vantablack pill=none of it matters. no matter how great your accomplishment, how good you look, how many foids you fucked, or how many children you've had, the survival of your specific genome past a few hundred years is incredibly unlikely due to the infinite amount of factors involved that can end your bloodline in an instant. furthermore, cosmic events well beyond the control of any human will almost certainly destroy all record of human existence eventually. beyond that, the entropic head death of the universe guarantees it.
Not true.
This is wrong. With this way of thinking, you come to the conclusion men and woman are equal. Even though we are not.Its a zero sum game, we cant expect girls to be saints while we act like horny degenerates
100000000000%
No woman will ever feel the natural and primal attraction towards a rich statusmaxxed recessed baldcel she would feel towards the next door Chad>>B-b-but Tate has a recessed jaw, a bad eye area and is bald so, therefore, he cannot be seen as high value!!
Because men and woman aren't equal and shouldn't be used in the same metric regarding sex.Please elaborate..
that didn’t disprove my point lol..
I don’t expect all woman to be traditional. There’s always going to be whores and good girls.that didn’t disprove my point lol..
You guys want to be slayers but expect chicks to be virgins???
You do realize… everytime you smash a chick you just added +1 to her body count
No lol they're all the same bro
Yes I agree this is the "rule" but there are exceptions no doubt.
Na, bro, destroy alreadyread everything boyos...dissapointed in a lot of you ....lol at "men and women are equal" bs.....i will destroy your copes tomorrow...too tired rn for this bs
Is she curry
ye
Their fathers help to mold them into high value women of character, not you. The prevalence of single mothers is the root of society's degradation today.This is all my own opinion btw. Everyone’s to each their own
There’s no such thing as high quality woman.. woman don’t come out the womb “high quality” unless you’re just talking about looks.. but that’s surface level mindset
You make her high quality based on your own standards & how she benefits your life & your program
Even if you’re doing everything right in the LTR there’s nothing you can do to stop her urges / impulses
It has nothing to do with you. It’s based off her own selfish desires
You cannot control women, you can only influence, guide & lead them
So if she cheats don’t get mad lol understand it what was out of her own selfish desire & charge her to the game
How will you test whether or not she’s has a one night stand before you met her?
How do you know she’s not putting on an act just to get you to like her more & possibly secure an LTR?
Unless you’re EXCLUSIVELY dating virgins, most chicks have already had some form of a ONS.. whether she was drunk or it was a regular hookup
And if you’re smart & have self awareness any guy would steer away from women who get drunk on a weekly basis & is eliminated from the LTR vetting process
Her attachment & emotions to you lol
Have we not seen Love Island?
New chads come in the villa, some girls turn others didn’t why? Because they’re already attached & have an emotional bond to the guy they’re with
Exhibit A: Tasha & Andrew vs Charlie
Its the same way how you made your night out thread where you met this chick who would’ve cheated on her bf with you
Her DESIRE to cheat on her bf with YOU was more important than losing the LTR
And she was probably not even that sexually / behaviorally attracted to him in the first place so that’ll make it worse
It all goes back to selfishness.
This whole “Chad will come in & steal your gf” is a meme.. unless you’re the most beta, needy, feminine bitch ass nigga she’s ever met
Inb4 cope, you’re
@Gargantuan delete any derailing comments if needed
I’m sure some of you have seen the latest episode of Stand Out TV by now. In case you haven’t seen it and are interested in watching it before reading the thread, here’s the link:
If you’re not familiar with what this show is about, in a nutshell, it’s about this chick named Chian who goes on these fake dates with various high-profile men who are public figures. She asks them a bunch of questions (stupid shit, really) trying to assess how ‘worthy’ he is to the modern female (jfl at that).
In this particular episode, she hosted none other than Andrew Tate, with whom most of you on the forum I assume are familiar.
Disclaimer: I’m not going to summarize what was said in the video, I’m merely going to give my reflections on the bigger picture.
A quick glance over the comments section will have you believe that Tate ‘destroyed’ her and largely made her look foolish in front of the public. Having watched the video in its entirety, I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with those statements.
HOWEVER, this may not be a good thing and here’s why:
To start off, this video truly epitomizes the modern-day battle of the sexes. The men tuning in will be cheering on Andrew Tate, presumably believing that this will embolden more men to stand up against women.
And yet, I couldn’t help but think that this isn’t going to change the minds of women and it might in fact make things WORSE.
