Looksmax.org rates famous, attractive women

Blanca Soler
1654506880469 1
blanca soler
There are more candids than I expected, but I couldn't easily find body examples.
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: THEMOGGER and DelonLover1999
I added some more votes. I’m sorry if the list is too long.
Meghan roche
Diane Kruger
Chanel Iman
Beyonce
Liza Soberano
Nata Lee
Nidhi sundil
Natassia Malthe
Lola chuil
Mindi Anden
Shlomit Malke
Vinetria
Renee Murden
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 29155 and khvirgin
I added some more votes. I’m sorry if the list is too long.
Meghan roche
Diane Kruger
Chanel Iman
Beyonce
Liza Soberano
Nata Lee
Nidhi sundil
Natassia Malthe
Lola chuil
Mindi Anden
Shlomit Malke
Vinetria
Renee Murden
has lola ever made a video? i think most of her pics are frauded
 
I have no clue to be honest.
but that's a good selection tbh
it's good to see someone who can appreciate beauty of difference races, since everyone here is so stubborin
 
  • +1
Reactions: aesthetic beauty
but that's a good selection tbh
it's good to see someone who can appreciate beauty of difference races, since everyone here is so stubborin
I don’t get it either. Skin and pheno changes but the bones stay the same.
 

Probably very difficult, if possible.

Renee Murden
i would suggest renee murden, but I don't think she has many candids
 
  • +1
Reactions: aesthetic beauty
All of them are 10s ❤️ 🥰
 
Stop placing these beautiful women in a ranking system, they're fucking beautiful and don't need no validation
This is an incel forum, sir.
 
  • JFL
  • WTF
Reactions: aesthetic beauty and Deleted member 29155
Questionable face but great body. Similar to


Her nose is almost as bad as @Blackgymmax's (prior to his alleged rhinoplasty, or use of filters):
patrick-mcmullan-archives.jpg
I’d say great face but her body wouldn’t compete against other women on this list.
 
You can't conclude that she has a poor ass from this because she's wearing loose underwear and is pushing her pelvis forward.
I was thinking more about her seemingly wide waist. but tbh I wasn’t trying to make a serious point, just fucking around.
 
I’ve seen women on pinterest more attractive than these models. Trust fund stacies >>>
yea psl taste is basically in 2 flavors

1. cartoonishly thick girls that people often claim to like just to appear masculine
2. generic models that they probably just like cuz theyve overanalyzed facial features to the point where they dont even have an actual taste anymore, they just calculate who is hottest based on facial ratios

random cutesy girls i see on youtube, ig, in public, etc yottamog girls in both of the above camps for me
 
yea psl taste is basically in 2 flavors

1. cartoonishly thick girls that people often claim to like just to appear masculine
2. generic models that they probably just like cuz theyve overanalyzed facial features to the point where they dont even have an actual taste anymore, they just calculate who is hottest based on facial ratios

random cutesy girls i see on youtube, ig, in public, etc yottamog girls in both of the above camps for me
another aspect of the 2nd camp is people here like knowing that the girl they like is someone everyone else likes as well. they want a trophy gf more than one theyre genuinely attracted to. another side effect of this shitholes narcissism
 
I was thinking more about her seemingly wide waist. but tbh I wasn’t trying to make a serious point, just fucking around.
I haven't even seen any good examples of her waist.
 
another aspect of the 2nd camp is people here like knowing that the girl they like is someone everyone else likes as well. they want a trophy gf more than one theyre genuinely attracted to. another side effect of this shitholes narcissism
This is only partially true and blatantly applies to the real world as well. Most people here are still more aesthetically objective than a normie.
 
  • +1
Reactions: DelonLover1999
This is only partially true and blatantly applies to the real world as well. Most people here are still more aesthetically objective than a normie.
its true that most everyone has that part of themselves yes, but i doubt its as extreme as people here.

i wonder if theres some brain mechanism that can be seen with fmri that can show you who you are TRULY most attracted to, barring social influence. i mean you can already basically tell who you are most genuinely sexually attracted to with these dick sensors they use in studies that measure how engorged your dick is.

 
its true that most everyone has that part of themselves yes, but i doubt its as extreme as people here.

i wonder if theres some brain mechanism that can be seen with fmri that can show you who you are TRULY most attracted to, barring social influence. i mean you can already basically tell who you are most genuinely sexually attracted to with these dick sensors they use in studies that measure how engorged your dick is.

