She was older by the time she became relevant through Lost. She probably had more sex appeal than Margot Robbie in their respective primes though.
She had a pretty face in her prime but wasn't an example of top female aesthetics due to her height/body.
Interesting point. I think If you were to poll, the majority of men would not rank the female model body type as ideal. Most of them skew towards slightly curvier, shorter and higher bf women. And this can't be overlooked, because aesthetics are partially defined by what the general populational preference is.
The majority of men swiftly fill niches based on desperation. This doesn't actually hold true at least on this site though.
There's no desperation factor when you're asking for what they would consider ideal, and men have been known to be more objective in polls than women, too. Also, this thread you linked is laughable sorry, that's a pretty bad and skewed way of assessing body types imo.The majority of men swiftly fill niches based on desperation. This doesn't actually hold true at least on this site though.
Why? Using silhouettes is well controlled.
Find adequate candids of her body...
It is, but you only used two: one short and stubby, and the other one taller and more balanced. Where are all the other variations?
in the pics you posted she looked better than lima already. And they were candids iirc.
If you made a silhouette of prime lima and one of this girl https://www.tiktok.com/@victorialynnmyers_?referer_url=s9e.github.io/&refer=embed&embed_source=121352282,121351166,121331973,120811592,120810756;null;embed_name&referer_video_id=7114007678921280814
It was meant to be exaggerated dimorphism in both directions (among females).
That's all I could find. She obviously lacks vertical proportions (most important).
I'm not using frauded TikTok videos as a reference.
How can you fraud the outline of your silhouette in a video that’s filmed dead straight, when you have a thin layer of clothing on and are literally just walking toward the camera with normal posture?
Angling, lens distortion, and filters.
Lens distortion barely affects bodies, because they are much flatter and have less depth differential (depth distribution doesn’t deviate as much) in the frontal plane than a skull. Even if she is frauding with a filter, that body that the filter produced might not be her own, but it could feasibly belong to a human female. And that’s why it’s still valid as an example, there are certainly people irl who have that exact body type in the video with no frauding. Since the poll would be of two faceless and nameless figures, it remains valid.
Fair enough, but I don't need a video reference to edit a silhouette in the direction of female dimorphism.
No you don’t, but I think you could’ve done a better job at that in the post you linked. I’m interested in analyzing this topic objectively too, and have decent drawing skills. I think it’d be a good idea to create a poll with at least 4 different options of bodies. When I get around to doing it, I’ll ask for your opinion before posting.
I've done a 3D render version as well.
looksmax.org
this 3d version is good, but I’m not sold on vertical proportions > horizontal. This might be like the jaw vs eye area debate though, difficult to navigate. But generally, I think that if a certain threshold for the vertical proportions is met, then the horizontal ones become more important.I've done a 3D render version as well.
Boobs versus butt (3D render edition)
Controlling for leanness, the ordering of importance for women is generally:
vertical proportions > horizontal proportions > posterior projection (butt) > anterior projection (breasts)
If a threshold for vertical proportions has to be met first then it's inherently more important than horizontal proportions.
fair ig, but you can look at it both ways. If the threshold is met by a significant number of individuals, then the word ‘important’ takes on a new meaning imo and is better suited for the other parameter. it’s like the difference between ‘crucial’ and ‘impactful’.
Women generally need to be above 5'7 to have optimal vertical proportions, which is already the ~90th percentile, and even past that many won't have proportionally long legs.
This is likely correct. But I already mentioned that wide hips aren't ideal for the male offspring (because they probably aren't optimal for running), which places greater emphasis on the importance of vertical proportions.
how inheritable is hip width between mothers and sons, though? Do you know of any data on this?
No, but looking at the pelvic widths of various races would be a good start.
Lika solt
Couldn't easily find candids.
looksmax.org
looksmax.org
Left is Alexandra Daddario, right Barbara Palvin
Rarer doesnt mean more attractive~55% say Lima fogs yet she's ~41x rarer in candid.
It does for this post.
looksmax.org
Low candid count.Blanca Soler
might change in the future, though
Maybe. She only has one page on Bellazon and Getty and I think she's already in her 20s (her age on Google is listed incorrectly).
In that case, I would like to request threads for the following names:
I already have folders of a few of them... Kos and Luss have only done high fashion, IIRC, which makes finding adequate body examples exponentially more difficult.
she has a few runway shots but not many close-ups from what I've seen
The differences in harmony are noticeable and Padilla probably has a better body too.
looksmax.org
nigga u prefer trans women
nigga u prefer trans women
looksmax.org
@Crusile when did you give this user the n-word pass?
Nope, even better—Jewish.Hold up, @@Crusile is black?
soft a is pretty aight with me. No one had used soft a in a racist way, ever
Okay.
I only use the hard R when I'm losing an argument bad, as a last resort, or as my last trump card. (I'm not racist)
