Copeful
2.5 PSL 5'6 rizzminned stylish nt curry slayer
- Joined
- May 29, 2020
- Posts
- 12,093
- Reputation
- 31,475
in b4 dn rd
Just fucking end it you donkeys. End either this disgusting cope or your pitiable existence. In this thread I will be detailing the several reasons as to why Tinder experiments are inapplicable and a completely insubstantial foundation for your dogshit "racepill" as well as whatever other cancerous copes they have been used to corroborate on this shithole forum.
Dogmaticcels, (namely JBWcopers, self-hating ethnic cucks and Tinder experiment worshippers) ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK!!
You have been warned.
Thesis: For an experiment to be considered valid and generalizable, it must occur in a neutral environment where any and all external parameters are either irrelevant to the outcome of the experiment, or controlled such that they do not influence the results significantly. The parameters under which Tinder "experiments" are conducted violate these criteria in that they either 1. directly influence the results to a large degree, or 2. are uncontrollable
These parameters include: extremely skewed gender ratios, inadequate # of trials relative to the population which these experiments are being applied to, differing demographical makeups between experiments and an unfair, partial, disruptive algorithm. The conjunction of these wayward parameters renders any results produced by Tinder experiments inconclusive. These experiments therefore cannot, in good conscience, be utilized to corroborate any generalized theories on the SMP as a whole.
This includes the racepill. The notion that an average white (4 PSL) has greater SMV than above average ethnics (4.5+ PSL) has little to no merit outside of lookism forums. The racepill in this sense is false, and is nothing more than an autistic delusion contrived in the depths of the blackpill echo chamber in order to satiate =<4 PSL whites clinging to whatever feeble hope they can and ugly self-hating ethnics coping with “muh racism is why women don’t want me”.
Skewed Gender ratios ~ I have already made a thread discussing this, but in short Tinder is naturally dominated by males looking for ONS. This inherently inflates the value of the minority of females using the app, and deflates the value of the male majority. Of course, the ratio present on Tinder (80/20 M/F if I'm being generous - It can be argued that it is further skewed due to bots) is absurd and not applicable on a wider scale for obvious reasons. Indeed, the general population is not 80% male and 20% female - believe it or not.
Sample size + # of Trials ~ You fools ran what, like 10 different experiments spanning a couple of hours? And you then go on to formulate the racepill and are now mindlessly applying it to the 170 million women in the US (even more if you include Canada)? Yeah, no. If you bastards have ever taken a science class, you'll know about the principles of "sample size" and "multiple trials". 10 measly experiments are inconsequential relative to the entire US population. Run at least 10 experiments in EVERY state (which accounts for demographical differences), compile the average results THEN we'll talk. Until then, these "studies" are essentially irrelevant. You cannot extrapolate the behavior of the entire female gender on the basis of 10 (I don't even think you've done 10, I always see the same ones) "experiments" performed on an inherently flawed platform. Stop presenting them as some incontrovertible, end-all be-all evidence you clowns. Many more trials must be run and in several locations for any conclusions to be drawn
Demographics ~ Take a white trucel and plop him down in China, and BOOM. Suddenly he's a 6 PSL chad, pulling in matches left and right. This should prove to you that the demographical makeup of where the experiment is run can influence results significantly. Obviously an extreme example, but the point stands nonetheless. In the matter of ethnics, placing one in the middle of Alabama (a.k.a KKK central, with a very low ethnic population) will undoubtedly have a negative influence on his results due to the particular sociopolitical environment of that region. Now take that same ethnic and put him in a more racially diverse area where ethnics are better integrated, and his match rate will improve drastically.
Tinder's algorithm ~ Tinder's algorithm is incredibly dubious, eventually reducing the visibility of profiles if they fail to attract a substantial amount of attention. The underlying mechanism behind this is the "ELO" score. Essentially, this score is calculated by taking into account the ability of a user to match with other users of predetermined attractiveness. In the matter of ethnics, it only takes a handful of 3 PSL white-worshipping noodles to swipe left and it's over. Tinder's ELO algorithm will erroneously determine that the gl ethnic is ugly as fuck because he cannot even match with ugly noodles, and from thereon his visibility (the amount of women that see him) decreases - therefore significantly reducing his potential to receive matches. With this disruptive underlying algorithm at play, it is impossible to draw conclusions due to the fact that low ELO females rejecting gl ethnics has a substantial impact on their visibility.
TL;DR - TINDER EXPERIMENTS INAPPLICABLE ON LARGE SCALE BC THEY DO NOT FOLLOW PROPER EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL. FAILURE TO ACCOUNT FOR EXTERNAL PARAMETERS = DISQUALIFIED FOR GENERALIZATION TO BROADER POPULATION = FALSIFIED, HALF-BAKED DOGSHIT THEORIES THAT HAVE BECOME MASTURBATION MATERIAL ON LOOKISM FORUMS
OMGGG!!! GUYYSS THIS GIRL IS SO HOTT! SWIPING RIGHT TEEHEE!!
