Ideal facial ratios and proportions

nigkook

nigkook

Dalit truecel
Joined
Jun 8, 2023
Posts
2,144
Reputation
3,009
this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here

facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper lip.

lower/full face ratio: 0.62+
measured by dividing the height between the nasion to the bottom of the chin by the face height (distance from hairline to bottom of the chin)

midface ratio: 1.0-1.1
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the height of the nasion to the upper lip. the closer to 1:1 this is, the better.

mouth to nose ratio: 1.5-1.62
measured by dividing the width of the mouth by the width of the nose.

lower to upper lip ratio: 1.62
measured by dividing the height of the lower lip to the upper lip.

chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0-2.25
measured by dividing the height of the middle part of the lips to the bottom of the chin by the height of the bottom of the nose to the middle part of the lips.

bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.35
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the bigonial width (distance from gonion to gonion).

ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.45-0.47
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone). the "third eyeball method" - a theory in which the distance between your eyes should be another eye apart - is widely accepted in determining whether or not your eyes are an appropriate distance away from eachother, however this is flawed and incorrect. here is a thread explaining why, along with some more useful information about this measurement.

EME (eye mouth eye) angle: 47°-50°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the center of the lips with the arms crossing the eye pupils. the EME angle is a good indicator of masculinity and symmetry. here is a thread with more information about this measurement.

cervicomental angle: 105°-120°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the hyoid with the arms set along the bottom of the chin and the neck. anything above 120° is said to give the impression of a double chin.

gonial angle: 115°-130°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the gonion with the arms set along the mandible and the ramus.

canthal tilt: 4°-6°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the medial canthus with the arms set parallel to the floor and the lateral canthus.

palpebral fissure length to height ratio: 3.0-3.5
measured by dividing the palpebral fissure length (distance between the medial to the lateral canthus) by the height of the upper and lower eyelid.

forehead height: 3 fingers
measured by clenching your fingers together and seeing how many you can fit on your forehead horizontally before reaching your hairline.

facial thirds: 1/3 of face length
the upper third (height between the hairline to the middle part of the eyebrows), middle third (height between the middle part of the eyebrows to the bottom of the nose) and lower third (height between the bottom of the nose to bottom of the chin) of the face should be approximately 1/3rd of your entire face length (height between the hairline to bottom of the chin). these facial thirds should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 3 parts as you transition down the face.

facial fifths: 1/5 of ear to ear width
the nose width, palpebral fissure length and length between the lateral canthus to the ear should be approximately 1/5th of the width between your ears. these facial fifths should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 5 parts as you transition from left to right of the face.
Mirin thread op even if it's 4 years old jfl
 
Jilada2

Jilada2

Iron
Joined
Sep 11, 2023
Posts
59
Reputation
36
i have perfect facial proportions but i still think im ugly (14)
 
PrinceofDarkness

PrinceofDarkness

Kraken
Joined
Jul 28, 2022
Posts
3,637
Reputation
3,452
can you even fix fwhr?
 
rolloftape

rolloftape

Silver
Joined
Mar 9, 2020
Posts
744
Reputation
652
facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
1.69

lower/full face ratio: 0.62+
.636

midface ratio: 1.0-1.1
1.08

mouth to nose ratio: 1.5-1.62
1.47

lower to upper lip ratio: 1.62
1.68

chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0-2.25
2.18

bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.35
1.15

ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.45-0.47
.485

EME (eye mouth eye) angle: 47°-50°
49.74

cervicomental angle: 105°-120°
111.27

gonial angle: 115°-130°
106.31

canthal tilt: 4°-6°
~2.5

bot:435, mid: 378, top: 345

conclusion: my ratios are fine, just need some bone density now
 
D

Deleted member 62070

Banned
Joined
Feb 3, 2024
Posts
792
Reputation
498
facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
1.69

lower/full face ratio: 0.62+
.636

midface ratio: 1.0-1.1
1.08

mouth to nose ratio: 1.5-1.62
1.47

lower to upper lip ratio: 1.62
1.68

chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0-2.25
2.18

bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.35
1.15

ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.45-0.47
.485

EME (eye mouth eye) angle: 47°-50°
49.74

cervicomental angle: 105°-120°
111.27

gonial angle: 115°-130°
106.31

canthal tilt: 4°-6°
~2.5

bot:435, mid: 378, top: 345

conclusion: my ratios are fine, just need some bone density now
howd you measure
 
arab_chink

arab_chink

Miserable therapist
Joined
Jun 25, 2023
Posts
5,508
Reputation
5,153
Goated thread, still rember when lurking 2022
 