Consult the standard deviation column in the OP.
 
  • +1
Reactions: aesthetic beauty
American singer Cassie Ventura
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Debetro
Female​
Votes​
Raw Rating (x/10)​
Adjusted Rating (x/10)​
SD​
Rarity (1/x)​
Amount of females currently alive who were/are/will be more attractive in their respective primes​
1​
5​
9.00​
10.00​
1.37​
3,488,556​
1,147​
2​
2​
9.00​
9.97​
1.41​
2,958,844​
1,352​
3​
37​
9.50​
9.88​
0.81​
1,858,157​
2,153​
4​
28​
8.83​
9.85​
1.08​
1,582,693​
2,527​
5​
18​
9.24​
9.84​
1.04​
1,559,182​
2,565​
6​
9​
9.06​
9.83​
1.10​
1,494,949​
2,676​
7​
15​
9.67​
9.83​
0.65​
1,429,557​
2,798​
8​
32​
9.39​
9.82​
0.86​
1,411,933​
2,833​
9​
82​
9.43​
9.82​
0.78​
1,363,851​
2,933​
10​
9​
8.81​
9.80​
1.07​
1,290,614​
3,099​
11​
12​
9.15​
9.78​
0.99​
1,158,736​
3,452​
12​
18​
9.49​
9.77​
0.70​
1,089,332​
3,672​
13​
10​
8.85​
9.77​
1.04​
1,071,911​
3,732​
14​
10​
8.68​
9.77​
1.04​
1,064,931​
3,756​
15​
10​
8.98​
9.76​
1.11​
1,056,709​
3,785​
16​
12​
9.56​
9.75​
0.58​
976,150​
4,098​
17​
9​
9.06​
9.75​
1.08​
968,496​
4,130​
18​
11​
8.80​
9.74​
1.13​
953,552​
4,195​
19​
16​
9.36​
9.73​
0.76​
905,224​
4,419​
20​
10​
8.75​
9.73​
1.11​
889,909​
4,495​
21​
25​
9.11​
9.73​
0.98​
885,005​
4,520​
22​
14​
9.14​
9.72​
0.99​
862,942​
4,635​
23​
34​
8.71​
9.72​
1.05​
827,719​
4,833​
24​
14​
9.09​
9.71​
0.95​
811,999​
4,926​
25​
16​
9.16​
9.71​
0.86​
808,195​
4,949​
26​
22​
8.70​
9.71​
0.97​
806,046​
4,962​
27​
37​
9.07​
9.70​
0.94​
776,658​
5,150​
28​
14​
8.59​
9.69​
1.07​
728,941​
5,487​
29​
16​
8.75​
9.69​
1.06​
724,791​
5,519​
30​
80​
8.96​
9.69​
0.94​
720,211​
5,554​
31​
19​
8.93​
9.68​
0.98​
698,632​
5,725​
32​
27​
8.82​
9.68​
0.98​
697,351​
5,736​
33​
11​
8.70​
9.67​
1.12​
648,286​
6,170​
34​
102​
9.21​
9.66​
0.83​
641,292​
6,237​
35​
10​
8.80​
9.66​
1.02​
634,180​
6,307​
36​
16​
9.36​
9.66​
0.78​
626,012​
6,390​
37​
11​
9.27​
9.66​
0.85​
623,779​
6,413​
38​
11​
8.95​
9.65​
0.96​
614,841​
6,506​
39​
27​
9.06​
9.65​
0.89​
609,484​
6,563​
40​
22​
8.14​
9.65​
0.92​
591,379​
6,764​
41​
10​
8.55​
9.63​
0.90​
551,422​
7,254​
42​
22​
8.98​
9.63​
0.91​
546,566​
7,318​
43​
11​
8.82​
9.63​
1.08​
544,230​
7,350​
44​
11​
8.73​
9.62​
1.06​
531,338​
7,528​
45​
15​
8.82​
9.61​
0.93​
499,286​
8,011​
46​
12​
8.75​
9.59​
0.98​
461,304​
8,671​
47​
14​
8.46​
9.57​
1.04​
419,108​
9,544​
48​
16​
9.30​
9.57​
0.69​
411,504​
9,720​
49​
12​
8.73​
9.56​
0.92​
400,313​
9,992​
50​
25​
8.92​
9.56​
0.92​
384,812​
10,395​
51​
24​
8.70​
9.56​
0.97​
384,497​
10,403​
52​
9​
8.42​
9.55​
0.91​
371,755​
10,760​
53​
22​
8.52​
9.54​
0.99​
356,481​
11,221​
54​
22​
8.88​
9.53​
0.82​
346,456​
11,545​
55​
13​
9.17​
9.52​
0.69​
317,284​
12,607​
56​
10​
8.80​
9.50​
0.90​
288,602​
13,860​
57​
10​
9.20​
9.49​
0.56​
281,925​
14,188​
58​
9​
9.19​
9.49​
0.61​
279,872​
14,292​
59​
10​
9.05​
9.49​
0.63​
277,579​
14,410​
60​
19​
8.57​
9.48​
0.93​
271,674​
14,724​
61​
18​
8.57​
9.46​
0.90​
240,691​
16,619​
62​
10​
8.98​
9.46​
0.71​
238,619​
16,763​
63​
92​
8.38​
9.45​
0.82​
238,391​
16,779​