If anything, they are going to double down because they have the weight of the establishment and the media on their side.
Additionally, what’s worth noting is how disrespectful this girl is towards Andrew Tate. Meanwhile, Tate is actually being very respectful to her as an individual. And yet, she doesn’t afford him the same level of respect.
Who is Andrew Tate and why is this significant?
View attachment 1757376View attachment 1757377View attachment 1757378
- A multimillionaire, not the spoon-fed kind but the SELF-MADE kind
- A successful businessman, for which he has had to work his ass off
- A former kickboxing world champion
- A high-value male altogether
>>B-b-but Tate has a recessed jaw, a bad eye area and is bald so, therefore, he cannot be seen as high value!!
>>B-b-but if Tate had looked like prime Chico or Gandy she wouldn’t have disrespected him!!
But even if that were the case in your stupid hypothetical scenario, that’s not the point, you retard.
The point is that her behaviour/attitude sends a message to the (female) audience because the reality of things is that here we have a female who will never understand the blood, sweat and tears that it takes for a man (who isn’t genetically gifted) to become high-value and yet she still OPENLY disrespects him.
Meanwhile, as a woman, you only need to look somewhat pretty (make-up can do wonders, even for bang-average-looking chicks
So now it’s seen as NORMAL for girls to talk disrespectfully to guys who have literally worked a million times harder than they will ever have to work in their lives.
Realistically speaking, it is absurd how a tramp of a woman like that can even sit at the same table with someone like Andrew Tate.
>>B-b-but all of this can be circumvented if you’re good-looking because when girls find you attractive they won’t disrespect you and you’ll still be seen as high-value!!
WRONG!
Even chads like Amnesia, someone 99% of users here will NEVER even get close to in terms of looks, get openly disrespected by women too, as is evident in the threads he makes.
>>It’s because he’s an aspie and non-NT
>>It’s because he’s a frauding manlet
>>It’s because he doesn’t have the latest iPhone
No, you retards, it’s because modern western women are a total fucking WRITE-OFF. It has always amazed me how on a blackpilled forum of all places, more and more users are blaming MEN for not conforming whilst simultaneously performing all sorts of mental gymnastics as to why a guy gets rejected or can’t get laid when the problem in this day and age has always been women’s insane entitlement.
You cannot expect to constantly be able to appease a group of individuals whose accountability goes unchecked, as is the case with western women. As long as men don't hold women to a certain standard, this will continue to be the case.
If you want to succeed in the modern dating scene in the west, you have to adapt to survive to a certain extent, sure, I get that, but please draw the line somewhere for your sanity and have some fucking integrity.
Nothing makes me cringe more than these guys who beat themselves up because they didn’t meet some whore’s insane standards, jfl. It's not easy out there and a lot of men are deprived, this is true, but there's more to life than chasing after some low-life tramps.
If you know what you’re worth then go get what you’re worth and the reality of that is that most of these absolute tramps in the west should not be worthy of YOUR time, not the other way round.
Unless you are looking to slay until the day you die, what you should be looking for instead is a REAL high-value woman. Most men don’t care about how much money a woman makes, they care about if she’s a HOE or not.
Tate touched upon this issue multiple times throughout the video and raised an interesting point on how male-female relations in the west could potentially be fixed if females had their body counts displayed on their foreheads:
>>B-b-but why is it okay for men to sleep around with lots of women?
View attachment 1757346
I hear women use this argument all the time.
This is hilarious to me because, in reality, women will look at a man and if he’s good-looking, makes loads of money, lives a nice lifestyle, is of high status etc. but has also slept with 300 women, a lot of them will still go for this guy, even if nothing comes of it in the long term.
But no man worth anything would even dream of being with a woman who has slept with 300 men
Promiscuity has always been a masculine trait, things are different for men and women and this is another thing that women can’t seem to grasp when you try to explain it to them.
So why is all of this a problem, you may ask?
Well, as I had already mentioned previously, it’s the fact that even high-value men have to put up with tramp-like characters like this Chian in the west who will openly disrespect them while bringing nothing to the table themselves.
So, even if you ascend, in terms of looks, money and/or status, the vast majority of women you will have at your disposal will still be utter TRASH.
Tradwives are basically unicorns at this point in the west, but they are still your best bet if you ever wish to settle down.
