, look like run-on sentences, or are poorly formatted or any other major structuring or formatting flaws will not qualify. People don't want to read threads that are hard to read or ugly.
- The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
Easy to explain. If necessary, the thread must explain to the reader what the topic, and content of the thread is and why it's important. If you're talking about why people should take a supplement, explain why. You must explain the why's and answer questions users may have when reading your thread, unless it's super obvious, like why not eating for a year will kill you.
- If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious, like getting rid of acne, explaining to people why it's important is necessary.
Incomprehensible threads that sound like Shakespeare wrote a PhD paper on the relationship between looksmaxing, quantum superchemistry and teleology will not be added to BOTB, since nobody will understand it and few will put in the effort to understand it, making the thread useless even if the information in it is great.
- The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
Originality:
This is because we value originality, effort and expertise. Generating threads with language models doesn't really demonstrate that the user actually is knowledgeable in a subject. Language models may either not be experts on these subjects, or the user may be a poor prompt engineer, causing these language models to give shallow level information on the topic, and can possibly give misinformation, hard to understand explanations, too simple and incomprehensive explanations, or demonstrate a bad understanding of the topic or audience. People who use these tools to write their threads may not realize this since they don't know better, therefore hindering the quality of the thread. As with threads that are mostly copypasta/information from external sources, this can't qualify since that user didn't actually write a majority of the thread, therefore, it isn't original. Again, we want the author to know what they're talking about and an author that is using mostly external, non-original information is less likely to know what they are talking about.
- The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.
You can always copy and paste the rubric in GPT to ask it if the thread fits the criteria or ask a moderator or someone you trust to evaluate your draft for you in the PMs.
Want to know how to write BOTB-Worthy threads? Click the thread below.
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...looksmax.org
Notes:
- Moderators, especially me can fix minor flaws for you, like bad titles and typos, or flaws that are easy to fix. Things like reformatting an entire thread usually won't happen unless the thread is extremely good.
- Compilations of good and valuable threads can qualify for BOTB. Just tag me and I'll analyze it. The qualification for compilations don't follow the above rules.
- Reasons for rejections are not limited to these criteria. In very rare cases, I do reject threads due to things not in the rubric, and update this thread accordingly. For example, as of October 9th, 2023, I recently added the Originality criteria since I saw a thread I couldn't promote to BOTB due to it being mostly generated by A.I.
- Reactions: The thread has less than 20 positive reactions from the community.
- Relevance: The thread isn't about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. The thread doesn't demonstrate what it promises.
- Effort: The thread is short, or not high-effort, below 500 words.
- Evidence: The thread doesn't present valid information, not information-dense, doesn't have good reasoning, and/or has no evidence.
- Presentation: The thread is hard to read and follow, is hard to understand, isn't organized, isn't coherent, has poor formatting, bad title (ex. "guide on eyes", "HOW TO GET WOMEN ONLINE GTFIH EVERYONE + PICS + I SLAYED A STACY LOL")
- Originality: Thread is written entirely or mostly by A.I. or copypasta from another source.
Examples of qualifiable threads
by @coispetThe Nose: Importance of the nasal base and how to find the correct nasal surgery for your nose
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE NOSE IN FACIAL AESTHETICS The nose can be a deciding factor on whether an individual is deemed attractive or not, a large proportion of this forum will claim that a good nose is only a necessity to facial aesthetics and is not a critical aspect when analysing the face...
by @BucketCrabMale Archetypes Spectrum
Introduction There is a lot of talk around here about prettyboys, mascmaxxers, ogres and the like. It becomes exceedingly complex to cleanly understand what these archetypes refer to, as posters often use different words to refer to the same concepts, or have twisted views of what an archetype...
by @garoupilled_The Sleepmaxxing Playbook: understand why and how to have the best deep night rest possible with this value-packed sleep megaguide
What if I told you... that scientists have discovered a brand new revolutionary pill, that when taken daily... increases your lifespan by 10 years, makes your face more attractive, increases IQ, lowers depression and anxiety, enhances memory by 20%, increases testosterone production by 15%...
by @BucketCrabBucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide - Understanding Hair & How To Get Beautiful Hair As Quick As Possible.
“...hair is architecture with a human element.” – Vidal Sassoon BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide the fastest way to understand hair, and how to make it beautiful Introduction This guide is written with the explicit aim to educate people about hair care in order to achieve beautiful hair as...
by @PrettyboyHow I Achieved A Chad Physique Naturally (My Detailed Exercise Routine)
I. Overview of the routine II. Monday: Upper body 1 Seated cable rows They are as good at building up the thickness of the back as weighted pull ups at widening it. Sets: 4 Reps: 8-12 https://www.strengthlog.com/cable-wide-grip-seated-row/ Shoulders Shoulder press A constantly rotate...
by @the MOUSEBOTB LIVER HEALTHMAXXING GUIDE
inb4 dnrd n reading without reacting, just skip to end conclusion n leave ur react :feelswhat: may also be of interest to heightmaxxers @Osie another rlly good thread https://looksmax.org/threads/underrated-factor-of-high-igf-1-levels-liver-function.842345/unread thread theme song Liver...
Again, if you want to qualify for BOTB, please read this.
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...
If you have any questions, please message me or a moderator by heading to my profile and pressing "Start Conversation".
Once your thread meets these qualifications...
- Submit: Once your thread meets these qualifications, submit the link below or notify one of the moderators (and link the thread(s), please).
- Evaluation: One of the moderators will carefully review your submission.
- Notification: If your thread is selected, we will notify you and promote it to the "Best of the Best" section.
Note: This thread will be edited from time to time by the moderators as the website's environment changes.
Tagging all moderators: @TRUE_CEL @enchanted_elixir @Preston @Lmao @Kingkellz @Gargantuan @NegativeNorwood @StoicSperg @tyronelite @AscendingHero @Niklaus Mikaelson @5ft1 @Lorsss @Alexanderr @Master
@Lygodactylus @8PSLcel @Br0sk1 @PrinceLuenLeoncur Chadeep@Chadeep @LMSMaxxer @Xangsane @mulattomaxxer @RottenSperg @StrangerDanger @Predeterminism @KING REIDYZ @AscendingHero @Prettyboy @SupremeSubhuman @Mogpogs @Piratecel @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Preoximerianas @tyronelite @FailedNormieManlet @Lars @Korea @bogii @StreegeReturn @Biggdink @eren1 @Reckless Turtle @Broly Banderas @House Lannister @WannabeJock @Racky @Erik-Jón @heightface @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Clark69 @ilovelamp08 @St.TikTokcel
@Anstrum95 @TeenAscender @loox @justadude @vaseqmoherad @astatine @Amnesia @Sigmamale @anya @dimorphism @Assyrian_Warrior @FreakkForLife @ThousandCuts @5footsix56 @Alexanderr @HQNPmaxxing @currylightskin @BasedPsychiatrist @´´´´´´´´ @ALP @HOLYFUARK @Chadpreetmaybe @BeenLMSsinceMSN @Kroker @oldcelloser @Tinydragon98 @Hiraeth @ascension! @HimmyButler @latincell95 @niko @latino_ @capybara @LiteralCaucasian @crimclown63 @Zures @Unsh @reptiles @pneumocystosis @Moggie
@Nation @RIPPED IRL @Saturn @Patient A @dieavirgin @SteveRogers @fogdart @Clark69 @vaninskybird @Racky @Beastimmung @Prince charming @NegativeNorwood @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @fjor2096 @callisto @Corleone @BasedPsychiatrist @heightface @currylightskin @HOLYFUARK @Anstrum95 @Moggedbyevery1 @StepbroMo @gamma2 @Unsh @Daniel Plainview @teemowhite @luljankybo @bogii @5ft1 @Chadpreetmaybe @latino_ @tesseract @FrameMogger @edward999 @Hiraeth @bleksandre @op463 @NFA PB @HerpDerpson @THEMOGGER @Bezel @norwegiancel @Moggie @ascension! @Frozqen @saulgoodman @crimclown63 @BigBundaSlapper @killaeast @Aypo129 @tbh af @jfbjfb @brea @dimorphism @CT03 @throwaway12902 @Tuxiio @Van @Sprinkles @futuregigamogger @julianchicago @HimmyButler @LiteralCaucasian @gribsufer1 @notrealdanish @Never Give Up! @Euclidious @Sarx @jim @garoupilled_ @5footsix56
BOTB BOYO!!!