D

Deleted member 40416

Gold
Joined
Aug 18, 2023
Posts
763
Reputation
617
How do yo
facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
1.69

lower/full face ratio: 0.62+
.636

midface ratio: 1.0-1.1
1.08

mouth to nose ratio: 1.5-1.62
1.47

lower to upper lip ratio: 1.62
1.68

chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0-2.25
2.18

bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.35
1.15

ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.45-0.47
.485

EME (eye mouth eye) angle: 47°-50°
49.74

cervicomental angle: 105°-120°
111.27

gonial angle: 115°-130°
106.31

canthal tilt: 4°-6°
~2.5

bot:435, mid: 378, top: 345

conclusion: my ratios are fine, just need some bone density now
How do you come to that conclusion when you have a variety of highly important ratios outside the ideal range?
 
rolloftape

rolloftape

Silver
Joined
Mar 9, 2020
Posts
744
Reputation
652
How do yo

How do you come to that conclusion when you have a variety of highly important ratios outside the ideal range?
Because most of my ratios are in range and I don’t need them to be perfect, when I get chin implant I’m gonna be even better
 
Braindeadautist

Braindeadautist

cutecel4life
Joined
Mar 31, 2024
Posts
994
Reputation
961
this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here

facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper lip.

lower/full face ratio: 0.62+
measured by dividing the height between the nasion to the bottom of the chin by the face height (distance from hairline to bottom of the chin)

midface ratio: 1.0-1.1
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the height of the nasion to the upper lip. the closer to 1:1 this is, the better.

mouth to nose ratio: 1.5-1.62
measured by dividing the width of the mouth by the width of the nose.

lower to upper lip ratio: 1.62
measured by dividing the height of the lower lip to the upper lip.

chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0-2.25
measured by dividing the height of the middle part of the lips to the bottom of the chin by the height of the bottom of the nose to the middle part of the lips.

bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.35
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the bigonial width (distance from gonion to gonion).

ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.45-0.47
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone). the "third eyeball method" - a theory in which the distance between your eyes should be another eye apart - is widely accepted in determining whether or not your eyes are an appropriate distance away from eachother, however this is flawed and incorrect. here is a thread explaining why, along with some more useful information about this measurement.

EME (eye mouth eye) angle: 47°-50°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the center of the lips with the arms crossing the eye pupils. the EME angle is a good indicator of masculinity and symmetry. here is a thread with more information about this measurement.

cervicomental angle: 105°-120°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the hyoid with the arms set along the bottom of the chin and the neck. anything above 120° is said to give the impression of a double chin.

gonial angle: 115°-130°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the gonion with the arms set along the mandible and the ramus.

canthal tilt: 4°-6°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the medial canthus with the arms set parallel to the floor and the lateral canthus.

palpebral fissure length to height ratio: 3.0-3.5
measured by dividing the palpebral fissure length (distance between the medial to the lateral canthus) by the height of the upper and lower eyelid.

forehead height: 3 fingers
measured by clenching your fingers together and seeing how many you can fit on your forehead horizontally before reaching your hairline.

facial thirds: 1/3 of face length
the upper third (height between the hairline to the middle part of the eyebrows), middle third (height between the middle part of the eyebrows to the bottom of the nose) and lower third (height between the bottom of the nose to bottom of the chin) of the face should be approximately 1/3rd of your entire face length (height between the hairline to bottom of the chin). these facial thirds should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 3 parts as you transition down the face.

facial fifths: 1/5 of ear to ear width
the nose width, palpebral fissure length and length between the lateral canthus to the ear should be approximately 1/5th of the width between your ears. these facial fifths should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 5 parts as you transition from left to right of the face.
Ok but how do I measure do I get a fucking measuring tape or what
 