Naturally, a male looks for nurturing qualities in a female. However, modern females, like this dumb bitch in the video seem to think that being a career woman constitutes a high-value woman
If a man wants to settle down, he should look for someone who isn’t going to compete for his position because everyone can’t play the same position at the end of the day.
So, whenever you hear this woman or any woman for that matter, talking about being a ‘’team’’ of ‘’equals’’, you know that she’s a total write-off and that things will never work out between the two of you in the long term.
Mutual dependency is key. When the woman depends on you (for a lot), then the relationship can work. If not, forget about ever happily settling down with a woman, she's not high-value.
Tagging some users who might have already watched this episode and/or are interested in reading/discussing the subject matter at hand:
@tyronelite @alriodai @whiteissuperior @Nameless_Sunflower @volcelfatcel @looksmaxxer234 @Mouthbreath @currylightskin @Afrikancel @vanilla @subhuman incel @Kingkellz @AscendingHero @Baldingman1998 @forevergymcelling @ForeverRecession @RAITEIII @Preston @TsarTsar444 @Hades @Vietnam
Having everything handed to you by virtue of having a vagina is destiny?
Not everyone does that nowadays at all cuz muh independancy and i hate foids for this but its how society should be if traditionalHaving everything handed to you by virtue of having a vagina is destiny?
I gotta disagree,it all boils down to your image,if u have a good one then even ur biggest enemy can't do shit about it.protect ur image at all cost.i was the kind of guy that used to abuse girls and call them names all the time but u know what?many girls defended me and didn't give two shits about it.boys naturally laughed it off with me and supported me.its easy to malign women than u think,u just gotta play the hoe card at perfect moment and everyone will believe you.
It's already destroyed mate,u have faggots and pedophiles roaming freely.womrn whore around whenever they want and neglecting her children when they require her mother.no sense of promoting intellectualness but promoting whoreness among teenage girls.making boys think that being weak is a good trait and u must submit to the will of women.
it is ; based; but faggots arent the pb, the women are and their nastiness and these
beta simps, which constitutes 99% of western "men"Depends on the ration of females to males, the higher the ratio, the more women one can fuck without all of them having a high body count.
I’m sure some of you have seen the latest episode of Stand Out TV by now. In case you haven’t seen it and are interested in watching it before reading the thread, here’s the link:
If you’re not familiar with what this show is about, in a nutshell, it’s about this chick named Chian who goes on these fake dates with various high-profile men who are public figures. She asks them a bunch of questions (stupid shit, really) trying to assess how ‘worthy’ he is to the modern female (jfl at that).
In this particular episode, she hosted none other than Andrew Tate, with whom most of you on the forum I assume are familiar.
Disclaimer: I’m not going to summarize what was said in the video, I’m merely going to give my reflections on the bigger picture.
A quick glance over the comments section will have you believe that Tate ‘destroyed’ her and largely made her look foolish in front of the public. Having watched the video in its entirety, I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with those statements.
HOWEVER, this may not be a good thing and here’s why:
To start off, this video truly epitomizes the modern-day battle of the sexes. The men tuning in will be cheering on Andrew Tate, presumably believing that this will embolden more men to stand up against women.
And yet, I couldn’t help but think that this isn’t going to change the minds of women and it might in fact make things WORSE.
If anything, they are going to double down because they have the weight of the establishment and the media on their side.
Additionally, what’s worth noting is how disrespectful this girl is towards Andrew Tate. Meanwhile, Tate is actually being very respectful to her as an individual. And yet, she doesn’t afford him the same level of respect.
Who is Andrew Tate and why is this significant?
View attachment 1757376View attachment 1757377View attachment 1757378
- A multimillionaire, not the spoon-fed kind but the SELF-MADE kind
- A successful businessman, for which he has had to work his ass off
- A former kickboxing world champion
- A high-value male altogether
>>B-b-but Tate has a recessed jaw, a bad eye area and is bald so, therefore, he cannot be seen as high value!!
>>B-b-but if Tate had looked like prime Chico or Gandy she wouldn’t have disrespected him!!
But even if that were the case in your stupid hypothetical scenario, that’s not the point, you retard.
The point is that her behaviour/attitude sends a message to the (female) audience because the reality of things is that here we have a female who will never understand the blood, sweat and tears that it takes for a man (who isn’t genetically gifted) to become high-value and yet she still OPENLY disrespects him.
