Take the FOUR head pill.

This is fine, but ideally your middle 3rd would be the shortest, and the.
Just measured some stuff, my fwhr is 1.87, midface ratio is 1.02, how good is this?
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Korea
Just measured some stuff, my fwhr is 1.87, midface ratio is 1.02, how good is this?
This is ideal, but most of the faces I've seen with good zygos usually hover around the 2 - 2.15 FWHR range.

I like your MFR :love::love::love:.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and TsarTsar444
This is ideal, but most of the faces I've seen with good zygos usually hover around the 2 - 2.15 FWHR range.

I like your MFR :love::love::love:.
Measured on a better pic now, MFR is 1.04-1.06, fwhr is 1.90, but my middle third strangely is the tallest... lol how
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Korea
Measured on a better pic now, MFR is 1.04-1.06, fwhr is 1.90, but my middle third strangely is the tallest... lol how
How long is ur nose? Or maybe you have a long philtrum.
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444
  • Love it
Reactions: NicMaster
How long is ur nose? Or maybe you have a long philtrum.
How do i translate pixels into mm/cm? My philtrum chin ratio is 1.97
 
  • +1
Reactions: Korea
Temples could be a bit more angular, hairline straighter but yea hairline is ideal i would say

The skin, bloating, neck, assymetry has to go be fixed tho

Grow your hair out bro
Thanks, I don't know what is tempora is there a topic that explains this?
 
Yea, usually 11 - 13mm looks best.

You're not above 17mm so it's not the end of the world.
So do you think i would benefit from very light chin fillers? I heard they are the least risky and would bring my ratio above 2
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and Korea
So do you think i would benefit from very light chin fillers? I heard they are the least risky and would bring my ratio above 2
Yea, that would do the trick. You probably need very little.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and TsarTsar444
Yea, that would do the trick. You probably need very little.
Thoughts on eye are?
SmartSelect 20220403 000825 Gallery
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Korea
You srs bro?
Yes, it actually looks good.

You could have a better medial canthus, more PCT, and wider PFL.

But those are MM's of nitpicks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and TsarTsar444
2.5+ tbh. Chin height is everything @EverythingMattersCel @volcelfatcel :chad:
I want to filler max my chin, and do somethinf about my my ramus, its inwards :feelsbadman:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Korea
2.5+ tbh. Chin height is everything @EverythingMattersCel @volcelfatcel :chad:
Above 2 is "ideal", but I guess ratios above 2.5 generally look much more masculine.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero
I want to filler max my chin, and do somethinf about my my ramus, its inwards :feelsbadman:
Bro, all ramuses tilt inwards lol.

It's about how ur gonions tilt.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and TsarTsar444
Above 2 is "ideal", but I guess ratios above 2.5 generally look much more masculine.
Yea this. Im lower third pilled so hard. Literally hypermasc or give up. Statham, Lundrogen tier.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16834
1648938211380


take the jessie pinkman pill
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Looks234, AscendingHero and Korea
Bro, all ramuses tilt inwards lol.

It's about how ur gonions tilt.
Yeah i mean my gonions, it causes me to have a round jaw if i don't clench the muscles. How to make the gonions go outwards? Is it risky? Expensive?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Korea
Yeah i mean my gonions, it causes me to have a round jaw if i don't clench the muscles. How to make the gonions go outwards? Is it risky? Expensive?
There's no way to naturally to my knowledge.

You can experiment with jaw fillers, until upgrading to implants.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and TsarTsar444
There's no way to naturally to my knowledge.

You can experiment with jaw fillers, until upgrading to implants.
Osteotomy?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Korea
Specifically for outward gonions? I don't know of any tbh.
I mean paul conceanpig can make jaws take on this sort of change

1648938979781


This will tilt the gonions outwards to some degree and minimize some of the negatives from naturally shitty gonions
 
  • +1
Reactions: TsarTsar444, AscendingHero, Deleted member 16834 and 1 other person
2.5+ tbh. Chin height is everything @EverythingMattersCel @volcelfatcel :chad:
forward growth is more important than chin height imo
an average - short chin ( > 2.25 ratio) which is forward grown will mog a tall chin ( > 2.5 ratio) with less forward growth

1648939058144
1648939149130
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: AscendingHero
life fuel for somalis (y)
 
I mean paul conceanpig can make jaws take on this sort of change

View attachment 1618971

This will tilt the gonions outwards to some degree and minimize some of the negatives from naturally shitty gonions
Can Pauls IMDO cause lateral ramii expansion and flare the gonions like this?

@alienmaxxer
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 16834
Can Pauls IMDO cause lateral ramii expansion and flare the gonions like this?