View attachment 2347842

If you have any suggestions of other women to rate, share them below (they must be very objectively attractive and have ample, prime-age candid examples).
Female​
Votes​
Raw Rating (x/10)​
Adjusted Rating (x/10)​
SD​
Rarity (1/x)​
Amount of females currently alive who were/are/will be more attractive in their respective primes​
1​
5​
9.00​
10.00​
1.37​
3,488,556​
1,147​
2​
2​
9.00​
9.97​
1.41​
2,958,844​
1,352​
3​
37​
9.50​
9.88​
0.81​
1,858,157​
2,153​
4​
28​
8.83​
9.85​
1.08​
1,582,693​
2,527​
5​
18​
9.24​
9.84​
1.04​
1,559,182​
2,565​
6​
9​
9.06​
9.83​
1.10​
1,494,949​
2,676​
7​
15​
9.67​
9.83​
0.65​
1,429,557​
2,798​
8​
32​
9.39​
9.82​
0.86​
1,411,933​
2,833​
9​
82​
9.43​
9.82​
0.78​
1,363,851​
2,933​
10​
9​
8.81​
9.80​
1.07​
1,290,614​
3,099​
11​
12​
9.15​
9.78​
0.99​
1,158,736​
3,452​
12​
18​
9.49​
9.77​
0.70​
1,089,332​
3,672​
13​
10​
8.85​
9.77​
1.04​
1,071,911​
3,732​
14​
10​
8.68​
9.77​
1.04​
1,064,931​
3,756​
15​
10​
8.98​
9.76​
1.11​
1,056,709​
3,785​
16​
12​
9.56​
9.75​
0.58​
976,150​
4,098​
17​
9​
9.06​
9.75​
1.08​
968,496​
4,130​
18​
11​
8.80​
9.74​
1.13​
953,552​
4,195​
19​
16​
9.36​
9.73​
0.76​
905,224​
4,419​
20​
10​
8.75​
9.73​
1.11​
889,909​
4,495​
21​
25​
9.11​
9.73​
0.98​
885,005​
4,520​
22​
14​
9.14​
9.72​
0.99​
862,942​
4,635​
23​
34​
8.71​
9.72​
1.05​
827,719​
4,833​
24​
14​
9.09​
9.71​
0.95​
811,999​
4,926​
25​
16​
9.16​
9.71​
0.86​
808,195​
4,949​
26​
22​
8.70​
9.71​
0.97​
806,046​
4,962​
27​
37​
9.07​
9.70​
0.94​
776,658​
5,150​
28​
14​
8.59​
9.69​
1.07​
728,941​
5,487​
29​
16​
8.75​
9.69​
1.06​
724,791​
5,519​
30​
80​
8.96​
9.69​
0.94​
720,211​
5,554​
31​
19​
8.93​
9.68​
0.98​
698,632​
5,725​
32​
27​
8.82​
9.68​
0.98​
697,351​
5,736​
33​
11​
8.70​
9.67​
1.12​
648,286​
6,170​
34​
102​
9.21​
9.66​
0.83​
641,292​
6,237​
35​
10​
8.80​
9.66​
1.02​
634,180​
6,307​
36​
16​
9.36​
9.66​
0.78​
626,012​
6,390​
37​
11​
9.27​
9.66​
0.85​
623,779​
6,413​
38​
11​
8.95​
9.65​
0.96​
614,841​
6,506​
39​
27​
9.06​
9.65​
0.89​
609,484​
6,563​
40​
22​
8.14​
9.65​
0.92​
591,379​
6,764​
41​
10​
8.55​
9.63​
0.90​
551,422​
7,254​
42​
22​
8.98​
9.63​
0.91​
546,566​
7,318​
43​
11​
8.82​
9.63​
1.08​
544,230​
7,350​
44​
11​
8.73​
9.62​
1.06​
531,338​
7,528​
45​
15​
8.82​
9.61​
0.93​
499,286​
8,011​
46​
12​
8.75​
9.59​
0.98​
461,304​
8,671​
47​
14​
8.46​
9.57​
1.04​
419,108​
9,544​
48​
16​
9.30​
9.57​
0.69​
411,504​
9,720​
49​
12​
8.73​
9.56​
0.92​
400,313​
9,992​
50​
25​
8.92​
9.56​
0.92​
384,812​
10,395​
51​
24​
8.70​
9.56​
0.97​
384,497​
10,403​
52​
9​
8.42​
9.55​
0.91​
371,755​
10,760​
53​
22​
8.52​
9.54​
0.99​
356,481​
11,221​
54​
22​
8.88​
9.53​
0.82​
346,456​
11,545​
55​
13​
9.17​
9.52​
0.69​
317,284​
12,607​
56​
10​
8.80​
9.50​
0.90​
288,602​
13,860​
57​
10​
9.20​
9.49​
0.56​
281,925​
14,188​
58​
9​
9.19​
9.49​
0.61​
279,872​
14,292​
59​
10​
9.05​
9.49​
0.63​
277,579​
14,410​
60​
19​
8.57​
9.48​
0.93​
271,674​
14,724​
61​
18​
8.57​
9.46​
0.90​
240,691​
16,619​
62​
10​
8.98​
9.46​
0.71​
238,619​
16,763​
63​
92​
8.38​
9.45​
0.82​
238,391​
16,779​