Braindeadautist

Braindeadautist

cutecel4life
Joined
Mar 31, 2024
Posts
994
Reputation
961
FWHR: 1.88

Lower/Fullface ratio: 0.67

Midface ratio: 1.05

Mouth to nose: 1.59

Lower to upper lip: 1.5

Chin to philtrum: 1.8

Bizygo to bigonial: 1.02

ESR: 0.49

EME angle: 49º

Cerviconmental angle: 104º

Gonial angle: 121º

Canthal tilt: 5.7º

Palpebral fissure length to height: 3.35

Forehead height: 3.2 (fingers)

Facial thirds: 0.35 (low), 0.3 (mid), 0.33 (top) (rounded from 5 digit decimals, taking into account 1 as the whole face)

Facial fifths: 0.2 (all fifths, rounded from 5 digit decimals, taking into account 1 as the whole)


Measured with those three pics, with low to no camera distortion (third pic has bit of distortion since its front cam but used only for canthal tilt and fissure width to height)
View attachment 324472 View attachment 324473
View attachment 324475
ogremaxx or its over and u have to be tall or its oveeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrr
 
heightmaxxing

heightmaxxing

I want a perfect body I want a perfect soul
Joined
Sep 24, 2023
Posts
13,006
Reputation
26,355
2.0-2.25 chin to philtrum doesn't seem ideal seems pretty bad. Ideal is 2.25-2.75 . I assume you got 2.0-2.25 from the golden ratio which I think is pretty outdated tbh good thread apart from that tho
 
C

crybaby

Iron
Joined
Jun 2, 2023
Posts
160
Reputation
114
1.35 bizygo to bigonial width is narrow cuck-jawed (0.74 other way around) ideal is 0.85-0.95 bigonial to bizygo (1.18 to 1.05 other way around). Apart from that still good thread.
 
LooksMaxxingBoss

LooksMaxxingBoss

GREEK CHAD
Joined
Sep 4, 2023
Posts
459
Reputation
238
this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here

facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper lip.

lower/full face ratio: 0.62+
measured by dividing the height between the nasion to the bottom of the chin by the face height (distance from hairline to bottom of the chin)

midface ratio: 1.0-1.1
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the height of the nasion to the upper lip. the closer to 1:1 this is, the better.

mouth to nose ratio: 1.5-1.62
measured by dividing the width of the mouth by the width of the nose.

lower to upper lip ratio: 1.62
measured by dividing the height of the lower lip to the upper lip.

chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0-2.25
measured by dividing the height of the middle part of the lips to the bottom of the chin by the height of the bottom of the nose to the middle part of the lips.

bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.35
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the bigonial width (distance from gonion to gonion).

ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.45-0.47
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone). the "third eyeball method" - a theory in which the distance between your eyes should be another eye apart - is widely accepted in determining whether or not your eyes are an appropriate distance away from eachother, however this is flawed and incorrect. here is a thread explaining why, along with some more useful information about this measurement.

EME (eye mouth eye) angle: 47°-50°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the center of the lips with the arms crossing the eye pupils. the EME angle is a good indicator of masculinity and symmetry. here is a thread with more information about this measurement.

cervicomental angle: 105°-120°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the hyoid with the arms set along the bottom of the chin and the neck. anything above 120° is said to give the impression of a double chin.

gonial angle: 115°-130°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the gonion with the arms set along the mandible and the ramus.

canthal tilt: 4°-6°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the medial canthus with the arms set parallel to the floor and the lateral canthus.

palpebral fissure length to height ratio: 3.0-3.5
measured by dividing the palpebral fissure length (distance between the medial to the lateral canthus) by the height of the upper and lower eyelid.

forehead height: 3 fingers
measured by clenching your fingers together and seeing how many you can fit on your forehead horizontally before reaching your hairline.

facial thirds: 1/3 of face length
the upper third (height between the hairline to the middle part of the eyebrows), middle third (height between the middle part of the eyebrows to the bottom of the nose) and lower third (height between the bottom of the nose to bottom of the chin) of the face should be approximately 1/3rd of your entire face length (height between the hairline to bottom of the chin). these facial thirds should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 3 parts as you transition down the face.