Meanwhile, as a woman, you only need to look somewhat pretty (make-up can do wonders, even for bang-average-looking chicks
So now it’s seen as NORMAL for girls to talk disrespectfully to guys who have literally worked a million times harder than they will ever have to work in their lives.
Realistically speaking, it is absurd how a tramp of a woman like that can even sit at the same table with someone like Andrew Tate.
>>B-b-but all of this can be circumvented if you’re good-looking because when girls find you attractive they won’t disrespect you and you’ll still be seen as high-value!!
WRONG!
Even chads like Amnesia, someone 99% of users here will NEVER even get close to in terms of looks, get openly disrespected by women too, as is evident in the threads he makes.
>>It’s because he’s an aspie and non-NT
>>It’s because he’s a frauding manlet
>>It’s because he doesn’t have the latest iPhone
No, you retards, it’s because modern western women are a total fucking WRITE-OFF. It has always amazed me how on a blackpilled forum of all places, more and more users are blaming MEN for not conforming whilst simultaneously performing all sorts of mental gymnastics as to why a guy gets rejected or can’t get laid when the problem in this day and age has always been women’s insane entitlement.
You cannot expect to constantly be able to appease a group of individuals whose accountability goes unchecked, as is the case with western women. As long as men don't hold women to a certain standard, this will continue to be the case.
If you want to succeed in the modern dating scene in the west, you have to adapt to survive to a certain extent, sure, I get that, but please draw the line somewhere for your sanity and have some fucking integrity.
Nothing makes me cringe more than these guys who beat themselves up because they didn’t meet some whore’s insane standards, jfl. It's not easy out there and a lot of men are deprived, this is true, but there's more to life than chasing after some low-life tramps.
If you know what you’re worth then go get what you’re worth and the reality of that is that most of these absolute tramps in the west should not be worthy of YOUR time, not the other way round.
Unless you are looking to slay until the day you die, what you should be looking for instead is a REAL high-value woman. Most men don’t care about how much money a woman makes, they care about if she’s a HOE or not.
Tate touched upon this issue multiple times throughout the video and raised an interesting point on how male-female relations in the west could potentially be fixed if females had their body counts displayed on their foreheads:
>>B-b-but why is it okay for men to sleep around with lots of women?
View attachment 1757346
I hear women use this argument all the time.
This is hilarious to me because, in reality, women will look at a man and if he’s good-looking, makes loads of money, lives a nice lifestyle, is of high status etc. but has also slept with 300 women, a lot of them will still go for this guy, even if nothing comes of it in the long term.
But no man worth anything would even dream of being with a woman who has slept with 300 men
Promiscuity has always been a masculine trait, things are different for men and women and this is another thing that women can’t seem to grasp when you try to explain it to them.
So why is all of this a problem, you may ask?
Well, as I had already mentioned previously, it’s the fact that even high-value men have to put up with tramp-like characters like this Chian in the west who will openly disrespect them while bringing nothing to the table themselves.
So, even if you ascend, in terms of looks, money and/or status, the vast majority of women you will have at your disposal will still be utter TRASH.
Tradwives are basically unicorns at this point in the west, but they are still your best bet if you ever wish to settle down.
Naturally, a male looks for nurturing qualities in a female. However, modern females, like this dumb bitch in the video seem to think that being a career woman constitutes a high-value woman
If a man wants to settle down, he should look for someone who isn’t going to compete for his position because everyone can’t play the same position at the end of the day.
So, whenever you hear this woman or any woman for that matter, talking about being a ‘’team’’ of ‘’equals’’, you know that she’s a total write-off and that things will never work out between the two of you in the long term.
Mutual dependency is key. When the woman depends on you (for a lot), then the relationship can work. If not, forget about ever happily settling down with a woman, she's not high-value.
Tagging some users who might have already watched this episode and/or are interested in reading/discussing the subject matter at hand:
@tyronelite @alriodai @whiteissuperior @Nameless_Sunflower @volcelfatcel @looksmaxxer234 @Mouthbreath @currylightskin @Afrikancel @vanilla @subhuman incel @Kingkellz @AscendingHero @Baldingman1998 @forevergymcelling @ForeverRecession @RAITEIII @Preston @TsarTsar444 @Hades @Vietnam
Rare hebbewem l
Tate has put himself in a catch -22. He ought to looksmax and surgerymax, but now that he is a public figure he can't do it without people noticing and calling him insecure.