Navity
Looksmaxxing Coach
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Posts
- 7,117
- Reputation
- 18,469
Navity
Looksmaxxing Coach
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Posts
- 7,117
- Reputation
- 18,469
jotunnr
The Infamous
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2026
- Posts
- 2,082
- Reputation
- 3,376
Attachments
Navity
Looksmaxxing Coach
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Posts
- 7,117
- Reputation
- 18,469
It was a satirical statement.
jotunnr
The Infamous
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2026
- Posts
- 2,082
- Reputation
- 3,376
Navity
Looksmaxxing Coach
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Posts
- 7,117
- Reputation
- 18,469
Now ur backtracking
Forum was better off when u selfbanned JFL
Obv,I,had,This,Implemented,OFC,I,Know,how,its,spelt.
Grow,some,IQ.
Hollywood
Golden Boy
- Joined
- May 31, 2026
- Posts
- 2,630
- Reputation
- 5,617
Does this qualify good sers?
Thanks for taking time to review regardless
@0ogrpostcel @Hernan @Master @Chad @Gengar’s Ghost
0ogrpostcel
Sub-Mod
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2024
- Posts
- 1,669
- Reputation
- 3,016
Your thread probably won't be put on botb if it has self promotion in it, like linking your YouTube video
Hollywood
Golden Boy
- Joined
- May 31, 2026
- Posts
- 2,630
- Reputation
- 5,617
Ahhhhh my bad, it is set as a private video just for the purpose of showing the billboard as a part of the thread
But if that's the case, I'd be happy to remove it from the thread (I just can't personally, but if any of the mods or admins wanted to then I'm totally happy for that video to be removed)
Sage
I’m dying.. brother you are just Warism
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2026
- Posts
- 1,384
- Reputation
- 5,053
ok master dada, whatever u say
duduboy
Delete the Unworthy
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2025
- Posts
- 918
- Reputation
- 2,232
Do I qualify? @Gengar’s Ghost
@enchanted_elixir
Askinov
𝖋𝖚𝖙𝖚𝖗𝖊 𝟔'𝟏 𝖍𝖙𝖓 𝖘𝖑𝖆𝖞𝖊𝖗
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2025
- Posts
- 4,763
- Reputation
- 11,250
https://looksmax.org/threads/anti-androgens-full-guide.2215968/
im tired dude no one is checking my guides
im tired dude no one is checking my guides
enchanted_elixir
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖈𝖊𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖞 𝕮𝖔𝖗𝖕 • 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐🥉• Inactive
Contributor
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2022
- Posts
- 24,578
- Reputation
- 43,919
If I were you, I'd tweak a few things before I would publish this, but again I'm not a moderator, so I can't do anything about it. I would change the title. The title should talk more about how these kinds of compounds help with acne and hair.
Askinov
𝖋𝖚𝖙𝖚𝖗𝖊 𝟔'𝟏 𝖍𝖙𝖓 𝖘𝖑𝖆𝖞𝖊𝖗
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2025
- Posts
- 4,763
- Reputation
- 11,250
What to do then bhai where ti kiss da wall for botb i have more guide can i tag you
enchanted_elixir
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖈𝖊𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖞 𝕮𝖔𝖗𝖕 • 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐🥉• Inactive
Contributor
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2022
- Posts
- 24,578
- Reputation
- 43,919
You’ll have to ask a moderator to edit the title for you
WhatCommunity
improooving
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2026
- Posts
- 239
- Reputation
- 328
It has 5 reactions, but it's amazing, high effort, niche thread. Just take a look at it.
guide to best cooking Youtubers, shows and basic knife skills | Anthony Bourdain, Tasting History, etc | HIGH EFFORT, GOOD TASTE
IQMaxxedSubhuman
Iron
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2026
- Posts
- 230
- Reputation
- 215
i would like to apply for botb, i have looked throught the forum i havent found many guides on the lower third, and none on botb so here is my humble application: https://looksmax.org/threads/megath...cal-reality-sources-best-of-all-time.2228728/Dear forum members,
As a newly appointed moderator of this website, my primary objective is to identify outstanding threads and give justice to the rotting gems on the looksmaxing section, and promote them to the "Best of the Best" section. Having assumed my role just a few hours ago, I am eager to fulfill my promise right away.
- Reactions:
- The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
- Relevance:
- The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
- It should either be educational and/or instructional.
- The thread demonstrates what it promises.
- The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best.
- The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (common sense) to normies.
- Effort:
- The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
- Evidence and Quality:
- The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
- The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
- The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
- Presentation:
- The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
- The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
- The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
- If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious.
- The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
- Originality:
- The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.
Here is a deeper explanation of the rubric. Please read if you're interested in getting your thread approved for BOTB.
Reactions:
This is very straightforward. Your thread needs to get 20+ positive reacts.
- The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
Relevance:
Pretty self-explanatory. Topics that don't help people looksmax, understand the blackpill, or self-improve don't count.
- The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
The thread should teach people something and/or show them how to do something.
- It should either be educational and/or instructional.
If your title is "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", please talk about that. If the thread is 95% about how fantastic plants are, or the thread doesn't really fulfill the promise of showing a "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", it would violate this rule.
- The thread demonstrates what it promises.
If there is a thread already in the BOTB section on the topic you'll discuss, then the thread you will write must be better.
- The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best. If there's already another fashion thread, for example in the BOTB section that is superior to your fashion thread, your thread isn't eligible.
A thread that mostly or entirely states very obvious things that normies know will not be added, like "Why Acne is a Looksmin", even if it's obvious to users, it still qualifies, as long as it isn't obvious to normies, because remember, we have much more lurkers than users. But if it's obvious to normies, it doesn't qualify.
- The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (aka common sense) to most of the target audience. This would basically mean that if the thread contains information that most non-blackpilled normies would know, it wouldn't qualify. Example: A thread solely dedicated to "Why acne destroys your looks" would violate this one.
Effort:
Very easy. Threads that appear high-effort only. No moderate-effort or low effort threads.
- The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort, and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
Evidence and Quality:
The thread shouldn't demonstrate threads that are empty, narrow, limited, and shallow when it comes to information. If you're going to make a skin guide, explain everything you know and can find online about skin. If you're talking about a more narrow subject, like How to turn straight hair curly, explain everything you know about how to turn straight hair curly! People want information-rich threads, especially when it comes to understanding the topic and solutions (if applicable) to the topic. Threads that are shallow or information-poor, or missing crucial information won't be added.
