Reckless Turtle
Kraken
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2021
- Posts
- 17,258
- Reputation
- 23,928
- OP
- #201
Maybe, but many of the current threads have barely any votes, so you should vote on them first.Hey are you still taking suggestions
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Maybe, but many of the current threads have barely any votes, so you should vote on them first.Hey are you still taking suggestions
Couldn't easily find body examples.Audreyana Michelle
Blanca Soler
There are more candids than I expected, but I couldn't easily find body examples.blanca soler
has lola ever made a video? i think most of her pics are fraudedI added some more votes. I’m sorry if the list is too long.
Meghan roche
Diane Kruger
Chanel Iman
Beyonce
Liza Soberano
Nata Lee
Nidhi sundil
Natassia Malthe
Lola chuil
Mindi Anden
Shlomit Malke
Vinetria
Renee Murden
I have no clue to be honest.has lola ever made a video? i think most of her pics are frauded
but that's a good selection tbhI have no clue to be honest.
I don’t get it either. Skin and pheno changes but the bones stay the same.but that's a good selection tbh
it's good to see someone who can appreciate beauty of difference races, since everyone here is so stubborin
Kate Li
Nata Lee
Probably very difficult, if possible.Vinetria
Renee Murden
i would suggest renee murden, but I don't think she has many candids
Correct.
it's good to see someone who can appreciate beauty of difference races, since everyone here is so stubborin
Vote accordingly.All of them are 10s
Stop placing these beautiful women in a ranking system, they're fucking beautiful and don't need no validationVote accordingly.
This is an incel forum, sir.Stop placing these beautiful women in a ranking system, they're fucking beautiful and don't need no validation
No it is not.This is an incel forum, sir.
It's going down with its @Master ship of the fleet (Incels.is).No it is not.
Not finding any examples of her body (which isn't great to begin with).Hoyeom Jung
Sharam Diniz
Meghan roche
Débora Nascimento
Mindi Anden
Lola chuil
Yeah, this isn't happening lol.has lola ever made a video? i think most of her pics are frauded
Questionable face but great body. Similar toChanel Iman
Tyra Banks
I’d say great face but her body wouldn’t compete against other women on this list.Questionable face but great body. Similar to
Her nose is almost as bad as @Blackgymmax's (prior to his alleged rhinoplasty, or use of filters):
I’d say great face but her body wouldn’t compete against other women on this list.
Who's more facially attractive?
I would pick Chanel imanWho's more facially attractive?
I don't see her being more facially attractive than Zendaya. Maybe it's worth polling.I would pick Chanel iman
I would pick Chanel iman
I don't see her being more facially attractive than Zendaya. Maybe it's worth polling.
There are more candids than I expected, but I couldn't easily find body examples.
You can't conclude that she has a poor ass from this because she's wearing loose underwear and is pushing her pelvis forward.
I was thinking more about her seemingly wide waist. but tbh I wasn’t trying to make a serious point, just fucking around.You can't conclude that she has a poor ass from this because she's wearing loose underwear and is pushing her pelvis forward.
yea psl taste is basically in 2 flavorsI’ve seen women on pinterest more attractive than these models. Trust fund stacies >>>
another aspect of the 2nd camp is people here like knowing that the girl they like is someone everyone else likes as well. they want a trophy gf more than one theyre genuinely attracted to. another side effect of this shitholes narcissismyea psl taste is basically in 2 flavors
1. cartoonishly thick girls that people often claim to like just to appear masculine
2. generic models that they probably just like cuz theyve overanalyzed facial features to the point where they dont even have an actual taste anymore, they just calculate who is hottest based on facial ratios
random cutesy girls i see on youtube, ig, in public, etc yottamog girls in both of the above camps for me
I haven't even seen any good examples of her waist.I was thinking more about her seemingly wide waist. but tbh I wasn’t trying to make a serious point, just fucking around.
This is only partially true and blatantly applies to the real world as well. Most people here are still more aesthetically objective than a normie.another aspect of the 2nd camp is people here like knowing that the girl they like is someone everyone else likes as well. they want a trophy gf more than one theyre genuinely attracted to. another side effect of this shitholes narcissism
its true that most everyone has that part of themselves yes, but i doubt its as extreme as people here.This is only partially true and blatantly applies to the real world as well. Most people here are still more aesthetically objective than a normie.
Consult the standard deviation column in the OP.its true that most everyone has that part of themselves yes, but i doubt its as extreme as people here.
i wonder if theres some brain mechanism that can be seen with fmri that can show you who you are TRULY most attracted to, barring social influence. i mean you can already basically tell who you are most genuinely sexually attracted to with these dick sensors they use in studies that measure how engorged your dick is.
