The most blatant contradiction in the Bible

[buddhistking]

Such an low tier “contradiction” I don’t have to even google to find out here’s a 3 min video of it all if your that fucking retarded.

Meanwhile there’s no evidence of Buddah doing anything he did and no contemporary sources on him. Sure I’m guessing here but I ain’t heard anybody give evidence of it but I’m willing to be corrected

I also refuse to answer to your dumbass messages where you add half the argument in with brand new points half way through so I don't care about this

That's why I'm only answering the first part of this message

Either make a new message entirely to state your new points that you find half an hour later or shut up (this is a good example)

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Lool stupid nigger first off I didn’t use GPT for shit took me hours to type all that out and actually think it through, unlike you who’s just parroting weak ass apologetics that been debunked a million times

So let me get this straight yh you’re actually saying the Bible contradicts itself on purpose just cause different groups of people viewed lineage differently? That’s the dumbest shit I ever heard If thats the case then why even bother writing two completely different genealogies if neither of them is supposed to be an accurate family tree?? What, God couldn’t figure out how to keep his own Messiah’s lineage str8?

And you keep crying about "that’s just how Jews did it back then" bro that’s literally my point Even by ancient Jewish standards a genealogy had to be consistent, especially if it's supposed to prove Jesus is the Messiah If you walked into any Jewish court back then and said, "Yeah uh, my dad had two different dads depending on who I'm talking to" you’d get laughed tf out the room

But nah instead of actually addressing the fact that Matthew and Luke’s genealogies contradict each other even after David, you just keep deflecting with this “well, Jews and Greeks saw things differently” bullshit It still don’t explain why one line goes through Solomon and the other through Nathan that’s got NOTHING to do with "cultural differences" thats just a straight up contradiction

And let’s be real, if this was any other religious book pullin this nonsense, you’d be clownin it just like I am now You just can’t admit that your book fumbled something as basic as Jesus' family tree

Bruh you have been refuted stfu and sit down that one video alone deals with the whole thing stop beating a dead horse it’s dead son you lost

Come with another refutation this one’s case is closed than you

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Lool stupid nigger first off I didn’t use GPT for shit took me hours to type all that out and actually think it through, unlike you who’s just parroting weak ass apologetics that been debunked a million times

So let me get this straight yh you’re actually saying the Bible contradicts itself on purpose just cause different groups of people viewed lineage differently? That’s the dumbest shit I ever heard If thats the case then why even bother writing two completely different genealogies if neither of them is supposed to be an accurate family tree?? What, God couldn’t figure out how to keep his own Messiah’s lineage str8?

And you keep crying about "that’s just how Jews did it back then" bro that’s literally my point Even by ancient Jewish standards a genealogy had to be consistent, especially if it's supposed to prove Jesus is the Messiah If you walked into any Jewish court back then and said, "Yeah uh, my dad had two different dads depending on who I'm talking to" you’d get laughed tf out the room

But nah instead of actually addressing the fact that Matthew and Luke’s genealogies contradict each other even after David, you just keep deflecting with this “well, Jews and Greeks saw things differently” bullshit It still don’t explain why one line goes through Solomon and the other through Nathan that’s got NOTHING to do with "cultural differences" thats just a straight up contradiction

And let’s be real, if this was any other religious book pullin this nonsense, you’d be clownin it just like I am now You just can’t admit that your book fumbled something as basic as Jesus' family tree

I have to do 100 + messages with you you’re very hard to speak to here I’m used to editing my comments touching them up before I send them but your sooo fucking irritating that I can’t even add my links with you and touch up my comments because your annoying ads keeps replying str8 away but I added this to that comment. Like wtf is wrong with you why do you reply as soon as the message hits I don’t have this issue with any other user other than you I may put you on my ignore for this because there’s no way we can speak

THE EDIT: Such a low tier “contradiction” I don’t have to even google to find out here’s a 3 min video of it all if your that fucking retarded.



Meanwhile there’s no evidence of Buddah doing anything he did and no contemporary sources on him. Sure I’m guessing here but I ain’t heard anybody give evidence of it but I’m willing to be corrected

 

[voluptuousness]

religion contradictory shit on some bs forum

 

[det3rmined]

I didn't want to do this cus I don't like talking shit on other people's religion everyone can follow what they follow but a monkey wouldn't stop pestering me telling me that Buddhism was bullshit and illogical for hours so I quoted him this:

Matthew 1:16 (Genealogy in Matthew):
"And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ."

Matthew lists Jacob as the father of Joseph (Jesus' earthly father).

Luke 3:23 (Genealogy in Luke):
"And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli."

Luke lists Heli as the father of Joseph

This is a clear contradiction. Matthew says Joseph's father is Jacob, while Luke says it's Heli and it's concerning Jesus the Messiah so it's quite important to the legitimacy of Christianity

Now I already had a chimp named @PrinceLuenLeoncur who tried to object by saying this bullshit excuse:

it is logical but not easy to read for our cultural context and time
Period.