- The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
This is the most important one. Especially when it comes to things that are science-based.
- The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
Get the facts right. Know what you're talking about. Demonstrate your understanding. Threads explaining things that the author doesn't know about can't be added to BOTB due to possible misinformation or the lack of crucial information. Please, always do as much research as possible and learn as much about the topic as possible. You'd be amazed at how much you don't know. Trust me. I removed almost all of my own BOTB threads in November 2023 for a reason, this reason specifically.
Example: Someone makes a guide on how to grow taller, and they know nothing about how HGH converts to IGF-1 in the liver and the whole thread assumes more HGH = more growth, not knowing that things like protein, minerals aromatase inhibitors, and vitamins also are important. This person's thread can't go to BOTB.
When it comes to using scientific evidence. If you took information from a scientific source of information, like a research paper, scientific article, etc. to write your thread, it's vital that you cite your sources. At the absolute minimum, show the link of the source you got your information from. Pasting the link on the thread or on the bottom of the thread in its own section is good. Citations are preferred.
- The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
Outside of that, if the thread is on things that are objective, like ways to grow taller, the information on the thread should be as truthful as possible. Threads that have misinformation on objective topics or that don't have good reasoning on topics that might be subjective (like opinions) won't qualify.
You don't have to cite evidence or anything if the topic is susceptible to subjectivity. Fashion is a good example, since fashion is susceptible to subjectivity. Anything that is susceptible to subjectivity will be assessed based on the thread's reasoning and consensus among users and moderators. If you're making a thread recommending people to wear dresses, the reasoning is bad (why would a straight male wear a dress as a looksmax?), and it won't gain consensus, therefore, it won't qualify.
When it comes to conjectural threads (A conjecture is a statement that is believed to be true, but has not yet been proven. Conjectures are based on intuition, observation, or experience, but lack formal proof and are based on incomplete information). The reasoning for the conjecture has to be solid.
For example, if you hypothesize or theorize something is likely to be true, like maybe you think a certain supplement can do something nobody (not even in the scientific community) has thought about in terms of looksmaxing, display good reasoning for it.
Opinions and theories. are touchy, since they can actually be good ones. If it's opinion-based or a theory, please add as many sources, pieces of evidence, or as much solid reasoning to back it up, to avoid the thread look like pure opinion or an uncredible theory or a hypothesis. With opinions and theories, consensus and great reasoning is the key to qualifying, so be extremely persuasive.
Presentation:
Example Topic: Health, and how it relates to Looksmaxing
- The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
Good Title: "Ultimate Health Guide: How To Maximize Your Health & Why Health is ESSENTIAL For Looksmaxing"
Bad Title: "health guide (high effort everyone GTFIH NOW)"
If the thread shows that the user can't spell, doesn't understand proper grammar, doesn't know how to punctuate, etc. It can't qualify.
- The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
Threads that are hard to read, are incoherent, look like run-on sentences, or are poorly formatted or any other major structuring or formatting flaws will not qualify. People don't want to read threads that are hard to read or ugly.
- The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
Easy to explain. If necessary, the thread must explain to the reader what the topic, and content of the thread is and why it's important. If you're talking about why people should take a supplement, explain why. You must explain the why's and answer questions users may have when reading your thread, unless it's super obvious, like why not eating for a year will kill you.
- If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious, like getting rid of acne, explaining to people why it's important is necessary.
Incomprehensible threads that sound like Shakespeare wrote a PhD paper on the relationship between looksmaxing, quantum superchemistry and teleology will not be added to BOTB, since nobody will understand it and few will put in the effort to understand it, making the thread useless even if the information in it is great.
- The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
Originality:
This is because we value originality, effort and expertise. Generating threads with language models doesn't really demonstrate that the user actually is knowledgeable in a subject. Language models may either not be experts on these subjects, or the user may be a poor prompt engineer, causing these language models to give shallow level information on the topic, and can possibly give misinformation, hard to understand explanations, too simple and incomprehensive explanations, or demonstrate a bad understanding of the topic or audience. People who use these tools to write their threads may not realize this since they don't know better, therefore hindering the quality of the thread. As with threads that are mostly copypasta/information from external sources, this can't qualify since that user didn't actually write a majority of the thread, therefore, it isn't original. Again, we want the author to know what they're talking about and an author that is using mostly external, non-original information is less likely to know what they are talking about.
- The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.
You can always copy and paste the rubric in GPT to ask it if the thread fits the criteria or ask a moderator or someone you trust to evaluate your draft for you in the PMs.
Want to know how to write BOTB-Worthy threads? Click the thread below.
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...
Notes:
- Moderators, especially me can fix minor flaws for you, like bad titles and typos, or flaws that are easy to fix. Things like reformatting an entire thread usually won't happen unless the thread is extremely good.
- Compilations of good and valuable threads can qualify for BOTB. Just tag me and I'll analyze it. The qualification for compilations don't follow the above rules.
- Reasons for rejections are not limited to these criteria. In very rare cases, I do reject threads due to things not in the rubric, and update this thread accordingly. For example, as of October 9th, 2023, I recently added the Originality criteria since I saw a thread I couldn't promote to BOTB due to it being mostly generated by A.I.
- Reactions: The thread has less than 20 positive reactions from the community.
- Relevance: The thread isn't about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. The thread doesn't demonstrate what it promises.
- Effort: The thread is short, or not high-effort, below 500 words.
- Evidence: The thread doesn't present valid information, not information-dense, doesn't have good reasoning, and/or has no evidence.
- Presentation: The thread is hard to read and follow, is hard to understand, isn't organized, isn't coherent, has poor formatting, bad title (ex. "guide on eyes", "HOW TO GET WOMEN ONLINE GTFIH EVERYONE + PICS + I SLAYED A STACY LOL")
- Originality: Thread is written entirely or mostly by A.I. or copypasta from another source.
Examples of qualifiable threads
by @coispetThe Nose: Importance of the nasal base and how to find the correct nasal surgery for your nose
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE NOSE IN FACIAL AESTHETICS The nose can be a deciding factor on whether an individual is deemed attractive or not, a large proportion of this forum will claim that a good nose is only a necessity to facial aesthetics and is not a critical aspect when analysing the face...
by @BucketCrabMale Archetypes Spectrum
Introduction There is a lot of talk around here about prettyboys, mascmaxxers, ogres and the like. It becomes exceedingly complex to cleanly understand what these archetypes refer to, as posters often use different words to refer to the same concepts, or have twisted views of what an archetype...
by @garoupilled_The Sleepmaxxing Playbook: understand why and how to have the best deep night rest possible with this value-packed sleep megaguide
What if I told you... that scientists have discovered a brand new revolutionary pill, that when taken daily... increases your lifespan by 10 years, makes your face more attractive, increases IQ, lowers depression and anxiety, enhances memory by 20%, increases testosterone production by 15%...
by @BucketCrabBucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide - Understanding Hair & How To Get Beautiful Hair As Quick As Possible.
