Life would be considerably better if the global population was 90% less than currently

Eternal_

Eternal_

✝️ Deus Vult ✝️
Joined
Nov 11, 2023
Posts
5,268
Reputation
8,033
And even then, there would still be an insane amount of people. If there were 800 million people and the woman to man ratio was 1.5 to 1, life would be great for everyone.

The earth isn’t overpopulated because we can easily and are currently producing food for 12 billion people. Further, most of earths land is still empty and food insecurity isn’t a problem. The problem is that human life doesn’t really mean anything at all with the amount of people we currently have and to add insult to injury, the excess of men makes life difficult for everyone.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: borismonster, pig_face, Hardrada and 2 others
High birth rates = everything
 
interesting idea but if you look back to when the population was 800 million not much was going on, perhaps a better approach would be the population only consisting of those currently in the 90th percentile of IQ
 
  • Love it
Reactions: pig_face
And even then, there would still be an insane amount of people. If there were 800 million people and the woman to man ratio was 1.5 to 1, life would be great for everyone.

The earth isn’t overpopulated because we can easily and are currently producing food for 12 billion people. Further, most of earths land is still empty and food insecurity isn’t a problem. The problem is that human life doesn’t really mean anything at all with the amount of people we currently have and to add insult to injury, the excess of men makes life difficult for everyone.
Not to worry, we are entering an era of population decline which is correcting the excesses caused by the Industrial Revolution.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Eternal_
interesting idea but if you look back to when the population was 800 million not much was going on, perhaps a better approach would be the population only consisting of those currently in the 90th percentile of IQ
There would be no women in that case
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: borismonster, Gilbert_Durandal and lemonnz
interesting idea but if you look back to when the population was 800 million not much was going on, perhaps a better approach would be the population only consisting of those currently in the 90th percentile of IQ
Wdym not much was going on
 
Wdym not much was going on
in terms of breakthroughs or like how OP put it life being great. tbh it was just a bunch of wars and diseases going around, obviously theres more differences between the 19th and 21th century then just purely population, but i would still say population still plays a major role or is atleast correlated with with general global stability
 
main problem is that most of the population is gullible, soft, and submissive
 
main problem is that most of the population is gullible, soft, and submissive
That’s always been the case, when speaking on a global scale. What do you want, an unruly population?
 
interesting idea but if you look back to when the population was 800 million not much was going on, perhaps a better approach would be the population only consisting of those currently in the 90th percentile of IQ
and looks
 
  • +1
Reactions: lemonnz

Similar threads

thebuffdon690
Replies
437
Views
4K
Eternal_
Eternal_
MaghrebGator
Replies
78
Views
1K
thebuffdon690
thebuffdon690
heightmaxxing
Replies
16
Views
1K
Freixel
Freixel
randomop
Discussion .
Replies
10
Views
1K
Funnyunenjoyer1
Funnyunenjoyer1

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top