Wearable E-Textile and CNT Sensor Wireless Measurement System for Real-Time Penile Erection Monitoring
Erection measurements are the most important indicator of male urological disease diagnosis, treatment, and results. Rigiscan has been used widely in studies and diagnoses for nocturnal penile tumescence for evaluating erectile dysfunction by measuring the number and timing of erectile...www.mdpi.com
There are plenty of good examples of her other than her exposed ass, which I couldn't find after a considerable amount of time.Diane Kruger
Female Votes Raw Rating (x/10) Adjusted Rating (x/10) SD Rarity (1/x) Amount of females currently alive who were/are/will be more attractive in their respective primes 1 5 9.00 10.00 1.37 3,488,556 1,147 2 2 9.00 9.97 1.41 2,958,844 1,352 3 37 9.50 9.88 0.81 1,858,157 2,153 4 28 8.83 9.85 1.08 1,582,693 2,527 5 18 9.24 9.84 1.04 1,559,182 2,565 6 9 9.06 9.83 1.10 1,494,949 2,676 7 15 9.67 9.83 0.65 1,429,557 2,798 8 32 9.39 9.82 0.86 1,411,933 2,833 9 82 9.43 9.82 0.78 1,363,851 2,933 10 9 8.81 9.80 1.07 1,290,614 3,099 11 12 9.15 9.78 0.99 1,158,736 3,452 12 18 9.49 9.77 0.70 1,089,332 3,672 13 10 8.85 9.77 1.04 1,071,911 3,732 14 10 8.68 9.77 1.04 1,064,931 3,756 15 10 8.98 9.76 1.11 1,056,709 3,785 16 12 9.56 9.75 0.58 976,150 4,098 17 9 9.06 9.75 1.08 968,496 4,130 18 11 8.80 9.74 1.13 953,552 4,195 19 16 9.36 9.73 0.76 905,224 4,419 20 10 8.75 9.73 1.11 889,909 4,495 21 25 9.11 9.73 0.98 885,005 4,520 22 14 9.14 9.72 0.99 862,942 4,635 23 34 8.71 9.72 1.05 827,719 4,833 24 14 9.09 9.71 0.95 811,999 4,926 25 16 9.16 9.71 0.86 808,195 4,949 26 22 8.70 9.71 0.97 806,046 4,962 27 37 9.07 9.70 0.94 776,658 5,150 28 14 8.59 9.69 1.07 728,941 5,487 29 16 8.75 9.69 1.06 724,791 5,519 30 80 8.96 9.69 0.94 720,211 5,554 31 19 8.93 9.68 0.98 698,632 5,725 32 27 8.82 9.68 0.98 697,351 5,736 33 11 8.70 9.67 1.12 648,286 6,170 34 102 9.21 9.66 0.83 641,292 6,237 35 10 8.80 9.66 1.02 634,180 6,307 36 16 9.36 9.66 0.78 626,012 6,390 37 11 9.27 9.66 0.85 623,779 6,413 38 11 8.95 9.65 0.96 614,841 6,506 39 27 9.06 9.65 0.89 609,484 6,563 40 22 8.14 9.65 0.92 591,379 6,764 41 10 8.55 9.63 0.90 551,422 7,254 42 22 8.98 9.63 0.91 546,566 7,318 43 11 8.82 9.63 1.08 544,230 7,350 44 11 8.73 9.62 1.06 531,338 7,528 45 15 8.82 9.61 0.93 499,286 8,011 46 12 8.75 9.59 0.98 461,304 8,671 47 14 8.46 9.57 1.04 419,108 9,544 48 16 9.30 9.57 0.69 411,504 9,720 49 12 8.73 9.56 0.92 400,313 9,992 50 25 8.92 9.56 0.92 384,812 10,395 51 24 8.70 9.56 0.97 384,497 10,403 52 9 8.42 9.55 0.91 371,755 10,760 53 22 8.52 9.54 0.99 356,481 11,221 54 22 8.88 9.53 0.82 346,456 11,545 55 13 9.17 9.52 0.69 317,284 12,607 56 10 8.80 9.50 0.90 288,602 13,860 57 10 9.20 9.49 0.56 281,925 14,188 58 9 9.19 9.49 0.61 279,872 14,292 59 10 9.05 9.49 0.63 277,579 14,410 60 19 8.57 9.48 0.93 271,674 14,724 61 18 8.57 9.46 0.90 240,691 16,619 62 10 8.98 9.46 0.71 238,619 16,763 63 92 8.38 9.45 0.82 238,391 16,779
View attachment 2347842
If you have any suggestions of other women to rate, share them below (they must be very objectively attractive and have ample, prime-age candid examples).
Those with fewer votes are irelevant, blanca padila very overrated in my opinion.