“...hair is architecture with a human element.” – Vidal Sassoon BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide the fastest way to understand hair, and how to make it beautiful Introduction This guide is written with the explicit aim to educate people about hair care in order to achieve beautiful hair as...
by @PrettyboyHow I Achieved A Chad Physique Naturally (My Detailed Exercise Routine)
I. Overview of the routine II. Monday: Upper body 1 Seated cable rows They are as good at building up the thickness of the back as weighted pull ups at widening it. Sets: 4 Reps: 8-12 https://www.strengthlog.com/cable-wide-grip-seated-row/ Shoulders Shoulder press A constantly rotate...
by @the MOUSEBOTB LIVER HEALTHMAXXING GUIDE
inb4 dnrd n reading without reacting, just skip to end conclusion n leave ur react :feelswhat: may also be of interest to heightmaxxers @Osie another rlly good thread https://looksmax.org/threads/underrated-factor-of-high-igf-1-levels-liver-function.842345/unread thread theme song Liver...
Again, if you want to qualify for BOTB, please read this.
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...
If you have any questions, please message me or a moderator by heading to my profile and pressing "Start Conversation".
Once your thread meets these qualifications...
- Submit: Once your thread meets these qualifications, submit the link below or notify one of the moderators (and link the thread(s), please).
- Evaluation: One of the moderators will carefully review your submission.
- Notification: If your thread is selected, we will notify you and promote it to the "Best of the Best" section.
Note: This thread will be edited from time to time by the moderators as the website's environment changes.
Tagging all moderators: @TRUE_CEL @enchanted_elixir @Preston @Lmao @Kingkellz @Gargantuan @NegativeNorwood @StoicSperg @tyronelite @AscendingHero @Niklaus Mikaelson @5ft1 @Lorsss @Alexanderr @Master
@Lygodactylus @8PSLcel @Br0sk1 @PrinceLuenLeoncur Chadeep@Chadeep @LMSMaxxer @Xangsane @mulattomaxxer @RottenSperg @StrangerDanger @Predeterminism @KING REIDYZ @AscendingHero @Prettyboy @SupremeSubhuman @Mogpogs @Piratecel @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Preoximerianas @tyronelite @FailedNormieManlet @Lars @Korea @bogii @StreegeReturn @Biggdink @eren1 @Reckless Turtle @Broly Banderas @House Lannister @WannabeJock @Racky @Erik-Jón @heightface @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Clark69 @ilovelamp08 @St.TikTokcel
@Anstrum95 @TeenAscender @loox @justadude @vaseqmoherad @astatine @Amnesia @Sigmamale @anya @dimorphism @Assyrian_Warrior @FreakkForLife @ThousandCuts @5footsix56 @Alexanderr @HQNPmaxxing @currylightskin @BasedPsychiatrist @´´´´´´´´ @ALP @HOLYFUARK @Chadpreetmaybe @BeenLMSsinceMSN @Kroker @oldcelloser @Tinydragon98 @Hiraeth @ascension! @HimmyButler @latincell95 @niko @latino_ @capybara @LiteralCaucasian @crimclown63 @Zures @Unsh @reptiles @pneumocystosis @Moggie
@Nation @RIPPED IRL @Saturn @Patient A @dieavirgin @SteveRogers @fogdart @Clark69 @vaninskybird @Racky @Beastimmung @Prince charming @NegativeNorwood @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @fjor2096 @callisto @Corleone @BasedPsychiatrist @heightface @currylightskin @HOLYFUARK @Anstrum95 @Moggedbyevery1 @StepbroMo @gamma2 @Unsh @Daniel Plainview @teemowhite @luljankybo @bogii @5ft1 @Chadpreetmaybe @latino_ @tesseract @FrameMogger @edward999 @Hiraeth @bleksandre @op463 @NFA PB @HerpDerpson @THEMOGGER @Bezel @norwegiancel @Moggie @ascension! @Frozqen @saulgoodman @crimclown63 @BigBundaSlapper @killaeast @Aypo129 @tbh af @jfbjfb @brea @dimorphism @CT03 @throwaway12902 @Tuxiio @Van @Sprinkles @futuregigamogger @julianchicago @HimmyButler @LiteralCaucasian @gribsufer1 @notrealdanish @Never Give Up! @Euclidious @Sarx @jim @garoupilled_ @5footsix56
IQMaxxedSubhuman
Iron
- Joined
- Jul 6, 2026
- Posts
- 230
- Reputation
- 215
enchanted_elixir
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖈𝖊𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖞 𝕮𝖔𝖗𝖕 • 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐🥉• Inactive
Contributor
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2022
- Posts
- 24,578
- Reputation
- 43,919
Please review my submission for BOTB.
Askinov
𝖋𝖚𝖙𝖚𝖗𝖊 𝟔'𝟏 𝖍𝖙𝖓 𝖘𝖑𝖆𝖞𝖊𝖗
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2025
- Posts
- 4,763
- Reputation
- 11,250
Bro thinks he can surpass my eye area guide
insecurity8
Iron
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2026
- Posts
- 4
- Reputation
- 0
holy
jotunnr
The Infamous
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2026
- Posts
- 2,082
- Reputation
- 3,376
WAY WAY better than the current nose thread
@Gengar’s Ghost @Navity @enchanted_elixir back me up
Navity
Looksmaxxing Coach
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Posts
- 7,117
- Reputation
- 18,469
I'll make some calls.
Navity
Looksmaxxing Coach
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Posts
- 7,117
- Reputation
- 18,469
This joke never gets old
enchanted_elixir
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖈𝖊𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖞 𝕮𝖔𝖗𝖕 • 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐🥉• Inactive
Contributor
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2022
- Posts
- 24,578
- Reputation
- 43,919
Navity
Looksmaxxing Coach
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Posts
- 7,117
- Reputation
- 18,469
This was one of the best guides I've seen in a while, definitely deserves BOTB
enchanted_elixir
𝕸𝖊𝖗𝖈𝖊𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖞 𝕮𝖔𝖗𝖕 • 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐🥉• Inactive
Contributor
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2022
- Posts
- 24,578
- Reputation
- 43,919
Thank you, man!This was one of the best guides I've seen in a while, definitely deserves BOTB
Navity
Looksmaxxing Coach
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Posts
- 7,117
- Reputation
- 18,469
Facial-hairmaxxing (GTFIHHH!!)(High-Effort)
Gather around children. Today we shall talk about Hair, facial hair and Importance of a good balance between Feminine and masculine Features. Importance "Oh yEh shAve mOGs bro:feelsuhh:" I'll prove you wrong in this thread. Facial hair generally enhances a man's attractiveness by signaling...
looksmax.org
Navity
Looksmaxxing Coach
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Posts
- 7,117
- Reputation
- 18,469
@GargantuanFacial-hairmaxxing (GTFIHHH!!)(High-Effort)
Gather around children. Today we shall talk about Hair, facial hair and Importance of a good balance between Feminine and masculine Features. Importance "Oh yEh shAve mOGs bro:feelsuhh:" I'll prove you wrong in this thread. Facial hair generally enhances a man's attractiveness by signaling...
Navity
Looksmaxxing Coach
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2025
- Posts
- 7,117
- Reputation
- 18,469
@Mods can I also change the title? This thread is already BOTB on multiple forums.Facial-hairmaxxing (GTFIHHH!!)(High-Effort)
Gather around children. Today we shall talk about Hair, facial hair and Importance of a good balance between Feminine and masculine Features. Importance "Oh yEh shAve mOGs bro:feelsuhh:" I'll prove you wrong in this thread. Facial hair generally enhances a man's attractiveness by signaling...