facial fifths: 1/5 of ear to ear width
the nose width, palpebral fissure length and length between the lateral canthus to the ear should be approximately 1/5th of the width between your ears. these facial fifths should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 5 parts as you transition from left to right of the face.
Only my nose is a little bit wider not nigga like but I have to slim it down somehow
 
D

Deleted member 83600

Master
Joined
Jul 24, 2024
Posts
9,298
Reputation
11,573
Hard to be cl without any failos
 
  • +1
Reactions: Rzn
User28823

User28823

do not go gentle into that good night
Joined
Aug 7, 2022
Posts
34,235
Reputation
61,600
absolute lifefuel knowing i have mostly perfect ratios except for slightly uneven lips / long philtrum and slightly narrow jaw width (will get implants for outward gonions) + shorten philtrum with lip lift to fix lip unevenness and philtrum length
 
R

ronald_2

Silver
Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Posts
707
Reputation
413
When measuring facial ratios remember to never use photos. They will distort ratios 99% ot the time, for better or worse. Use calipers instead. They will give you reliable measurements and accurate facial ratios.
 
D

Deleted member 81737

Hoping I wake up in the Eylsian Fields
Joined
Jul 15, 2024
Posts
156
Reputation
129
all this just to tell me its over :lul::lul:
 
Surgerymaxxer1998

Surgerymaxxer1998

Bronze
Joined
Aug 11, 2023
Posts
280
Reputation
239
Nobody talks about this yet its so important, if u have lower than ideal es ratio but ur eyes are more than 1 eyes apart it cancels each other out creating balance and harmony. You basically get perfect eye spacing from this (creating attractive talked about this). This phenomenon is rare but more common in East Asians due to wide cheekbones and epicanthic folds increasing intercanthal distance. I'm fortunate enough to have this sort of balance
 
Magnum Opus

Magnum Opus

Equinox
Joined
Oct 20, 2022
Posts
5,724
Reputation
8,968
When measuring facial ratios remember to never use photos. They will distort ratios 99% ot the time, for better or worse. Use calipers instead. They will give you reliable measurements and accurate facial ratios.
You realize most "ideal" ratio ranges are derived from pictures, right? The people who have the ideal on-paper ES ratio by X picture setup defined as the "standard", will also still have the ideal in real life, just a different value. Meaning the one they get irl measuring in the mirror is what'd then constitute the ideal value under irl circumstances, but there's little to no data on that.
Makes absolutely no sense to measure your ratios irl but compare it to value ranges that were derived from pictures
 
R

ronald_2

Silver
Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Posts
707
Reputation
413
You realize most "ideal" ratio ranges are derived from pictures, right? The people who have the ideal on-paper ES ratio by X picture setup defined as the "standard", will also still have the ideal in real life, just a different value. Meaning the one they get irl measuring in the mirror is what'd then constitute the ideal value under irl circumstances, but there's little to no data on that.
Makes absolutely no sense to measure your ratios irl but compare it to value ranges that were derived from pictures
Are you aware that depending on the camera's focal length and distance between the camera and the person, a photo can result in completely different ratios?

This is why I suggested using calipers instead. There's even a thread here explaining camera's distortion in detail.
 
Magnum Opus

Magnum Opus

Equinox
Joined
Oct 20, 2022
Posts
5,724
Reputation
8,968
Are you aware that depending on the camera's focal length and distance between the camera and the person, a photo can result in completely different ratios?
Yes, I am aware of that, if you have some ratio range data from a camera setup with a focal length of f.e. 120mm and a distance of 4m to the subject, then you have to replicate that camera setup and measure the ratio under those exact circumstances to be truly accurate.
This is why I suggested using calipers instead. There's even a thread here explaining camera's distortion in detail.
You measuring it irl with calipers doesn't make sense if you still compare it to the ratio ranges derived from datasets in which pics were used, and even those aren't standardised among themselves. Only a logical approach if you have the data for which values are ideal under real-life circumstances, which you don't
 
D

Deleted member 70667

Iron
Joined
Apr 23, 2024
Posts
211
Reputation
83
would 0.94 midface be a problem
 
R

ronald_2

Silver
Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Posts
707
Reputation
413
Just a reminder: selfies taken with wide lense cameras (present in the majority of modern cellphones), from a distance of an arm length or less, will elongate and narrow your facial features.