Female Votes Raw Rating (x/10) Adjusted Rating (x/10) SD Rarity (1/x) Amount of females currently alive who were/are/will be more attractive in their respective primes 1 5 9.00 10.00 1.37 3,488,556 1,147 2 2 9.00 9.97 1.41 2,958,844 1,352 3 37 9.50 9.88 0.81 1,858,157 2,153 4 28 8.83 9.85 1.08 1,582,693 2,527 5 18 9.24 9.84 1.04 1,559,182 2,565 6 9 9.06 9.83 1.10 1,494,949 2,676 7 15 9.67 9.83 0.65 1,429,557 2,798 8 32 9.39 9.82 0.86 1,411,933 2,833 9 82 9.43 9.82 0.78 1,363,851 2,933 10 9 8.81 9.80 1.07 1,290,614 3,099 11 12 9.15 9.78 0.99 1,158,736 3,452 12 18 9.49 9.77 0.70 1,089,332 3,672 13 10 8.85 9.77 1.04 1,071,911 3,732 14 10 8.68 9.77 1.04 1,064,931 3,756 15 10 8.98 9.76 1.11 1,056,709 3,785 16 12 9.56 9.75 0.58 976,150 4,098 17 9 9.06 9.75 1.08 968,496 4,130 18 11 8.80 9.74 1.13 953,552 4,195 19 16 9.36 9.73 0.76 905,224 4,419 20 10 8.75 9.73 1.11 889,909 4,495 21 25 9.11 9.73 0.98 885,005 4,520 22 14 9.14 9.72 0.99 862,942 4,635 23 34 8.71 9.72 1.05 827,719 4,833 24 14 9.09 9.71 0.95 811,999 4,926 25 16 9.16 9.71 0.86 808,195 4,949 26 22 8.70 9.71 0.97 806,046 4,962 27 37 9.07 9.70 0.94 776,658 5,150 28 14 8.59 9.69 1.07 728,941 5,487 29 16 8.75 9.69 1.06 724,791 5,519 30 80 8.96 9.69 0.94 720,211 5,554 31 19 8.93 9.68 0.98 698,632 5,725 32 27 8.82 9.68 0.98 697,351 5,736 33 11 8.70 9.67 1.12 648,286 6,170 34 102 9.21 9.66 0.83 641,292 6,237 35 10 8.80 9.66 1.02 634,180 6,307 36 16 9.36 9.66 0.78 626,012 6,390 37 11 9.27 9.66 0.85 623,779 6,413 38 11 8.95 9.65 0.96 614,841 6,506 39 27 9.06 9.65 0.89 609,484 6,563 40 22 8.14 9.65 0.92 591,379 6,764 41 10 8.55 9.63 0.90 551,422 7,254 42 22 8.98 9.63 0.91 546,566 7,318 43 11 8.82 9.63 1.08 544,230 7,350 44 11 8.73 9.62 1.06 531,338 7,528 45 15 8.82 9.61 0.93 499,286 8,011 46 12 8.75 9.59 0.98 461,304 8,671 47 14 8.46 9.57 1.04 419,108 9,544 48 16 9.30 9.57 0.69 411,504 9,720 49 12 8.73 9.56 0.92 400,313 9,992 50 25 8.92 9.56 0.92 384,812 10,395 51 24 8.70 9.56 0.97 384,497 10,403 52 9 8.42 9.55 0.91 371,755 10,760 53 22 8.52 9.54 0.99 356,481 11,221 54 22 8.88 9.53 0.82 346,456 11,545 55 13 9.17 9.52 0.69 317,284 12,607 56 10 8.80 9.50 0.90 288,602 13,860 57 10 9.20 9.49 0.56 281,925 14,188 58 9 9.19 9.49 0.61 279,872 14,292 59 10 9.05 9.49 0.63 277,579 14,410 60 19 8.57 9.48 0.93 271,674 14,724 61 18 8.57 9.46 0.90 240,691 16,619 62 10 8.98 9.46 0.71 238,619 16,763 63 92 8.38 9.45 0.82 238,391 16,779
View attachment 2347842
If you have any suggestions of other women to rate, share them below (they must be very objectively attractive and have ample, prime-age candid examples).
I'm slowly getting around to boosting the sample sizes. You can always bump the threads though...Those with fewer votes are irelevant, blanca padila very overrated in my opinion.
Fixed.
The edit feature has disappeared, and I can no longer update the table! May I be able to edit the OP again?Had some exams I needed to focus on to make sure I didn't fail the year, but that's all done now (and I passed).
What happened to mog battles?