Chazza.cl
𝕺𝖒𝖓𝖎𝖛𝖚𝖑𝖙𝖚𝖘 𝕸𝖔𝖙𝖚𝖘
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2026
- Posts
- 2,549
- Reputation
- 5,067
Juqss.
𝐖𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐖𝐎𝐋𝐅
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2026
- Posts
- 803
- Reputation
- 1,312
Dear forum members,
As a newly appointed moderator of this website, my primary objective is to identify outstanding threads and give justice to the rotting gems on the looksmaxing section, and promote them to the "Best of the Best" section. Having assumed my role just a few hours ago, I am eager to fulfill my promise right away.
- Reactions:
- The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
- Relevance:
- The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
- It should either be educational and/or instructional.
- The thread demonstrates what it promises.
- The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best.
- The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (common sense) to normies.
- Effort:
- The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
- Evidence and Quality:
- The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
- The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
- The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
- Presentation:
- The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
- The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
- The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
- If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious.
- The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
- Originality:
- The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.
Here is a deeper explanation of the rubric. Please read if you're interested in getting your thread approved for BOTB.
Reactions:
This is very straightforward. Your thread needs to get 20+ positive reacts.
- The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
Relevance:
Pretty self-explanatory. Topics that don't help people looksmax, understand the blackpill, or self-improve don't count.
- The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
The thread should teach people something and/or show them how to do something.
- It should either be educational and/or instructional.
If your title is "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", please talk about that. If the thread is 95% about how fantastic plants are, or the thread doesn't really fulfill the promise of showing a "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", it would violate this rule.
- The thread demonstrates what it promises.
If there is a thread already in the BOTB section on the topic you'll discuss, then the thread you will write must be better.
- The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best. If there's already another fashion thread, for example in the BOTB section that is superior to your fashion thread, your thread isn't eligible.
A thread that mostly or entirely states very obvious things that normies know will not be added, like "Why Acne is a Looksmin", even if it's obvious to users, it still qualifies, as long as it isn't obvious to normies, because remember, we have much more lurkers than users. But if it's obvious to normies, it doesn't qualify.
- The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (aka common sense) to most of the target audience. This would basically mean that if the thread contains information that most non-blackpilled normies would know, it wouldn't qualify. Example: A thread solely dedicated to "Why acne destroys your looks" would violate this one.
Effort:
Very easy. Threads that appear high-effort only. No moderate-effort or low effort threads.
- The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort, and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
Evidence and Quality:
The thread shouldn't demonstrate threads that are empty, narrow, limited, and shallow when it comes to information. If you're going to make a skin guide, explain everything you know and can find online about skin. If you're talking about a more narrow subject, like How to turn straight hair curly, explain everything you know about how to turn straight hair curly! People want information-rich threads, especially when it comes to understanding the topic and solutions (if applicable) to the topic. Threads that are shallow or information-poor, or missing crucial information won't be added.
- The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
This is the most important one. Especially when it comes to things that are science-based.
- The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
Get the facts right. Know what you're talking about. Demonstrate your understanding. Threads explaining things that the author doesn't know about can't be added to BOTB due to possible misinformation or the lack of crucial information. Please, always do as much research as possible and learn as much about the topic as possible. You'd be amazed at how much you don't know. Trust me. I removed almost all of my own BOTB threads in November 2023 for a reason, this reason specifically.
Example: Someone makes a guide on how to grow taller, and they know nothing about how HGH converts to IGF-1 in the liver and the whole thread assumes more HGH = more growth, not knowing that things like protein, minerals aromatase inhibitors, and vitamins also are important. This person's thread can't go to BOTB.
When it comes to using scientific evidence. If you took information from a scientific source of information, like a research paper, scientific article, etc. to write your thread, it's vital that you cite your sources. At the absolute minimum, show the link of the source you got your information from. Pasting the link on the thread or on the bottom of the thread in its own section is good. Citations are preferred.
- The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
Outside of that, if the thread is on things that are objective, like ways to grow taller, the information on the thread should be as truthful as possible. Threads that have misinformation on objective topics or that don't have good reasoning on topics that might be subjective (like opinions) won't qualify.
You don't have to cite evidence or anything if the topic is susceptible to subjectivity. Fashion is a good example, since fashion is susceptible to subjectivity. Anything that is susceptible to subjectivity will be assessed based on the thread's reasoning and consensus among users and moderators. If you're making a thread recommending people to wear dresses, the reasoning is bad (why would a straight male wear a dress as a looksmax?), and it won't gain consensus, therefore, it won't qualify.
When it comes to conjectural threads (A conjecture is a statement that is believed to be true, but has not yet been proven. Conjectures are based on intuition, observation, or experience, but lack formal proof and are based on incomplete information). The reasoning for the conjecture has to be solid.
For example, if you hypothesize or theorize something is likely to be true, like maybe you think a certain supplement can do something nobody (not even in the scientific community) has thought about in terms of looksmaxing, display good reasoning for it.
Opinions and theories. are touchy, since they can actually be good ones. If it's opinion-based or a theory, please add as many sources, pieces of evidence, or as much solid reasoning to back it up, to avoid the thread look like pure opinion or an uncredible theory or a hypothesis. With opinions and theories, consensus and great reasoning is the key to qualifying, so be extremely persuasive.
Presentation:
Example Topic: Health, and how it relates to Looksmaxing
- The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
Good Title: "Ultimate Health Guide: How To Maximize Your Health & Why Health is ESSENTIAL For Looksmaxing"
Bad Title: "health guide (high effort everyone GTFIH NOW)"
If the thread shows that the user can't spell, doesn't understand proper grammar, doesn't know how to punctuate, etc. It can't qualify.
- The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
Threads that are hard to read, are incoherent, look like run-on sentences, or are poorly formatted or any other major structuring or formatting flaws will not qualify. People don't want to read threads that are hard to read or ugly.
- The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
Easy to explain. If necessary, the thread must explain to the reader what the topic, and content of the thread is and why it's important. If you're talking about why people should take a supplement, explain why. You must explain the why's and answer questions users may have when reading your thread, unless it's super obvious, like why not eating for a year will kill you.
- If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious, like getting rid of acne, explaining to people why it's important is necessary.
Incomprehensible threads that sound like Shakespeare wrote a PhD paper on the relationship between looksmaxing, quantum superchemistry and teleology will not be added to BOTB, since nobody will understand it and few will put in the effort to understand it, making the thread useless even if the information in it is great.
- The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
Originality:
This is because we value originality, effort and expertise. Generating threads with language models doesn't really demonstrate that the user actually is knowledgeable in a subject. Language models may either not be experts on these subjects, or the user may be a poor prompt engineer, causing these language models to give shallow level information on the topic, and can possibly give misinformation, hard to understand explanations, too simple and incomprehensive explanations, or demonstrate a bad understanding of the topic or audience. People who use these tools to write their threads may not realize this since they don't know better, therefore hindering the quality of the thread. As with threads that are mostly copypasta/information from external sources, this can't qualify since that user didn't actually write a majority of the thread, therefore, it isn't original. Again, we want the author to know what they're talking about and an author that is using mostly external, non-original information is less likely to know what they are talking about.
- The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.
You can always copy and paste the rubric in GPT to ask it if the thread fits the criteria or ask a moderator or someone you trust to evaluate your draft for you in the PMs.
Want to know how to write BOTB-Worthy threads? Click the thread below.
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...
