that's a godlike thread man . sorry to ask again as i'm low iq as fuck but what would someone with close set eyes do to their nose i'm not sure to get it should the nasal bridge be shaved a bit? and do you have such a similar " mind trick " method for midface length ? thanks you're a genius
I think the point op is trying to make is the effect that it has on harmony vs changing the ES ratio itself
agreed ,
I think we are measuring a lot of model ratios wrong. Plenty of them are in 0.44 range which is below ideal. Tyler Maher for example is below 0.45 but someone measured him higher. I'm skeptical of some of the measurements on the guys that have larger cheekbones.
Because you focused on analyzing mathematically the IPD distance after reading the text instead of just looking at the face as a whole. If you read in this same thread, the user weallburninhell didn´t properly read the thread itself and thought I had actually changed their ipd by some mm's. Also, the IPD is exactly the same between those two pics, but I have made the test myself and people do think the woman have diferent eye distances in the two images, despite it being the same, you are just reaching.
bones always matter tho, it doesnt matter whether irl or photo, eye area is the most striking eye area imo
Misstype, i meant that eye area is the most striking part of the face
yeah it is, but its not everything, my eye area is chad tier, rest of my face is bad and im considered ugly
Im not saying its the most important, but when a person looks at you the first thing they see is the eye area then the jawline its been proven in studies
no actually the first point is the left of your nose, then eyes, then teeth (assuming you are talking to them)
Nonsense, it works even better in real life.
Hey man sent you a pm, would appreciate it if you could please have a look thanks
yes need help pls, my nasal bridge is recessed like a chink, need help now or i rope
Show photo at least, so people see your ugliness and probably will sorry for you and donate money for surgery
i can help you bro
This is one of the few features what made Stallone attractive - thick defined nasal bridge
proof that all you need is chin and good nose bridge to make you a slayer.
Sorry man but you fucked up with morphing, they don't have the same IPD. You can measure it yourself, the left one has a slightly wider face and also slightly wider IPD(I guess like 2mm which is certainly not nothing). The other morphs are also off if you used the same method probably, but your overall thread is legit
Tbh this particular image wasn´t even mine, I found it online, only the other morphs are, you can use the same method to check, the IPD's are exactly the same on all the other ones.
how to get a defined nasal bridge? fillers seem very risky in that area
Not really similar threads
It's somewhat cope. Just because you can disguise the problematic ratio/proportion, doesn't mean it's at all comparable to the L boost of actually fixing that ratio.
Unless you have very bad IPD these changes can put you in the normal range
There are aspects of the effect of ipd that will not improve with styling. Such as when looking at someone directly in the eyes, a common romantic scenario. Just because we're autistically observing pictures of celebrity faces from afar and they look improved with styling, doesn't mean these bad ES ratios don't hurt someone conversing face to face with a girl irl.
what a fucken high iq thread
But don’t you think those grooming things can have some effect even in those situations. Obviously changing your actual IPD is going to be a stronger effect
Your eye area in isolation is very good, but it looks like you have a short skull and look kiddish. The contrast looks not as good imo.I won't looksmax my eye area since it's good enough , but what are legit failos ? I think : small IPD , relative small PFL , no PCT , suboptimal medial canthus , eye coulour , + maybe thicker brows . Nose is faceapped , that's why the pic has shit quality
@ForeverRecession , am I right ?
To somewhat prove that concept, you should do a comparison between :
Other people have demonstrated this on this site, too lazy to dig it up. And notice my post after which makes another copium-killing point, the effect of eye contact one-on-one with someone vs a far away picture where the face might be processed a little more holistically.
Not convinced that specific comparison exists.
Oh ya, like I didn’t consider this “specific comparison” before the box osteotomy and that helped motivate me to get it?
Plausible maybe
to deny nose bridge and eyebrows don’t effect precieved IPD is completely false but obviously isn’t as powerful as moving your literal eye balls
That wasn't my point. My point is there's a difference between the effects of nose bridge and eyebrows on perceived IPD in far away photos, vs. real life face-to-face conversation. It's quite intuitive that when someone is locked into your eyes the way people do when they converse, that IPD fraud will be much less effective.
what’s your evidence of this?
I really don´t mean to insult, but that doesnt´make any sense. Your statement holds no logical truth. You are talking about "far away photos", but you ignore the fact that one can make someones face look just as big as it it in real life, in their computer screen. Actually, you can make it even bigger. I just made the test out of curiosity, I placed the pictures side by side in my big screen, as zoomed as I could, and the IPD perception shift was still very significant, maybe even more than when the pictures are smaller sized. One can easily test for himself to confirm that what you are saying is devoid of sense.
