GTFIH Test your mouth area

VampyrMaxx

VampyrMaxx

π–†π–šπ–™π–Žπ–˜π–’ 𝖆𝖙 π–Žπ–™π–˜ π–‹π–Žπ–“π–Šπ–˜π–™
Joined
Oct 10, 2024
Posts
2,526
Reputation
2,619
Perfect mouth area: Upturned mouth corners (ideal), 54mm wide mouth, defined lips and vermillion border, good upper and lower lip thickness, good fat pads around the mouth

1759674689517


Downturned mouth corners (unideal)

1759674731887


Neutral mouth corners (unideal but not as bad as downturned)

1759674808726


Thin Lips (Unideal)

1759676251620


Thick Lips (Unideal; with average Caucasian philtrum anatomy)

1759676340814


Thick Lips that MOG

1759676387245


Narrow Mouths

52mm

1759675196824


50mm

1759675612172


48mm

1759675681378


46mm

1759675746486


44mm

1759675780580


Wide Mouths

56mm

1759675962616


58mm

1759676027688


60mm

1759676085120


62mm

1759676119221


64mm

1759676153056
 
  • +1
Reactions: dawooddX, hax and slaters
@Luca_.
 
If you missed my last thread

 
on average philtrum anatomy of a Caucasian they should be full but not thick. Thick lips can only be supported by people with a short philtrum. Otherwise you look uncanny

You wouldn't be able to convince me that a Caucasian with a 15mm philtrum would look good with these lips

1759678042734
 
they should be full but not thick.
What's the difference?
The pic you attached doesn't look too thick & Jeremy Meeks has thicker.
Thick lips can only be supported by people with a short philtrum. Otherwise you look uncanny
Don't Lips reduce philtrum height?
If Philtrum to chin & facial thirds are good, they should be Ideal no?
You wouldn't be able to convince me that a Caucasian with a 15mm philtrum would look good with these lips

View attachment 4177672
I think I'm misunderstanding something, can you clear my doubts?
 
  • +1
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
What's the difference?
The pic you attached doesn't look too thick & Jeremy Meeks has thicker.

Don't Lips reduce philtrum height?
If Philtrum to chin & facial thirds are good, they should be Ideal no?

I think I'm misunderstanding something, can you clear my doubts?
The anatomy of africans is different than caucasians. This is why ratios dont work when analyzing a face, you will always have to look at the features themselves. You wouldn't be able to tell if both the features (chin and philtrum) are ideal from looking at one number from the ratio. You will have to look at the individual features themselves to determine whether they are good or not.

The ideal chin to philtrum is 2.67 (no pun intended) as indicated by this photo.

1759679114229


I can increase or decrease the philtrum to maintain the 2.67. This morph is a bit extreme but the 2.67 is basically maintained. The problem is not the "ratio", the problem is that the philtrum and the chin are both too long. This is why features only matter not ratios.

1759679227852


The point I was trying to make with the photos is that Africans have a shorter philtrum and thicker lips to compensate for the mouth area, but Caucasians have a longer philtrum with thinner lips to compensate. Both look good but they compensate in different areas to maintain a working and aesthetic mouth area.

 
Perfect mouth area: Upturned mouth corners (ideal), 54mm wide mouth, defined lips and vermillion border, good upper and lower lip thickness, good fat pads around the mouth

View attachment 4177523

Downturned mouth corners (unideal)

View attachment 4177525

Neutral mouth corners (unideal but not as bad as downturned)

View attachment 4177528

Thin Lips (Unideal)

View attachment 4177586


Thick Lips (Unideal; with average Caucasian philtrum anatomy)

View attachment 4177591

Thick Lips that MOG

View attachment 4177594


Narrow Mouths

52mm

View attachment 4177533

50mm

View attachment 4177549


48mm

View attachment 4177553

46mm

View attachment 4177556

44mm

View attachment 4177561

Wide Mouths

56mm

View attachment 4177568

58mm

View attachment 4177572

60mm

View attachment 4177581

62mm

View attachment 4177583

64mm

View attachment 4177585
Why do I think a wider mouth looks more good as it signifies masuclinity and dimorphism, I think 58mm should be the ideal
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: VampyrMaxx
Why do I think a wider mouth looks more good as it signifies masuclinity and dimorphism, I think 58mm should be the ideal
Really? I think it could look good at 56 maybe, but 58? No way, it starts becoming uncanny imo

58 isnt masculine and dimorphic, that would be 54
 
Also, mouth width aesthetics can also be semi-dependent on phenotype, this is for mostly Caucasian anatomy**
 

Similar threads

Zeba
Replies
70
Views
11K
ΒΏNero
ΒΏNero
NZb6Air
Replies
154
Views
33K
Deleted member 56968
D
dragomaxxer
Replies
83
Views
14K
narcissuscurrycel
narcissuscurrycel
emeraldglass
Replies
8
Views
69K
Phillybeard1996
P

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top