Notes:
- Moderators, especially me can fix minor flaws for you, like bad titles and typos, or flaws that are easy to fix. Things like reformatting an entire thread usually won't happen unless the thread is extremely good.
- Compilations of good and valuable threads can qualify for BOTB. Just tag me and I'll analyze it. The qualification for compilations don't follow the above rules.
- Reasons for rejections are not limited to these criteria. In very rare cases, I do reject threads due to things not in the rubric, and update this thread accordingly. For example, as of October 9th, 2023, I recently added the Originality criteria since I saw a thread I couldn't promote to BOTB due to it being mostly generated by A.I.
- Reactions: The thread has less than 20 positive reactions from the community.
- Relevance: The thread isn't about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. The thread doesn't demonstrate what it promises.
- Effort: The thread is short, or not high-effort, below 500 words.
- Evidence: The thread doesn't present valid information, not information-dense, doesn't have good reasoning, and/or has no evidence.
- Presentation: The thread is hard to read and follow, is hard to understand, isn't organized, isn't coherent, has poor formatting, bad title (ex. "guide on eyes", "HOW TO GET WOMEN ONLINE GTFIH EVERYONE + PICS + I SLAYED A STACY LOL")
- Originality: Thread is written entirely or mostly by A.I. or copypasta from another source.
Examples of qualifiable threads
by @coispetThe Nose: Importance of the nasal base and how to find the correct nasal surgery for your nose
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE NOSE IN FACIAL AESTHETICS The nose can be a deciding factor on whether an individual is deemed attractive or not, a large proportion of this forum will claim that a good nose is only a necessity to facial aesthetics and is not a critical aspect when analysing the face...
by @BucketCrabMale Archetypes Spectrum
Introduction There is a lot of talk around here about prettyboys, mascmaxxers, ogres and the like. It becomes exceedingly complex to cleanly understand what these archetypes refer to, as posters often use different words to refer to the same concepts, or have twisted views of what an archetype...
by @garoupilled_The Sleepmaxxing Playbook: understand why and how to have the best deep night rest possible with this value-packed sleep megaguide
What if I told you... that scientists have discovered a brand new revolutionary pill, that when taken daily... increases your lifespan by 10 years, makes your face more attractive, increases IQ, lowers depression and anxiety, enhances memory by 20%, increases testosterone production by 15%...
by @BucketCrabBucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide - Understanding Hair & How To Get Beautiful Hair As Quick As Possible.
“...hair is architecture with a human element.” – Vidal Sassoon BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide the fastest way to understand hair, and how to make it beautiful Introduction This guide is written with the explicit aim to educate people about hair care in order to achieve beautiful hair as...
by @PrettyboyHow I Achieved A Chad Physique Naturally (My Detailed Exercise Routine)
I. Overview of the routine II. Monday: Upper body 1 Seated cable rows They are as good at building up the thickness of the back as weighted pull ups at widening it. Sets: 4 Reps: 8-12 https://www.strengthlog.com/cable-wide-grip-seated-row/ Shoulders Shoulder press A constantly rotate...
by @the MOUSEBOTB LIVER HEALTHMAXXING GUIDE
inb4 dnrd n reading without reacting, just skip to end conclusion n leave ur react :feelswhat: may also be of interest to heightmaxxers @Osie another rlly good thread https://looksmax.org/threads/underrated-factor-of-high-igf-1-levels-liver-function.842345/unread thread theme song Liver...
Again, if you want to qualify for BOTB, please read this.
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...
If you have any questions, please message me or a moderator by heading to my profile and pressing "Start Conversation".
Once your thread meets these qualifications...
- Submit: Once your thread meets these qualifications, submit the link below or notify one of the moderators (and link the thread(s), please).
- Evaluation: One of the moderators will carefully review your submission.
- Notification: If your thread is selected, we will notify you and promote it to the "Best of the Best" section.
Note: This thread will be edited from time to time by the moderators as the website's environment changes.
Tagging all moderators: @TRUE_CEL @enchanted_elixir @Preston @Lmao @Kingkellz @Gargantuan @NegativeNorwood @StoicSperg @tyronelite @AscendingHero @Niklaus Mikaelson @5ft1 @Lorsss @Alexanderr @Master
@Lygodactylus @8PSLcel @Br0sk1 @PrinceLuenLeoncur Chadeep@Chadeep @LMSMaxxer @Xangsane @mulattomaxxer @RottenSperg @StrangerDanger @Predeterminism @KING REIDYZ @AscendingHero @Prettyboy @SupremeSubhuman @Mogpogs @Piratecel @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Preoximerianas @tyronelite @FailedNormieManlet @Lars @Korea @bogii @StreegeReturn @Biggdink @eren1 @Reckless Turtle @Broly Banderas @House Lannister @WannabeJock @Racky @Erik-Jón @heightface @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Clark69 @ilovelamp08 @St.TikTokcel
@Anstrum95 @TeenAscender @loox @justadude @vaseqmoherad @astatine @Amnesia @Sigmamale @anya @dimorphism @Assyrian_Warrior @FreakkForLife @ThousandCuts @5footsix56 @Alexanderr @HQNPmaxxing @currylightskin @BasedPsychiatrist @´´´´´´´´ @ALP @HOLYFUARK @Chadpreetmaybe @BeenLMSsinceMSN @Kroker @oldcelloser @Tinydragon98 @Hiraeth @ascension! @HimmyButler @latincell95 @niko @latino_ @capybara @LiteralCaucasian @crimclown63 @Zures @Unsh @reptiles @pneumocystosis @Moggie
@Nation @RIPPED IRL @Saturn @Patient A @dieavirgin @SteveRogers @fogdart @Clark69 @vaninskybird @Racky @Beastimmung @Prince charming @NegativeNorwood @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @fjor2096 @callisto @Corleone @BasedPsychiatrist @heightface @currylightskin @HOLYFUARK @Anstrum95 @Moggedbyevery1 @StepbroMo @gamma2 @Unsh @Daniel Plainview @teemowhite @luljankybo @bogii @5ft1 @Chadpreetmaybe @latino_ @tesseract @FrameMogger @edward999 @Hiraeth @bleksandre @op463 @NFA PB @HerpDerpson @THEMOGGER @Bezel @norwegiancel @Moggie @ascension! @Frozqen @saulgoodman @crimclown63 @BigBundaSlapper @killaeast @Aypo129 @tbh af @jfbjfb @brea @dimorphism @CT03 @throwaway12902 @Tuxiio @Van @Sprinkles @futuregigamogger @julianchicago @HimmyButler @LiteralCaucasian @gribsufer1 @notrealdanish @Never Give Up! @Euclidious @Sarx @jim @garoupilled_ @5footsix56
Juqss.
𝐖𝐄𝐑𝐄𝐖𝐎𝐋𝐅
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2026
- Posts
- 803
- Reputation
- 1,312
Dear forum members,
As a newly appointed moderator of this website, my primary objective is to identify outstanding threads and give justice to the rotting gems on the looksmaxing section, and promote them to the "Best of the Best" section. Having assumed my role just a few hours ago, I am eager to fulfill my promise right away.
- Reactions:
- The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
- Relevance:
- The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
- It should either be educational and/or instructional.
- The thread demonstrates what it promises.
- The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best.
- The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (common sense) to normies.
- Effort:
- The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
- Evidence and Quality:
- The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
- The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
- The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
- Presentation:
- The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
- The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
- The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
- If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious.