@alienmaxxer
If you mean like this, this is coming out of his own mouth more than anything

He uploads shit like this



He strikes me as odd
 
  • Woah
  • JFL
Reactions: AscendingHero and LooksOrDeath
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero, Deleted member 16834 and LooksOrDeath
I gave two examples
reduce his chin philtrum ratio and give him forward growth and he'd be just as attractive if not more
No.
and didn't you say forward growth is different for negroid skulls?
Yes, but you said Chin Forward Growth > Chin Height.

Blacks with good chin height easily disprove what you said.

Even then, here's a white male you has an incel chin according to your logic.
1648940188347
1648940199419


Chin projection only matters from separating the recessed from the normal.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and LooksOrDeath
Feel like I'm being condescended on when you say this. Just say you don't want to elaborate man.
Yes, but you said Chin Forward Growth > Chin Height.

Blacks with good chin height easily disprove what you said.

Even then, here's a white male you has an incel chin according to your logic.
View attachment 1619016View attachment 1619017
i never said that chin height isn't important jfl, i said forward growth is more important. Brad Pitt has a mogger chin because of his chin height.
Chin projection only matters from separating the recessed from the normal.
Brad Pitt has good projection despite his chin being behind his lip. He has a recessed maxilla which causes his jaw to fall back. I have the same thing, a recessed jaw with a forward chin.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and Korea
Feel like I'm being condescended on when you say this. Just say you don't want to elaborate man.

i never said that chin height isn't important jfl, i said forward growth is more important. Brad Pitt has a mogger chin because of his chin height.

Brad Pitt has good projection despite his chin being behind his lip. He has a recessed maxilla which causes his jaw to fall back. I have the same thing, a recessed jaw with a forward chin.
Low iq
 
Feel like I'm being condescended on when you say this. Just say you don't want to elaborate man.
I'm saying "No" as a base response lol, not to be insulting.
i never said that chin height isn't important jfl, i said forward growth is more important. Brad Pitt has a mogger chin because of his chin height.
You said a >2.25 Ratio is better than a <2.5 Ratio based on forward growth alone.
Brad Pitt has good projection despite his chin being behind his lip. He has a recessed maxilla which causes his jaw to fall back. I have the same thing, a recessed jaw with a forward chin.
Brad Pitt definetly doesn't have any cranial recession bro, you are out of wack with this one.

His facial convexity angles are fine, and his face clrealy shows it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscendingHero and LooksOrDeath
Brad Pitt definetly doesn't have any cranial recession bro, you are out of wack with this one.

His facial convexity angles are fine, and his face clrealy shows it.
i'm judging by the eye to nose tip method is that the wrong way to do this
1648941680453

You said a <2.25 Ratio is better than a >2.5 Ratio based on forward growth alone.
Cavill and Mukasa have great chins, chin philtrum is important but forward growth can make up for the lack of it
i should say that chin philtrum ratio isn't important, since cavill has a tall chin and philtrum

Mukasa serves as an example though, his chin philtrum is low and his chin isn't tall
I'm saying "No" as a base response lol, not to be insulting.
oh no problem jfl
kinda hard to tell on messages innit
 
alguem me explica o'que é temple, para tentar achar uma tradução mas ta difícil
 
alguem me explica o'que é temple, para tentar achar uma tradução mas ta difícil
someone explain to me what is temple, I'm trying to find the translation but it's hard
 
i'm judging by the eye to nose tip method is that the wrong way to do this
View attachment 1619042
When gauging chin recession, you do not use the full facial convexity measurement, instead you measure the bare convexity.
1648942114730

"G-Sn-Pg"
Cavill and Mukasa have great chins, chin philtrum is important but forward growth can make up for the lack of it
i should say that chin philtrum ratio isn't important, since cavill has a tall chin and philtrum

Mukasa serves as an example though, his chin philtrum is low and his chin isn't tall
Yes, it is. His Chin to Philtrum ratio is 2.53
https://looksmax.org/threads/ideal-ratios-for-ethnic-black-men.456032/
 
  • +1
Reactions: Racky, AscendingHero and LooksOrDeath
I'm saying "No" as a base response lol, not to be insulting.

You said a >2.25 Ratio is better than a <2.5 Ratio based on forward growth alone.

Brad Pitt definetly doesn't have any cranial recession bro, you are out of wack with this one.

His facial convexity angles are fine, and his face clrealy shows it.
What did you rate brad pitt
 

Similar threads

lestoa
Replies
11
Views
1K
melon6329
melon6329
mogstars
Replies
73
Views
4K
Themanletauticel123
Themanletauticel123
Baban
Replies
21
Views
2K
johnny4612
J
Rigged
Replies
133
Views
4K
RAMU KAKA
RAMU KAKA

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top