PERFECT HEIGHT

LOST

LOST

Gold
Joined
Dec 28, 2019
Posts
936
Reputation
1,347
I HAVE BEEN READING TONS OS STUPID POSTS AROUND HEIGHT

I will always say this:
The range between 188cm-194cm is the PERFECT HEIGHT

Being taller than that will help you with some girls, but will fuck you with others.
The range between 194 and 200 cm is good BUT NOT OPTIMAL
Being taller tan 200cm is bad for muscle insertions, it will take you AGES AND AGES AND AGES to look a little bit muscular...
--->Some clothes wont fit u at all...and that will be bad for ur overall aesthetics.

DONT THINK IN ONE ONLY THING, THINK ABOUT THE WHOLE PACKAGE

For real, STOP TALKING SHIT (some of you guys need some brainmaxx before even considering LOOKSMAX or at least before giving advice to others)
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: XXX22 and john2
6'9
 
  • +1
Reactions: DidntRead and Griffith
6'10+ or manlet
 
  • +1
Reactions: DidntRead and Griffith
Being taller tan 200cm is bad for muscle insertions, it will take you AGES AND AGES AND AGES to look a little bit muscular...
cope (speaking from experience)
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444 and didntreadlol
225 (7'5") is optimal
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444, MandibularCel, william and 2 others
OP's probably a 6'2-6'4 coping manlet.
 
Face > height
 
  • +1
Reactions: goat2x
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: diggbicc, MandibularCel, SayNoToRotting and 1 other person
Anything over 186cm is as bad as being 170.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 2661
Anything over 186cm is as bad as being 170.
True. I was just kidding about my 7'5 comment. Ideal is probably 178 (5'10") if we ate being real
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Almu
Anything over 186cm is as bad as being 170.
I'd say everything over 195cm... Manlet is still more of a death sentence but too big isn't good either
 
I'd say everything over 195cm... Manlet is still more of a death sentence but too big isn't good either

Being +220 is IMO as bad as being a manlet under 178
But being really tall is not as bad as being a manlet in general terms
 
Being +220 is IMO as bad as being a manlet under 178
But being really tall is not as bad as being a manlet in general terms
I was trying to say that but kinda messed up jfl... 6'2 to 6'4 is perfect, everything above scares of some girls (although it still attracts others with decent frame and face)
 
  • +1
Reactions: LOST
I was trying to say that but kinda messed up jfl... 6'2 to 6'4 is perfect, everything above scares of some girls (although it still attracts others with decent frame and face)
100% agree with that
 
With online dating studies have shown the jump from 6'3" to 6'4" causes matches to nosedive.

Anything from about 6'3" onwards has to have some muscle mass. Being taller is a multiplier for your physique. If you're skinny, it'll look way more comical. If you're muscular, it'll look way more impressive. This gets more and more true the taller you get.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BackFromTheMogging
6'6 to 6'9 is optimal
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 2486
190 is the perfect height
 
who the fuck is talking about what is more important??
WTF Brainmaxx dudeeeeeeee
I feel like we all just need a quick and daily reminder of this fact. If I could, I would write it in all threads
 
  • +1
Reactions: LOST
With online dating studies have shown the jump from 6'3" to 6'4" causes matches to nosedive.

Anything from about 6'3" onwards has to have some muscle mass. Being taller is a multiplier for your physique. If you're skinny, it'll look way more comical. If you're muscular, it'll look way more impressive. This gets more and more true the taller you get.

Can i read that?? Looks interesting
6'6 to 6'9 is optimal

mmmm, i would even say that 8foot is the MOST OPTIMAL
 
  • +1
Reactions: LOST

Similar threads

NitoRump
Replies
80
Views
3K
WhoAmIReally
WhoAmIReally
MyDreamIsToBe183CM
Replies
47
Views
792
Mike141
Mike141
6"4 Tyrone(I'm not)
Replies
22
Views
993
Sexually Disabled
Sexually Disabled
Accelerator
Replies
59
Views
2K
97baHater
97baHater
thegiganigga
Replies
32
Views
1K
nofap
nofap

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top