- The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
- Originality:
- The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.
Here is a deeper explanation of the rubric. Please read if you're interested in getting your thread approved for BOTB.
Reactions:
This is very straightforward. Your thread needs to get 20+ positive reacts.
- The thread must receive at least 20 positive reactions from the community.
Relevance:
Pretty self-explanatory. Topics that don't help people looksmax, understand the blackpill, or self-improve don't count.
- The thread must be about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement.
The thread should teach people something and/or show them how to do something.
- It should either be educational and/or instructional.
If your title is "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", please talk about that. If the thread is 95% about how fantastic plants are, or the thread doesn't really fulfill the promise of showing a "Megadictionary of Phytonutrients for Looksmaxing", it would violate this rule.
- The thread demonstrates what it promises.
If there is a thread already in the BOTB section on the topic you'll discuss, then the thread you will write must be better.
- The thread should be the best thread on that topic, and not inferior to what is already in the best of the best. If there's already another fashion thread, for example in the BOTB section that is superior to your fashion thread, your thread isn't eligible.
A thread that mostly or entirely states very obvious things that normies know will not be added, like "Why Acne is a Looksmin", even if it's obvious to users, it still qualifies, as long as it isn't obvious to normies, because remember, we have much more lurkers than users. But if it's obvious to normies, it doesn't qualify.
- The information in it also shouldn't be mostly or entirely water (aka common sense) to most of the target audience. This would basically mean that if the thread contains information that most non-blackpilled normies would know, it wouldn't qualify. Example: A thread solely dedicated to "Why acne destroys your looks" would violate this one.
Effort:
Very easy. Threads that appear high-effort only. No moderate-effort or low effort threads.
- The thread must demonstrate a high level of effort, and thoughtfulness. 500 words minimum.
Evidence and Quality:
The thread shouldn't demonstrate threads that are empty, narrow, limited, and shallow when it comes to information. If you're going to make a skin guide, explain everything you know and can find online about skin. If you're talking about a more narrow subject, like How to turn straight hair curly, explain everything you know about how to turn straight hair curly! People want information-rich threads, especially when it comes to understanding the topic and solutions (if applicable) to the topic. Threads that are shallow or information-poor, or missing crucial information won't be added.
- The thread should comprehensively explain the topic it promises to discuss.
This is the most important one. Especially when it comes to things that are science-based.
- The author must demonstrate a good (preferably deep) understanding of what is being discussed. Threads that demonstrate a shallow understanding or no understanding will not be added to BOTB.
Get the facts right. Know what you're talking about. Demonstrate your understanding. Threads explaining things that the author doesn't know about can't be added to BOTB due to possible misinformation or the lack of crucial information. Please, always do as much research as possible and learn as much about the topic as possible. You'd be amazed at how much you don't know. Trust me. I removed almost all of my own BOTB threads in November 2023 for a reason, this reason specifically.
Example: Someone makes a guide on how to grow taller, and they know nothing about how HGH converts to IGF-1 in the liver and the whole thread assumes more HGH = more growth, not knowing that things like protein, minerals aromatase inhibitors, and vitamins also are important. This person's thread can't go to BOTB.
When it comes to using scientific evidence. If you took information from a scientific source of information, like a research paper, scientific article, etc. to write your thread, it's vital that you cite your sources. At the absolute minimum, show the link of the source you got your information from. Pasting the link on the thread or on the bottom of the thread in its own section is good. Citations are preferred.
- The thread should be as truthful as possible on objective topics, display solid conjecture, or backed by great reasoning and consensus on subjective subjects.
Outside of that, if the thread is on things that are objective, like ways to grow taller, the information on the thread should be as truthful as possible. Threads that have misinformation on objective topics or that don't have good reasoning on topics that might be subjective (like opinions) won't qualify.
You don't have to cite evidence or anything if the topic is susceptible to subjectivity. Fashion is a good example, since fashion is susceptible to subjectivity. Anything that is susceptible to subjectivity will be assessed based on the thread's reasoning and consensus among users and moderators. If you're making a thread recommending people to wear dresses, the reasoning is bad (why would a straight male wear a dress as a looksmax?), and it won't gain consensus, therefore, it won't qualify.
When it comes to conjectural threads (A conjecture is a statement that is believed to be true, but has not yet been proven. Conjectures are based on intuition, observation, or experience, but lack formal proof and are based on incomplete information). The reasoning for the conjecture has to be solid.
For example, if you hypothesize or theorize something is likely to be true, like maybe you think a certain supplement can do something nobody (not even in the scientific community) has thought about in terms of looksmaxing, display good reasoning for it.
Opinions and theories. are touchy, since they can actually be good ones. If it's opinion-based or a theory, please add as many sources, pieces of evidence, or as much solid reasoning to back it up, to avoid the thread look like pure opinion or an uncredible theory or a hypothesis. With opinions and theories, consensus and great reasoning is the key to qualifying, so be extremely persuasive.
Presentation:
Example Topic: Health, and how it relates to Looksmaxing
- The thread must be titled properly. Poorly titled threads like "skin guide BOTB" will not qualify.
Good Title: "Ultimate Health Guide: How To Maximize Your Health & Why Health is ESSENTIAL For Looksmaxing"
Bad Title: "health guide (high effort everyone GTFIH NOW)"
If the thread shows that the user can't spell, doesn't understand proper grammar, doesn't know how to punctuate, etc. It can't qualify.
- The thread must be written properly. Frequent grammar, spelling, punctuation mistakes, among others, will not qualify.
Threads that are hard to read, are incoherent, look like run-on sentences, or are poorly formatted or any other major structuring or formatting flaws will not qualify. People don't want to read threads that are hard to read or ugly.
- The thread must be coherent, structured (having chapters, sections or table of contents) and formatted properly.
Easy to explain. If necessary, the thread must explain to the reader what the topic, and content of the thread is and why it's important. If you're talking about why people should take a supplement, explain why. You must explain the why's and answer questions users may have when reading your thread, unless it's super obvious, like why not eating for a year will kill you.
- If relevant, the thread must explain what the topic and content is about and why it is important. Unless it's super obvious, like getting rid of acne, explaining to people why it's important is necessary.
Incomprehensible threads that sound like Shakespeare wrote a PhD paper on the relationship between looksmaxing, quantum superchemistry and teleology will not be added to BOTB, since nobody will understand it and few will put in the effort to understand it, making the thread useless even if the information in it is great.
- The thread must be clear, lucid, and easy to understand for the average person. Terms that are not commonly known must be explained simply and comprehensively.
Originality:
This is because we value originality, effort and expertise. Generating threads with language models doesn't really demonstrate that the user actually is knowledgeable in a subject. Language models may either not be experts on these subjects, or the user may be a poor prompt engineer, causing these language models to give shallow level information on the topic, and can possibly give misinformation, hard to understand explanations, too simple and incomprehensive explanations, or demonstrate a bad understanding of the topic or audience. People who use these tools to write their threads may not realize this since they don't know better, therefore hindering the quality of the thread. As with threads that are mostly copypasta/information from external sources, this can't qualify since that user didn't actually write a majority of the thread, therefore, it isn't original. Again, we want the author to know what they're talking about and an author that is using mostly external, non-original information is less likely to know what they are talking about.
- The majority of the text must be written by the author. Threads written mostly or entirely generated by A.I. language models, mostly comprised of copypasta, information from external sources, or other's writing won't be added to BOTB.
