lol but I can, If I was hardwired to believe in god I never would have been skeptical in the first place and became an athiest. crazy who as a grew older and my intellect grew with me I distanced myself further and further from religion.
then , prove to me , that objective morality exists without god
yes but they're not hardwired to believe in the teachings of 7th century goat herders
most humans are hardwired in writing with their right hand. It doesn't mean that they can't also do it with their left. It will however never be the same as with the right one. Just like it is with using your left hand in a fist fight. It won't help you and you won't survive: That is why it is falsehood you hold.
read the original post you simpleton.
See Dunning-Kruger effect
read the study. It is rather Atheism that is a cope. No point in repeating slogans.
we haven't lived in a world free of "god", how the fuck could I do that retard?
doesn't mean anything what retarded babies think
I did, but we all know that you still believe that only islam is the real deal, so how does that hardwired belief in god help people who still reject muslim doctrine? will the author of that study get any virgins in paradise?
saying both are cope is cope. unless an agnostic atheist
Let´s not move out of the topic. Let me put it this way. A normal functioning human won´t think hours long if a tree is not something else then a tree. You won´t think everyday that maybe your in a computer program. It is the same case with the example you giv. For that moment you think that the person likes you until proven otherwise
we do now . most people aren't religious , and don't uphold religious values .
aren't you muslim ?
Im agnostic. And yes both are cope since no one knows the truth. Keep discussing this pointless shit with everyone. Get to work
What´s your point. Early Muslims never made books or research in proving God´s existence. They didn´t do it because nobody was foolish enough to think like that until the modern times. We have many books that argue on concepts like prophethood and divine intervention. Read books on that if you want to know our statements. my original post has nothing to do with this.
no i'm atheist
Read the original post. The argument is that we are hardwired in believing that God´s existence is true. Nothing more nothing less
Yes but you aren't, you want someone to disprove something you believe not understanding how burden of proof works, you've used circular argument
That doesn't disprove anything who said God can't have a beginning or end can you prove it.
incoherent, cope.
god by definition shouldn't have a beginning.
I was just reacting to his post. What has this post have anything to do with that?
They are barking at me rather then trying to discuss this study jfl
By whose definition many people beleive in gods who were born, the definition of god is just a supreme supernatural being
Depends on what you would accept as science.Most social sciences have a left-leaning bias, to the point where people got a bullshit story peer-reviewed, titled "Dog parks are petri dishes for canine rape culture".
What did you expect bro honestly lol at your IQ for engaging with these people you will never convince them.
I hadn't moved away from the topic at all. You're only proving to me that you can't think abstractly (not intelligent). Intellegent people often have pattern thinking and can see the commonality between different things and situations. That's why they put those types of questions on IQ tests.
That's not proof the definition of god is literally just a supreme supernatural being, you're giving the description of an Abrahamic religion's view of god.
listen, the ones who did this study percieved it themselves man. Nothing can be taken away from it.
again your diverting from the topic. My whole point is that you can´t undo something that is hardwired. Trying to do it means your own disability. Accept it.
Rubs handsINFANTS are hard-wired to believe in God, and atheism has to be learned, according to an Oxford University psychologist.
Dr Olivera Petrovich told a University of Western Sydney conference on the psychology of religion that even preschool children constructed theological concepts as part of their understanding of the physical world.
Pyschologists have debated whether belief in God or atheism was the natural human state. According to Dr Petrovich, an expert in psychology of religion, belief in God is not taught but develops naturally.
Dr Petrovich said her findings were based on several studies, particularly one of Japanese children aged four to six, and another of 400 British children aged five to seven from seven different faiths.
"Atheism is definitely an acquired position," she said.
Long story short Believe in God is hardwired into the brain, meaning it is something that is necessary for survival. Atheism is a position that comes from nurture not nature.
this is the study
(PDF) Natural-Theological Understanding from Childhood to Adulthood
PDF | On Sep 13, 2018, Olivera Petrovich published Natural-Theological Understanding from Childhood to Adulthood | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGatewww.researchgate.net
social science is cope tainted by fags ,females and betas. human behavior is complex enough to attempt to legitimize anything and with societal ramifications for saying otherwise. It's objective psuedo-science since there is no way to observe all the environmental and physical factors at play.
It can never be a neutral field because people who do these studies are never neutral themselves, nobody can. Taking Science as some moral understanding is the biggest mistake that is ever done. The left is known for this because they can´t do otherwise. If you take God out of your world understanding your at scratch and need to cope with ´
PATTERN THINKING, you lack it. you have the brain of a female.
´first hand cause´ is the abrahamic understanding of God. we are not talking about some stone that is worshipped or did the infants from the study
Nice try instead of talking about the content of it you only bark at me.
okay , if zeus had a beginning and was born. how did his father exist father ?
being agnostic is just refusing to research reasoning being irrelevant. I'm more of an agnostic atheist than a gnostic one. I don't believe there is a god and certainly not the gods human described but I can't yet completely discount some sort of higher being though still I'd say it to be fairly unlikely. even if a god was to exist, interaction would be very unlikely.
No where does it say they innately believed in an Abrahamic version God in the study, they didn't even say they believed in a God innately it basically says the developed supernatural and metaphysical beliefs based on their experience and understanding.
Chapter 6 I report data regarding the same participants’ understanding
the whole point of you analogy is to prove that working against the way your brain functions is also evolutionary beneficial, however it isn't.
the point of my first analogy was to reinforce what I stated plainly which was just because something is beneficial doesn't make it correct, even if it raises chances of success.
From an Darwinian point of view that atheists hold dear to them it does.
story doesn't make sense , how can something come from nothing