(White normie)
EW, THIS GIRL? SHE LOOKS ETHNIC THOUGH. NOT ATTRACTED
(gl ethnic)
OMGGG!!! GIRLLSSS THIS GUY IS SO HOTT! SWIPING RIGHT TEEHEE!!
(White normie)
EW, THIS DUDE? HE LOOKS ETHNIC THOUGH. NOT ATTRACTED
(gl ethnic)
JFL!!!!
Really puts things into "perspective", doesn't it? You could substitute a Stacy/chadlite or even HTN and the effect would be the same, so don’t bark about the people I’ve chosen.
Reminder that I have made this exact argument multiple times and you fags have yet to provide a response. The best you have come up with is "Most guys would prefer the white girl bro, so most girls would prefer the white guy".
Just lol. My question to you is this:
Do you? Do you find average white females more attractive than good-looking ethnic females? No, you say? Then why in the FUCK would women find average white males more attractive than good-looking ethnic males? Huh???
Explain that to me, brainlets. You can have sexual preferences for whites (as I am sure the majority of this forum does), but that does not mean that a 4 PSL white m/fogs a 5+ or even 4.5 PSL ethnic. Sure, there will be the delusional noodlewhores and curryfoids that are white-worshipping and attracted to even 2 PSL trucels for their white skin. Or the white supremacists that will swipe left even if you are a 7.5 PSL ethnic, if you live in a KKK-tier location. It is what is is.
Just fucking laughing out loud at your Neanderthal IQ if you unironically think race > facial aesthetics. What’s far more important is the bone mass in your face and the harmony in your facial features, not the fucking color of your skin/your racial background. Just lol @ ur intelligence if you still think a handful of wildly conflicting and intrinsically flawed Tinder experiments definitively establish that gl ethnics (4.5+ PSL) have lower SMV than average whites (4 PSL). The real "racepill" is that whites have, on average, better facial features/structures than other races, which is where their advantage lies. Meaning that the average white > average ethnic. But a better looking ethnic will always mog.
This debate is OVER copers.
It is, and always will be face >>>>>>> race
Tagging high-IQ users
@NordicIranian @Blackout.xl @SubhumanCurrycel @abmonger @Sikkunt23 @inceletto @personalityinkwell
Tagging JBWcopers, self-hating cucks, and those that took Tinder experiments as gospel without questioning their authenticity in any way
@Biggdink @MentalistKebab @Vidyacoper @DharkDC @john2 @TsarTsar444
Just fucking end it you donkeys. End either this disgusting cope or your pitiable existence. In this thread I will be detailing the several reasons as to why Tinder experiments are inapplicable and a completely insubstantial foundation for your dogshit "racepill" as well as whatever other cancerous copes they have been used to corroborate on this shithole forum.
Dogmaticcels, (namely JBWcopers, self-hating ethnic cucks and Tinder experiment worshippers) ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK!!
You have been warned.
Thesis: For an experiment to be considered valid and generalizable, it must occur in a neutral environment where any and all external parameters are either irrelevant to the outcome of the experiment, or controlled such that they do not influence the results significantly. The parameters under which Tinder "experiments" are conducted violate these criteria in that they either 1. directly influence the results to a large degree, or 2. are uncontrollable
These parameters include: extremely skewed gender ratios, inadequate # of trials relative to the population which these experiments are being applied to, differing demographical makeups between experiments and an unfair, partial, disruptive algorithm. The conjunction of these wayward parameters renders any results produced by Tinder experiments inconclusive. These experiments therefore cannot, in good conscience, be utilized to corroborate any generalized theories on the SMP as a whole.
This includes the racepill. The notion that an average white (4 PSL) has greater SMV than above average ethnics (4.5+ PSL) has little to no merit outside of lookism forums. The racepill in this sense is false, and is nothing more than an autistic delusion contrived in the depths of the blackpill echo chamber in order to satiate =<4 PSL whites clinging to whatever feeble hope they can and ugly self-hating ethnics coping with “muh racism is why women don’t want me”.
-------------Invalidity of Parameters------------
Skewed Gender ratios ~ I have already made a thread discussing this, but in short Tinder is naturally dominated by males looking for ONS. This inherently inflates the value of the minority of females using the app, and deflates the value of the male majority. Of course, the ratio present on Tinder (80/20 M/F if I'm being generous - It can be argued that it is further skewed due to bots) is absurd and not applicable on a wider scale for obvious reasons. Indeed, the general population is not 80% male and 20% female - believe it or not.