I’m sure some of you have seen the latest episode of Stand Out TV by now. In case you haven’t seen it and are interested in watching it before reading the thread, here’s the link:
If you’re not familiar with what this show is about, in a nutshell, it’s about this chick named Chian who goes on these fake dates with various high-profile men who are public figures. She asks them a bunch of questions (stupid shit, really) trying to assess how ‘worthy’ he is to the modern female (jfl at that).
In this particular episode, she hosted none other than Andrew Tate, with whom most of you on the forum I assume are familiar.
Disclaimer: I’m not going to summarize what was said in the video, I’m merely going to give my reflections on the bigger picture.
A quick glance over the comments section will have you believe that Tate ‘destroyed’ her and largely made her look foolish in front of the public. Having watched the video in its entirety, I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with those statements.
HOWEVER, this may not be a good thing and here’s why:
To start off, this video truly epitomizes the modern-day battle of the sexes. The men tuning in will be cheering on Andrew Tate, presumably believing that this will embolden more men to stand up against women.
And yet, I couldn’t help but think that this isn’t going to change the minds of women and it might in fact make things WORSE.
If anything, they are going to double down because they have the weight of the establishment and the media on their side.
Additionally, what’s worth noting is how disrespectful this girl is towards Andrew Tate. Meanwhile, Tate is actually being very respectful to her as an individual. And yet, she doesn’t afford him the same level of respect.
Who is Andrew Tate and why is this significant?
View attachment 1757376View attachment 1757377View attachment 1757378
- A multimillionaire, not the spoon-fed kind but the SELF-MADE kind
- A successful businessman, for which he has had to work his ass off
- A former kickboxing world champion
- A high-value male altogether
>>B-b-but Tate has a recessed jaw, a bad eye area and is bald so, therefore, he cannot be seen as high value!!
>>B-b-but if Tate had looked like prime Chico or Gandy she wouldn’t have disrespected him!!
But even if that were the case in your stupid hypothetical scenario, that’s not the point, you retard.
The point is that her behaviour/attitude sends a message to the (female) audience because the reality of things is that here we have a female who will never understand the blood, sweat and tears that it takes for a man (who isn’t genetically gifted) to become high-value and yet she still OPENLY disrespects him.
Meanwhile, as a woman, you only need to look somewhat pretty (make-up can do wonders, even for bang-average-looking chicks
So now it’s seen as NORMAL for girls to talk disrespectfully to guys who have literally worked a million times harder than they will ever have to work in their lives.
Realistically speaking, it is absurd how a tramp of a woman like that can even sit at the same table with someone like Andrew Tate.
>>B-b-but all of this can be circumvented if you’re good-looking because when girls find you attractive they won’t disrespect you and you’ll still be seen as high-value!!
WRONG!
Even chads like Amnesia, someone 99% of users here will NEVER even get close to in terms of looks, get openly disrespected by women too, as is evident in the threads he makes.
>>It’s because he’s an aspie and non-NT
>>It’s because he’s a frauding manlet
>>It’s because he doesn’t have the latest iPhone
No, you retards, it’s because modern western women are a total fucking WRITE-OFF. It has always amazed me how on a blackpilled forum of all places, more and more users are blaming MEN for not conforming whilst simultaneously performing all sorts of mental gymnastics as to why a guy gets rejected or can’t get laid when the problem in this day and age has always been women’s insane entitlement.
You cannot expect to constantly be able to appease a group of individuals whose accountability goes unchecked, as is the case with western women. As long as men don't hold women to a certain standard, this will continue to be the case.
If you want to succeed in the modern dating scene in the west, you have to adapt to survive to a certain extent, sure, I get that, but please draw the line somewhere for your sanity and have some fucking integrity.
Nothing makes me cringe more than these guys who beat themselves up because they didn’t meet some whore’s insane standards, jfl. It's not easy out there and a lot of men are deprived, this is true, but there's more to life than chasing after some low-life tramps.
If you know what you’re worth then go get what you’re worth and the reality of that is that most of these absolute tramps in the west should not be worthy of YOUR time, not the other way round.
Unless you are looking to slay until the day you die, what you should be looking for instead is a REAL high-value woman. Most men don’t care about how much money a woman makes, they care about if she’s a HOE or not.
Tate touched upon this issue multiple times throughout the video and raised an interesting point on how male-female relations in the west could potentially be fixed if females had their body counts displayed on their foreheads:
>>B-b-but why is it okay for men to sleep around with lots of women?
View attachment 1757346
I hear women use this argument all the time.
This is hilarious to me because, in reality, women will look at a man and if he’s good-looking, makes loads of money, lives a nice lifestyle, is of high status etc. but has also slept with 300 women, a lot of them will still go for this guy, even if nothing comes of it in the long term.
But no man worth anything would even dream of being with a woman who has slept with 300 men
Promiscuity has always been a masculine trait, things are different for men and women and this is another thing that women can’t seem to grasp when you try to explain it to them.
So why is all of this a problem, you may ask?
Well, as I had already mentioned previously, it’s the fact that even high-value men have to put up with tramp-like characters like this Chian in the west who will openly disrespect them while bringing nothing to the table themselves.
So, even if you ascend, in terms of looks, money and/or status, the vast majority of women you will have at your disposal will still be utter TRASH.
Tradwives are basically unicorns at this point in the west, but they are still your best bet if you ever wish to settle down.
Naturally, a male looks for nurturing qualities in a female. However, modern females, like this dumb bitch in the video seem to think that being a career woman constitutes a high-value woman
If a man wants to settle down, he should look for someone who isn’t going to compete for his position because everyone can’t play the same position at the end of the day.
So, whenever you hear this woman or any woman for that matter, talking about being a ‘’team’’ of ‘’equals’’, you know that she’s a total write-off and that things will never work out between the two of you in the long term.
Mutual dependency is key. When the woman depends on you (for a lot), then the relationship can work. If not, forget about ever happily settling down with a woman, she's not high-value.
Tagging some users who might have already watched this episode and/or are interested in reading/discussing the subject matter at hand:
@tyronelite @alriodai @whiteissuperior @Nameless_Sunflower @volcelfatcel @looksmaxxer234 @Mouthbreath @currylightskin @Afrikancel @vanilla @subhuman incel @Kingkellz @AscendingHero @Baldingman1998 @forevergymcelling @ForeverRecession @RAITEIII @Preston @TsarTsar444 @Hades @Vietnam
I’m sure some of you have seen the latest episode of Stand Out TV by now. In case you haven’t seen it and are interested in watching it before reading the thread, here’s the link:
If you’re not familiar with what this show is about, in a nutshell, it’s about this chick named Chian who goes on these fake dates with various high-profile men who are public figures. She asks them a bunch of questions (stupid shit, really) trying to assess how ‘worthy’ he is to the modern female (jfl at that).
In this particular episode, she hosted none other than Andrew Tate, with whom most of you on the forum I assume are familiar.
Disclaimer: I’m not going to summarize what was said in the video, I’m merely going to give my reflections on the bigger picture.
A quick glance over the comments section will have you believe that Tate ‘destroyed’ her and largely made her look foolish in front of the public. Having watched the video in its entirety, I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with those statements.
HOWEVER, this may not be a good thing and here’s why:
To start off, this video truly epitomizes the modern-day battle of the sexes. The men tuning in will be cheering on Andrew Tate, presumably believing that this will embolden more men to stand up against women.
And yet, I couldn’t help but think that this isn’t going to change the minds of women and it might in fact make things WORSE.
If anything, they are going to double down because they have the weight of the establishment and the media on their side.
Additionally, what’s worth noting is how disrespectful this girl is towards Andrew Tate. Meanwhile, Tate is actually being very respectful to her as an individual. And yet, she doesn’t afford him the same level of respect.
Who is Andrew Tate and why is this significant?
View attachment 1757376View attachment 1757377View attachment 1757378
- A multimillionaire, not the spoon-fed kind but the SELF-MADE kind
- A successful businessman, for which he has had to work his ass off
- A former kickboxing world champion
- A high-value male altogether
>>B-b-but Tate has a recessed jaw, a bad eye area and is bald so, therefore, he cannot be seen as high value!!
>>B-b-but if Tate had looked like prime Chico or Gandy she wouldn’t have disrespected him!!
But even if that were the case in your stupid hypothetical scenario, that’s not the point, you retard.
The point is that her behaviour/attitude sends a message to the (female) audience because the reality of things is that here we have a female who will never understand the blood, sweat and tears that it takes for a man (who isn’t genetically gifted) to become high-value and yet she still OPENLY disrespects him.