You can always copy and paste the rubric in GPT to ask it if the thread fits the criteria or ask a moderator or someone you trust to evaluate your draft for you in the PMs.
Want to know how to write BOTB-Worthy threads? Click the thread below.
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...
Notes:
- Moderators, especially me can fix minor flaws for you, like bad titles and typos, or flaws that are easy to fix. Things like reformatting an entire thread usually won't happen unless the thread is extremely good.
- Compilations of good and valuable threads can qualify for BOTB. Just tag me and I'll analyze it. The qualification for compilations don't follow the above rules.
- Reasons for rejections are not limited to these criteria. In very rare cases, I do reject threads due to things not in the rubric, and update this thread accordingly. For example, as of October 9th, 2023, I recently added the Originality criteria since I saw a thread I couldn't promote to BOTB due to it being mostly generated by A.I.
- Reactions: The thread has less than 20 positive reactions from the community.
- Relevance: The thread isn't about looksmaxing, blackpill, or self-improvement. The thread doesn't demonstrate what it promises.
- Effort: The thread is short, or not high-effort, below 500 words.
- Evidence: The thread doesn't present valid information, not information-dense, doesn't have good reasoning, and/or has no evidence.
- Presentation: The thread is hard to read and follow, is hard to understand, isn't organized, isn't coherent, has poor formatting, bad title (ex. "guide on eyes", "HOW TO GET WOMEN ONLINE GTFIH EVERYONE + PICS + I SLAYED A STACY LOL")
- Originality: Thread is written entirely or mostly by A.I. or copypasta from another source.
Examples of qualifiable threads
by @coispetThe Nose: Importance of the nasal base and how to find the correct nasal surgery for your nose
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE NOSE IN FACIAL AESTHETICS The nose can be a deciding factor on whether an individual is deemed attractive or not, a large proportion of this forum will claim that a good nose is only a necessity to facial aesthetics and is not a critical aspect when analysing the face...
by @BucketCrabMale Archetypes Spectrum
Introduction There is a lot of talk around here about prettyboys, mascmaxxers, ogres and the like. It becomes exceedingly complex to cleanly understand what these archetypes refer to, as posters often use different words to refer to the same concepts, or have twisted views of what an archetype...
by @garoupilled_The Sleepmaxxing Playbook: understand why and how to have the best deep night rest possible with this value-packed sleep megaguide
What if I told you... that scientists have discovered a brand new revolutionary pill, that when taken daily... increases your lifespan by 10 years, makes your face more attractive, increases IQ, lowers depression and anxiety, enhances memory by 20%, increases testosterone production by 15%...
by @BucketCrabBucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide - Understanding Hair & How To Get Beautiful Hair As Quick As Possible.
“...hair is architecture with a human element.” – Vidal Sassoon BucketCrab's Practical Hair Guide the fastest way to understand hair, and how to make it beautiful Introduction This guide is written with the explicit aim to educate people about hair care in order to achieve beautiful hair as...
by @PrettyboyHow I Achieved A Chad Physique Naturally (My Detailed Exercise Routine)
I. Overview of the routine II. Monday: Upper body 1 Seated cable rows They are as good at building up the thickness of the back as weighted pull ups at widening it. Sets: 4 Reps: 8-12 https://www.strengthlog.com/cable-wide-grip-seated-row/ Shoulders Shoulder press A constantly rotate...
by @the MOUSEBOTB LIVER HEALTHMAXXING GUIDE
inb4 dnrd n reading without reacting, just skip to end conclusion n leave ur react :feelswhat: may also be of interest to heightmaxxers @Osie another rlly good thread https://looksmax.org/threads/underrated-factor-of-high-igf-1-levels-liver-function.842345/unread thread theme song Liver...
Again, if you want to qualify for BOTB, please read this.
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads
How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads by @enchanted_elixir Table of Contents Introduction Explaining The Rubric In Detail & Tips on How To Qualify Outline and Clarity Formatting Writing and Research Citations Writing Tools [/SPOILER] Tips on How To Write BOTB-Worthy Threads def...
If you have any questions, please message me or a moderator by heading to my profile and pressing "Start Conversation".
Once your thread meets these qualifications...
- Submit: Once your thread meets these qualifications, submit the link below or notify one of the moderators (and link the thread(s), please).
- Evaluation: One of the moderators will carefully review your submission.
- Notification: If your thread is selected, we will notify you and promote it to the "Best of the Best" section.
Note: This thread will be edited from time to time by the moderators as the website's environment changes.
Tagging all moderators: @TRUE_CEL @enchanted_elixir @Preston @Lmao @Kingkellz @Gargantuan @NegativeNorwood @StoicSperg @tyronelite @AscendingHero @Niklaus Mikaelson @5ft1 @Lorsss @Alexanderr @Master
@Lygodactylus @8PSLcel @Br0sk1 @PrinceLuenLeoncur Chadeep@Chadeep @LMSMaxxer @Xangsane @mulattomaxxer @RottenSperg @StrangerDanger @Predeterminism @KING REIDYZ @AscendingHero @Prettyboy @SupremeSubhuman @Mogpogs @Piratecel @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Preoximerianas @tyronelite @FailedNormieManlet @Lars @Korea @bogii @StreegeReturn @Biggdink @eren1 @Reckless Turtle @Broly Banderas @House Lannister @WannabeJock @Racky @Erik-Jón @heightface @PURE ARYAN GENETICS @Clark69 @ilovelamp08 @St.TikTokcel
@Anstrum95 @TeenAscender @loox @justadude @vaseqmoherad @astatine @Amnesia @Sigmamale @anya @dimorphism @Assyrian_Warrior @FreakkForLife @ThousandCuts @5footsix56 @Alexanderr @HQNPmaxxing @currylightskin @BasedPsychiatrist @´´´´´´´´ @ALP @HOLYFUARK @Chadpreetmaybe @BeenLMSsinceMSN @Kroker @oldcelloser @Tinydragon98 @Hiraeth @ascension! @HimmyButler @latincell95 @niko @latino_ @capybara @LiteralCaucasian @crimclown63 @Zures @Unsh @reptiles @pneumocystosis @Moggie
@Nation @RIPPED IRL @Saturn @Patient A @dieavirgin @SteveRogers @fogdart @Clark69 @vaninskybird @Racky @Beastimmung @Prince charming @NegativeNorwood @Shitfacegoodbod=mog @fjor2096 @callisto @Corleone @BasedPsychiatrist @heightface @currylightskin @HOLYFUARK @Anstrum95 @Moggedbyevery1 @StepbroMo @gamma2 @Unsh @Daniel Plainview @teemowhite @luljankybo @bogii @5ft1 @Chadpreetmaybe @latino_ @tesseract @FrameMogger @edward999 @Hiraeth @bleksandre @op463 @NFA PB @HerpDerpson @THEMOGGER @Bezel @norwegiancel @Moggie @ascension! @Frozqen @saulgoodman @crimclown63 @BigBundaSlapper @killaeast @Aypo129 @tbh af @jfbjfb @brea @dimorphism @CT03 @throwaway12902 @Tuxiio @Van @Sprinkles @futuregigamogger @julianchicago @HimmyButler @LiteralCaucasian @gribsufer1 @notrealdanish @Never Give Up! @Euclidious @Sarx @jim @garoupilled_ @5footsix56
Similar threads
RoidER333