Sample size + # of Trials ~ You fools ran what, like 10 different experiments spanning a couple of hours? And you then go on to formulate the racepill and are now mindlessly applying it to the 170 million women in the US (even more if you include Canada)? Yeah, no. If you bastards have ever taken a science class, you'll know about the principles of "sample size" and "multiple trials". 10 measly experiments are inconsequential relative to the entire US population. Run at least 10 experiments in EVERY state (which accounts for demographical differences), compile the average results THEN we'll talk. Until then, these "studies" are essentially irrelevant. You cannot extrapolate the behavior of the entire female gender on the basis of 10 (I don't even think you've done 10, I always see the same ones) "experiments" performed on an inherently flawed platform. Stop presenting them as some incontrovertible, end-all be-all evidence you clowns. Many more trials must be run and in several locations for any conclusions to be drawn
Demographics ~ Take a white trucel and plop him down in China, and BOOM. Suddenly he's a 6 PSL chad, pulling in matches left and right. This should prove to you that the demographical makeup of where the experiment is run can influence results significantly. Obviously an extreme example, but the point stands nonetheless. In the matter of ethnics, placing one in the middle of Alabama (a.k.a KKK central, with a very low ethnic population) will undoubtedly have a negative influence on his results due to the particular sociopolitical environment of that region. Now take that same ethnic and put him in a more racially diverse area where ethnics are better integrated, and his match rate will improve drastically.
Tinder's algorithm ~ Tinder's algorithm is incredibly dubious, eventually reducing the visibility of profiles if they fail to attract a substantial amount of attention. The underlying mechanism behind this is the "ELO" score. Essentially, this score is calculated by taking into account the ability of a user to match with other users of predetermined attractiveness. In the matter of ethnics, it only takes a handful of 3 PSL white-worshipping noodles to swipe left and it's over. Tinder's ELO algorithm will erroneously determine that the gl ethnic is ugly as fuck because he cannot even match with ugly noodles, and from thereon his visibility (the amount of women that see him) decreases - therefore significantly reducing his potential to receive matches. With this disruptive underlying algorithm at play, it is impossible to draw conclusions due to the fact that low ELO females rejecting gl ethnics has a substantial impact on their visibility.
TL;DR - TINDER EXPERIMENTS INAPPLICABLE ON LARGE SCALE BC THEY DO NOT FOLLOW PROPER EXPERIMENTAL PROTOCOL. FAILURE TO ACCOUNT FOR EXTERNAL PARAMETERS = DISQUALIFIED FOR GENERALIZATION TO BROADER POPULATION = FALSIFIED, HALF-BAKED DOGSHIT THEORIES THAT HAVE BECOME MASTURBATION MATERIAL ON LOOKISM FORUMS
---------The nail in the coffin for racepill ~ "Perspective" theory--------
OMGGG!!! GUYYSS THIS GIRL IS SO HOTT! SWIPING RIGHT TEEHEE!!
(White normie)
EW, THIS GIRL? SHE LOOKS ETHNIC THOUGH. NOT ATTRACTED
(gl ethnic)
REVERSING GENDERS IN CASE YOU DO NOT GET THE COMPARISONOMGGG!!! GIRLLSSS THIS GUY IS SO HOTT! SWIPING RIGHT TEEHEE!!
(White normie)
EW, THIS DUDE? HE LOOKS ETHNIC THOUGH. NOT ATTRACTED
(gl ethnic)
JFL!!!!
Really puts things into "perspective", doesn't it? You could substitute a Stacy/chadlite or even HTN and the effect would be the same, so don’t bark about the people I’ve chosen.
Reminder that I have made this exact argument multiple times and you fags have yet to provide a response. The best you have come up with is "Most guys would prefer the white girl bro, so most girls would prefer the white guy".
Just lol. My question to you is this:
Do you? Do you find average white females more attractive than good-looking ethnic females? No, you say? Then why in the FUCK would women find average white males more attractive than good-looking ethnic males? Huh???
Explain that to me, brainlets. You can have sexual preferences for whites (as I am sure the majority of this forum does), but that does not mean that a 4 PSL white m/fogs a 5+ or even 4.5 PSL ethnic. Sure, there will be the delusional noodlewhores and curryfoids that are white-worshipping and attracted to even 2 PSL trucels for their white skin. Or the white supremacists that will swipe left even if you are a 7.5 PSL ethnic, if you live in a KKK-tier location. It is what is is.
Just fucking laughing out loud at your Neanderthal IQ if you unironically think race > facial aesthetics. What’s far more important is the bone mass in your face and the harmony in your facial features, not the fucking color of your skin/your racial background. Just lol @ ur intelligence if you still think a handful of wildly conflicting and intrinsically flawed Tinder experiments definitively establish that gl ethnics (4.5+ PSL) have lower SMV than average whites (4 PSL). The real "racepill" is that whites have, on average, better facial features/structures than other races, which is where their advantage lies. Meaning that the average white > average ethnic. But a better looking ethnic will always mog.
This debate is OVER copers.
It is, and always will be face >>>>>>> race
Tagging high-IQ users
@NordicIranian @Blackout.xl @SubhumanCurrycel @abmonger @Sikkunt23 @inceletto @personalityinkwell
Tagging JBWcopers, self-hating cucks, and those that took Tinder experiments as gospel without questioning their authenticity in any way
@Biggdink @MentalistKebab @Vidyacoper @DharkDC @john2 @TsarTsar444
Last edited:
