Erectus Walks Amongst us - The most controversial and racist book ever written

vinn98

vinn98

Kraken
Joined
Dec 7, 2021
Posts
5,452
Reputation
10,161
Summary: Author argues against the Out of Africa theory and instead proposes the Out of Eurasia theory. In this model different humans arose in Eurasia and there was movement of human subspecies into Africa during the ice ages over hundreds of thousands of years when the Sahara desert was traversable. This would explain why Africa is the most genetically diverse continent, because they were getting an introgression of genes from Eurasia over hundreds of thousands of years. It would also explain why there are Asian-looking black people in South Africa and why Africans were recently found to be 0.3% neanderthal even though neanderthals lived only in Eurasia. He argues that because Africa didn't have the harsh environment of Eurasia they were always a few steps behind evolutionary, and genes for intelligence and cooperation were not advantageous.

He claims that West Africans like Nigerians are the most pure of the black race and this is who American blacks descend from. He claims that East Africans look more caucasian because this region was one of the main entry points from Eurasia into Africa. He also claims that Europeans get their features from neanderthals.


Quote from book

Congoids
Because the Congoids are the most simian Africans and live in one of the areas most inaccessible to Eurasian migrants into Africa, they are likely to be descended from some of the oldest hominoids that migrated into Africa. The tropically-adapted traits of the Congoids, e.g., dark, hairless skin and short, wooly black head hair, were most likely brought into Africa by a tropics-specialized bipedal ape, probably a species of Australopithecus. Although Hs and Hss migrated south into both SE Asia and Africa, displacing more primitive hominids, in SE Asia the primitive hominids were driven onto islands and there was less interbreeding with them. In Africa, however, Hs and Hss did not survive as well. As a result, fewer Hs and Hss alleles entered the African genome, especially the more isolated Congoids, who therefore retained more of the simian traits of their ape ancestors

78qxuET.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: ArcticStorm, ChadFucksYourOneitis, klip11 and 7 others
Classic
 
  • +1
Reactions: ArcticStorm
Summary: Author argues against the Out of Africa theory and instead proposes the Out of Eurasia theory. In this model different humans arose in Eurasia and there was movement of human subspecies into Africa during the ice ages over hundreds of thousands of years when the Sahara desert was traversable. This would explain why Africa is the most genetically diverse continent, because they were getting an introgression of genes from Eurasia over hundreds of thousands of years. It would also explain why there are Asian-looking black people in South Africa and why Africans were recently found to be 0.3% neanderthal even though neanderthals lived only in Eurasia. He argues that because Africa didn't have the harsh environment of Eurasia they were always a few steps behind evolutionary, and genes for intelligence and cooperation were not advantageous.

He claims that West Africans like Nigerians are the most pure of the black race and this is who American blacks descend from. He claims that East Africans look more caucasian because this region was one of the main entry points from Eurasia into Africa. He also claims that Europeans get their features from neanderthals.


Quote from book



78qxuET.jpeg
that orc monkeyman picture always cracks me up. This along with buck breaking are timeless classics.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ArcticStorm and Deleted member 16369
"""evolution"""
 
He argues against the Out of Africa theory and claims that humans originated in Eurasia. He says Africans are basically a mixture of different subspecies of archaic hominid species like homo erectus. He says evolution was slower in Africa because they didn't have the harsh environment of Eurasia.
 
Last edited:
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: ArcticStorm and Aypo129
He says Africans are basically a mixture of different subspecies of archaic hominid species like homo erectus and more primitive than Eurasians.
YO that means Africans are not human
 
YO that means Africans are not human
The mainstream conensus right now is that no one is 100% "human" because it's known that other hominid species like neanderthals and denisovans mixed with humans.
 
One of his most controversial theories, he believes the prognathism (protruding of lower jaw) in Africans is a trait from ancestors closer to apes. He believes that the ancestors of west Africans mixed with chimpanzees more than a million years ago when interbreeding was possible.
NOTE he's not saying blacks are basically chimpanzees, they're of course much much closer to Eurasians than a monkey. He's saying there's slight influence though from ancient times.

offset_1106721.jpg
il_fullxfull.3943824990_7wg9.jpg


portrait-profile-teenage-girl-brunette-european-years-old-dark-long-hair-indoor-223898157.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16369 and Danish_Retard
Summary: Author argues against the Out of Africa theory and instead proposes the Out of Eurasia theory. In this model different humans arose in Eurasia and there was movement of human subspecies into Africa during the ice ages over hundreds of thousands of years when the Sahara desert was traversable. This would explain why Africa is the most genetically diverse continent, because they were getting an introgression of genes from Eurasia over hundreds of thousands of years. It would also explain why there are Asian-looking black people in South Africa and why Africans were recently found to be 0.3% neanderthal even though neanderthals lived only in Eurasia. He argues that because Africa didn't have the harsh environment of Eurasia they were always a few steps behind evolutionary, and genes for intelligence and cooperation were not advantageous.

He claims that West Africans like Nigerians are the most pure of the black race and this is who American blacks descend from. He claims that East Africans look more caucasian because this region was one of the main entry points from Eurasia into Africa. He also claims that Europeans get their features from neanderthals.


Quote from book



78qxuET.jpeg
This theory falls flat when you analyse the climate apes live and strive in. Humans originated in Africa and moved northward. This is why white people are more cucked than blacks. They are the outcasts of the true master race.
 
More and more the mainstream is moving towards his Out of Eurasia theory, in the past it would be considered racist.

Researchers find signs of western Eurasian genes in southern African Khoisan tribes​

Scientists believe humans evolved from ancestral primates in Africa several hundred thousand years ago, but it wasn't until approximately 65,000 years ago that they made their way out of Africa and into the Middle East and eventually the rest of the world. Until recently, that migration has been viewed by most scientists as a one-way trip. Gene studies over the past several years has turned that thinking around, however, as its been found that many people in several parts of Africa have European or Asian gene segments in their DNA. In this latest study, the researchers have found evidence of Eurasian genes in tribespeople who were thought to have a purely African ancestry.


You can clearly see these indigenous tribes in South Africa have Asian mixture

5-researchersf.jpg
khoisan.jpg
the-khoisan-people-v0-djzi5lhzu0fa1.jpg
 
This theory falls flat when you analyse the climate apes live and strive in. Humans originated in Africa and moved northward. This is why white people are more cucked than blacks. They are the outcasts of the true master race.
There were large apes in Eurasia.

Today's apes are few in number and in kind. But between 22 million and 5.5 million years ago, a time known as the Miocene epoch, apes ruled the primate world. Up to 100 ape species ranged throughout the Old World, from France to China in Eurasia and from Kenya to Namibia in Africa. Yet fossils of great apes--the large-bodied group represented today by chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans (gibbons and siamangs make up the so-called lesser apes)--have turned up only in western and central Europe, Greece, Turkey, South Asia and China. It is thus becoming clear that, by Darwin's logic, Eurasia is more likely than Africa to have been the birthplace of the family that encompasses great apes and humans, the hominids.

 
@Octillionaire finds this book racist and reprehensible and will be reporting this book to his local BLM chapter and his local ADL chapter
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 16369
@NubhumanSiggers
 

Similar threads

King Solomon
Replies
26
Views
509
barettrealrx
barettrealrx
.Myth
Replies
412
Views
32K
looks>books
looks>books
dreamcake1mo
Replies
45
Views
9K
xyukeeee
xyukeeee
B
Replies
27
Views
2K
BrahminBoss
BrahminBoss

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top