View attachment 2347842

If you have any suggestions of other women to rate, share them below (they must be very objectively attractive and have ample, prime-age candid examples).
Those with fewer votes are irelevant, blanca padila very overrated in my opinion.
 
Those with fewer votes are irelevant, blanca padila very overrated in my opinion.
I'm slowly getting around to boosting the sample sizes. You can always bump the threads though...
 
  • +1
Reactions: Survivor95
T. Swift

1691091411823


Jolie

1691091523525


Emma Watson

1691091564966
 
Female​
Votes​
Adjusted Sample Size​
Raw Rating (x/10)​
Adjusted Rating (x/10)​
SD​
Rarity (1/x)​
Amount of females currently alive who were/are/will be more attractive in their respective primes​
1​
90​
74.2​
9.56​
10.00​
0.72​
3,488,556​
1,147​
2​
18​
13.1​
9.24​
9.98​
1.04​
3,178,287​
1,259​
3​
10​
6.0​
8.90​
9.97​
1.23​
3,037,006​
1,317​
4​
11​
5.4​
8.77​
9.97​
1.17​
3,010,480​
1,329​
5​
10​
4.2​
8.70​
9.94​
1.07​
2,573,835​
1,554​
6​
90​
69.3​
9.42​
9.93​
0.77​
2,485,922​
1,609​
7​
16​
15.0​
9.64​
9.93​
0.64​
2,391,230​
1,673​
8​
12​
7.6​
9.15​
9.92​
0.99​
2,343,191​
1,707​
9​
18​
14.5​
9.49​
9.91​
0.70​
2,199,158​
1,819​
10​
10​
5.1​
8.85​
9.91​
1.04​
2,163,040​
1,849​
11​
10​
3.7​
8.68​
9.91​
1.04​
2,148,574​
1,862​
12​
10​
6.1​
8.98​
9.90​
1.11​
2,131,537​
1,877​
13​
73​
36.1​
8.80​
9.90​
1.04​
2,098,637​
1,906​
14​
12​
10.4​
9.56​
9.89​
0.58​
1,964,792​
2,036​
15​
9​
6.0​
9.06​
9.89​
1.08​
1,948,967​
2,052​
16​
11​
6.0​
8.80​
9.88​
1.13​
1,918,081​
2,085​
17​
16​
11.9​
9.36​
9.87​
0.76​
1,818,284​
2,200​
18​
10​
5.1​
8.75​
9.87​
1.11​
1,786,688​
2,239​
19​
14​
10.0​
9.14​
9.86​
0.99​
1,731,088​
2,311​
20​
68​
43.6​
9.13​
9.86​
0.90​
1,705,276​
2,346​
21​
67​
34.8​
8.87​
9.86​
0.98​
1,675,499​
2,387​
22​
14​
8.8​
9.09​
9.85​
0.95​
1,626,179​
2,460​
23​
16​
10.5​
9.16​
9.85​
0.86​
1,618,354​
2,472​
24​
14​
5.8​
8.59​
9.83​
1.07​
1,455,515​
2,748​
25​
19​
11.2​
8.93​
9.82​
0.98​
1,393,364​
2,871​
26​
60​
35.9​
9.05​
9.82​
0.88​
1,383,169​
2,892​
27​
88​
48.9​
8.92​
9.82​
0.95​