Actually no Jacob (mentioned in Matthew) and Heli (mentioned in Luke) were thus half brothers. When Heli died childless, Jacob married his widow and fathered Joseph, who was biologically the son of Jacob but legally the son of Heli(see Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 1:6:7).

And I easily smacked him down by saying this:

Nowhere in the Bible is there a mention of Jacob and Heli being half-brothers or that Heli died childless and that Jacob married his widow, at all none, 0, nothing

Your dumb explanation rests assumption that Jacob and Heli were half-brothers based on LATER HISTORICAL INTERPRETATIONS (AKA NOT FACT) (eg Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History) but this is not part of the Biblical narrative and can be seen as SPECULATIVE (AKA ALSO NOT FACT)

Now to finish this off, if Heli died childless and Jacob married his widow, why is there no mention of this in either genealogy?

AND GUESS WHAT AFTER RESPONDING BACK AND FORTH INSTSNTLY IT'S BEEN ALMOST 45 MINUTES AND NO RESPONSE FROM THIS MESSAGE, I HAVE POSTED IT THREE TIMES AS WELL SO HE HAS DEFINITELY SEEN IT

This is revenge for mocking me for not replying to you about the trinity argument explanation which was way more difficult to understand and needs more research on it than what I just said

STOP HIDING AND EXPLAIN RIGHT NOW!

@REGULUS @PrinceLuenLeoncur

@R1PPer

Also any other Christians want to explain this?

Joseph Fathered Jesus, Jacob did aswell, not by being genetical father but by FATHERING.

 

[buddhistking]

Bruh you have been refuted stfu and sit down that one video alone deals with the whole thing stop beating a dead horse it’s dead son you lost

Come with another refutation this one’s case is closed than you

The nigga gets hit with a solid comeback

His answer: "stfu"

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

The nigga gets hit with a solid comeback

His answer: "stfu"

Learn to fucking read, that was after I thought you saw my edited comment which I sdited within the first min of posting it

But with you being a weirdo I can’t edit shit to now I have to tag shit and it seemed even when I don’t edit you still have eye cancer so can’t see jack shit

I have to do 100 + messages with you you’re very hard to speak to here I’m used to editing my comments touching them up before I send them but your sooo fucking irritating that I can’t even add my links with you and touch up my comments because your annoying ads keeps replying str8 away but I added this to that comment. Like wtf is wrong with you why do you reply as soon as the message hits I don’t have this issue with any other user other than you I may put you on my ignore for this because there’s no way we can speak

THE EDIT: Such a low tier “contradiction” I don’t have to even google to find out here’s a 3 min video of it all if your that fucking retarded.



Meanwhile there’s no evidence of Buddah doing anything he did and no contemporary sources on him. Sure I’m guessing here but I ain’t heard anybody give evidence of it but I’m willing to be corrected

READ ABOVE.

Once again I have closed this case you have lost

 

[det3rmined]

according to monty phyton jesus was the son of a roman legionnaire thats why he looks Italian in paintings

View attachment 3508065

the most probable reason is, well, the renaissance was in Italy thats why he looks like Italian Niggas

View attachment 3508068

italians arent this fucked i promise u

 

[Gamerspyy786]

1. Buddha was from Nepal not India he went to teach in India

2. Buddha is not God, there is no God like Jesus is in Christianity to worship, it is a non-theistic religion without a deity and I worship nobody

So what exactly is ur belief system? Sounds atheistic

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

according to monty phyton jesus was the son of a roman legionnaire thats why he looks Italian in paintings

View attachment 3508065

the most probable reason is, well, the renaissance was in Italy thats why he looks like Italian Niggas

View attachment 3508068

Well actually that’s true… in Western European iconography Jesus is an Italian.


But that presupposes all Christian’s are from the western denomination (Protestant/roman Catholic)

Nestorian church, Armenian, Oriental and Eastern Orthodox pain Jesus as an ETHNIC

These church’s are all older than the western church as well so yeah it’s clear Jesus wasn’t an white Italian man

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

can you sum it down

I have debunked this already OPs a retard

 

[Skara]

let's be honest, there's no god

 

[milchbubi88]

the difference between Matthew 1:16 and Luke 3:23 is not necessarily a contradiction but can be explained in several ways:

Levirate Marriage; If Heli died childless, his brother Jacob could have married his widow, making Joseph legally Heli's son but biologically Jacob’s.
Different Lineages; Matthew traces the royal (legal) line through Solomon, while Luke follows the biological line through Nathan (both sons of David).
Mary’s Genealogy; Luke may actually record Mary’s lineage, with Joseph as Heli’s son-in-law.
Different Perspectives; Matthew emphasizes Jesus’ kingship, while Luke highlights His universal connection to humanity.