Meanwhile if you take selfies at a distance of more than 2 arms length with that same camera, your face will shorten and widen.

That's why its best to measure yourself using a ruler or mm caliper to get the most accurate ratios.
 
cannotbeasked

cannotbeasked

real eyes, realize, real lies
Joined
May 4, 2024
Posts
923
Reputation
1,303
Yes, I am aware of that, if you have some ratio range data from a camera setup with a focal length of f.e. 120mm and a distance of 4m to the subject, then you have to replicate that camera setup and measure the ratio under those exact circumstances to be truly accurate.

You measuring it irl with calipers doesn't make sense if you still compare it to the ratio ranges derived from datasets in which pics were used, and even those aren't standardised among themselves. Only a logical approach if you have the data for which values are ideal under real-life circumstances, which you don't

It makes sense when you’re trying to look like the guy in the picture, if a 1.8 FWHR on camera looks ideal then in real life it will too. Yeah maybe in real life that FWHR is slightly higher or lower but the difference is probably so small it doesn’t make much of a difference, and regardless the “distorted version” looks good so if you have it in real life then it still looks good.
 
R

ronald_2

Silver
Joined
Aug 8, 2024
Posts
707
Reputation
413
Please if someone knows of a website where there's a list of all the average facial measurements used for the ratios of this thread, please share it. It would be really useful.
 
D

Deleted member 99272

3rd Acc since 2022 | CL 5'11.5 23 inch bidelt
Joined
Oct 9, 2024
Posts
5,480
Reputation
5,283
this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here

facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper lip.

lower/full face ratio: 0.62+
measured by dividing the height between the nasion to the bottom of the chin by the face height (distance from hairline to bottom of the chin)

midface ratio: 1.0-1.1
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the height of the nasion to the upper lip. the closer to 1:1 this is, the better.

mouth to nose ratio: 1.5-1.62
measured by dividing the width of the mouth by the width of the nose.

lower to upper lip ratio: 1.62
measured by dividing the height of the lower lip to the upper lip.

chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0-2.25
measured by dividing the height of the middle part of the lips to the bottom of the chin by the height of the bottom of the nose to the middle part of the lips.

bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.35
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the bigonial width (distance from gonion to gonion).

ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.45-0.47
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone). the "third eyeball method" - a theory in which the distance between your eyes should be another eye apart - is widely accepted in determining whether or not your eyes are an appropriate distance away from eachother, however this is flawed and incorrect. here is a thread explaining why, along with some more useful information about this measurement.

EME (eye mouth eye) angle: 47°-50°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the center of the lips with the arms crossing the eye pupils. the EME angle is a good indicator of masculinity and symmetry. here is a thread with more information about this measurement.

cervicomental angle: 105°-120°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the hyoid with the arms set along the bottom of the chin and the neck. anything above 120° is said to give the impression of a double chin.

gonial angle: 115°-130°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the gonion with the arms set along the mandible and the ramus.

canthal tilt: 4°-6°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the medial canthus with the arms set parallel to the floor and the lateral canthus.

palpebral fissure length to height ratio: 3.0-3.5
measured by dividing the palpebral fissure length (distance between the medial to the lateral canthus) by the height of the upper and lower eyelid.

forehead height: 3 fingers
measured by clenching your fingers together and seeing how many you can fit on your forehead horizontally before reaching your hairline.

facial thirds: 1/3 of face length
the upper third (height between the hairline to the middle part of the eyebrows), middle third (height between the middle part of the eyebrows to the bottom of the nose) and lower third (height between the bottom of the nose to bottom of the chin) of the face should be approximately 1/3rd of your entire face length (height between the hairline to bottom of the chin). these facial thirds should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 3 parts as you transition down the face.

facial fifths: 1/5 of ear to ear width
the nose width, palpebral fissure length and length between the lateral canthus to the ear should be approximately 1/5th of the width between your ears. these facial fifths should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 5 parts as you transition from left to right of the face.
What is the measurement of the width of upper third called?
 
OldBones

OldBones

Silver
Joined
Sep 24, 2024
Posts
610
Reputation
1,137
this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here

facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper lip.

lower/full face ratio: 0.62+
measured by dividing the height between the nasion to the bottom of the chin by the face height (distance from hairline to bottom of the chin)

midface ratio: 1.0-1.1
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the height of the nasion to the upper lip. the closer to 1:1 this is, the better.

mouth to nose ratio: 1.5-1.62
measured by dividing the width of the mouth by the width of the nose.

lower to upper lip ratio: 1.62
measured by dividing the height of the lower lip to the upper lip.

chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0-2.25
measured by dividing the height of the middle part of the lips to the bottom of the chin by the height of the bottom of the nose to the middle part of the lips.

bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.35
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the bigonial width (distance from gonion to gonion).

ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.45-0.47
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone). the "third eyeball method" - a theory in which the distance between your eyes should be another eye apart - is widely accepted in determining whether or not your eyes are an appropriate distance away from eachother, however this is flawed and incorrect. here is a thread explaining why, along with some more useful information about this measurement.

EME (eye mouth eye) angle: 47°-50°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the center of the lips with the arms crossing the eye pupils. the EME angle is a good indicator of masculinity and symmetry. here is a thread with more information about this measurement.

cervicomental angle: 105°-120°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the hyoid with the arms set along the bottom of the chin and the neck. anything above 120° is said to give the impression of a double chin.

gonial angle: 115°-130°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the gonion with the arms set along the mandible and the ramus.

canthal tilt: 4°-6°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the medial canthus with the arms set parallel to the floor and the lateral canthus.

palpebral fissure length to height ratio: 3.0-3.5
measured by dividing the palpebral fissure length (distance between the medial to the lateral canthus) by the height of the upper and lower eyelid.

forehead height: 3 fingers
measured by clenching your fingers together and seeing how many you can fit on your forehead horizontally before reaching your hairline.

facial thirds: 1/3 of face length
the upper third (height between the hairline to the middle part of the eyebrows), middle third (height between the middle part of the eyebrows to the bottom of the nose) and lower third (height between the bottom of the nose to bottom of the chin) of the face should be approximately 1/3rd of your entire face length (height between the hairline to bottom of the chin). these facial thirds should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 3 parts as you transition down the face.

facial fifths: 1/5 of ear to ear width
the nose width, palpebral fissure length and length between the lateral canthus to the ear should be approximately 1/5th of the width between your ears. these facial fifths should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 5 parts as you transition from left to right of the face.
Mouth to nose is 1.36 to 1.55 for men, chin to philtrum is 2.0 to 2.5 for men
 
Last edited:
ItsOverLawg

ItsOverLawg

Right hand man of the bluecell union
Joined
Jul 25, 2024
Posts
4,915
Reputation
4,889
this is an updated version of my previous ideal facial ratios & proportions thread which can be found here

facial width to height ratio (FWHR): 1.8+
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the height of the middle part of the eyebrow to the upper lip.

lower/full face ratio: 0.62+
measured by dividing the height between the nasion to the bottom of the chin by the face height (distance from hairline to bottom of the chin)

midface ratio: 1.0-1.1
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the height of the nasion to the upper lip. the closer to 1:1 this is, the better.

mouth to nose ratio: 1.5-1.62
measured by dividing the width of the mouth by the width of the nose.

lower to upper lip ratio: 1.62
measured by dividing the height of the lower lip to the upper lip.

chin to philtrum ratio: 2.0-2.25
measured by dividing the height of the middle part of the lips to the bottom of the chin by the height of the bottom of the nose to the middle part of the lips.

bizygomatic to bigonial width: 1.35
measured by dividing the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone) by the bigonial width (distance from gonion to gonion).

ESR (eye separation ratio): 0.45-0.47
measured by dividing the interpupillary distance (distance between the centers of the pupils) by the the bizygomatic width (distance from cheekbone to cheekbone). the "third eyeball method" - a theory in which the distance between your eyes should be another eye apart - is widely accepted in determining whether or not your eyes are an appropriate distance away from eachother, however this is flawed and incorrect. here is a thread explaining why, along with some more useful information about this measurement.

EME (eye mouth eye) angle: 47°-50°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the center of the lips with the arms crossing the eye pupils. the EME angle is a good indicator of masculinity and symmetry. here is a thread with more information about this measurement.

cervicomental angle: 105°-120°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the hyoid with the arms set along the bottom of the chin and the neck. anything above 120° is said to give the impression of a double chin.

gonial angle: 115°-130°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the gonion with the arms set along the mandible and the ramus.

canthal tilt: 4°-6°
measured by calculating the angle formed upon setting the vertex at the medial canthus with the arms set parallel to the floor and the lateral canthus.

palpebral fissure length to height ratio: 3.0-3.5
measured by dividing the palpebral fissure length (distance between the medial to the lateral canthus) by the height of the upper and lower eyelid.

forehead height: 3 fingers
measured by clenching your fingers together and seeing how many you can fit on your forehead horizontally before reaching your hairline.

facial thirds: 1/3 of face length
the upper third (height between the hairline to the middle part of the eyebrows), middle third (height between the middle part of the eyebrows to the bottom of the nose) and lower third (height between the bottom of the nose to bottom of the chin) of the face should be approximately 1/3rd of your entire face length (height between the hairline to bottom of the chin). these facial thirds should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 3 parts as you transition down the face.

facial fifths: 1/5 of ear to ear width
the nose width, palpebral fissure length and length between the lateral canthus to the ear should be approximately 1/5th of the width between your ears. these facial fifths should all be approximately equal to eachother and dividable smoothly into 5 parts as you transition from left to right of the face.
insane how im fucked up in all these cases
 
ItsOverLawg

ItsOverLawg

Right hand man of the bluecell union
Joined
Jul 25, 2024
Posts
4,915
Reputation
4,889
i was in 8th grade when ts was posted
fml why did i join so late :feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy::feelswhy:
 
copester2

copester2

Diamond
Joined
Dec 14, 2024
Posts
1,316
Reputation
1,230
useful thread
 
slice

slice

Iron
Joined
Feb 13, 2024
Posts
65
Reputation
55
whats the ideal nose slope?
 
fifi.mogy

fifi.mogy

Bronze
Joined
Nov 23, 2024
Posts
253
Reputation
119
I dont understand how i can check my face?
Are the numbers he saud in cm ir inch ?
HELP!!
 
F

favsubhuman000

Iron
Joined
Nov 9, 2024
Posts
247
Reputation
163
I dont understand how i can check my face?
Are the numbers he saud in cm ir inch ?
HELP!!
its a ratio sherlock, just mesure it with the ruler in apple photos and then divide the pixels you get and youll have the ratio
 
1.618

1.618

Bronze
Joined
Mar 25, 2024
Posts
257
Reputation
251
its a ratio sherlock, just mesure it with the ruler in apple photos and then divide the pixels you get and youll have the ratio
It's better to do it in a mirror because of lens distortion but much harder, you'd need a pair of calipers.
 
F

favsubhuman000

Iron
Joined
Nov 9, 2024
Posts
247
Reputation
163
It's better to do it in a mirror because of lens distortion but much harder, you'd need a pair of calipers.
tbh i did it on snapchat i just zoomed on my face and put my phone as far as i could and my ratios arent bad
 
fifi.mogy

fifi.mogy

Bronze
Joined
Nov 23, 2024
Posts
253
Reputation
119
It's better to do it in a mirror because of lens distortion but much harder, you'd need a pair of calipers.
I have goodnotes can i also do it with the goodnotes ruler ?
 

Similar threads

SlayerJonas
Replies
151
Views
9K
hatefoid
hatefoid
Asoka
Replies
197
Views
21K
HitlerAdvocate
H
emeraldglass
Replies
214
Views
15K
HitlerAdvocate
H
Jatt
Replies
104
Views
25K
tascends
T

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ToastyBred
  • efiskoo
Top