exactly, that's why god doesn't exist.
just because Darwin wrote something down doesn't mean that the whole thing has to be seen as correct.
god is infinite
It's doesn't work like that. It is not something just that has been written, rather it is the core tenant of the darwinian theory. You can't just dismiss crucial parts of any scientific theory because it doesn't suit you
man weren't you already Muslim?
look at islam
Islam is for arabs, I'm a Kiwi Slav it's more normal for me to follow Christianity. Worked well in the west decades ago
Looksmatch in 2020+
FitrahINFANTS are hard-wired to believe in God, and atheism has to be learned, according to an Oxford University psychologist.
Dr Olivera Petrovich told a University of Western Sydney conference on the psychology of religion that even preschool children constructed theological concepts as part of their understanding of the physical world.
Pyschologists have debated whether belief in God or atheism was the natural human state. According to Dr Petrovich, an expert in psychology of religion, belief in God is not taught but develops naturally.
Dr Petrovich said her findings were based on several studies, particularly one of Japanese children aged four to six, and another of 400 British children aged five to seven from seven different faiths.
"Atheism is definitely an acquired position," she said.
Long story short Believe in God is hardwired into the brain, meaning it is something that is necessary for survival. Atheism is a position that comes from nurture not nature.
this is the study
(PDF) Natural-Theological Understanding from Childhood to Adulthood
PDF | On Sep 13, 2018, Olivera Petrovich published Natural-Theological Understanding from Childhood to Adulthood | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGatewww.researchgate.net
when it comes to figuring out what is correct, you're moving towards an absolute truth if evidence proves something to be wrong or parts to be incorrect it can be reworked. The nature of science is truth, it has no rules except be correct so "it doesn't work like that means nothing"
not really , islam is for all .
The thing with atheists is that they call all of us copers while they are the biggest ones. No fool in human history until now believed in atheism, because it is simply against our very own nature. Doing this is like going against your brain. Everyday in your life you will struggle like some mental patient trying to figure out the world.
You should read both scriptures tbh before making your mind up. I myself am from Turkey,
There is one one survey that was posted. In the News section of this forum you can find it. Most users here are atheists themselves. Mainly from USA i believe. Ethnics are rather a small margin here.
If curcial parts of an theory become disproven then the whole thing falls apart. I hope you can understand that. Now in no way am I a darwinist but the atheists are. That is why I find it contradictonary for them to disbelieve in God.
That's from 1995 cant imagine how much its grown since then
might or might not, my point is these people are in a confusion because they go directly against their own nature. If that makes sense..
I will check it out bro. rn I am working on something. I keep it in my mind.
I agree religious people tend to be happier and more fulfilled even from experience, but knowing what I know makes it impossible to be religious it's like trying to convince yourself to believe in something that has absolutely no evidence behind it.
man you dismiss every evidence we bring.
I don't know that much out of the basics of Islam but I know about Christianity and Abrahamic religions in general, in actuality I would prefer if God existed if good people were blessed eternally for their actions and evil ones were damned to hell, but I can't, there's no reproducible evidence from it.
Because it's really not evidence or it isn't rigorous enough. How can you tell with absolute certainty that the God you personally believe in is real ?
Isn't the proven natural inclination you have not evidence?
No it's a suggestion people tend to expect a creator behind things, which is completely independent on wether it was actually created by someone.
Here's the funny thing, even if your study was legit (which I doubt you even read into, if you did you'd understand you don't come to conclusions on human nature this quickly) it would be completely useless in proving your specific sandcult opposed to the other 300 sandcults, and the 5000 other religions which describe a "creator".
Because it is evident. You can't have it otherwise. Why do you think we have this hardwired brain to believe in God? neither can matter be created without a cause. In the case matter is created by matter alone it goes infinitly. What is the sense of that lmao?
Insha Allah i will adress it this Ramadan, don't worry about it
No as I told you it's a coping mechanism people create to explain the inexplicable, it's also a good tool to manage societies and offers comfort cause it tends to assures life after death.
No idea wtf that wordfuckery was about, doubt you even did yourself but the hardwiring could be easily explained given the fact humans are naturally prone to expect a creator behind things, which is completely useless for ACTUALLY proving your religion
Before they knew about the earths rotation, they just said it came from god
Why do you want that? Religion is probably the best cope for living, whats the point of knowing a truth? You don't gain anything from it, it's better to be deluded and believe in religion
look, i read it two times before making this thread. all these atheist made me read it another 2 times. There are more studies then just 1.
There are in reality only 2 main doctirines. One is Monotheistic and the other Polytheistic. That's it idk how you come with the '300' & '500' but it doesn't mean anything. You have Abrahamic Religions and Polytheist ones. All polytheist ones are similair.
Yes, that's the point we are hardwired to believe in God, that is omniscient & omnipresent just as it is stated in the study. Man read it before writing. Like atleast try.
And? are both statements false? Forget about us atheists right now believe that molucules are alive and the universe went through an infinite loop, What we would ascribe it to God you give it to the universe or something similair. The polytheists of the past are nothing more then the Atheists in the present.
Humans will always be bound to their specific place and time. You will never 'progress' let alone come to 'understand' everything , talk about coping jfl
The point is we aren't coping rather believing in God is the natural stance a human has. To function normally you can only be religious from an darwinian point of view.
No it's not. Your brain is hardwired to do so regardless if you can explain something or can't explain it
The study shows that Japanese children from 4-6 believe in God like it is told in Islamic tradition.
So basically like you need to learn and read to understand logical fallacies, similarly religion. Got it.INFANTS are hard-wired to believe in God, and atheism has to be learned, according to an Oxford University psychologist.
Dr Olivera Petrovich told a University of Western Sydney conference on the psychology of religion that even preschool children constructed theological concepts as part of their understanding of the physical world.
Pyschologists have debated whether belief in God or atheism was the natural human state. According to Dr Petrovich, an expert in psychology of religion, belief in God is not taught but develops naturally.
Dr Petrovich said her findings were based on several studies, particularly one of Japanese children aged four to six, and another of 400 British children aged five to seven from seven different faiths.
"Atheism is definitely an acquired position," she said.
Long story short Believe in God is hardwired into the brain, meaning it is something that is necessary for survival. Atheism is a position that comes from nurture not nature.
this is the study
(PDF) Natural-Theological Understanding from Childhood to Adulthood
PDF | On Sep 13, 2018, Olivera Petrovich published Natural-Theological Understanding from Childhood to Adulthood | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
lol whaaat?! listen, my argument is that from an darwinian point of view you should believe in God because your brain is hardwired to do so.
look, i read it two times before making this thread. all these atheist made me read it another 2 times. There are more studies then just 1.
This is completely irrelevant to Darwin, cause darwin never claimed you should just follow that what is natural without logical reasoning. This is simply an appeal to nature fallacy