1,379,730​
2,899​
28​
62​
35.6​
8.94​
9.81​
0.96​
1,310,254​
3,053​
29​
17​
9.2​
8.79​
9.81​
1.04​
1,309,271​
3,055​
30​
88​
47.9​
8.91​
9.81​
0.93​
1,294,304​
3,090​
31​
104​
75.5​
9.22​
9.80​
0.83​
1,291,489​
3,097​
32​
11​
6.0​
8.70​
9.80​
1.12​
1,290,282​
3,100​
33​
62​
27.6​
8.68​
9.80​
1.00​
1,276,216​
3,134​
34​
10​
5.2​
8.80​
9.80​
1.02​
1,261,439​
3,171​
35​
16​
13.4​
9.36​
9.80​
0.78​
1,244,744​
3,214​
36​
61​
19.5​
8.40​
9.80​
0.96​
1,243,692​
3,216​
37​
11​
8.4​
9.27​
9.80​
0.85​
1,240,181​
3,225​
38​
11​
6.4​
8.95​
9.79​
0.96​
1,221,921​
3,274​
39​
83​
51.4​
9.02​
9.78​
0.92​
1,138,796​
3,512​
40​
10​
3.3​
8.55​
9.77​
0.90​
1,092,574​
3,661​
41​
11​
6.4​
8.82​
9.77​
1.08​
1,077,930​
3,711​
42​
10​
2.8​
8.55​
9.77​
0.90​
1,066,022​
3,752​
43​
11​
5.5​
8.73​
9.76​
1.06​
1,051,692​
3,803​
44​
15​
7.6​
8.82​
9.75​
0.93​
986,534​
4,055​
45​
62​
8.8​
7.96​
9.74​
0.78​
919,946​
4,348​
46​
19​
14.8​
9.25​
9.73​
0.78​
912,272​
4,385​
47​
12​
5.7​
8.75​
9.73​
0.98​
909,470​
4,398​
48​
62​
41.3​
9.10​
9.73​
0.80​
905,300​
4,418​
49​
14​
5.5​
8.46​
9.71​
1.04​
824,056​
4,854​
50​
12​
5.6​
8.73​
9.70​
0.92​
786,083​
5,089​
51​
14​
4.4​
8.52​
9.70​
0.84​
755,924​
5,292​
52​
9​
3.1​
8.42​
9.69​
0.91​
728,480​
5,491​
53​
22​
9.0​
8.52​
9.68​
0.99​
697,721​
5,733​
54​
22​
11.4​
8.88​
9.67​
0.82​
677,552​
5,904​
55​
13​
9.0​
9.17​
9.66​
0.69​
618,952​
6,463​
56​
58​
30.0​
8.74​
9.65​
0.93​
600,899​
6,657​
57​
10​
4.9​
8.80​
9.64​
0.90​
561,480​
7,124​
58​
10​
6.8​
9.20​
9.63​
0.56​
548,124​
7,298​
59​
9​
6.5​
9.19​
9.63​
0.61​
544,018​
7,353​
60​
10​
5.2​
9.05​
9.63​
0.63​
539,433​
7,415​
61​
19​
8.0​
8.57​
9.62​
0.93​
527,633​
7,581​
62​
94​
28.5​
8.39​
9.60​
0.83​
484,154​
8,262​
63​
18​
7.2​
8.57​
9.60​
0.90​
465,836​
8,587​
64​
10​
5.7​
8.98​
9.59​
0.71​
461,712​
8,663​

View attachment 2362405

If you have any suggestions of other women to rate, share them below (they must be very objectively attractive and have ample, prime-age candid examples).
What happened to mog battles?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top