Female Votes Adjusted Sample Size Raw Rating (x/10) Adjusted Rating (x/10) SD Rarity (1/x) Amount of females currently alive who were/are/will be more attractive in their respective primes 1 90 74.2 9.56 10.00 0.72 3,488,556 1,147 2 18 13.1 9.24 9.98 1.04 3,178,287 1,259 3 10 6.0 8.90 9.97 1.23 3,037,006 1,317 4 11 5.4 8.77 9.97 1.17 3,010,480 1,329 5 10 4.2 8.70 9.94 1.07 2,573,835 1,554 6 90 69.3 9.42 9.93 0.77 2,485,922 1,609 7 16 15.0 9.64 9.93 0.64 2,391,230 1,673 8 12 7.6 9.15 9.92 0.99 2,343,191 1,707 9 18 14.5 9.49 9.91 0.70 2,199,158 1,819 10 10 5.1 8.85 9.91 1.04 2,163,040 1,849 11 10 3.7 8.68 9.91 1.04 2,148,574 1,862 12 10 6.1 8.98 9.90 1.11 2,131,537 1,877 13 73 36.1 8.80 9.90 1.04 2,098,637 1,906 14 12 10.4 9.56 9.89 0.58 1,964,792 2,036 15 9 6.0 9.06 9.89 1.08 1,948,967 2,052 16 11 6.0 8.80 9.88 1.13 1,918,081 2,085 17 16 11.9 9.36 9.87 0.76 1,818,284 2,200 18 10 5.1 8.75 9.87 1.11 1,786,688 2,239 19 14 10.0 9.14 9.86 0.99 1,731,088 2,311 20 68 43.6 9.13 9.86 0.90 1,705,276 2,346 21 67 34.8 8.87 9.86 0.98 1,675,499 2,387 22 14 8.8 9.09 9.85 0.95 1,626,179 2,460 23 16 10.5 9.16 9.85 0.86 1,618,354 2,472 24 14 5.8 8.59 9.83 1.07 1,455,515 2,748 25 19 11.2 8.93 9.82 0.98 1,393,364 2,871 26 60 35.9 9.05 9.82 0.88 1,383,169 2,892 27 88 48.9 8.92 9.82 0.95 1,379,730 2,899 28 62 35.6 8.94 9.81 0.96 1,310,254 3,053 29 17 9.2 8.79 9.81 1.04 1,309,271 3,055 30 88 47.9 8.91 9.81 0.93 1,294,304 3,090 31 104 75.5 9.22 9.80 0.83 1,291,489 3,097 32 11 6.0 8.70 9.80 1.12 1,290,282 3,100 33 62 27.6 8.68 9.80 1.00 1,276,216 3,134 34 10 5.2 8.80 9.80 1.02 1,261,439 3,171 35 16 13.4 9.36 9.80 0.78 1,244,744 3,214 36 61 19.5 8.40 9.80 0.96 1,243,692 3,216 37 11 8.4 9.27 9.80 0.85 1,240,181 3,225 38 11 6.4 8.95 9.79 0.96 1,221,921 3,274 39 83 51.4 9.02 9.78 0.92 1,138,796 3,512 40 10 3.3 8.55 9.77 0.90 1,092,574 3,661 41 11 6.4 8.82 9.77 1.08 1,077,930 3,711 42 10 2.8 8.55 9.77 0.90 1,066,022 3,752 43 11 5.5 8.73 9.76 1.06 1,051,692 3,803 44 15 7.6 8.82 9.75 0.93 986,534 4,055 45 62 8.8 7.96 9.74 0.78 919,946 4,348 46 19 14.8 9.25 9.73 0.78 912,272 4,385 47 12 5.7 8.75 9.73 0.98 909,470 4,398 48 62 41.3 9.10 9.73 0.80 905,300 4,418 49 14 5.5 8.46 9.71 1.04 824,056 4,854 50 12 5.6 8.73 9.70 0.92 786,083 5,089 51 14 4.4 8.52 9.70 0.84 755,924 5,292 52 9 3.1 8.42 9.69 0.91 728,480 5,491 53 22 9.0 8.52 9.68 0.99 697,721 5,733 54 22 11.4 8.88 9.67 0.82 677,552 5,904 55 13 9.0 9.17 9.66 0.69 618,952 6,463 56 58 30.0 8.74 9.65 0.93 600,899 6,657 57 10 4.9 8.80 9.64 0.90 561,480 7,124 58 10 6.8 9.20 9.63 0.56 548,124 7,298 59 9 6.5 9.19 9.63 0.61 544,018 7,353 60 10 5.2 9.05 9.63 0.63 539,433 7,415 61 19 8.0 8.57 9.62 0.93 527,633 7,581 62 94 28.5 8.39 9.60 0.83 484,154 8,262 63 18 7.2 8.57 9.60 0.90 465,836 8,587 64 10 5.7 8.98 9.59 0.71 461,712 8,663
View attachment 2362405
If you have any suggestions of other women to rate, share them below (they must be very objectively attractive and have ample, prime-age candid examples).