Meanwhile, as a woman, you only need to look somewhat pretty (make-up can do wonders, even for bang-average-looking chicks
So now it’s seen as NORMAL for girls to talk disrespectfully to guys who have literally worked a million times harder than they will ever have to work in their lives.
Realistically speaking, it is absurd how a tramp of a woman like that can even sit at the same table with someone like Andrew Tate.
>>B-b-but all of this can be circumvented if you’re good-looking because when girls find you attractive they won’t disrespect you and you’ll still be seen as high-value!!
WRONG!
Even chads like Amnesia, someone 99% of users here will NEVER even get close to in terms of looks, get openly disrespected by women too, as is evident in the threads he makes.
>>It’s because he’s an aspie and non-NT
>>It’s because he’s a frauding manlet
>>It’s because he doesn’t have the latest iPhone
No, you retards, it’s because modern western women are a total fucking WRITE-OFF. It has always amazed me how on a blackpilled forum of all places, more and more users are blaming MEN for not conforming whilst simultaneously performing all sorts of mental gymnastics as to why a guy gets rejected or can’t get laid when the problem in this day and age has always been women’s insane entitlement.
You cannot expect to constantly be able to appease a group of individuals whose accountability goes unchecked, as is the case with western women. As long as men don't hold women to a certain standard, this will continue to be the case.
If you want to succeed in the modern dating scene in the west, you have to adapt to survive to a certain extent, sure, I get that, but please draw the line somewhere for your sanity and have some fucking integrity.
Nothing makes me cringe more than these guys who beat themselves up because they didn’t meet some whore’s insane standards, jfl. It's not easy out there and a lot of men are deprived, this is true, but there's more to life than chasing after some low-life tramps.
If you know what you’re worth then go get what you’re worth and the reality of that is that most of these absolute tramps in the west should not be worthy of YOUR time, not the other way round.
Unless you are looking to slay until the day you die, what you should be looking for instead is a REAL high-value woman. Most men don’t care about how much money a woman makes, they care about if she’s a HOE or not.
Tate touched upon this issue multiple times throughout the video and raised an interesting point on how male-female relations in the west could potentially be fixed if females had their body counts displayed on their foreheads:
>>B-b-but why is it okay for men to sleep around with lots of women?
View attachment 1757346
I hear women use this argument all the time.
This is hilarious to me because, in reality, women will look at a man and if he’s good-looking, makes loads of money, lives a nice lifestyle, is of high status etc. but has also slept with 300 women, a lot of them will still go for this guy, even if nothing comes of it in the long term.
But no man worth anything would even dream of being with a woman who has slept with 300 men
Promiscuity has always been a masculine trait, things are different for men and women and this is another thing that women can’t seem to grasp when you try to explain it to them.
So why is all of this a problem, you may ask?
Well, as I had already mentioned previously, it’s the fact that even high-value men have to put up with tramp-like characters like this Chian in the west who will openly disrespect them while bringing nothing to the table themselves.
So, even if you ascend, in terms of looks, money and/or status, the vast majority of women you will have at your disposal will still be utter TRASH.
Tradwives are basically unicorns at this point in the west, but they are still your best bet if you ever wish to settle down.
Naturally, a male looks for nurturing qualities in a female. However, modern females, like this dumb bitch in the video seem to think that being a career woman constitutes a high-value woman
If a man wants to settle down, he should look for someone who isn’t going to compete for his position because everyone can’t play the same position at the end of the day.
So, whenever you hear this woman or any woman for that matter, talking about being a ‘’team’’ of ‘’equals’’, you know that she’s a total write-off and that things will never work out between the two of you in the long term.
Mutual dependency is key. When the woman depends on you (for a lot), then the relationship can work. If not, forget about ever happily settling down with a woman, she's not high-value.
Tagging some users who might have already watched this episode and/or are interested in reading/discussing the subject matter at hand:
@tyronelite @alriodai @whiteissuperior @Nameless_Sunflower @volcelfatcel @looksmaxxer234 @Mouthbreath @currylightskin @Afrikancel @vanilla @subhuman incel @Kingkellz @AscendingHero @Baldingman1998 @forevergymcelling @ForeverRecession @RAITEIII @Preston @TsarTsar444 @Hades @Vietnam
its a glitch, and she looks like a girl i knew
wtf is this couple from russia?
I can TAKE her reproductive value
it is very easy to do why do you think it is women that brought the dowry?
She didn't like me, we'd just met and were housemates
